Abstract
Differences in the correlated activity of networked brain regions have been reported in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) but an overreliance on null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST) limits the identification of disorder-relevant relationships. In this preregistered study, we applied both a Bayesian statistical framework and NHST to the analysis of resting-state fMRI scans from females with GAD and matched healthy comparison females. Eleven a-priori hypotheses about functional connectivity (FC) were evaluated using Bayesian (multilevel model) and frequentist (t-test) inference. Reduced FC between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the posterior-mid insula (PMI) was confirmed by both statistical approaches and was associated with anxiety sensitivity. FC between the vmPFC-anterior insula, the amygdala-PMI, and the amygdala-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) region pairs did not survive multiple comparison correction using the frequentist approach. However, the Bayesian model provided evidence for these region pairs having decreased FC in the GAD group. Leveraging Bayesian modeling, we demonstrate decreased FC of the vmPFC, insula, amygdala, and dlPFC in females with GAD. Exploiting the Bayesian framework revealed FC abnormalities between region pairs excluded by the frequentist analysis and other previously undescribed regions in GAD, demonstrating the value of applying this approach to resting-state FC data in clinical investigations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a psychiatric disorder characterized by disproportionate and uncontrollable worry in addition to somatic symptoms including muscle tension, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and difficulty concentrating. It is a common anxiety disorder, and is associated with substantial functional impairments and economic costs as well as high rates of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders1. While the neurobiology of GAD has been investigated extensively2, technical advancements in functional neuroimaging in recent decades have afforded insights into abnormalities of regional and network-level neural communication underlying this condition3. Results from many imaging studies suggest that brain regions are organized in distinguishable networks that facilitate complex cognitive functions4. Given the aforementioned functional impairments in GAD it is conceivable that these networks (or the nodes within them) are dysfunctional as well5,6. Among the most frequently described neural networks are the default mode network (DMN, active during the absence of a specific task)7, the salience network (SN, responsible for shifting attention to behaviorally relevant internal and external stimuli)8, and the central executive network (CEN, involved in cognitively demanding functions like management of attention)9. Although only a few studies have examined these three networks explicitly in GAD and with heterogenous results10,64, and predictive processing59, which is in line with increased insula activity during emotional processing tasks in anxiety-prone individuals65. Recent results from our group collected in the same sample show blunted vmPFC activity during an interoceptive perturbation task (pharmacologic infusions of a fast-acting peripheral adrenaline analog resulting in cardiorespiratory modulation29), a method that has been reliably shown to activate the insula66.
The results from this current study suggest the implication of the vmPFC and insula as networked brain regions in the pathophysiology of GAD. More precisely, reduced vmPFC-PMI FC could support the idea that individuals with GAD may have difficulty exercising top-down regulation of emotion due to aberrant processing of bottom-up signals flowing through an interoceptive hub: the insula. This hypothesis is backed by our observations of vmPFC and PMI differences between HC and GAD, which were confirmed by both statistical approaches. While reduced vmPFCI-PMI FC at rest could partly be explained by increased sensitivity of the insula to interoceptive events in the GAD group, it seems plausible that impaired prefrontal regulation of negatively valenced interoceptive states plays a stronger role in this connection based on the observation of vmPFC hypoactivation during the aforementioned cardiorespiratory perturbation task in the same sample29. We also found that FC between the vmPFC and PMI was negatively associated with anxiety sensitivity, which is broadly defined as the fear of experiencing anxiety-related sensations especially those arising from within the body (e.g., heart palpitations or dyspnea)67. In a clinical context, this could mean that the smaller the correlated activity between the vmPFC and the insula at rest, the more likely patients are to experience internal body states as anxiety provoking. However, this interpretation is preliminary and other clinical scores were not correlated with vmPFC-PMI FC, suggesting that this relation might be specific to the anxiety sensitivity construct. Also, this result was statistically significant only before Bonferroni correction and while the Bayes factor indicated that a relationship between vmPFC-insula FC and anxiety sensitivity is likely, our dual statistical approach did not converge on this result. In conclusion, this finding provides some initial evidence of functional association between abnormal neural activity in the vmPFC and PMI and a transdiagnostic trait underlying the initiation and maintenance of pathological anxiety68.
Other results from the frequentist analysis indicated abnormal FC of the amygdala in GAD. Though contrary to our hypothesis, we observed decreased rather than increased FC between the amygdala and the PMI. The direction of this finding also contrasts with previous reports of an amygdala-insula resting state network in both anxious adults69 and adolescents15, but on the other hand aligns with other previous findings of reduced amygdala-insula FC13. Additionally, FC between the amygdala and the dlPFC was decreased, not increased, in our GAD sample. This finding was against our hypothesis that was based on previous literature13. Decreased FC between the amygdala and the dlPFC, which is a central node in the CEN, could be argued to reflect a dysfunctional management of attention (a key function of the CEN9) towards threat-related stimuli, which is a key clinical feature of GAD70. However, the overly general view of the amygdala as the central hub of fear processing is challenged by the absence of amygdala involvement in human fear extinction in a recent meta-analysis71, and heterogenous amygdala findings across reviews of neuroimaging literature in GAD5,72. While the results from our cross-sectional study might hint at the possibility that the role of the amygdala might not be as pivotal to the maintenance of GAD as expected, both amygdala-related findings (i.e., reduced FC for the PMI-amygdala and the dlPFC-amygdala in the GAD group) did not withstand correction for multiplicity and would therefore not be considered statistically significant using the NHST model framework. On the other hand, evaluation of the results from the BML indicated high probabilities for a group difference regarding those region pairs, raising the question whether overly rigorous multiplicity correction might have induced a type II error in our NHST-analysis of those brain regions. Viewing the data from a different, i.e., Bayesian, perspective thus strengthened the validity of our reduced amygdala FC findings, permitting us to discuss these results and consider their potential implications for GAD. Further insight into FC of the amygdala (and more generally, all of the selected ROIs) could be gained by employing seed-based whole-brain voxel wise FC analysis, a common approach to identify the networked connectivity of brain regions73. However, large datasets are required with this method to have sufficient statistical power and consequently, efforts have been made by the ENIGMA consortium to provide an analysis pipeline for employing seed-based FC analysis on pooled datasets from multicenter studies74 that can provide such large sample sizes.
Bayesian multilevel modeling further allowed us to investigate relationships in GAD that were not hypothesized a-priori with minimal risk of information loss. Our analysis identified high probabilities for decreased FC of the PMI with the dlPFC, the dmPFC, and the TP. Decreased functional coupling of the PMI and the dlPFC could be interpreted to reflect abnormal signaling of internal body systems to a key region for executive functions like working memory75 and attention76: aspects of cognition known to be impaired in anxiety77,78. The reduced PMI FC between both the dmPFC (a brain area known to be hyperactivated in GAD during emotional processing17 and at rest79), and the TP (an area implicated in social and emotional processing80), align well with a proposed model of the insula as an “integral hub” for detecting salient events, and for switching attention to these stimuli in preparation for regulatory (i.e., visceromotor) processing81. These additional findings suggest that the insula shows decreased functional coupling at rest with brain areas that have previously been found to show aberrant activity and/or connectivity in anxious individuals and whose functions are relevant to the clinical characteristics of GAD. However, this interpretation remains preliminary and requires causal examination in further experiments.
The Bayesian multilevel analysis also revealed diminished FC of the vmPFC-dmPFC region pair in GAD, two key components of the DMN7. This finding is consistent with previous reports of DMN alterations in GAD12, albeit decreased FC between the vmPFC and dmPFC has not been reported previously. These regions of the DMN are hypothesized to promote functions like processing of emotion and self-referential cognition7, which are impaired in GAD82. Lastly, the Bayesian analysis revealed reduced FC with the vmPFC and the dlPFC, which are key components, respectively, of the DMN and CEN networks8. Additionally, the GAD group exhibited decreased FC of both these regions with the dACC, a key node in the salience network and hypothesized to facilitate “switching” between the spontaneous cognition of the DMN83 and executive functioning of the CEN8. These results hint at the possibility that decreased FC between the vmPFC and dlPFC could be mediated by reduced functional coupling of these regions to the dACC.
Limitations
Limitations of this study include a female-only sample with modest size (that is still above average compared to fMRI studies in recent years84), selected psychotropic medication allowance, and the methodological limitation that correlational analysis cannot determine the causality or directionality (i.e., responsible region) for impaired FC observed within region pairs (see Supplement for further discussion). The choice of brain regions we investigated was based on previous literature, but is not exhaustive. Other brain areas relevant to pathological mechanisms in GAD (e.g., thalamus85 or striatum44,86) should be investigated in future studies. As mentioned in the “Discussion”, testing FC differences between region pairs does not allow for network analysis as commonly employed in seed-based FC analysis across the whole brain. Our focus on females with GAD was based on the fact that females outnumber males with the disorder by a factor of two to one87, and that our sample was drawn from a larger study examining psychiatric disorders predominantly affecting females (e.g., anorexia nervosa and GAD). Future research is needed to establish whether our findings extend to males, i.e., whether sex differences in FC play a role in GAD. A recent mega-analysis found structural brain differences only in males with GAD but no general effect of GAD on brain structure88, indicating that a dynamic approach using functional MRI could provide better insight into the neurobiology of GAD.
Conclusion
We leveraged the strengths of the Bayesian inference framework to convergently identify reduced FC between the vmPFC and the PMI in GAD and identified an association of this relationship with the anxiety sensitivity trait. Bayesian multilevel modeling allowed us to identify decreased FC between region pairs excluded by the frequentist analysis and other previously undescribed regions, emphasizing the utility of this method for probing the pathophysiological basis of psychiatric disorders. Future fMRI studies of resting state FC may benefit from a similar approach.
Data availability
All study data and scripts necessary to replicate the results of this study are available online on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/vf7s4/.
References
Hoge, E. A., Ivkovic, A. & Fricchione, G. L. Generalized anxiety disorder: Diagnosis and treatment. BMJ 345, e7500 (2012).
Stein, M. B. Neurobiology of generalized anxiety disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 70, 15–19 (2009).
Fonzo, G. A. & Etkin, A. Affective neuroimaging in generalized anxiety disorder: An integrated review. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 19, 169–179 (2017).
van den Heuvel, M. P. & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 20, 519–534 (2010).
Hilbert, K., Lueken, U. & Beesdo-Baum, K. Neural structures, functioning and connectivity in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and interaction with neuroendocrine systems: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 158, 114–126 (2014).
Kolesar, T. A., Bilevicius, E., Wilson, A. D. & Kornelsen, J. Systematic review and meta-analyses of neural structural and functional differences in generalized anxiety disorder and healthy controls using magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage Clin. 24, 102016 (2019).
Raichle, M. E. et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 676–682 (2001).
Seeley, W. W. et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J. Neurosci. 27, 2349–2356 (2007).
Bressler, S. L. & Menon, V. Large-scale brain networks in cognition: Emerging methods and principles. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 277–290 (2010).
Rabany, L. et al. Resting-state functional connectivity in generalized anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder: Evidence for a dimensional approach. Brain Connect. 7, 289–298 (2017).
**ong, H., Guo, R.-J. & Shi, H.-W. Altered default mode network and salience network functional connectivity in patients with generalized anxiety disorders: An ICA-based resting-state fMRI study. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2020, e4048916 (2020).
Andreescu, C., Sheu, L. K., Tudorascu, D., Walker, S. & Aizenstein, H. The ages of anxiety-differences across the lifespan in the default mode network functional connectivity in generalized anxiety disorder: The ages of anxiety. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 29, 704–712 (2014).
Etkin, A., Prater, K. E., Schatzberg, A. F., Menon, V. & Greicius, M. D. Disrupted Amygdalar subregion functional connectivity and evidence of a compensatory network in generalized anxiety disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66, 1361–1372 (2009).
Cui, H. et al. Insula shows abnormal task-evoked and resting-state activity in first-episode drug-naïve generalized anxiety disorder. Depress. Anxiety 37, 632–644 (2020).
Roy, A. K. et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity of amygdala-based networks in adolescent generalized anxiety disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 52, 290-299.e2 (2013).
Li, W. et al. Aberrant functional connectivity between the amygdala and the temporal pole in drug-free generalized anxiety disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 549 (2016).
Paulesu, E. et al. Neural correlates of worry in generalized anxiety disorder and in normal controls: A functional MRI study. Psychol. Med. 40, 117–124 (2010).
Ball, T. M., Ramsawh, H. J., Campbell-Sills, L., Paulus, M. P. & Stein, M. B. Prefrontal dysfunction during emotion regulation in generalized anxiety and panic disorders. Psychol. Med. 43, 1475–1486 (2013).
Chen, G. Sources of information waste in neuroimaging: mishandling structures, thinking dichotomously, and over-reducing data. Aperture Neuro 2, 1–22 (2022).
Maxwell, S. E., Kelley, K. & Rausch, J. R. Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 537–563 (2008).
Smith, S. & Nichols, T. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 44, 83–98 (2009).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 35–57 (2018).
Cox, R. W. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29, 162–173 (1996).
Chen, G. et al. An integrative Bayesian approach to matrix-based analysis in neuroimaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 4072–4090 (2019).
Steinhäuser, J., Teed, A. & Khalsa, S. Correlated activity in generalized anxiety disorder—a resting-state fMRI approach. (2020) https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/J29QV.
Sheehan, D. V. et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J. Clin. Psychiatry 59(Suppl 20), 22–33 (1998).
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. (2013).
Campbell-Sills, L. et al. Validation of a brief measure of anxiety-related severity and impairment: The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS). J. Affect. Disord. 112, 92–101 (2009).
Teed, A. R. et al. Association of generalized anxiety disorder with autonomic hypersensitivity and blunted ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity during peripheral adrenergic stimulation: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat. 79, 323 (2022).
Williams, N. PHQ-9. Occup. Med. 64, 139–140 (2014).
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W. & Löwe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 166, 1092 (2006).
Spielberger, C., Gorsuch, R., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. & Jacobs, G. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Vol. IV (Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983).
Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M. & McNally, R. J. Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behav. Res. Ther. 24, 1–8 (1986).
Ekhtiari, H., Kuplicki, R., Yeh, H. & Paulus, M. P. Physical characteristics not psychological state or trait characteristics predict motion during resting state fMRI. Sci. Rep. 9, 419 (2019).
Betzel, R. F. et al. Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. Neuroimage 102, 345–357 (2014).
Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012).
Glover, G. H., Li, T. Q. & Ress, D. Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn. Reson. Med. 44, 162–167 (2000).
Fan, L. et al. The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A new brain atlas based on connectional architecture. Cereb. Cortex 26, 3508–3526 (2016).
Greenberg, T., Carlson, J. M., Cha, J., Hajcak, G. & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex reactivity is altered in generalized anxiety disorder during fear generalization. Depress. Anxiety 30, 242–250 (2013).
Toazza, R. et al. Amygdala-based intrinsic functional connectivity and anxiety disorders in adolescents and young adults. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 257, 11–16 (2016).
Makovac, E. et al. Alterations in amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity account for excessive worry and autonomic dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 80, 786–795 (2016).
Mohlman, J., Eldreth, D. A., Price, R. B., Staples, A. M. & Hanson, C. Prefrontal-limbic connectivity during worry in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Aging Ment. Health 21, 426–438 (2017).
Porta-Casteràs, D. et al. Prefrontal-amygdala connectivity in trait anxiety and generalized anxiety disorder: Testing the boundaries between healthy and pathological worries. J. Affect. Disord. 267, 211–219 (2020).
Qiao, J. et al. Aberrant functional network connectivity as a biomarker of generalized anxiety disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 626 (2017).
Liu, W. et al. Abnormal functional connectivity of the amygdala-based network in resting-state fMRI in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. Med. Sci. Monit. 21, 459–467 (2015).
Chen, G. et al. Handling multiplicity in neuroimaging through Bayesian lenses with multilevel modeling. Neuroinformatics 17, 515–545 (2019).
Wasserstein, R. L. & Lazar, N. A. The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. Am. Stat. 70, 129–133 (2016).
Bechara, A., Tranel, D. & Damasio, H. Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain 123, 2189–2202 (2000).
Hiser, J. & Koenigs, M. The multifaceted role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotion, decision making, social cognition, and psychopathology. Biol. Psychiatry 83, 638–647 (2018).
Sotres-Bayon, F., Cain, C. K. & LeDoux, J. E. Brain mechanisms of fear extinction: Historical perspectives on the contribution of prefrontal cortex. Biol. Psychiatry 60, 329–336 (2006).
Phelps, E. A., Delgado, M. R., Nearing, K. I. & LeDoux, J. E. Extinction learning in humans. Neuron 43, 897–905 (2004).
Myers-Schulz, B. & Koenigs, M. Functional anatomy of ventromedial prefrontal cortex: Implications for mood and anxiety disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 17, 132–141 (2012).
LeDoux, J. The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 23, 727–738 (2003).
Feinstein, J. S., Adolphs, R., Damasio, A. & Tranel, D. The human amygdala and the induction and experience of fear. Curr. Biol. 21, 34–38 (2011).
Khalsa, S. S. et al. Panic anxiety in humans with bilateral amygdala lesions: Pharmacological induction via cardiorespiratory interoceptive pathways. J. Neurosci. 36, 3559–3566 (2016).
Berntson, G. G. & Khalsa, S. S. Neural circuits of interoception. Trends Neurosci. 44, 17–28 (2021).
Khalsa, S. S. et al. Interoception and mental health: A roadmap. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 3, 501–513 (2018).
Craig, A. D. How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 59–70 (2009).
Barrett, L. F. & Simmons, W. K. Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 419–429 (2015).
Morel, A., Gallay, M. N., Baechler, A., Wyss, M. & Gallay, D. S. The human insula: Architectonic organization and postmortem MRI registration. Neuroscience 236, 117–135 (2013).
Evrard, H. C., Logothetis, N. K. & Craig, A. D. B. Modular architectonic organization of the insula in the macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 522, 64–97 (2014).
Dosenbach, N. U. F. et al. A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron 50, 799–812 (2006).
Nelson, S. M. et al. Role of the anterior insula in task-level control and focal attention. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 669–680 (2010).
Zaki, J., Davis, J. I. & Ochsner, K. N. Overlap** activity in anterior insula during interoception and emotional experience. Neuroimage 62, 493–499 (2012).
Stein, M. B., Simmons, A. N., Feinstein, J. S. & Paulus, M. P. Increased amygdala and insula activation during emotion processing in anxiety-prone subjects. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 318–327 (2007).
Hassanpour, M. S. et al. The insular cortex dynamically maps changes in cardiorespiratory interoception. Neuropsychopharmacology 43, 426–434 (2018).
Anxiety Sensitivity: Theory, Research, and Treatment of the Fear of Anxiety. (Routledge, 2014). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603326.
Naragon-Gainey, K. Meta-analysis of the relations of anxiety sensitivity to the depressive and anxiety disorders. Psychol. Bull. 136, 128–150 (2010).
Baur, V., Hänggi, J., Langer, N. & Jäncke, L. Resting-state functional and structural connectivity within an insula-amygdala route specifically index state and trait anxiety. Biol. Psychiatry 73, 85–92 (2013).
Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. Attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder versus depressive disorder. Cogn. Ther. Res. 29, 29–45 (2005).
Fullana, M. A. et al. Fear extinction in the human brain: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies in healthy participants. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 88, 16–25 (2018).
Mochcovitch, M. D., da Rocha Freire, R. C., Garcia, R. F. & Nardi, A. E. A systematic review of fMRI studies in generalized anxiety disorder: Evaluating its neural and cognitive basis. J. Affect. Disord. 167, 336–342 (2014).
Cole, D., Smith, S. & Beckmann, C. Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI data. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4 (2010).
Adhikari, B. M. et al. A resting state fMRI analysis pipeline for pooling inference across diverse cohorts: An ENIGMA rs-fMRI protocol. Brain Imaging Behav. 13, 1453–1467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2010.00008 (2019).
Barbey, A. K., Koenigs, M. & Grafman, J. Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex 49, 1195–1205 (2013).
Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 637–671 (2002).
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoorn, M. H. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychol. Bull. 133, 1–24 (2007).
Vytal, K. E., Cornwell, B. R., Letkiewicz, A. M., Arkin, N. E. & Grillon, C. The complex interaction between anxiety and cognition: Insight from spatial and verbal working memory. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 93 (2013).
Wang, W. et al. Aberrant regional neural fluctuations and functional connectivity in generalized anxiety disorder revealed by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci. Lett. 624, 78–84 (2016).
Olson, I. R., Plotzker, A. & Ezzyat, Y. The enigmatic temporal pole: A review of findings on social and emotional processing. Brain 130, 1718–1731 (2007).
Menon, V. & Uddin, L. Q. Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 655–667 (2010).
Turk, C. L., Heimberg, R. G., Luterek, J. A., Mennin, D. S. & Fresco, D. M. Emotion dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder: A comparison with social anxiety disorder. Cogn. Ther. Res. 29, 89–106 (2005).
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Huang, C. & Buckner, R. L. Evidence for the default network’s role in spontaneous cognition. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 322–335 (2010).
Szucs, D. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals. Neuroimage 221, 117164 (2020).
Buff, C. et al. Directed threat imagery in generalized anxiety disorder. Psychol. Med. 48, 617–628 (2018).
White, S. F. et al. Prediction error representation in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder during passive avoidance. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 110–117 (2017).
Weisberg, R. B. Overview of generalized anxiety disorder: Epidemiology, presentation, and course. J. Clin. Psychiatry 70(Suppl 2), 4–9 (2009).
Harrewijn, A. et al. Cortical and subcortical brain structure in generalized anxiety disorder: Findings from 28 research sites in the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group. Transl. Psychiatry 11, 502 (2021).
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of Valerie Upshaw MSN, APRN-CNP in gathering participants information and Rayus Kuplicki PhD for help with MRI data management.
Funding
This work was supported by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) Center Grant P20GM121312 (S.S.K.), National Institute of Mental Health Grants K23MH112949 and R01MH127225 (S.S.K.), The William K. Warren Foundation (S.S.K.) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research by providing J.S. with a scholarship for his collaboration with the Laureate Institute for Brain Research. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.L.S.: conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, visualization. A.R.T.: conceptualization, data curation, writing—review and editing. O.A.Z: software, data curation, writing—review and editing. R.H.: investigation, writing—review and editing. G.C.: methodology, software, writing—review and editing, visualization. S.S.K.: conceptualization, investigation, data curation, resources, writing—original draft, review, and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Steinhäuser, J.L., Teed, A.R., Al-Zoubi, O. et al. Reduced vmPFC-insula functional connectivity in generalized anxiety disorder: a Bayesian confirmation study. Sci Rep 13, 9626 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35939-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35939-2
- Springer Nature Limited