Abstract
The proto-oncogene MYC encodes a nuclear transcription factor that has an important role in a variety of cellular processes, such as cell cycle progression, proliferation, metabolism, adhesion, apoptosis, and therapeutic resistance. MYC amplification is consistently observed in aggressive forms of several solid malignancies and correlates with poor prognosis and distant metastases. While the tumorigenic effects of MYC in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are well known, the molecular mechanisms by which the amplification of this gene may confer treatment resistance, especially to immune checkpoint inhibitors, remains under-investigated. Here we present a unique case of a patient with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC who, despite initial response to nivolumab-based treatment, developed rapidly progressive metastatic disease after the acquisition of MYC amplification. We conducted comparative transcriptomic analysis of this patient’s tumor at baseline and upon progression to interrogate potential molecular processes through which MYC may confer resistance to immunotherapy and/or chemoradiation and used TCGA-HNSC dataset and an institutional cohort to further explore clinicopathologic features and key molecular networks associated with MYC amplification in HNSCC. This study highlights MYC amplification as a potential mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance and suggest its use as a predictive biomarker and potential therapeutic target in R/M HNSCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with poor 5-year survival of only 40% for non-viral mediated disease, and substantial functional morbidity with combined multimodality therapy1,2,3,4. Due to the poor success of systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy in treating recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC, the recent clinical focus has shifted to immunotherapy with antibodies targeting T cell inhibitory receptors that function as immune checkpoints, such as programmed death 1 (PD-1). Nonetheless, PD-1 inhibitors were reported to unleash anti-tumor immunity and achieve durable clinical responses in only 15–20% of treated patients in front-line recurrent/metastatic (R/M) setting5,6,7,8, with 4-year overall survival rate of about 15% overall and up to 22% among cases with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 20 or greater5,6,7,8,9. Such disparity in treatment benefits between patients, paired with the absence of any standard effective therapies that target immunotherapy resistance, necessitates the identification of predictive biomarkers to better inform clinicians’ therapeutic decisions3. While it was reported that higher PD-L1 expression, assessed by the CPS, is predictive of a favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), CPS remains an imperfect biomarker, with the majority of patients ultimately develo** therapeutic resistance. Therefore, identification of improved biomarkers of response and resistance is of great importance, as biomarker-directed therapeutics after progression on immunotherapy (such as HRAS) suggest that determining specific mechanisms driving treatment resistance in HNSCC is key to therapeutic development10,11. Furthermore, little is known regarding the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs in head and neck cancer, further limiting the ability to predict non-responders and to investigate novel therapeutics targeting mechanisms of resistance to ICIs in R/M HNSCC12,13.
A high prevalence of alterations in the MYC oncogene is well documented in various solid malignancies, along with its association with aggressive disease and poor clinical outcomes14,15,16. While recurrent MYC gain-of-function mutations were found in certain human lymphomas17,18,19, in HNSCC, amplification appears to be the predominant genetic aberration that occurs in the MYC gene20, with an estimated prevalence of 12% in the HNSCC cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), whereas mutations occur in only a small subset (1.2%) of patients21. MYC amplification is known to have broad influence on the transcriptome, driving upregulation of various mitogenic and survival signaling pathways associated with cell growth, proliferative, anti-apoptotic, and metabolic processes in ovarian, breast, and lung cancers among others22,23,24,25. Furthermore, MYC plays an important role in suppressing the host anti-tumor immune response, through various mechanisms involving modifications to the tumor microenvironment via inhibitory cytokines (e.g., TGFβ and immunomodulatory molecules such as PD-L1, CD47, and MHC I)26,27,28,29. While the tumorigenic effects of MYC are well known, the molecular mechanisms by which the mutation or amplification of this gene may confer treatment resistance in HNSCC remains under-investigated30. A recent case report of a patient with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC highlighted a differential response to nivolumab in metastatic lesions secondary to the acquisition of MYC amplification. The MYC amplified lesion was resistant to the ICI while all other lesions, devoid of MYC amplification, responded to treatment, suggesting MYC amplification may play a role in ICI resistance in R/M HNSCC31. Supporting this suggestion, another study showed that MYC amplification regulates PD-L1 expression and is involved in a decreased response to ICI therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma32.
Here we present a unique case of a patient with R/M HNSCC who, despite initial response to nivolumab-based therapy, developed rapidly progressive, metastatic disease after the acquisition of a MYC amplification. We conducted transcriptomic analysis of this patient’s HNSCC to identify the potential molecular processes through which MYC amplification may confer resistance to immunotherapy. In light of these findings, we searched our in-house genomic sequencing platform and identified seven additional patients with MYC amplified HNSCC along with 48 MYC wild-type matched controls, to further elucidate the broader clinicopathologic characteristics of MYC-driven disease. Finally, we performed gene expression and pathway analysis using the transcriptomic data obtained from TCGA to further explore key molecular networks associated with MYC amplification in HNSCC. Collectively, this work seeks to highlight MYC amplification as a potential mechanism of treatment resistance and suggest its use as a predictive biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of R/M HNSCC24,33,34.
Results
Case presentation
A 58-year-old male with an 80-pack-year tobacco history but quit at diagnosis presented in July 2020 noting a right-sided neck mass (Fig. 1). A CT soft tissue neck with contrast demonstrated abnormally enlarged bilateral lymph nodes with a heterogenous appearance and a soft tissue prominence of the anterior hypopharynx at the level of the glottis. A subsequent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of a right cervical node demonstrated scant metastatic squamous cell carcinoma involving fibrous and lymphoid tissue, at which time the patient was referred to our institutional multidisciplinary head and neck cancer team. Upon endoscopic evaluation, a 3 cm epiglottic pedunculated lesion was noted. A biopsy of the epiglottic lesion was performed and demonstrated squamous cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining for p16 was negative. Subsequently, a PET/CT scan was conducted, which showed metastatic cervical lymph nodes, most prominent at bilateral level 2, with mild hypermetabolic activity of a lesion along the anterior commissure of the glottis and was staged as (cT1N2cM0, Stage IVa, American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition). A baseline Oncoplus molecular analysis was retrospectively conducted on the primary epiglottic specimen, showing CDKN2A loss, TP53 loss, BAP1 rearrangement, and KDM6A mutation. The specimen was found to be microsatellite stable (MSS) and had a tumor mutation burden (TMB) of 18.0 mutations/mb. PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining was negative (CPS < 1%).
The patient was enrolled in a phase II clinical trial for locally advanced, HPV-negative HNSCC evaluating nivolumab-based chemoimmunotherapy followed by response-stratified locoregional therapy (NCT03944915). He initiated induction chemoimmunotherapy with three cycles of nivolumab 360 mg day 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 days 1/8/15, and carboplatin AUC 5 day 1 of 21-day cycle followed by imaging demonstrating 42% tumor shrinkage per RECIST 1.1 and was subsequently treated per protocol with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) consisting of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 q21 days with daily fractionated radiation therapy (RT) at 2 Gy per fraction to total of 70 Gy over 35 fractions to gross disease and bilateral neck. Following completion of CRT he initiated adjuvant nivolumab per protocol. Three months after completion of CRT, the patient underwent PET demonstrating a complete metabolic response. MRI demonstrated no residual cervical lymph node metastases or discernible measurable laryngeal tumor consistent with a complete response by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and direct laryngoscopy showed a complete clinical response. However, during adjuvant nivolumab, six months after completion of chemoradiation, the patient underwent CT imaging demonstrating new mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. A subsequent PET scan showed 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity of the mediastinal and bilateral hilar adenopathy along with a left adrenal nodule. Endobronchial ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of a mediastinal lymph node demonstrated p16 negative, metastatic SCC in September 2021. Repeat Oncoplus molecular analysis was performed on the mediastinal lymph node and revealed an acquired MYC amplification in addition to the genetic aberrations detected in the baseline analysis (e.g., CDKN2A and TP53 loss, BAP1 rearrangement as well as KDM6A mutation) supporting a clonal relationship between primary and progressive disease. Of note, this biopsy was also found to be PD-L1 negative on immunohistochemical staining.
The patient started a chemotherapy regimen consisting of carboplatin (AUC 5 day 1), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 1000 mg/m2/d days 1–4), and cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly of 21-day cycle). Repeat imaging demonstrated progressive disease with interval increase in both the intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (LAD) and adrenal lesion as well as new vertebral metastases in T10 and T12 after four cycles of chemotherapy/cetuximab. The patient received palliative XRT to the right hip, however, his performance status rapidly worsened and he ultimately died from progressive disease five months after starting chemotherapy/cetuximab for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Given the observation of an acquired MYC amplification upon rapidly progressive disease while receiving anti-PD-1 therapy following an initial partial response, we proceeded to characterize clinical-pathologic features of MYC amplified HNSCC from our internal dataset, performed RNA-Seq of the paired samples with and without MYC amplification from our case study, and analyzed transcriptomic data of MYC amplified cases obtained from TCGA-HNSC dataset.
Clinical-pathologic characterization of recurrent MYC amplified HNSCC
To further interrogate the clinical and molecular profile of tumors with acquired MYC amplification, we performed a retrospective medical records review of patients with HNSCC treated at our institution between 2018 and 2021. We identified 8 cases (including the index patient) who were positive for MYC amplification based on the OncoPlus assay at the time of recurrence, and 48 matched control cases bearing a wild-type MYC (Supplementary Data 1). MYC amplified cases demonstrated a median age of 61, 25% were p16 positive oropharynx, all cases (100%) had the local disease at the time of diagnosis and initially received chemoradiotherapy, while the majority (63%) ultimately received immunotherapy during their treatment course. MYC amplification was significantly associated with enrichment for the laryngeal primary site (Supplementary Table 1) and showed numerical trend toward elevated frequency of TP53 and CDKN2A genetic aberrations, similar to previous reports (Supplementary Table 2)35,36,37. While median age, gender, treatment modality, p16 status (a surrogate biomarker for HPV-positivity), as well as tumor stage at diagnosis, were not different between the two groups, MYC amplified patients showed non-significant trend toward higher rates of develo** recurrent and/or metastatic disease following primary therapy, with 100% of cases among MYC amplified compared to 72.9% among the wild-type MYC counterparts (p = 0.08; Supplementary Table 1). Furthermore, although the overall survival was not statistically significantly different with this small sample size available for analysis, median survival of MYC amplified patients was 40.6 months, compared to 49.1 months across the MYC wild-type individuals (Supplementary Table 1)36.
RNA-Seq analysis of paired patient samples with acquired MYC amplification
Given that transcriptional changes associated with the acquisition of MYC amplification in setting of immunotherapeutic resistance is poorly understood in HNSCC, we next performed RNA-Seq analysis of the tumor specimens collected from the patient described in the case report at baseline and upon rapid progression of R/M disease while receiving nivolumab (Supplementary Data 2). A purely descriptive comparative transcriptomic analysis of paired samples showed that genes known to be modulated by MYC were upregulated at disease progression, such as WNT/\(\beta\)-catenin pathway agonists, genes central to the glycolytic pathway (e.g., encoding phosphofructokinase, hexokinase II and enolase), fatty acid metabolism (e.g., acetyl-CoA carboxylase, fatty acid synthase, and ATP-citrate lyase), regulators of nucleotide (e.g., ribonucleotide reductase and ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase) and protein (e.g., eukaryotic translation and elongation factors) synthesis networks, as well as molecules that play role in cell proliferation and survival (Fig. 2). Conversely, WNT antagonists, tumor suppressors known to negatively regulate cell cycle, apoptosis and cell adhesion were downregulated in the MYC amplified disease. Notably, genes involved in host anti-tumor immune response such as immune activation regulators, class I human leukocyte antigens (HLAs), STAT 1/2, and chemokines associated with recruitment of immunosuppressive cells were almost universally downregulated in the MYC amplified tumor compared to baseline. While these descriptive observations may provide a snapshot of the transcriptomic changes associated with acquired MYC amplification, thousands of genes (nearly 15% of transcriptome) are predicted to be direct targets of MYC, highlighting the complexity of the MYC-regulated signaling network38,39,40.
Acquisition of MYC amplification is associated with broad transcriptomic changes
As we could not generate statistically meaningful conclusions based on the analysis of a single case sequencing, we next performed transcriptomic evaluation using samples obtained from the TCGA-HNSC dataset (Supplementary Data 3). Notably, tumors carrying amplified MYC (n = 59) were enriched for laryngeal disease, TP53 and CDKN2A mutations (Supplementary Table 3, Supplementary Fig. 1), and exhibited significant upregulation of numerous driver genes known to be associated with carcinogenesis in several types of cancer, including HNSCC (e.g. ELAVL2, CXCL5, FGFR4, CCNP, STC2, POU5F1B and SYT12)41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50. Significantly down-regulated genes contained known tumor suppressors and regulators of immune response (MYD88, NAT1, DDB2, PPP2R5C, LPAR6, CNP, CASP1, CXCL10, and CEACAM1)51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,91,92. To study the dysregulation of cellular processes between MYC amplified and MYC wild-type cases, iPANDA algorithm67 was applied using the Reactome pathways database93. iPANDA calculates the activation or inhibition score for each pathway by combining precalculated gene coexpression data with gene importance factors based on the degree of differential gene expression and pathway topology decomposition. Significantly dysregulated pathways with iPANDA score > 0.01 or < −0.01 were considered as activated and inhibited, respectively (Supplementary Data 6). P-values for the iPANDA pathway activation scores were obtained using weighted Fisher’s combined probability test. Detailed description and statistical credibility of the iPANDA score was previously published67. Unsupervised complete-linkage clustering was performed following Farthest Point algorithm and Euclidean metric94. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed with the GSEAPY python package95 using two collections of gene sets obtained from Enrichr library96 - MSigDB_Hallmark_2020 and KEGG_2021_Human (Supplementary Data 5).
Statistical analysis
Survival analysis was prepared in PandaOmics using the Kaplan–MeierFitter function from the lifelines Python package (two-sided log-rank test). The differences in clinical and disease-specific characteristics i(e.g. age, gender, primary site, HPV/p16 status, TNM stage, gene mutation frequency, etc.) between MYC amplified and wild-type cases (in the internal cohort and TCGA-HNSC dataset) were calculated by two-sample t-tests and chi-square tests of independence using GraphPad Prism software. The significance level was defined as 0.05.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files. Source data are provided with this paper. Patients’ de-identified data (such as diagnosis, gender, averaged age, and treatment type) is provided in the manuscript.
Code availability
No code was developed in this study. GSEA software is freely available for download at https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp. PandaOmics is industry-grade commercial software platform used since 2020. The platform is available at https://pandaomics.com. A trial access to the platform is available from InSilico Medicine upon request. A workflow for running the platforms is described in the “Methods” section.
References
Johnson, D. E. et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 6, 92 (2020).
Mody, M. D., Rocco, J. W., Yom, S. S., Haddad, R. I. & Saba, N. F. Head and neck cancer. Lancet 398, 2289–2299 (2021).
Ang, K. K. et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 24–35 (2010).
Machtay, M. et al. Factors associated with severe late toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: an RTOG analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 3582–3589 (2008).
Burtness, B. et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in KEYNOTE-048: subgroup analysis by programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 2321–2332 (2022).
Burtness, B. et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 394, 1915–1928 (2019).
Cohen, E. E. W. et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 393, 156–167 (2019).
Ferris, R. L. et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1856–1867 (2016).
Harrington, K. J. et al. Pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: updated results of the phase III KEYNOTE-048 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 790–802 (2023).
Gavrielatou, N., Doumas, S., Economopoulou, P., Foukas, P. G. & Psyrri, A. Biomarkers for immunotherapy response in head and neck cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 84, 101977 (2020).
Ho, A. L. et al. Tipifarnib in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with HRAS mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 1856–1864 (2021).
Lee, M. Y. & Allen, C. T. Mechanisms of resistance to T cell-based immunotherapy in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 42, 2722–2733 (2020).
Kok, V. C. Current understanding of the mechanisms underlying immune evasion from PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade in head and neck cancer. Front. Oncol. 10, 268 (2020).
Lin, X., Lin, X., Guo, L., Wang, Y. & Zhang, G. Distinct clinicopathological characteristics, genomic alteration and prognosis in breast cancer with concurrent TP53 mutation and MYC amplification. Thorac. Cancer 13, 3441–3450 (2022).
Mastronikolis, N. et al. Mechanisms of C-myc oncogenic activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. BUON 24, 2242–2244 (2019).
Bailey, P. et al. Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature 531, 47–52 (2016).
Xu-Monette, Z. Y. et al. Clinical and biologic significance of MYC genetic mutations in De Novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 3593–3605 (2016).
Love, C. et al. The genetic landscape of mutations in Burkitt lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 44, 1321–1325 (2012).
Bahram, F., von der Lehr, N., Cetinkaya, C. & Larsson, L. G. c-Myc hot spot mutations in lymphomas result in inefficient ubiquitination and decreased proteasome-mediated turnover. Blood 95, 2104–2110 (2000).
Bhattacharya, N., Roy, A., Roy, B., Roychoudhury, S. & Panda, C. K. MYC gene amplification reveals clinical association with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Indian patients. J. Oral. Pathol. Med. 38, 759–763 (2009).
Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6, pl1 (2013).
Lin, C. Y. et al. Transcriptional amplification in tumor cells with elevated c-Myc. Cell 151, 56–67 (2012).
Dang, C. V. et al. The c-Myc target gene network. Semin. Cancer Biol. 16, 253–264 (2006).
Chen, H., Liu, H. & Qing, G. Targeting oncogenic Myc as a strategy for cancer treatment. Signal. Transduct. Target Ther. 3, 5 (2018).
Kalkat, M. et al. MYC deregulation in primary human cancers. Genes https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8060151 (2017).
Versteeg, R., Noordermeer, I. A., Krüse-Wolters, M., Ruiter, D. J. & Schrier, P. I. c-myc down-regulates class I HLA expression in human melanomas. EMBO J. 7, 1023–1029 (1988).
Dhanasekaran, R. et al. The MYC oncogene - the grand orchestrator of cancer growth and immune evasion. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 19, 23–36 (2022).
Casey, S. C. et al. MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science 352, 227–231 (2016).
Xu, Y. et al. Translation control of the immune checkpoint in cancer and its therapeutic targeting. Nat. Med. 25, 301–311 (2019).
Robinson, A. M. et al. Cisplatin exposure causes c-Myc-dependent resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition in HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 10, 867 (2019).
Noji, R. et al. MYC-PDL1 axis reduces sensitivity to nivolumab in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral. Oncol. 124, 105666 (2022).
Liang, M. Q., Yu, F. Q. & Chen, C. C-Myc regulates PD-L1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 12, 379–388 (2020).
Llombart, V. & Mansour, M. R. Therapeutic targeting of “undruggable” MYC. EBioMedicine 75, 103756 (2022).
Duffy, M. J., O’Grady, S., Tang, M. & Crown, J. MYC as a target for cancer treatment. Cancer Treat. Rev. 94, 102154 (2021).
Baltaci, E., Karaman, E., Dalay, N. & Buyru, N. Analysıs of gene copy number changes ın head and neck cancer. Clin. Otolaryngol. 43, 1004–1009 (2018).
Zhao, S. et al. Identification and validation of the role of c-Myc in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 12, 820587 (2022).
Ulz, P., Heitzer, E. & Speicher, M. R. Co-occurrence of MYC amplification and TP53 mutations in human cancer. Nat. Genet. 48, 104–106 (2016).
Lachmann, A. et al. ChEA: transcription factor regulation inferred from integrating genome-wide ChIP-X experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 2438–2444 (2010).
Kim, J., Lee, J. H. & Iyer, V. R. Global identification of Myc target genes reveals its direct role in mitochondrial biogenesis and its E-box usage in vivo. PLoS ONE 3, e1798 (2008).
Ahmadi, S. E., Rahimi, S., Zarandi, B., Chegeni, R. & Safa, M. MYC: a multipurpose oncogene with prognostic and therapeutic implications in blood malignancies. J. Hematol. Oncol. 14, 121 (2021).
Zhao, W. S. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR activation screening identifies a role of ELAVL2-CDKN1A axis in paclitaxel resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 9, 1183–1200 (2019).
Miyazaki, H. et al. Down-regulation of CXCL5 inhibits squamous carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 66, 4279–4284 (2006).
Dutra, R. L. et al. FGFR4 profile as a prognostic marker in squamous cell carcinoma of the mouth and oropharynx. PLoS ONE 7, e50747 (2012).
Sánchez-Botet, A. et al. The atypical cyclin CNTD2 promotes colon cancer cell proliferation and migration. Sci. Rep. 8, 11797 (2018).
Gasa, L. et al. A systematic analysis of orphan cyclins reveals CNTD2 as a new oncogenic driver in lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 7, 10228 (2017).
Yang, S. et al. STC2 promotes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through modulating the PI3K/AKT/Snail signaling. Oncotarget 8, 5976–5991 (2017).
Simó-Riudalbas, L. et al. Transposon-activated POU5F1B promotes colorectal cancer growth and metastasis. Nat. Commun. 13, 4913 (2022).
Wagner, K. W. et al. KDM2A promotes lung tumorigenesis by epigenetically enhancing ERK1/2 signaling. J. Clin. Invest 123, 5231–5246 (2013).
Liu, K. et al. Synaptotagmin 12 (SYT12) Gene expression promotes cell proliferation and progression of lung adenocarcinoma and involves the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. Med. Sci. Monit. 26, e920351 (2020).
Chen, C. et al. Targeting KDM2A enhances T-cell infiltration in NSD1-deficient head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 83, 2645–2655 (2023).
Liu, M., Guo, S. & Stiles, J. K. The emerging role of CXCL10 in cancer (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2, 583–589 (2011).
Reschke, R. et al. Immune cell and tumor cell-derived CXCL10 is indicative of immunotherapy response in metastatic melanoma. J. Immunother. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-003521 (2021).
Deguine, J. & Barton, G. M. MyD88: a central player in innate immune signaling. F1000Prime Rep. 6, 97 (2014).
Shi, C. et al. Hypermethylation of N-acetyltransferase 1 is a prognostic biomarker in colon adenocarcinoma. Front. Genet. 10, 1097 (2019).
Zhang, C., Zhao, Z., Liu, H., Yao, S. & Zhao, D. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis identified a novel thirteen-gene signature associated with progression, prognosis, and immune microenvironment of colon adenocarcinoma patients. Front. Genet. 12, 657658 (2021).
Sun, H. et al. Long non-coding RNA H19 mediates N-acetyltransferase 1 gene methylation in the development of tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Exp. Ther. Med. 23, 12 (2022).
Bommi, P. V., Ravindran, S., Raychaudhuri, P. & Bagchi, S. DDB2 regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in oral/head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 9, 34708–34718 (2018).
Eichhorn, P. J., Creyghton, M. P. & Bernards, R. Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunits and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1795, 1–15 (2009).
Wlodarchak, N. & **ng, Y. PP2A as a master regulator of the cell cycle. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 51, 162–184 (2016).
Li, B., Liu, S., Gao, Y., Zheng, L. & Lu, Y. Combined detection of SDC2/ADHFE1/PPP2R5C methylation in stool DNA for colorectal cancer screening. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 149, 10241–10253 (2023).
He, J. et al. Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 6 (LPAR6) is a potential biomarker associated with lung adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111038 (2021).
Tao, K. et al. Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 6 (LPAR6) expression and prospective signaling pathway analysis in breast cancer. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 23, 127–138 (2019).
Zorniak, M. et al. Differential expression of 2’,3’-cyclic-nucleotide 3’-phosphodiesterase and neural lineage markers correlate with glioblastoma xenograft infiltration and patient survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 3628–3636 (2012).
Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14129 (2015).
Celardo, I. et al. Caspase-1 is a novel target of p63 in tumor suppression. Cell Death Dis. 4, e645 (2013).
Sappino, A. P. et al. The CEACAM1 tumor suppressor is an ATM and p53-regulated gene required for the induction of cellular senescence by DNA damage. Oncogenesis 1, e7 (2012).
Ozerov, I. V. et al. In silico Pathway Activation Network Decomposition Analysis (iPANDA) as a method for biomarker development. Nat. Commun. 7, 13427 (2016).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
He, T. C. et al. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science 281, 1509–1512 (1998).
Li, J., Dong, T., Wu, Z., Zhu, D. & Gu, H. The effects of MYC on tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Cell Death Discov. 9, 103 (2023).
Sidiropoulos, K. et al. Reactome enhanced pathway visualization. Bioinformatics 33, 3461–3467 (2017).
Xu, J., Chen, Y. & Olopade, O. I. MYC and Breast Cancer. Genes Cancer 1, 629–640 (2010).
Schaub, F. X. et al. Pan-cancer alterations of the MYC oncogene and its proximal network across the Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell Syst. 6, 282–300.e282 (2018).
Lawrence, M. S. et al. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature 517, 576–582, (2015).
Luke, J. J., Bao, R., Sweis, R. F., Spranger, S. & Gajewski, T. F. WNT/β-catenin pathway activation correlates with immune exclusion across human cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 3074–3083 (2019).
Ganesan, S. MYC, PARP1, and chemoresistance: BIN there, done that? Sci. Signal. 4, pe15 (2011).
Wang, W. J. et al. MYC regulation of CHK1 and CHK2 promotes radioresistance in a stem cell-like population of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 73, 1219–1231 (2013).
Wildsmith, S. et al. Tumor mutational burden as a predictor of survival with durvalumab and/or tremelimumab treatment in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 2066–2074 (2023).
Moroishi, T. et al. The hippo pathway kinases LATS1/2 suppress cancer immunity. Cell 167, 1525–1539.e1517 (2016).
Ni, X. et al. YAP is essential for Treg-mediated suppression of antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 8, 1026–1043 (2018).
Zhou, G., Liu, Z. & Myers, J. N. TP53 mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and their impact on disease progression and treatment response. J. Cell Biochem. 117, 2682–2692 (2016).
Fakhry, C. et al. Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 100, 261–269 (2008).
Makarev, E. et al. In silico analysis of pathways activation landscape in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral leukoplakia. Cell Death Discov. 3, 17022 (2017).
Pun, F. W. et al. A comprehensive AI-driven analysis of large-scale omic datasets reveals novel dual-purpose targets for the treatment of cancer and aging. Aging Cell https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.14017 (2023).
Kadri, S. et al. Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing genomic oncology panel via cross-platform benchmarking against established amplicon sequencing assays. J. Mol. Diagn. 19, 43–56 (2017).
Rosenberg, A. J. et al. A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase II study of cediranib with or without lenalidomide in iodine 131-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Ann. Oncol. 34, 714–722 (2023).
Andrews, S. FastQC a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available online at: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Mermel, C. H. et al. GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers. Genome Biol. 12, R41 (2011).
Kamya, P. et al. PandaOmics: an AI-driven platform for therapeutic target and biomarker discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01619 (2024).
Suehnholz, S. P. et al. Quantifying the expanding landscape of clinical actionability for patients with cancer. Cancer Discov. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-23-0467 (2023).
Chakravarty, D. et al. OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base. JCO Precis. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/po.17.00011 (2017).
Gillespie, M. et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D687–d692 (2022).
Bar-Joseph, Z., Gifford, D. K. & Jaakkola, T. S. Fast optimal leaf ordering for hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 17, S22–S29 (2001).
Fang, Z., Liu, X. & Peltz, G. GSEApy: a comprehensive package for performing gene set enrichment analysis in Python. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac757 (2022).
Chen, E. Y. et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinform. 14, 128 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R01DE027809 and R01DE028674. Thomas Cyberski was partially supported by the Burroughs Wellcome Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: A.J.R., E.I. and N.A. Investigation: E.I., A.J.R., T.F.C., A.S., V.M., M.K. and F.P. Resources: E.I., A.J.R., A.Z. and N.A. Data curation: A.S., M.K., L.S., A.T.P., F.P., A.J., W.G., S.K., M.L., E.D., G.C. and A.Z. Writing - original draft preparation: E.I., A.J.R., T.F.C., N.A. and A.S. Writing - review and editing: E.I., N.A., A.J.R., A.T.P., B.B., A.S., C.W., X.C., M.E., M.K., E.D., V.M., M.L., F.P., Y.M., G.C., A.J. and T.F.C. Supervision: E.I., A.J.R. and N.A. Funding acquisition: E.I., N.A., A.J.R., T.F.C. and A.Z. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
M.K., A.Z. and F.P. are affiliated with InSilico Medicine, a company develo** an AI-based end-to-end integrated pipeline for drug discovery and development. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cyberski, T.F., Singh, A., Korzinkin, M. et al. Acquired resistance to immunotherapy and chemoradiation in MYC amplified head and neck cancer. npj Precis. Onc. 8, 114 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00606-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00606-w
- Springer Nature Limited