Introduction

Relativistic temperature electrons1,2,3,4,5,6,7 higher than 0.5 MeV are generated typically with laser intensities of about 1018 W cm−2. In gas targets one of the most successful methods of high-energy electron generation is laser wakefield acceleration (LWFA)8. However, at moderate intensities of 1017 W cm−2, LWFA becomes inefficient since the acceleration gradient formed is only about a few GV/m9. Nonetheless, LWFA, using mJ-class table-top, high-repetition (≥0.5 kHz) laser systems, have been demonstrated10,11. For example, a quasi-monoenergetic electron beam of 100 keV was observed in interaction of tightly focused 800 nm, 10 mJ, 32 fs pulses reaching an intensity of 3 × 1018 W cm−2 with 100 μm gas target10. Further, electron acceleration up to 1.5 MeV have also been observed in both He and H2 gas jet interaction with 800 nm, 30 fs laser pulses focussed to a 9 μm full-width at half maxima (FWHM) of pulse energy and 10 mJ11. New strategies, capable of exploiting different aspects of laser-plasma interaction, are necessary for reducing the required intensity to non-relativistic regimes (1016 W cm−2) for the realization of compact, high-repetition rate, ultrashort electron sources. Among various efforts, a noteworthy approach towards generating relativistic electrons with low laser intensities has been target modification. Although these experiments have been performed for many years12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 none have efficiently achieved relativistic electrons using moderate-intensity table-top lasers. Other experiments in the non-relativistic regime implement parametric processes like two-plasmon decay (TPD) initiated in long pulse (≥ps) laser interaction20,21,22, which require high energy (100 mJ) laser pulses to reach even intensities of 1015–1016 W cm−2.

We report here, a technique of dynamic target structuring of microdroplets, capable of generating 200 keV and 1 MeV electron temperatures at 1/100th of the intensity required by ponderomotive scaling (1018 W cm−2) to generate relativistic electron temperature. Combining the concepts of pre-plasma tailoring, optimized scale length and micro-optics, this method achieves two-plasmon decay boosted electron acceleration with ultrashort (25 fs) pulses at 4 × 1016 W cm−2, only. TPD is ideally observed for laser pulses with large pulse duration capable of generating long scale-length pre-plasma in which the plasma waves that accelerate the electrons are initiated20,21,22. For ultrashort pulses (25–40 fs), which generate steep electron density profiles, TPD is not efficient for electron acceleration with resulting Thot reaching only ~150 keV for intensities as high as 1018 W cm−2 23. Therefore, the present experimental laser-pulse parameters are conventionally “non-ideal” for electron acceleration through TPD. With shot repeatability at kHz, this precise in-situ targetry produces directed, imaging quality beam-like electron emission beyond 4 MeV with millijoule class lasers, that can be transformational for time-resolved, microscopic studies in various fields of science24,25,26,27,28.

Results

Our method uses the classic parametric instabilities route executed on dynamically structured, size-limited droplet target. TPD is a parametric process when electromagnetic fields of ω0 frequency, generate two-plasmon waves of ω0/2 frequency in non-collinear direction. This process is based on three aspects: (i) dynamically shaped critical density surface of optimal length and concavity, (ii) appropriate plasma density gradient about the concave critical density surface and a (iii) mesoscopic liquid droplet target suspended in vacuum that is used to generate features (i) and (ii). A collinear pre-pulse sets up hydrodynamic heating and expansion of the convex liquid surface to create a concave surface. A dynamically cavitated concave liquid drop structure is shown to be formed both from experimental shadowgrams and hydrodynamic simulations. The main pulse incident at the apex of the concave surface generate a concave critical density surface. Evaporating liquid provides the low-density background, which is ionized by the focused laser pulse at 1014 W cm−2 providing a plasma density gradient for the generation of plasma waves. As explained above, conventionally, femtosecond (~25 fs) pulses with steeper electron density profile are not optimal to take advantage of instability effects. However, these effects are invoked in the current experiments with millijoule (mJ), ≤100 fs laser pulses through oblique-incidence TPD induced by the in-situ target structuring, to achieve unprecedented hot electron temperatures at sub-relativistic intensities and kHz repetition rates. The unique geometry provides longer effective density scale lengths at oblique incidence, reducing the instability threshold for TPD29,30,31 for the main pump laser beam which has an intensity of 4 × 1016 W cm−2 resulting in Thot components of 200 keV and 1 MeV. The 200 keV Thot component is measured to scale as I4.5 in this laser intensity regime. The signature of the TPD is seen via Stimulated Raman scattered signal (SRS) that is formed at 3ω0/220,32,33, ω0 is the laser frequency. The two directed electron beams generated simultaneously, a further proof of the TPD instability, whose direction is controlled by laser polarization, are shown to have fluxes bright enough to produce high resolution (14 μm) resolution electron radiograph, at 100 times lower intensity than relativistic intensity sources25.

The present report describes the underlying mechanisms, corroborating experiments, together with 2D particle in-cell (PIC) simulations using the PIC codes SMILEI and EPOCH10 and Supplementary Movie 2a). In comparison, due to the absence of a critical density barrier, the backward directed plasma waves are shown to grow unhindered resulting in resonant excitation of electrons to relativistic energies. This is also evident from the temporal evolution of the electron momentum components shown in Supplementary Figs. 11 and 12. Supplementary Fig. 11 shows the temporal snapshots of electron momentum (px) as a function of propagation distance x. The laser, incident from the left boundary of the simulation box is shown to excite the electrons resonantly. Inset shows the region of interest(white rectangle) considered for tracking the particle momentum as a function of time. On further propagation, the optical pulse is reflected from the overdense cup-structure (Supplementary Movie 2b, snapshots presented in Supplementary Fig. 13). A similar process takes place in the y direction, as depicted in Supplementary Fig. 12. The reflected pulse in this situation is also seen to enhance the plasma wave amplitude. Supplementary Movies 3a, b and 4a, b show the temporal evolution of the momentum and the electric field simultaneously to observe the above discussed process. Further details are presented in supplementary Notes 7 and 8. It is seen that while the electrons gain energy by wave breaking in the x direction, dam** of the plasma waves releases hot electrons in the y direction. For accelerating electrons by this mechanism to a sub-relativistic (200 keV) and a relativistic temperature component, plasma waves with wave vector k of magnitudes 4.5 × 106 m−1 and 5.64 × 106 m−1, respectively, are required. Fourier analysis of the plasma wave dispersion at the apex of the cup (Fig. 5b), reveal wave vectors with the appropriate magnitudes to be maximized along the ±45° and ±135° directions in the laser polarization plane. PIC simulations show that the stronger 200 keV component can be seen even when the plasma scale length is small (L = 4λ, Fig. 4d). Increasing the plasma scale length to 8λ, as estimated by the hydrodynamic simulations, clearly shows the appearance of the relativistic temperature component corroborating with the experimental results.

Fig. 5: Signatures of two-plasmon decay (TPD) accelerated electrons and their application.
figure 5

a Schematic of hot electron generation mechanism in the pre-pulse modified droplet. The incident laser-pulse decays via TPD in the pre-plasma gradient of the cup at ncr/4 (quarter-critical plasma density). The plasmons generated (marked with black dashed arrows) resonantly oscillate the electrons in the plasma. As they are damped, the accelerated electrons are ejected as backward-directed jets, along with 3/2 harmonic emission. b 2D k-space spectrum of the plasma fields in the cavitation region (demarcated by the white box in Supplementary Fig. 11 (inset)) shows generation of directed plasma waves with wave vectors capable of generating the observed relativistic electrons. c The experimentally measured optical spectrum along the backward-propagation direction (opp. to normal incidence). I0 denotes the normalized incident intensity on the spectrometer. e Fourier spectrum of the electric field components obtained along the backward-propagation direction. As the 3/2 harmonic light propagates primarily along the negative −x axis in this region, the 532 nm peak is distinct in the Ey component as opposed to the Ex component of the wavelength spectrum. e The backward directed electrons at ±50° can be used for electron radiography. This is demonstrated with an electron image of a 41 μm thick Ni wire grid acquired with a 100 ms LANEX exposure.

Full size image

iii) However, in conventional targets, TPD, is unable to substantially enhance electron temperatures with near-threshold, ultrashort pulses. We overcome this difficulty by generating the cup-shaped dynamic structure. TPD is known to be stronger for oblique incidence29,30,31, where the instability interacts with longer effective pre-plasma length scales as opposed to normal incidence. The cup geometry significantly lowers the TPD enhancement threshold by ensuring oblique-angle incidence. This also explains the varying electron emission angle with increasing laser intensity (Fig. 3b). At low intensities (8 × 1015 W cm−2), the absence of a strong critical density concave surface initiates TPD only at high incidence angles and electrons are emitted dominantly at ± 90°. Increasing the laser intensity, progressively drives ‘perpendicular’ TPD at the back of the cup, changing the emission angle to ± 45° for 4 × 1016 W cm−2.

iv) In addition, angular distribution of the electron emission, shown in Fig. 4c from the 2D PIC are in good agreement with the obtained experimental electron angular distribution, shown in Fig. 2e.

v) The TPD induced plasma waves are expected to interact with the incident light and stimulate Raman scattering. The ω/2 plasma wave coupling with the incident light at ω (800 nm) should generate 3/2 ω light at about 530 nm33. Figure 5c, d shows the 3/2 ω emission observed both in experiment and simulations respectively, providing direct evidence of the TPD mechanism. Both the experimental and the numerical spectrum from the droplet, are captured along the back-reflected direction (opposite to the laser incidence). As the electric field component is always perpendicular to the direction of propagation, for backward-propagation only Ey component of 3/2 harmonic observed from the numerically calculated Fourier spectrum. While at the side of the target both Ex and Ey spectrum show the existence of 532 nm peak (Supplementary Fig. 3e, f).

vi) Lastly, as the two plasmons in TPD are generated in the plane of laser polarization, rotation of the incident laser polarization changes the electron emission plane. The synchronous rotation of the electron emission plane with the laser polarization, as observed in Fig. 2, provides the final verification for TPD as the dominant electron acceleration process. In typical long pulse experiments several parametric instabilities like SRS, TPD and Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS) compete43. For short-pulse (≤100 fs) laser-matter interaction, ion motion can be neglected45. However, in such experiments with steep plasma gradients(<10 μm), both TPD and SRS can concomitantly exist in the near quarter-critical density leading to a hybrid mode of acceleration and the generation of 3/2 ω emission46. TPD is favored in the current experiment, not only due to lower intensity threshold22, but also as a consequence of the oblique-angle of incidence within the cavity29,30,31. This is also inferred from the experimentally observed direction of electron emission. However, the interplay of TPD and SRS, is highly dependent on parameters like laser intensity, pre-plasma parameters, focal spot size and the like46 and quantitative statements regarding the same require further investigation of observables like the angular distribution of 3/2 ω emission45.

Aside from the key result of enhancing the electron temperature by 2-3 orders of magnitude, we demonstrate the suitability of such size-limited droplet targets for producing high-flux, directional electron beams for radiographic applications. Figure 5e shows a well-resolved lens-less transmission image of a 41 μm thick Ni wire grid, generated by electrons on a LANEX scintillation screen with a 100 ms exposure time.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we present here a dynamic, laser-controlled, target structuring scheme for achieving relativistic electron temperatures, over a few-micron acceleration length at 4 × 1016 W cm−2, only. The experimental results show that this laser-plasma optimization technique generates two beams of electrons, having 200 keV and 1 MeV electron temperature components with the maximum electron energy extending beyond 4 MeV with mJ/pulse 25 fs lasers. A summary of the entire mechanism (with the actual plasma wave profiles from the 2D PIC simulations) is illustrated in Fig. 5a. First, the spherical droplet interaction with the pre-pulse creates a concave surface and a low-density plasma front-surface. The concave geometry and the pre-plasma gradient, optimizes the growth of instabilities during the main pulse interaction, following which wave dam** or wave-breaking ejects the observed, relativistic electrons. The scheme very well explains why: (a) the generation of hot electrons requires the presence of both cavitation and a plasma density gradient in the cup, (b) the electrons are emitted at ±500 with respect to the incident laser direction in the plane of polarization (c) the angle of dominant electron emission changes with the laser intensity, from 900 at the intensity threshold to 30-600 at higher intensities. The simulations verify this TPD driven electron generation mechanism and explain the dependencies of the electron properties with the laser parameters. These results, therefore, demonstrate a simple yet elegant mechanism of accelerating electrons way beyond the ponderomotive limit, leading to highly efficient hot electron production even at modest intensities.

Looking to the future, we expand upon two important points regarding the suitability of this scheme for applications. Firstly, our droplet source operates at 1 MHz and is synchronized with the 1 kHz laser. This has enabled us to acquire electron radiographs even with few laser pulses. There are consequently no apparent barriers to synchronization with a higher repetition rate system, with a resultant increase in the average current. Secondly, as the electrons are directed by the laser-plasma transient fields, the electron emission is also expected to be ultrashort (few tens of fs) in nature, as seen in the simulation. Combining these two features would result in ultrashort electron pulses having both high peak brightness and high average flux. This would be invaluable for applications like radiography and diffraction. The laser system used in these experiments has an active pointing stabilization system assuring high-pointing stability. As the droplets are synchronized with the laser pulses with a delay generator, the shot-to-shot drift of the laser-droplet synchronization is negligible. We infer this from the 14 μm and 41 μm resolution of electron and X-ray radiographs, respectively, acquired for ~105 shots. Of course there is a slow long-term drift in the laser-droplet alignment (primarily in the vertical direction), which can be corrected by changing the timing in the delay-generator and also automated by the implementation of a feed-back loop. However, these drifts occur over long-time scales (>30 mins) and do not limit the electron spectrum measurement or the high-resolution radiography applications, the data for which is acquired within periods of a few seconds. It is important to keep in mind that the droplet is also a hard X-ray source with energies extending from few keV to 200 keV, emitted directly from the droplet, capable of acquiring X-ray images in a few seconds. Similar to the electrons these X-rays are also expected to be pulsed47,48,49, making them ideal spectroscopic probes for studying ultra-fast chemical dynamics50. The demonstration of such an electron acceleration mechanism with its myriad applications in a low energy, moderate-intensity regime, therefore opens an exciting and new direction for the development of genuinely compact table-top accelerators that can be driven by readily available low cost, high-repetition rate, femtosecond lasers.

Methods

Electron, X-ray and optical measurements

The electron energy measurements are performed using an ESM with LANEX and Image plates (IP) as electron detectors. The droplet generated electrons are collimated with a 2 mm aperture before entering the ESM. A magnet of strength 0.11 T is used to bend these electrons onto the detector, the position of incidence being proportional to the electron energy. The LANEX is used for online detection of the incident electrons within the range of 200 keV–1 MeV. Integrated counts over 8 s exposure are collected using an 8-bit CCD, with a 540 nm bandpass filter to collect the light generated from the LANEX scintillation only. For high energy trace collection, beyond 1 MeV, longer acquisition is performed using BAS-MS IP detectors. To prevent a reduction in IP signal by ambient light, a 10 μm Al foil is wrapped around the IP detector. The IPs are read using GE’s Amersham Typhoon image scanner. The signal strength N(x) measured as a function of the splat position, x, on the detector is converted to N(E) vs E using position-to-energy calibration calculated using the experimentally measured magnetic profile and ESM geometry based on the standard position to energy conversion formulation51. The calibration curves are presented in the supplement Supplementary Fig. 14 and Supplementary Note 9. The final electron spectra obtained from LANEX and IP are corrected for the LANEX sensitivity values52 and the PSL sensitivity and fading time characteristics, respectively, obtained from literature53,54. The spectrally resolved signals are fitted to a Maxwellian distribution (functional form is exp(-E/kT)), similar to the previous methodology used for temperature determination from electron spectrum55, where E is the energy of the electron, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the hot electron temperature.

To corroborate the electron energy measurements, bremsstrahlung X-ray measurements are also performed. X-rays generated from the experiment are acquired using both a MINIPIX detector (for measurement of X-rays up to 300 keV) and a NaI(Tl) detector (100 keV to 6 MeV) coupled to a multi-channel analyser (MCA) in the pulse counting mode, where each photon incident on the crystal coupled to a PMT, gives a signal proportionate to the energy of the photon. The NaI(Tl) detector is triggered and gated to acquire a signal only during the main pulse incidence. To avoid pile-up in spectroscopic measurements for the high-energy X-rays, a 6 mm Pb filter is used. This demands an acquisition time of about 900 s to generate a background subtracted X-ray spectrum up to 6 MeV(Supplementary Fig. 3). Calibration of the MINIPIX detector is performed using L α and L β lines of Pb having energies of ~10 keV and ~12 keV, respectively. While for the NaI(Tl) detector is carried out using 137 Cs, 22 Na and 133 Ba radioactive gamma sources. The filter transmission corrections are accounted for in the reported spectrum56. The signal collected for a number of pulses is used to generate a histogram that gives the number of photons of a given energy im**ing on the crystal. This energy spectrum is again fitted to the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution to derive the temperature.

In addition to the electron energy, the spatial profile of the emitted electrons is also captured with electron angular distribution measurements. IPs spanning from 0° to 360° in the azimuthal (x–y) plane and −40° to 40° in the polar(z) plane are placed at a distance of 3.2 cm around the droplet target. The IP geometry in the Cartesian coordinate is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 3c, where (0,0,0) indicates the target droplet position. Each IP is wrapped with 110 μm Al foil to prevent both optical light and low energy electrons from being incident on the detector. Circular openings are made both in the entry and exit direction for unhindered propagation of the laser beam. Further details are presented in Supplementary Note 10 and in Supplementary Fig. 15. Each angular distribution measurements are acquired for an exposure of 30 s. Electron spectra for emission directions of 45° and 90° for different angles of laser polarization are also shown in Supplementary Fig. 16 and explained in Supplementary Note 11.

The optical spectrum of the laser-plasma emission is measured along the back-reflected direction using a spectrometer. The supercontinuum background is captured by misaligning the laser from the droplet. The TPD optical spectrum is obtained for the optimal alignment of the laser and droplet, monitored by the maximization of the electron energy on the LANEX. Figure 5c shows the supercontinuum subtracted optical spectrum as obtained from the experiments.

Discussion on the shadowgraphy imaging of the droplet target modified by the pre-pulse

In order to observe the effect of the pre-pulse on the target structure, shadowgraphy imaging is set up. The schematic of the set-up is shown in Fig. 3d. The principle of the measurement, in brief, is as follows: the main laser pulse is split into two beams P1 and P2. The first beam P1 containing 8% of the beam energy, and the second P2 contains the rest 92%. The beam P1 is incident first on the drop target and acts as the pre-pulse, the beam P2 then arrives at a given time delay perpendicular to P1 to image the structural change of drop due to pre-pulse. P2 is converted to 400 nm wavelength using a BBO crystal. Since the X-ray yield varies marginally with pre-pulse variation from 4 to 10% (Fig. 3c), we have chosen an 8% pre-pulse for our shadowgraphy experiments. The delay between P1 and P2 has been varied from 2.6 ns to 6 ns, and a CCD, time-synchronized with P2, is used to capture the droplet images as P2 arrives. A few snapshots of the droplet structure at 2.6 ns are shown in Fig. 3e, f. Similar structures are also observed at later time scales. However, the shadowgraphy images do not reveal any information about the target parameters like temperature or density. For such information, we take the help of the 2D hydrocode-h2d. Also, in the main experiments, the pump-probe delay is about 4 ns and the pre-pulse intensity ~5%. The shadowgraphy parameters though similar to this, are not exactly identical. We, therefore, use the hydrocode using the exact experimental parameters to find the structural modification and the associated plasma parameters of the hydrodynamically modified target.

In addition to the target deformation, the hydrodynamic simulations also show an extended region of low-density gas/plasma existing in front of the drop target (Supplementary Fig. 7), which is shown to be essential for the generation of relativistic electrons.

2D hydrodynamic simulations

The 2D lagrangian radiation-hydrodynamics simulations are performed using the code h2d. h2d is a commercial product of Cascade Applied Sciences email larsen@casinc.com. The spherical target is simulated with an initial radius of 7.5 μm and an initial density of 0.792 g cm−3. The laser pulse having an 800 nm wavelength, 0.1 mJ energy, 25 fs FWHM is simulated with a sech2 temporal profile and a Gaussian spatial profile with an 11 μm FWHM. A ray-tracing algorithm brought the energy to the target, mimicking a focusing optic employed in the experiment. The final on-target intensity is 0.2 × 1016 W cm−2, 5% that of the main pulse. The simulations are run for 4 ns after the arrival of the pulse, at which point a snapshot of the mass density of the mesh is taken. The under-dense plasma length scale of 8.6 ± 0.1 μm is obtained from an exponential fit n(Z) = n0exp(−Z/L)55of Supplementary Fig. 7b, where n(Z) is the electron density profile along the line cut R = 0, Z is the direction of laser propagation with Z = 0 being the drop surface prior to pre-pulse interaction, n0 is the electron density at Z = 0 after 4 ns of the pre-pulse interaction and L is the plasma length scale.

2D Particle-in-cell simulations

The 2D PIC simulations are performed using two codes SMILEI34 and EPOCH35. For the simple spherical droplet discussed earlier (Supplementary Fig. 8a nocup), the plasma electron density is initialized at ne/nc = 10 for r /λ0 < 5 and \({n}_{{{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}}}/{n}_{{{{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}}}}=10\cos (\pi ({{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}}-5)/10)\) for 5 < r/λ0 < 10, where r\(=\scriptstyle\sqrt{{({{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}}-50)}^{2}+{({{{{{{{\bf{y}}}}}}}}-50)}^{2}}\) is the radius measured to the center of the droplet at x = 50λ0 and y = 50λ0. For the cup-like pre-plasma (Supplementary Fig. 8a cup-hs3), the droplet electron density is given by ne/nc = 7 for r/λ0 < 10 and rc/λ0 > 13, and n\({}_{{{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}}}/{n}_{{{{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}}}}=7\cos (\pi ({{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}}-10)/10)\) for r /λ0 < 15 and rc/λ0 > 13, where r\({}_{{{{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}}}}=\scriptstyle\sqrt{{(x-30)}^{2}+{(y-50)}^{2}}\) is the radius measured to the cup center at x = 30λ0 and y = 50λ0; the cup electron density is given by n\({}_{{{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}}}/{n}_{{{{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}}}}=7\exp (-{(13-{{{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}}}})}^{2}/4)+0.01\) for x /λ0 > 30 and rc/λ0 < 13. A laser of normalized vector potential a \(={a}_{0}\sin {(\pi t/\tau )}^{2}\) is launched from the left boundary, where a0 = 0.2 and τ = 25T0 = 25λ0/c correspond to a peak intensity of 8.56 × 1016 W cm−2 and a pulse duration of 24.3 fs (FWHM in intensity profile), respectively. The laser parameters in EPOCH simulation are kept identical to the SMILEI simulation. In addition, in the EPOCH simulations, an ionization module is included by the addition of a background of Ar (has similar ionization energy to N) neutral atoms, represented by 49 macro-particles per cell in the simulations corresponding to a gas density of 1017 cm−3. Both simulations provide similar results as shown in Fig. 4b, d. Further, we observe with the EPOCH simulations that a plasma length-scale of 8 λ is optimum for producing hot electrons up to 3.5 MeV.