Abstract
Indochina is one of the regions with the most severe biomass burning (BB) in the world, which produces enormous amounts of atmospheric aerosols, mostly in spring. Moreover, the spring soil moisture anomalies in Indochina have been found to have a significant influence on the summer rainfall in the Yangtze River Valley (YRV). It is still partially unclear how spring BB in Indochina influences the local and regional climate and land–atmosphere interactions. Here, we use regional model experiments and observational data to show that the radiative effect of BB aerosols in Indochina stabilizes the atmosphere and reduces local precipitation and soil moisture. The dry soil in Indochina persists from spring to summer, which warms the land surface and the atmosphere. As a result, the western Pacific subtropical high (WPSH) is stronger and extends westward from spring to summer. This leads to stronger moisture transport to and more precipitation in the YRV (increases of approximately 5% in July and 10% in August). Thus, the effect of BB aerosols on the YRV rainfall is similar to that of the Indochina dry soil anomaly. Additionally, the increase in the YRV summer rainfall caused by the Indochina spring dry soil anomaly is almost doubled when there are BB aerosols compared to that without BB aerosols, suggesting the importance of BB aerosols in regulating the regional land–atmosphere interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Biomass burning (BB) refers to the burning of living or dead vegetation through human or natural processes. It includes land clearing and land-use change by humans as well as natural wild fires. BB releases enormous amounts of particulates and gases; the former are known as atmospheric aerosols1. Aerosols play an important role in atmospheric physics and chemistry by affecting the diffusion and absorption of solar radiation (the radiative effect) and by changing cloud microphysics (the microphysical effect). The aerosol radiative effect usually cools the surface, reduces the planetary boundary layer (PBL) height, and stabilizes the atmosphere, which can reduce the likelihood of atmospheric convection and precipitation2,3. The aerosol microphysical effect is more complex and can be positive or negative, depending on the atmosphere and cloud conditions4,5,6 and the aerosol composition7.
The Indochina Peninsula (comprising Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam) is one of the regions with the most severe BB in the world8,9. The number of annual active fire points in the region has been >20,000 since 200410. The fires in Indochina mainly occur in late winter and spring, and the peak frequency usually occurs in March. Aerosols produced from BB aerosols in Indochina have widespread impacts on the air quality and weather in the local and surrounding regions11,12,13.
In addition, spring soil moisture anomalies in Indochina have been found to have a significant influence on summer rainfall in the Yangtze River Valley (YRV)14. This is due to the soil moisture memory in Indochina and the associated change in the western Pacific subtropical high (WPSH). As BB in Indochina mainly occurs in spring, an interesting question is how spring BB aerosols affect the local and regional climate in spring and summer. Can the effects of BB aerosols be recorded in the soil moisture and brought to summer? How do aerosols adjust the influence of the spring soil moisture in Indochina on the summer rainfall in the YRV? In this study, we use a series of regional model simulations (“Methods”) to investigate these questions.
Results
Spatiotemporal evolution of aerosols
Figure 1 shows the temporal evolution of the aerosol optical depth (AOD) in the study region. The Indochina and southern China had high AODs in March and April, an indication of the presence of BB aerosols and the transport of pollutants with the air flow15,16. Beginning in May, when the monsoon begins to develop, the AOD gradually decreases in Indochina and southern China. The highest summer AOD occurs in North China. Compared with the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), the two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) experiments with BB emissions (Dry_BB and Wet_BB) simulate the spring-to-summer evolution of the AOD in Indochina quite well (Fig. 1g). However, the two experiments without BB emissions (Dry_NoBB and Wet_NoBB) produce evidently lower AODs in Indochina from March to mid-May. These differences in AOD are consistent with the differences in BB emissions (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Influence of BB aerosols on local and regional climate
Next, we examine the climate differences in spring and summer caused by the BB emissions. Figure 2 shows the simulated spring-to-summer precipitation, geopotential height (GPH), and soil moisture differences due to differences in BB emissions (BB−NoBB). The BB aerosols reduce the spring (March–May) precipitation and soil moisture over Indochina and parts of eastern China. This is related to the radiative effect of aerosols, which cools the surface and warms the upper atmosphere (Supplementary Fig. 2). The more stable atmosphere makes it more difficult for convection and rainfall to occur. As a result, Indochina becomes drier.
a, b Spring (March–May); c, d June; e, f July; g, h August. Simulated spring-to-summer (left panels) precipitation (shading) and (right panels) soil moisture differences due to differences in BB emissions (BB−NoBB). The red (blue) contours are the 500 hPa GPH (units: m) from BB (NoBB). The arrows are the 850 hPa wind differences. The contour of 5880 m is thicker than other contours (same in subsequent figures). The mean percentage difference in the YRV ((BB−NoBB)/NoBB) is shown in each plot. Stippling highlights differences confident at 95% level based on a bootstrap test of resampling the ensemble members 10,000 times. The box encloses the YRV region (same in subsequent figures).
Moreover, the spring soil moisture and precipitation anomalies in Indochina extend to summer (Fig. 2), although the BB aerosols have diminished during this period (Fig. 1). This is due to the memory of the soil moisture and the associated land–atmosphere interactions, including the response of the WPSH to drier Indochina14,17. The Indochina upper-level heating is much weaker in summer than in spring because of the reduction of BB, and eastern China shows strong summer heating in response to the westward extension of the WPSH (Supplementary Fig. 2). In July and August, the WPSH moves northward and is located further westward when there are BB emissions, leading to stronger moisture transport to the YRV and enhanced precipitation (Fig. 2e, g). The increases in precipitation in the YRV are 4.65% in July and 10.3% in August. The soil moisture exhibits changing patterns similar to those of the precipitation but with greater statistical significance (Fig. 2f, h). For the area-average precipitation in YRV, the changes are insignificant in June (p > 0.1) but significant in July and August (p < 0.05). The June-July-August mean of the area also exhibits a significant increase (p < 0.1).
Are the simulation results consistent with observations? We selected 9 years with the highest BB aerosols and 9 years with the lowest BB aerosols according to the regional mean spring AOD in Indochina during 1980–2021, corresponding to AOD anomalies greater than 0.8 times the standard deviation. The high BB aerosol years are 1982, 1983, 1992, 1998, 2004, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016, and the low BB aerosol years are 1988, 1989, 1994, 1996, 1997, 2001, 2002, 2017, and 2018. The composite differences between the high and low BB aerosol years exhibit patterns very similar to those from the simulations, including the drying of Indochina in spring and summer and the wetting of the YRV and part of the North China Plain in July and August (Fig. 3). Another set of observation-based datasets produced similar results (Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, the results of the simulations are supported by the observations.
a, b Spring (March–May); c, b June; e, f July; g, h August. Same as in Fig. 2, but based on the composite differences between the 9 years with the highest BB aerosols and the 9 years with the lowest BB aerosols. See text for details. The AOD is from MERRA-2, the precipitation is from the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Unified dataset, the soil moisture is from GLEAM, and the GPH, and 850 hPa winds are from ERA5.
Influence of spring soil moisture on summer rainfall adjusted by BB aerosols
The above analyses show that the soil moisture anomalies caused by BB aerosols in Indochina can persist into summer and influence the local and regional climate. Specifically, the drier soil in Indochina combined with the westward extended WPSH not only reduces the summer precipitation in Indochina but also increases the summer precipitation in the YRV. An interesting question is how the BB aerosols adjust the influence of the spring soil moisture anomalies in Indochina on the summer climate. Figure 4a, b show the simulated summer precipitation response to the initial soil moisture difference in March. Regardless of whether there are BB emissions, the YRV shows increased precipitation in response to drier initial soil. However, the WPSH extends westward when there are BB emissions, which leads to stronger moisture transport to the YRV and more widespread precipitation increases. When there are no BB emissions, the WPSH is located further eastward and the precipitation increase is limited to a narrow band. The percentage of the precipitation increase in the YRV is 5.02% when there are BB emissions and 2.91% when there are no BB emissions. Thus, the effect of spring soil moisture anomalies on the summer YRV is almost doubled when there are BB emissions compared to when there are no BB emissions. Regression of the summer precipitation to the spring Indochina soil moisture in the years with high and low BB aerosols based on observational data produces patterns similar to those of the model experiments (Fig. 4c–f). It is also found that when there are BB emissions, the same initial spring soil moisture difference can cause larger differences in the summer soil moisture and air temperature in Indochina (Fig. 5). These larger differences lead to stronger WPSH responses and finally leads to stronger influences of the spring soil moisture anomaly in Indochina on the summer YRV rainfall (Fig. 4).
Summer mean precipitation difference caused by the initial soil moisture difference in March from experiments a with and b without BB emissions (shading). The contours denote the summer mean 500 hPa GPH from the two experiments, and the red and blue contours are 5880 m contour of the 500 hPa GPH from a Dry_BB and Wet_BB (or b Dry_NoBB and Wet_NoBB) experiments, respectively. The interannual regression of the summer precipitation in each grid cell on the Indochina spring mean soil moisture in c, e 9 years with high BB aerosols and in d, f 9 years with low BB aerosols. To be consistent with the precipitation anomalies in a, b, the regressed precipitation in c–f are multiplied by −1 to denote the influence of negative soil moisture anomalies. The contours are summer mean 500 hPa GPH from the respective years. c, d Use precipitation from the CPC Unified dataset, 500 hPa GPH from ERA5, and soil moisture from GLEAM. e, f Use precipitation from GPCC, 500 hPa GPH from MERRA-2, and soil moisture from ERA5. Stippling highlights differences confident at 95% level based on a bootstrap test of resampling the data 10,000 times.
Simulated summer mean differences in a, b surface soil moisture, c, d surface air temperature at 2 m, and e vertical profile of air temperature between the experiments with dry and wet initial soil moisture conditions. Stippling highlights differences confidence at 95% level based on the Student’s t test. The shading in e shows the range of one standard deviation among the ensemble members.
Discussion
In this study, we perform a series of WRF-Chem experiments to study the influence of BB aerosols in Indochina on the local and regional climate and investigate the role of BB aerosols in adjusting the influence of the Indochina spring soil moisture on the summer rainfall in the YRV. The major findings are summarized schematically in Fig. 6. The spring BB in Indochina increases the aerosol concentration, which cools the land surface and warms the upper atmosphere. This stable atmospheric structure reduces the precipitation and dries the soil. Due to the memory of the soil moisture, the dry soil conditions persist from spring to summer, which warms the land surface and the atmosphere. As a result, the WPSH is stronger and extends further westward. This leads to stronger moisture transport and more precipitation in the YRV (~5% more in July and 10% more in August). Previous studies have found that Indochina spring soil moisture dry (wet) anomalies may enhance (reduce) the summer rainfall in the YRV. We further show that the effect of BB aerosols on the rainfall in the YRV is similar to that of the Indochina dry soil anomalies. Additionally, the summer rainfall increase in the YRV due to the Indochina spring dry soil anomalies is almost doubled when there are BB emissions compared to when there are no BB emissions.
This study’s regional model simulations are limited to the year 2004. Further investigation is warranted to explore how interannual variations in background climate may impact the role of BB in regional land–atmosphere interactions. In this study, we mainly investigate the responses of the monthly and seasonal mean precipitation; however, the extremes and seasonal evolution of precipitation have also changed. Generally, the BB emissions increase (reduce) the high-intensity (low-intensity) precipitation in the YRV, but the reverse is true for Indochina (Supplementary Fig. 4). BB emissions also slightly prolong the rainy season in the YRV (Supplementary Fig. 5). As these characteristics of precipitation have stronger socioeconomic impacts than the mean precipitation18, the potential impacts of BB aerosols deserve further investigation.
Although the BB aerosols mainly occur in early spring, and we only prescribe the anomalous Indochina initial soil moisture in early spring, the resulting soil moisture anomalies persist through spring and summer. This demonstrates the strong soil moisture memory in the region, which is related to the land–atmosphere interactions, including the interactions between the Indochina soil moisture and the WPSH. The strengthening and westward extension of the WPSH persist from spring to summer, contributing to the long persistence of the soil moisture anomalies. The study provides an illustration of the land–atmosphere interactions beyond local processes.
Methods
Observational datasets
Monthly data for 1980–2021 from several observation-based global datasets are used. We used the AOD from the MERRA-219 with a 0.5° × 0.625° resolution, a product that assimilates the AOD data from various ground- and space-based remote sensing platforms20. We used the precipitation data from Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Unified Gauge-Based Analysis29 are added. The major emission categories and their monthly variations can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1. We turn on the aerosol radiative (direct) effect in the model, including its semi-direct effect on the cloud cover and liquid water path, but the aerosol microphysical (indirect) effects are turned off to reduce the uncertainties in simulations.
To check the influence of BB aerosols on the regional climate, we compare the simulation results from WRF-Chem experiments with (Wet_BB and Dry_BB) and without (Wet_NoBB and Dry_NoBB) BB emissions. For simplification, we use BB and NoBB to represent the average results of the two experiments with different initial soil moisture conditions, that is,
The differences between BB and NoBB are thus the influence of BB aerosols.
Data availability
The ERA5 data can be downloaded from https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5. The MERRA-2 data can be downloaded from https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/reanalysis/MERRA-2/. The MIX emission data can be downloaded from http://meicmodel.org/. The GFED4 data can be downloaded from http://www.globalfiredata.org/. The GLEAM soil moisture can be downloaded from https://www.gleam.eu/. The CPC Unified precipitation can be downloaded from https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.cpc.globalprecip.html. The GPCC precipitation data can be downloaded from https://www.psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.gpcc.html.
Code availability
The computer code used in the present study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Andreae, M. O. Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 8523–8546 (2019).
Mashayekhi, R. & Sloan, J. Effects of aerosols on precipitation in north-eastern North America. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 5111–5125 (2014).
Wang, Y., Khalizov, A., Levy, M. & Zhang, R. New directions: light absorbing aerosols and their atmospheric impacts. Atmos. Environ. 81, 713–715 (2013).
Koren, I., Martins, J. V., Remer, L. A. & Afargan, H. Smoke invigoration versus inhibition of clouds over the Amazon. Science 321, 946–949 (2008).
Li, Z. et al. Long-term impacts of aerosols on the vertical development of clouds and precipitation. Nat. Geosci. 4, 888–894 (2011).
Niu, F. & Li, Z. Systematic variations of cloud top temperature and precipitation rate with aerosols over the global tropics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 8491–8498 (2012).
Fan, J., Zhang, R., Tao, W. K. & Mohr, K. I. Effects of aerosol optical properties on deep convective clouds and radiative forcing. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 113, D08209 (2008).
Chan, C. et al. Characteristics of biomass burning emission sources, transport, and chemical speciation in enhanced springtime tropospheric ozone profile over Hong Kong. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108, ACH 3-1–ACH 3-13 (2003).
Dwyer, E., Pinnock, S., Grégoire, J.-M. & Pereira, J. Global spatial and temporal distribution of vegetation fire as determined from satellite observations. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21, 1289–1302 (2000).
Lin, C.-Y. et al. A new transport mechanism of biomass burning from Indochina as identified by modeling studies. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 7901–7911 (2009).
Ding, K. et al. Aerosol-boundary-layer-monsoon interactions amplify semi-direct effect of biomass smoke on low cloud formation in Southeast Asia. Nat. Commun. 12, 6416 (2021).
Huang, L., Lin, W., Li, F., Wang, Y. & Jiang, B. Climate impacts of the biomass burning in Indochina on atmospheric conditions over southern China. Aerosol. Air Qual. Res 19, 2707–2720 (2019).
Yadav, I. C. et al. Biomass burning in Indo-China peninsula and its impacts on regional air quality and global climate change-a review. Environ. Pollut. 227, 414–427 (2017).
Gao, C., Li, G., Chen, H. & Yan, H. Interdecadal change in the effect of spring soil moisture over the Indo-China Peninsula on the following summer precipitation over the Yangtze River basin. J. Clim. 33, 7063–7082 (2020).
Lin, C.-Y., Zhao, C., Liu, X., Lin, N.-H. & Chen, W.-N. Modelling of long-range transport of Southeast Asia biomass-burning aerosols to Taiwan and their radiative forcings over East Asia. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 66, 23733 (2014).
Yen, M.-C. et al. Climate and weather characteristics in association with the active fires in northern Southeast Asia and spring air pollution in Taiwan during 2010 7-SEAS/Dongsha experiment. Atmos. Environ. 78, 35–50 (2013).
Gao, C. et al. Land–atmosphere interaction over the Indo-China Peninsula during spring and its effect on the following summer climate over the Yangtze River basin. Clim. Dyn. 53, 6181–6198 (2019).
Dong, Y., Chen, H. & Dong, X. Impact of antecedent soil moisture anomalies over the Indo-China Peninsula on the Super Meiyu Event in 2020. J. Meteorol. Res. 37, 234–247 (2023).
Bosilovich, M. G. Coauthors. MERRA-2: initial evaluation of the climate. NASA/TM-2015-104606 43, 139. https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/pubs/docs/Bosilovich803.pdf (2015).
Randles, C. et al. The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part I: system description and data assimilation evaluation. J. Clim. 30, 6823–6850 (2017).
**e, P. et al. A gauge-based analysis of daily precipitation over East Asia. J. Hydrometeorol. 8, 607–626 (2007).
Schneider, U. et al. GPCC’s new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 115, 15–40 (2014).
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
Martens, B. et al. GLEAM v3: Satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 1903–1925 (2017).
Grell, G. A. et al. Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39, 6957–6975 (2005).
Sodemann, H., Schwierz, C. & Wernli, H. Interannual variability of Greenland winter precipitation sources: Lagrangian moisture diagnostic and North Atlantic Oscillation influence. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 113, D03107 (2008).
Rodell, M. et al. The global land data assimilation system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85, 381–394 (2004).
Li, M. et al. MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 935–963 (2017).
Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T. & Van Der Werf, G. R. Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth‐generation global fire emissions database (GFED4). J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 118, 317–328 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF0801603) and the National Science Foundation of China (41975084 and 42021004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.W. and Q.M. designed and conceived the research. Q.M. performed the model simulations and most data analysis. Y.S. contributed to the graphics. J.W. and Q.M. wrote the initial draft. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the writing of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, J., Mao, Q., Shan, Y. et al. Spring biomass burning in Indochina enhances summer Yangtze River Valley rainfall through land–atmosphere interactions. npj Clim Atmos Sci 6, 183 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00514-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00514-z
- Springer Nature Limited