Abstract
Tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy and -imaging have significantly advanced our understanding of low-dimensional quantum materials and their interactions with light, providing a rich insight into the underlying physics at their natural length scale. Recently, various functionalities of the plasmonic tip expand the capabilities of the nanoscopy, enabling dynamic manipulation of light-matter interactions at the nanoscale. In this review, we focus on a new paradigm of the nanoscopy, shifting from the conventional role of imaging and spectroscopy to the dynamical control approach of the tip-induced light-matter interactions. We present three different approaches of tip-induced control of light-matter interactions, such as cavity-gap control, pressure control, and near-field polarization control. Specifically, we discuss the nanoscale modifications of radiative emissions for various emitters from weak to strong coupling regime, achieved by the precise engineering of the cavity-gap. Furthermore, we introduce recent works on light-matter interactions controlled by tip-pressure and near-field polarization, especially tunability of the bandgap, crystal structure, photoluminescence quantum yield, exciton density, and energy transfer in a wide range of quantum materials. We envision that this comprehensive review not only contributes to a deeper understanding of the physics of nanoscale light-matter interactions but also offers a valuable resource to nanophotonics, plasmonics, and materials science for future technological advancements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Low-dimensional quantum materials, such as two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), semiconductor nanowires, and quantum dots (QDs) have garnered significant attention due to their exceptional optical, electrical, and structural properties1,2,3,4. Their unique properties are inherited from the reduced dimensionality, which leads to the new physical phenomena, such as the increased quantum confinement effect5 and decreased dielectric screening effects6. These characteristics exhibit remarkable sensitivity to external engineering strategies, offering wide tunability that distinguishes them from their bulk counterparts7,8. By leveraging the tunability, we can precisely control their optical response9,10, electrical conductivity11,12, and structural characteristics13,14, rendering them promising candidates for a multitude of applications in nanophotonics, optoelectronics, and beyond.
Since the length scale of the interesting phenomena reduces down to the nanoscale, the intriguing physical processes of low-dimensional quantum materials cannot be investigated by the conventional microscale spatial imaging methods. Nanoscopy approaches, such as scanning probe microscopy (SPM)15,16,17,18,19 and tip-enhanced spectroscopy20,21,22,23,24, have enabled us to directly visualize the nanoscale characteristics of the low-dimensional quantum materials with extraordinary accessibility. Using the plasmonic tip, nanoscopy allows for the spatially resolved characterizations of the electronic structure, excitonic properties, and local optical responses of the materials. This capability has revealed a wealth of interesting physical phenomena at the nanoscale, including exciton dynamics, quantum confinement effects, and the interplay between electronic and optical properties. For instance, the ability to probe the optically dark states, which are typically challenging to access, opens up possibilities for the manipulation of light emission and tailored photon sources25,26,27. Nanoscopy also unveils the drift-dominant exciton funneling facilitated by the nanoscale strain, providing insights into strain engineering for improved optoelectronic devices28,29,30. Moreover, achieving strong coupling with nanoscale mode volumes allows for the exploration of cavity quantum electrodynamics effects, enabling precise control over light-matter interactions at the fundamental level31,32,33.
However, a plethora of physics captured by the conventional nanoscopy is just the tip of the iceberg, whereas the complex interplay between multiple degrees of freedom, such as electronic, vibrational, and photonic modes, as well as their coupling dynamics remain largely unexplored. Therefore, there is a growing demand for innovative approaches to actively manipulate the light-matter interactions. In this review, we discuss the recent progress on the dynamic control of tip-induced light-matter interactions, especially for the low-dimensional quantum materials. As illustrated in Fig. 1b, we divide the main text into three parts based on the type of tip-induced control, i.e., gap control of tip-cavity, tip-pressure control, and near-field polarization control. For low-dimensional semiconductors, such as 0D QDs and 2D TMDs, we discuss the modulation of radiative emission depending on the variation of tip-sample distance (part 1) and the modified strain and band gap properties induced by the GPa scale tip-pressure (part 2). Additionally, we discuss the near-field polarization control at the tip apex achieved by the geometrical tip modification and adaptive wavefront sha** of the excitation beam (part 3). We believe that this review will guide the future direction of manipulation of the quantum light-matter interaction by introducing a new paradigm of near-field microscopy and suggesting the recently developed approaches to discover the hidden nature of the emerging quantum materials.
Illustration of dynamic tip-induced control of light-matter interactions. a Unique properties of low-dimensional quantum materials that can be dynamically manipulated by the tip-induced control. b Schematic illustrations for the three types of tip-induced control. Gap control for engineering the cavity-emitter coupling strength, pressure control for engineering the strain, bandgap, and emission energy of quantum materials, and near-field polarization control for engineering the plasmon-emitter coupling with high selectivity
Tip-induced control of radiative emissions via cavity-gap engineering
Many types of light-matter interaction play a crucial role in photonic and optoelectronic device applications, e.g., lasers, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), single photon emitters, photodiodes, and solar cells34,35,36,37,38. Since plasmonic cavities can modify light-matter interactions with the nanoscale mode volume, cavity-quantum electrodynamics (cavity-QED) study with many different platforms, such as nanoparticles on mirror (NPoM)39,40,41,42,43,44, bowtie antennas45,46,47,48,49,50,51, and nanogap structures52,53,54,55,56,57,58, has become ever more important. However, the static geometry of the conventional plasmonic cavities highly restricts the dynamic controllability of light-matter interactions, e.g., Purcell enhancement48,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66, radiative decay rate57,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74, and coupling strength33,42,43,47,49,75,76,83. Nonlocal screening pertains to the behavior of electrons in a metal and how they interact with screen charges at the metal-semiconductor gap. This phenomenon can cause deviations in the spatial distribution of electron gas within the metal structure compared to the geometric boundaries, resulting in a decrease of TEPL intensity at smaller gaps84,85. Quantum tunneling, on the other hand, is a well-known electron behavior in sub-nanometer gaps, contributing to nonradiative decay of excitons in the semiconductor via charge transfer to the metallic tip in TEPL experiments. The distance-dependent change in TEPL from the classical to the quantum regime can be effectively described by modified rate equation models, as evidenced in prior studies81,84. This study demonstrated the near-field light-matter interactions in a TMD monolayer with TEPL and TERS, revealing the potential of tip-induced cavity-gap engineering for modulating nano-optical properties of emerging 2D materials.
Tip-induced control of photoluminescence and Raman scattering via cavity-gap engineering. a Manipulation of the TERS/TEPL response of a WSe2 monolayer. (i) Schematic of the tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy. (ii) TERS/TEPL spectra at the selected typical tip-sample distances. (iii) Evolution of the TERS/TEPL intensity of a WSe2 monolayer as the tip-sample distance decreases, fitted with the rate equation model. b Purcell effect-induced TEPL manipulation of a TMD heterostructure. (i) Schematic of tip-enhanced nanocavity clock spectroscopy. (ii) TEPL images of the heterobilayer for the integrated intensity of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{WS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\) (red), \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{MoS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\) (yellow), and \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{IX}}}\) (green). Scale bar is 500 nm. (iii) Evolution of TEPL spectra with respect to the tip-sample distance \(z\). (iv) Distance-dependent PL intensity of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{WS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\), \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{MoS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\), and \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{IX}}}\), fitted with the coupled rate equation model. a Reproduced with permission81. Copyright [2016] American Chemical Society. b Reproduced with permission86. Copyright [2021] American Chemical Society
The similar tip-induced approach was also employed to control the light-matter interactions in a TMD heterobilayer, especially by manipulating competing TEPL responses of intra- and inter-layer excitons. As shown in Fig. 2b, May et al.86 investigated TEPL properties of the WSe2/MoSe2 heterostructure. First of all, the spatially homogeneous region over a 1 μm2 was confirmed through the TEPL imaging (Fig. 2b-(ii)). Then, the authors were able to manipulate the TEPL spectra of intralayer excitons (\({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{WS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\) and \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{MoS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\)), interlayer exciton (\({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{IX}}}\)), and surface plasmon (SP) as a function of the tip-sample distance \(z\) from 25 nm to 0 nm, as shown in Fig. 2b-(iii). From the measurement results, the authors could classify the near-field responses of the heterobilayer into three ranges depending on \(z\): (1) a range of near-field (NF) (\(z\) ≥ 5 nm), (2) a range of suppressed enhancement (1 nm < \(z\) < 5 nm), and (3) a NF+ range (\(z\) ≤ 1 nm). In the NF range, PL intensity of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{WS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\), \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{MoS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\), and \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{IX}}}\) is continuously enhanced as the increasing excitation rate dominates over PL quenching in the proximity of the Au tip. In the range of 1 nm < \(z\) < 5 nm, the PL quenching has a predominance of the near-field response over the increased excitation rate via dipole coupling of the Au tip and ultrafast ohmic Drude dam**. By contrast, the strong Purcell effect enhances the spontaneous emission rate in the range of \(z\) ≤ 1 nm (NF+ region). Interestingly, in this region, only the TEPL of intralayer excitons is largely increased due to Purcell enhancement. Concurrently, the \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{IX}}}\) are quenched, because the tip-enhanced nonradiative dam** of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{IX}}}\) becomes much faster than the intralayer charge transfer. This complex competing spectral behaviors of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{IX}}}\), \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{WS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\), and \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{MoS}}{{\rm{e}}}_{2}}\) with respect to the decreasing \(z\) is modeled by the coupled rate equations, as shown in Fig. 2b-(iv). This work presents a method for controlling the radiative emission of complex quantum systems solely by dynamically modulating the tip-sample distance. Moreover, the proposed method can be applied to investigate the dynamics of excitonic systems in a wide range of materials.
In addition to the bright excitons, the strong out-of-plane optical field at the tip-cavity can reveal the forbidden optical states in 2D TMDs. Park et al.25 demonstrated the first work of tip-induced probing and controlling the room temperature dark exciton (\({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\)) radiation in a WSe2 monolayer, which typically exhibits the spin-forbidden nonradiative decay with the intrinsic out-of-plane oriented transition dipole moment. Following that, the recent study of Hasz et al.26 showed the tip-induced \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) radiation in nano-bubbles of a WSe2 monolayer (Fig. 3a-(i)). The physical mechanism of the tip-induced radiative control of the \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) is divided into two steps as follows. First, the linearly polarized incident light is strongly confined in the tip-cavity formed with the metal substrate resulting in the large enhancement of the out-of-plane optical field due to the dipole-dipole interaction. The confined light then effectively excites the vertically oriented \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) in the WSe2 monolayer. Additionally, the spontaneous emission rate of the \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) is increased by the Purcell effect, which, in general, gives maximum enhancement when the orientation of the emitter aligns with the polarization axis of the localized fields. Therefore, the Purcell effect of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) in the tip-cavity achieved an extraordinarily large enhancement of the radiative emission rate. In addition, as illustrated in Fig. 3a-(i), a side-illumination TEPL geometry is particularly advantageous for the effective collection of dark exciton emissions, which possess a k-vector parallel to the 2D surface. Note that the lower bandgap energy of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) compared to X0 can be attributed to the spin-forbidden transition to the lower-energy conduction band. The degree of confinement of the incident light and the enhancement of the radiative emission rate sensitively depends on the cavity-gap, as described previously. Therefore, the radiative emission rate of XD is controlled by modulating the tip-sample distance, as shown in Fig. 3a-(ii). Figure 3a-(iii) shows the two extracted TEPL spectra from Fig. 3a-(ii) at different distances of the tip and sample. For the 10 nm of tip-sample distance (green), only the bright exciton emission is observed. By contrast, as the tip-sample distance is decreased, \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) emission is observed, while the intensity of the bright exciton decreases due to dipole coupling and energy transfer with Drude relaxation in the metal substrate and tip. Therefore, the forbidden optical state in conventional light-matter coupling was allowed to be brightened via nanoscale engineering of the tip-cavity gap. Through the dynamical engineering of radiative emission of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) at room temperature, we envision many different types of device applications in quantum nano-optoelectronics, utilizing its long radiative lifetime and coherence time. Since these studies were light-matter interaction phenomena in the weak coupling regime, one could only observe modifications in optical intensity induced by the coupling of plasmon with excitons and phonons. In the strong coupling regime, on the other hand, the modifications in photon energy can also be pronouncedly observed in addition to the tip-enhanced optical responses. However, because of its dominant out-of-plane optical field in the cavity-gap, tip-cavity is less advantageous for the strong coupling with in-plane excitons in 2D materials. While metasurfaces have been suggested for achieving strong coupling with in- plane excitons87, tip-cavity has stood out as a suitable platform for the out-of-plane dipole emitter, such as QD. Park et al.31 introduced a concept of tip-enhanced strong coupling (TESC) spectroscopy, by forming a nanoscale tip-cavity for a single emitter. In this study, a single CdSe/ZnS QD was placed between the Au tip and the Au surface, as illustrated in Fig. 3b-(i). Since this Au-Au junction provides a nanoscale mode volume in the tip-cavity, it can induce strong coupling between the cavity plasmon and the QD exciton. To induce the strong coupling state, the transition dipole moment of a QD should be also oriented vertically (along the tip-cavity axis) because the coupling strength (\(g\)) depends on the dipole orientation of the excitons (\(\vec{\mu }\)) and plasmon polarization (\({\vec{E}}_{0}\))88:
where \({\vec{u}}_{{\rm{cav}}}\) is the unit vector of the plasmon polarization of the cavity, \(N\) is the number of molecules, \({\epsilon }_{0}\) is the vacuum permittivity, \({{\hslash}} {\omega }_{{\rm{exc}}}\) is the exciton energy, and \(V\) is the cavity mode volume. As shown in the energy diagram of Fig. 3b-(ii), when the coupling strength is larger than the loss of the coupled system, one can facilitate the plexciton state, i.e., strong coupling state of plasmon and exciton, which shows a signature of Rabi splitting in TEPL spectra. The beauty of TESC spectroscopy compared to strong coupling studies using static plasmonic cavities33,42,43,47,49,75,76,77,78,79,80 is dynamic controllability of the strong coupling state. The authors could control the coupling strength of plexcitons by modulating the optical mode volume \(V\) through the cavity-gap engineering in a few nm scales (\({\rm{g}}\propto 1/\sqrt{{\rm{V}}}\)) because the Au tip can move laterally or vertically by the AFM control. TEPL spectra in Fig. 3b-(iii), (iv) demonstrate the continuous modifications in coupling strength for the plexciton state, when the tip-cavity mode volume gradually changes. For the single isolated CdSe/ZnS QD in the TESC spectroscopy, the coupling strength of ~140 meV was observed at room temperature. The coupling strength is derived by using the coupled harmonic oscillator model with Weisskopf-Wigner approximation89:
where \(\Omega\), \({\omega }_{{\rm{SP}}}\), \({\gamma }_{{\rm{QD}}}\), and \({\gamma }_{{\rm{SP}}}\) denote the vacuum Rabi frequency, the resonance frequency of QD, the resonance frequency of cavity, the decay rate of QD, and the decay rate of cavity, respectively.
Tip-induced control of radiative emission of dark exciton and strong coupling of quantum dot exciton via cavity-gap engineering. a Probing radiative emission of the dark exciton (\({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\)) in a WSe2 monolayer via TEPL. (i) Schematic of the TEPL to probe and control \({{\rm{X}}}_{{\rm{D}}}\) in a TMD nanobubble. (ii) Continuous plot of TEPL spectra with respect to the tip-sample distance. (iii) TEPL spectra at different tip-sample distances indicated by dotted lines in (a-(ii)). b Control of the strong coupling between the tip-cavity and the single quantum emitter. (i) Schematic of the TESC spectroscopy. (ii) Energy diagram of the tip-cavity, QD, and the polariton state of plasmon and exciton, i.e., plexciton. Modified TEPL spectra depending on the lateral (iii) and the vertical (iv) tip-sample distance change. a Reproduced with permission26. Copyright [2023] American Chemical Society. b Reprinted with permission31. Copyright © 2019 Park et al., some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC)
This work presented a modulation of coupling strength through plasmonic cavity-gap engineering allowing for the control of the Rabi splitting in a strong coupling regime. The other advantage of TESC compared to conventional static cavities is the ability to perform a control experiment. That is, one can induce tip-enhanced strong coupling for many different emitters with the 3D movable tip-cavity, which enables control experiments in the strong coupling regime. Hence, this approach enables the tuning of quantum-optical interfaces and provides a large degree of functionality to control quantum dynamics, which can lead to the advanced development of quantum computing. Furthermore, quantum plasmonic effects in sub-nm gaps should be briefly introduced. As the cavity-gap decreases down to the quantum tunneling regime, quantum plasmonic effects play a pivotal role in light-matter interactions, leading to unique and often non-classical phenomena under this extreme cavity condition83. For example, a transition from plasmonic enhancement to electron tunneling was observed in a tip-cavity. In an insightful study by Kravtsov et al.84, the authors measured luminescence signals using a gold tip positioned above a flat gold surface while changing the tip-sample gap. Their observations revealed that the peak luminescence intensity was attained when the tip was at an approximate gap distance of \(d\) ~ 1.5 nm. Notably, as the gap width reduced, PL quenching became evident, and concurrently, the luminescence spectral peaks exhibited a blue-shift, signaling the onset of electron tunneling. In addition, Zhe et al. demonstrated exciton-to-trion conversion in a TMD monolayer by using the electron tunneling regime of tip-cavity90. Their experimental observations underscore the fundamental distinctions between classical and quantum plasmonic regimes in the study of light-matter interactions. Classical TEPL facilitates nano-spectroscopy through plasmonic near-field enhancement but provides limited capacity to locally manipulate the excitons in 2D semiconductors. In contrast, the quantum plasmonic TEPL technique offers novel control mechanisms alongside classical nano-spectroscopy capabilities, thereby unlocking fresh avenues for concurrent nano-imaging and control within the quantum domain. Therefore, considering the unique quantum plasmonic behaviors of the sub-nm gap tip-cavity will open up exciting possibilities for investigating phenomena that were previously inaccessible. Moreover, in the quantum regime, the tip-induced approach can be used to investigate the tunneling effect in biomolecules91,92. However, embedding biomolecules in the gap between the tip and substrate is not an easy process, particularly in achieving reproducibility and stability. Recently, hyperspectral TERS imaging of single molecules at room temperature has been made possible by improved reproducibility via a freeze-frame approach using a thin Al2O3 cap** layer93, yet dynamic control of light-biomolecule interactions remains challenge. Conversely, the use of static nanogap structures, coupled with the application of dynamic control factors like external electric and optical fields, offers distinct advantages, compared to tip-induced approach, when it comes to probing quantum effects within the tunneling region of biomolecules94,95. These recent studies are compelling examples demonstrating how this approach provides a new avenue for investigating the intricate interplay between biological molecules and light-matter interactions, ultimately leading to a deeper comprehension of these complex phenomena.
In summary, the recently demonstrated works on tip-induced control of radiative emissions via cavity-gap engineering provide a new direction for the cavity-QED studies. In contrast to the static plasmonic cavity, the dynamically modulating mode volume in the tip-cavity enables a systematic manipulation of the plasmon-coupled optical properties for various emitters, such as spontaneous emission rate, energy transfer, coupling strength, and so forth. Specifically, strong coupling significantly modifies the chemical reaction rate of molecules96, emission rate of single quantum dot97, and emission properties of 2D TMDs42. Therefore, we envision that the tunability of tip-cavity for a range of light-matter interactions at the nanoscale provides a new strategy for the next-generation nano-photonic device applications, overcoming the current performance limits of optoelectronic devices.
Tip-induced control of excitons via GPa-scale pressure engineering
Strain engineering has emerged as a versatile method to modify the physical properties of materials, expanding their potential applications in various nano-optoelectronic devices98,99,100. Although several techniques, such as thermal annealing101,142,143,144,145, and light-matter coupling in hetero- and hybrid structures146,147,148,149. Likewise, polarization control in the near-field regime is also highly desired for studying nanoscale characteristics, i.e., coupled behavior of single quantum emitters150,151,152 and excitonic states in superlattice structures153,154,155. Yet, modulation of near-field polarization at the nanoscale remains challenging. Conventional tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy is known to suffer from limited tunability of polarization at the tip apex since traditionally used plasmonic tips generate strong out-of-plane fields at the apex, while the corresponding in-plane fields are relatively weak25. Controlling optical field distribution at the tip apex can therefore increase sensitivity and enhance light-matter interaction with in-plane oriented dipole excitations, such as excitons in 2D materials156.
One approach to create substantial in-plane components in a conventional conical tip structure is by using a simple geometry modification, as shown in Fig. 6a-(i), (ii). Adjusting the angle of the tip axis with respect to the substrate under side illumination significantly increases the in-plane field component at the tip apex157, which is attributed to the geometry-dependent dam** of the collective oscillations of electrons158. The electron oscillations are overdamped for a vertically aligned tip due to the semi-infinite geometry with only a single metal–dielectric interface, resulting in a weak localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). On the other hand, the collective electron oscillations for a tilted tip are confined within a finite volume near the apex, leading to an enhanced LSPR response for both the in-plane and out-of-plane components compared to the vertically aligned tip. The angle-dependent in-plane enhancement of the tilted tip is clearly demonstrated in the imaging of ferroelectric domains in single-crystalline YMnO3, as shown in Fig. 6a-(iii), (iv)159,160. When the tip is tilted at 35° to the sample plane, a distinct contrast between domains is observed in the tip-enhanced second harmonic generation (SHG) image, while the domains are barely noticeable when the tip is oriented vertically (θtip = 90°). To systematically evaluate the field enhancement of the tilted tip, the authors calculated nanoscale spatial distributions of the in-plane |Ex|2 and out-of-plane |Ez|2 components of the optical field for a variable tip tilting angle. The results shown in Fig. 6a-(v), (vi) demonstrate that both the in-plane and out-of-plane field components are maximized at the angle of 35°. Thus, through the experimental geometry of tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy, one can substantially modify the near-field distribution and improve light-matter interactions between the tip and excitations in the studied sample.
Tip-induced nearfield polarization control by exploiting plasmonic cavity geometry. a Near-field polarization control by tilting the conventional antenna tip. (i) Schematic of \(x\)-cut single-crystalline YMnO3 nano-crystallographic imaging using the tilted tip. (ii) Illustration of the geometric confinement for collective electron oscillations in conventional tip oriented at 90° (top) to the sample surface (top) and tilted tip oriented at 35° (bottom). Tip-enhanced SHG images measured with tips tilted at an angle of 35° (iii) and at 90° (iv). Calculations for the in-plane (v) and out-of-plane (vi) optical field intensities at the sample for varying tilt angle of the tip (θtip). b Designed nanoantenna structures to manipulate the near-field polarization. (i) Schematic of scanning single molecule emitters using a special resonant dipole nanoantenna. (ii) Measured \(x\)- and \(z\)-field intensity from the selected individual molecules with \(x\)- and \(z\)-oriented dipole moments. (iii) Schematic of vector field polarization in a triple-tips nanostructure, which consists of a bowtie antenna structure and a tip (left), together with FDTD simulation result of plasmonic field enhancement in the triple-tips nanostructure (right). (iv) Calculated in-plane (|Ex|2, left) and out-of-plane (|Ez|2, right) field distributions of the bowtie structure without (top) and with (bottom) a vertically oriented tip. Reprinted with permission from ref. 157. Copyright [2018] American Chemical Society. b-(i), (ii) Reproduced with permission162. Copyright [2014] American Chemical Society. b-(iii), (iv) Reproduced with permission165. Copyright [2021] John Wiley and Sons
Another approach to manipulating the near-field polarization in tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy takes advantage of the geometry-dependent field distribution in plasmonic nano-antennas161. For example, the use of a resonant dipole antenna instead of a conventional tip has been demonstrated, as shown in Fig. 6b-(i)33,162. To produce the resonant antenna, a fiber tip was tapered using the heat pulling method, which is generally used for near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM), followed by Al deposition and focused ion beam (FIB) milling to fabricate a rectangular antenna with the dimensions of 200 nm × 60 nm. The fabricated rectangular structure provides spatially separated in-plane and out-of-plane field distributions in the tip-sample gap. Therefore, when raster scanned over a sample containing single molecules, the antenna structure allows extracting information on the dipole orientational of each molecule, as shown in Fig. 6b-(ii)163,164.
Instead of modifying the tip geometry, combining a conventional tip with additional plasmonic nanostructures has also been suggested as a way to modulate the near-field distribution. For example, a triple-sharp-tips structure has been proposed and demonstrated by integrating a bowtie antenna and a conventional tip, as shown in Fig. 6b-(iii)165. To study the spatial distribution of the in-plane and out-of-plane field components for such structure, optical field distribution has been calculated for a bowtie structure with and without the tip using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations, as shown in Fig. 6b-(iv). The results showed that the bowtie structure without the tip has a strong in-plane field component (|Ex|2, top left panel) inside the gap while the corresponding out-of-plane field (|Ez|2, top right panel) is significantly weaker. In contrast, the triple-sharp-tips structure formed in the presence of the tip exhibits a significant enhancement of both Ex and Ez fields at the bowtie cavity (bottom left and right panels, respectively). The authors further utilized the structure to induce and investigate localized excitons in a WSe2 monolayer. Due to the strain of the transferred WSe2 on the bowtie structure166 and strong field enhancement at the cavity, localized excitons at room temperature were observed at the cavity of the triple-sharp-tips structure162.
All approaches to control the near-field polarization reviewed in this section so far relied on modifying the geometry and structure of plasmonic tips. While these approaches in principle allowed one to manipulate the field distribution at the tip and enhance light-matter interaction for dipole moments oriented in-plane, which is difficult to achieve with conventional tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy, the requirement for a special experimental configuration limits their potential applications. This calls for a more versatile method for controlling the near-field polarization.
To address the aforementioned issue, optically controlled adaptive tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy was demonstrated using wavefront sha** method, as shown in Fig. 7167,168. A spatial light modulator (SLM) integrated into a conventional tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy setup allows manipulating the phase of incident light by dividing the laser beam into multiple segments and controlling the phase of each segment169,170,171. The SLM-shaped wavefront is then used to illuminate the tip-sample gap, and the target signal of the detected TEPL response is optimized using the sequential feedback algorithm, as shown in Fig. 7a-(ii). To understand the effect of SLM on the near-field polarization, the phase-dependent field enhancement at the tip is evaluated theoretically via FDTD simulations, with the results shown in Fig. 7b-(i), (ii). To examine the local field enhancement with respect to spatial phase difference, the incident light source was constructed with many optical sources, all with the same linear polarization but varying phase delays ranging from 0 to π. Both in-plane (1) and out-of-plane (2) near-field components were found to be sensitive to phase delay, which indicates that adjusting the phase delay provides accurate control on the local field enhancement and associated light-matter interactions. The calculated phase-dependent near-field polarization behavior was confirmed experimentally via measuring excitonic TEPL signals from a WSe2 monolayer sample. As depicted in Fig. 7c-(i), the PL intensity generated with a radially polarized excitation beam in the monolayer (black) is first considerably increased as the tip approached the sample (TEPL, blue), which is attributed to the conventional tip enhancement effect. The TEPL intensity is further enhanced by the adaptive optimization of the excitation wavefront with SLM (a-TEPL, red), more than twice compared to the conventional TEPL intensity, with the corresponding enhancement factor of ~4.4 × 104, which is attributed to the stronger in-plane enhancement at the tip.
Tip-induced nearfield polarization control by optical phase modulation. a Dynamic wavefront sha** method with tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy. (i) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for adaptive tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy. A He-Ne laser with a wavelength of 632.8 nm is spatially filtered and expanded to fully illuminate the active area of a spatial light modulator (SLM) for wavefront sha**. The wavefront-shaped beam is then imaged onto the back aperture of an objective lens (OL) within a 4f system, enabling dynamic manipulation of LSPR at the tip. (ii) TEPL intensity of a WSe2 monolayer changes as the phase mask (PM) is optimized using a stepwise sequential algorithm. The TEPL response with the optimal phase mask shows stronger enhancement than the conventional TEPL setup. b Simulated optical field distributions at the tip-sample gap for different phase masks. (i), (ii) In-plane (|Ex|2) and out-of-plane (|Ez|2) components of the optical field with respect to spatial phase variation. Intensity profiles of the in-plane (|Ex|2) and out-of-plane (|Ez|2) optical field at a horizontal plane 1 nm below the tip (bottom). c (i), (ii) Far-field PL/Raman spectrum (black) and TEPL/TERS spectra of a WSe2 monolayer without SLM (blue) and with optimal wavefront conditions using SLM (a-TEPL, red). d Selective TEPL modulation of intra- and interlayer exciton emission in a WSe2/Mo0.5W0.5Se2 heterobilayer via wavefront sha**. (i) Comparison of normal TEPL and a-TEPL spectra without (gray) and with (red) the optimized phase mask for the IX peak (PMIX). (ii) Comparison between normal TEPL and a-TEPL spectra without (gray) and with (red) the optimized phase mask for the \({{\rm{X}}}_{{{\rm{WSe}}}_{2}}\) peak (PMX). (iii) Simulated exciton density (nx) profiles of WSe2 intralayer excitons (\({{\rm{X}}}_{{{\rm{WSe}}}_{2}}\)) along the \(x\)-axis for two different model phase masks (PM1 and PM2). (iv) Simulated Purcell factors for the in-plane (\({{\rm{X}}}_{{{\rm{WSe}}}_{2}}\), PH) and out-of-plane (IX, PV) dipoles as functions of the dipole position with respect to the tip. e Demonstration of optical switching in a nano-excitonic transistor using a-TEPL spectra of IX and \({{\rm{X}}}_{{{\rm{WSe}}}_{2}}\). These figures demonstrated data units of (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 1), and (1, 1) for the operation of a 2-bit nano-excitonic transistor. f Representation of two-optical bit processing using the four distinct data units from (e) and comparison of the nano-ray disc utilizing a 2-bit nano-excitonic transistor, which has significantly higher data density and capacity, with a traditional Blu-ray disc. a Reproduced with permission167. Copyright [2021] Lee. b Reproduced with permission167. Copyright [2021] Lee. c Reproduced with permission167. Copyright [2021] Lee. d Reproduced with permission168. Copyright [2023] American Chemical Society. e Reproduced with permission168. Copyright [2023] American Chemical Society. f Reproduced with permission168. Copyright [2023] American Chemical Society
In addition, adaptive TERS (a-TERS) experiment was carried out on the same sample to analyze the effects of wavefront sha** on Raman responses as the vibrational modes have different orientation and enhancement mechanism. Figure 7c-(ii) shows the far-field Raman (black) and TERS spectra of a WSe2 monolayer, both with (red) and without (blue) wavefront sha**. The a-TERS intensities of A(M) (asymmetric phonon mode at the M point) and \({A}_{1g}+{E}_{2g}^{1}\) (out-of-plane vibration of Se atoms and in-plane vibration of W and Se atoms) modes were enhanced more than two times in comparison to the TERS signals in the absence of wavefront sha**, while the \({E}_{1g}\) (in-plane vibration of Se atoms) mode was slightly decreased. This result indicates that the phase mask optimization procedure enhances the vibrational modes in the out-of-plane direction \(({A}_{1g})\), but not the in-plane modes \(({E}_{1g})\) 172,173. The authors also point out that the additional enhancement by the wavefront sha** varies between different tips (1.3 ~ 2.5 times compared to normal TERS/TEPL), which is attribute to the nanoscale differences in the tip apex geometry. If the fabrication of identical tip shapes is feasible, it will enable the quantitative analysis of enhancement and field distribution.
In addition to the orientation-dependent enhancement of vibrational modes in a-TERS, selective enhancement of PL spectra for excitons with different dipole orientations has been demonstrated in a WSe2/Mo0.5W0.5Se2 heterostructure, as shown in Fig. 7d-(i), (ii)168. In the heterostructure, a-TEPL can selectively enhance intralayer excitons \({{\rm{X}}}_{{{\rm{WSe}}}_{2}}\) (in-plane dipole orientation) and interlayer excitons IX (out-of-plane dipole orientation) using different phase masks. The mechanism behind the selective control of two PL peaks relies on two aspects, namely, the different spatial distribution of excitons created for different phase masks and distinctive dependencies of radiative emission on in-plane coordinate for intra- and inter-layer excitons. As shown in Fig. 7d-(iii), the simulated spatial distributions of the exciton density are qualitatively different for two model phase masks corresponding to the in-plane (PM1, gray) and out-of-plane (PM2, red) polarized incident light. In addition, the Purcell factors calculated for horizontally (PH) and vertically (PV) oriented dipoles exhibit distinctly different dependencies on the in-plane exciton coordinate, corresponding to different radiative emission rates of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{{\rm{WSe}}}_{2}}\) and IX, as shown in Fig. 7d-(iv). The total a-TEPL response is then evaluated as a convolution of the spatial dependencies for the exciton density and Purcell factor, which yields selective enhancement of X or IX peaks for different phase mask, in agreement with the experimental results. Based on the demonstrated selective modulation of X and IX PL peaks, the authors proposed a conceptual device, an optically controlled nano-excitonic transistor. As shown in Fig. 7e, the proposed device can controllably generate two optical bits of data at the nanoscale. A 2-ternary digit (trit) system can be also developed based on the same idea, where the a-TEPL intensities of \({{\rm{X}}}_{{{\rm{WSe}}}_{2}}\) and IX can be controlled to represent −1, 0, and 1 digits. Furthermore, since the demonstrated approach has few-nm spatial resolution, it allows develo** data storage and processing elements with data capacity exceeding that of a Blu-ray disc by more than 1000 times, as depicted in Fig. 7f. In addition, we envision that the near-field polarization control at the tip can further expand to light-matter interactions in the ultrafast time domain174,175. Notably, fs-pulsed laser excitation at plasmonic tips has been shown to reveal the nanoscale nonlinear optical phenomena in 2D van der Waals materials176,177. Furthermore, recent advancements in ultrafast spatiotemporal light control, utilizing active metasurfaces178 and SLM179, enable ultrafast wavefront manipulation with potential applications in near-field polarization control at the tip in both time and space domains.
In summary, this section provides an overview of the methods to control near-field polarization for enhancing tip-induced light-matter interactions. Strong in-plane enhancement can be enabled by modifying the geometry and structure of the tip, i.e., tilting a conventional tip, fabricating a resonant antenna at the tip end, and integrating a conventional tip with additional nanostructures. Adaptive wavefront sha** using SLM is suggested as a more versatile approach that enables selective enhancement and suppression of the desired optical responses in a conventional tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy scheme without the need for modification of the tip structure. Given that this technique is still in its nascent stages, there is a pressing need for more comprehensive and systematic experiments aimed at characterizing the near-field polarization induced by wavefront sha**. These dedicated efforts are poised to advance our comprehension of adaptive near-field optics, paving the way for a multitude of potential applications and expanded capabilities. The ability to control near-field polarization introduces a new degree of freedom for dynamic all-optical control of low-dimensional quantum materials, which will facilitate the development of novel compact photonic and optoelectronic devices for processing classical and quantum information.
Conclusions
In this comprehensive review, we have delved into the recent advancements in tip-induced control of quantum light-matter interactions at the nanoscale, with a particular focus on its applications in low-dimensional quantum materials. Going beyond the conventional uses of SPM180,181 and tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy20 to overcome optical diffraction limits and improve sensitivity, we explored how incorporating newly developed control functions enables the manipulation of tip-enhanced spectroscopy to precisely influence light-matter interactions at the nanoscale.
Throughout the review, we highlighted three unique approaches for controlling nanoscale light-matter interactions. Firstly, we discussed the tip-induced control of radiative emission via cavity-gap regulation. By carefully adjusting the distance between the tip and the sample with sub-nanometer precision in ambient conditions, researchers demonstrated that the mode volume of the tip-cavity can be dynamically engineered, allowing us to control the radiative decay rate of emitters positioned within the cavity. The controllable tip-cavity mode volume significantly changes the field enhancement and Purcell factor, which in turn modifies the radiative emitting properties of low-dimensional quantum materials, such as dark exciton emission25,182,183 and the coupling strength between the cavity and emitters31,33,184,185.
Secondly, we explored the emerging field of tip-induced control of excitonic behaviors through GPa-scale pressure engineering. In addition to traditional tip indentation methods186,187, we showed how combining this approach with tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy allows us to modify the mechanical and electronic properties of specific nanoscale regions while investigating the structural and optical properties of low-dimensional quantum materials, such as TMD mono- and bi-layers and perovskite QDs.
Lastly, we examined the promising avenue of tip-induced near-field polarization controls and their wide-ranging applications. Traditionally, physical modifications to the tip, such as the tilted-tip method and the fabrication of plasmonic structures, were employed to change the direction of near-field polarization. However, recent advances in adaptive optics techniques have provided more versatile and generalizable approaches, even with normal plasmonic tips. By reconstructing the wavefront of the excitation beam using SLM, researchers demonstrated the ability to achieve arbitrary near-field polarization states at the tip apex. This all-optical near-field polarization control technique selectively enhances or suppresses quantum light-matter interactions, opening up possibilities for various optoelectronic device applications.
In addition to the demonstrated tip-induced control approaches, numerous other methods can be combined with tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy. For instance, magnetic field or force from magnetized tips can manipulate light-matter interactions by tuning the magneto-optical resonance for various systems188,189. Likewise, conductive tips can provide an additional modulation parameter through the local electric field, influencing plasmonic and electronic systems190,191. Furthermore, different approaches can be employed together to manipulate tip-induced light-matter interactions in a hybrid manner, for example, tip-induced hot electron injection into a TMD heterobilayer with modifications to the tip-cavity gap126.
In this review, while our discussions mainly focused on the optical phenomena in the visible and near-infrared (NIR) range, the tip-induced control approaches can also be applied to ultraviolet (UV)192,193, infrared (IR)194,195, and even Terahertz range196,197. Additionally, the tip-induced control approaches can be extended to chemical and biological systems, allowing manipulation of molecular dynamics at the single-molecule level43,198 and influencing photosynthesis in biological materials199,200.
In conclusion, this review showcases the exciting progress in tip-induced control of quantum light-matter interactions at the nanoscale, particularly in the realm of low-dimensional quantum materials. These novel approaches, including cavity-gap control, GPa-scale pressure engineering, and all-optical near-field polarization control, offer promising opportunities for tailoring and manipulating light-matter interactions in nanoscale systems. The insights presented here contribute to advancing the field of nanophotonics and lay the foundation for the development of cutting-edge optoelectronic devices with unprecedented capabilities.
References
Fang, J. Z. et al. Recent advances in low-dimensional semiconductor nanomaterials and their applications in high-performance photodetectors. InfoMat 2, 291–317 (2020).
Zhang, L. et al. High-performance quasi-2D perovskite light-emitting diodes: from materials to devices. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 61 (2021).
Wang, Y. H., Nie, Z. H. & Wang, F. Q. Modulation of photocarrier relaxation dynamics in two-dimensional semiconductors. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 192 (2020).
Chen, J. H. et al. Silica optical fiber integrated with two-dimensional materials: towards opto-electro-mechanical technology. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 78 (2021).
Takagahara, T. & Takeda, K. Theory of the quantum confinement effect on excitons in quantum dots of indirect-gap materials. Phys. Rev. B 46, 15578 (1992).
Latini, S., Olsen, T. & Thygesen, K. S. Excitons in van der Waals heterostructures: the important role of dielectric screening. Phys. Rev. B 92, 245123 (2015).
Butler, S. Z. et al. Progress, challenges, and opportunities in two-dimensional materials beyond graphene. ACS Nano 7, 2898–2926 (2013).
Geim, A. K. Graphene: status and prospects. Science 324, 1530–1534 (2009).
Shen, H. B. et al. Visible quantum dot light-emitting diodes with simultaneous high brightness and efficiency. Nat. Photonics 13, 192–197 (2019).
Lorchat, E. et al. Filtering the photoluminescence spectra of atomically thin semiconductors with graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 283–288 (2020).
Mehdi Pour, M. et al. Laterally extended atomically precise graphene nanoribbons with improved electrical conductivity for efficient gas sensing. Nat. Commun. 8, 820 (2017).
Huang, X. et al. A two-dimensional \(\pi\)–d conjugated coordination polymer with extremely high electrical conductivity and ambipolar transport behaviour. Nat. Commun. 6, 7408 (2015).
Jo, S. et al. Negative differential capacitance in ultrathin ferroelectric hafnia. Nat. Electron. 6, 390–397 (2023).
Ghatge, M. et al. An ultrathin integrated nanoelectromechanical transducer based on hafnium zirconium oxide. Nat. Electron. 2, 506–512 (2019).
Odom, T. W. et al. Atomic structure and electronic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature 391, 62–64 (1998).
Addou, R., Colombo, L. & Wallace, R. M. Surface defects on natural MoS2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 11921–11929 (2015).
Kirmse, H. et al. Transmission electron microscopy investigation of structural properties of self-assembled CdSe/ZnSe quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1329–1331 (1998).
Liu, H. J. et al. Molecular-beam epitaxy of monolayer and bilayer WSe2: a scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy study and deduction of exciton binding energy. 2D Mater. 2, 034004 (2015).
Xu, K., Cao, P. G. & Heath, J. R. Scanning tunneling microscopy characterization of the electrical properties of wrinkles in exfoliated graphene monolayers. Nano Lett. 9, 4446–4451 (2009).
Stöckle, R. M. et al. Nanoscale chemical analysis by tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 318, 131–136 (2000).
Park, K. D. et al. Probing bilayer grain boundaries in large-area graphene with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603601 (2017).
Lee, H. et al. Tip-enhanced photoluminescence nano-spectroscopy and nano-imaging. Nanophotonics 9, 3089–3110 (2020).
Bouhelier, A. et al. Plasmon-coupled tip-enhanced near-field optical microscopy. J. Microsc. 210, 220–224 (2003).
Guzatov, D. V. & Klimov, V. V. Optical properties of a plasmonic nano-antenna: an analytical approach. New J. Phys. 13, 053034 (2011).
Park, K. D. et al. Radiative control of dark excitons at room temperature by nano-optical antenna-tip Purcell effect. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 59–64 (2018).
Hasz, K. et al. Tip-enhanced dark exciton nanoimaging and local strain control in monolayer WSe2. Nano Lett. 23, 198–204 (2023).
Zhou, J. Z. et al. Near-field coupling with a nanoimprinted probe for dark exciton nanoimaging in monolayer WSe2. Nano Lett. 23, 4901–4907 (2023).
Koo, Y. et al. Tip-induced nano-engineering of strain, bandgap, and exciton funneling in 2D semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 33, 2008234 (2021).
Lee, H. et al. Drift-dominant exciton funneling and trion conversion in 2D semiconductors on the nanogap. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5236 (2022).
Shao, J. Q. et al. Probing nanoscale exciton funneling at wrinkles of twisted bilayer MoS2 using tip-enhanced photoluminescence microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 3304–3309 (2022).
Park, K. D. et al. Tip-enhanced strong coupling spectroscopy, imaging, and control of a single quantum emitter. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav5931 (2019).
May, M. A. et al. Nano-Cavity QED with tunable nano-tip interaction. Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 1900087 (2020).
Groß, H. et al. Near-field strong coupling of single quantum dots. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4906 (2018).
Maryam, W. et al. Dynamics of a vertical cavity quantum cascade phonon laser structure. Nat. Commun. 4, 2184 (2013).
Higashitarumizu, N. et al. Long operating lifetime mid-infrared LEDs based on black phosphorus. Nat. Commun. 14, 4845 (2023).
Istrati, D. et al. Sequential generation of linear cluster states from a single photon emitter. Nat. Commun. 11, 5501 (2020).
Gao, Y. et al. Photon-trap** microstructures enable high-speed high-efficiency silicon photodiodes. Nat. Photonics 11, 301–308 (2017).
Li, W. B. et al. Light-activated interlayer contraction in two-dimensional perovskites for high-efficiency solar cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 45–52 (2022).
Huang, S. X. et al. Ultrasmall mode volumes in plasmonic cavities of nanoparticle-on-mirror structures. Small 12, 5190–5199 (2016).
Jakob, L. A. et al. Giant optomechanical spring effect in plasmonic nano-and picocavities probed by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Nat. Commun. 14, 3291 (2023).
Chen, W. et al. Probing the limits of plasmonic enhancement using a two-dimensional atomic crystal probe. Light Sci. Appl. 7, 56 (2018).
Kleemann, M. E. et al. Strong-coupling of WSe2 in ultra-compact plasmonic nanocavities at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 8, 1296 (2017).
Chikkaraddy, R. et al. Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities. Nature 535, 127–130 (2016).
Zhang, C. et al. Switching plasmonic nanogaps between classical and quantum regimes with supramolecular interactions. Sci. Adv. 8, eabj9752 (2022).
Kinkhabwala, A. et al. Large single-molecule fluorescence enhancements produced by a bowtie nanoantenna. Nat. Photonics 3, 654–657 (2009).
Chen, X. D. et al. Focusing the electromagnetic field to 10−6 \(\lambda\) for ultra-high enhancement of field-matter interaction. Nat. Commun. 12, 6389 (2021).
Bitton, O. et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting of a dark plasmonic cavity mode revealed by fast electrons. Nat. Commun. 11, 487 (2020).
Luo, Y. et al. Purcell-enhanced quantum yield from carbon nanotube excitons coupled to plasmonic nanocavities. Nat. Commun. 8, 1413 (2017).
Gupta, S. N. et al. Complex plasmon-exciton dynamics revealed through quantum dot light emission in a nanocavity. Nat. Commun. 12, 1310 (2021).
Hu, S. R. et al. Experimental realization of deep-subwavelength confinement in dielectric optical resonators. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat2355 (2018).
Fromm, D. P. et al. Gap-dependent optical coupling of single “bowtie” nanoantennas resonant in the visible. Nano Lett. 4, 957–961 (2004).
Chen, X. S. et al. Atomic layer lithography of wafer-scale nanogap arrays for extreme confinement of electromagnetic waves. Nat. Commun. 4, 2361 (2013).
Ward, D. R. et al. Optical rectification and field enhancement in a plasmonic nanogap. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 732–736 (2010).
Lee, H. et al. All-optical control of high-purity trions in nanoscale waveguide. Nat. Commun. 14, 1891 (2023).
Nam, J. M. et al. Plasmonic nanogap-enhanced Raman scattering with nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2746–2755 (2016).
Lim, D. K. et al. Nanogap-engineerable Raman-active nanodumbbells for single-molecule detection. Nat. Mater. 9, 60–67 (2010).
Regmi, R. et al. All-dielectric silicon nanogap antennas to enhance the fluorescence of single molecules. Nano Lett. 16, 5143–5151 (2016).
Oh, Y. J. & Jeong, K. H. Glass nanopillar arrays with nanogap-rich silver nanoislands for highly intense surface enhanced Raman scattering. Adv. Mater. 24, 2234–2237 (2012).
Li, Q. T. et al. A Purcell-enabled monolayer semiconductor free-space optical modulator. Nat. Photonics 17, 897–903 (2023).
Akselrod, G. M. et al. Probing the mechanisms of large Purcell enhancement in plasmonic nanoantennas. Nat. Photonics 8, 835–840 (2014).
Hoang, T. B. et al. Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas. Nat. Commun. 6, 7788 (2015).
Wang, Z. et al. Giant photoluminescence enhancement in tungsten-diselenide–gold plasmonic hybrid structures. Nat. Commun. 7, 11283 (2016).
Kongsuwan, N. et al. Suppressed quenching and strong-coupling of Purcell-enhanced single-molecule emission in plasmonic nanocavities. ACS Photonics 5, 186–191 (2018).
Vesseur, E. J. R., de Abajo, F. J. G. & Polman, A. Broadband Purcell enhancement in plasmonic ring cavities. Phys. Rev. B 82, 165419 (2010).
Ji, B. T. et al. Non-blinking quantum dot with a plasmonic nanoshell resonator. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 170–175 (2015).
Du, B. W. et al. Polarization-dependent Purcell enhancement on a two-dimensional h-BN/WS2 light emitter with a dielectric plasmonic nanocavity. Nano Lett. 22, 1649–1655 (2022).
Muskens, O. L. et al. Strong enhancement of the radiative decay rate of emitters by single plasmonic nanoantennas. Nano Lett. 7, 2871–2875 (2007).
Russell, K. J. et al. Large spontaneous emission enhancement in plasmonic nanocavities. Nat. Photonics 6, 459–462 (2012).
Dhawan, A. R. et al. Extreme multiexciton emission from deterministically assembled single-emitter subwavelength plasmonic patch antennas. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 33 (2020).
Kim, W. G. et al. Three-dimensional plasmonic nanocluster-driven light–matter interaction for photoluminescence enhancement and picomolar-level biosensing. Nano Lett. 22, 4702–4711 (2022).
Faggiani, R., Yang, J. J. & Lalanne, P. Quenching, plasmonic, and radiative decays in nanogap emitting devices. ACS Photonics 2, 1739–1744 (2015).
Teperik, T. V., Popov, V. V. & de Abajo, F. J. G. Radiative decay of plasmons in a metallic nanoshell. Phys. Rev. B 69, 155402 (2004).
Rose, A. et al. Control of radiative processes using tunable plasmonic nanopatch antennas. Nano Lett. 14, 4797–4802 (2014).
Wang, J. Z. et al. Strong vibrational coupling in room temperature plasmonic resonators. Nat. Commun. 10, 1527 (2019).
Mueller, N. S. et al. Deep strong light–matter coupling in plasmonic nanoparticle crystals. Nature 583, 780–784 (2020).
Wen, B. Y. et al. Manipulating the light-matter interactions in plasmonic nanocavities at 1 nm spatial resolution. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 235 (2022).
**ang, B. et al. Intermolecular vibrational energy transfer enabled by microcavity strong light–matter coupling. Science 368, 665–667 (2020).
Väkeväinen, A. I. et al. Plasmonic surface lattice resonances at the strong coupling regime. Nano Lett. 14, 1721–1727 (2014).
Hou, S. Y. et al. Manipulating coherent light–matter interaction: continuous transition between strong coupling and weak coupling in MoS2 monolayer coupled with plasmonic nanocavities. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1900857 (2019).
Salomon, A. et al. Strong light-molecule coupling on plasmonic arrays of different symmetry. ChemPhysChem 14, 1882–1886 (2013).
Park, K. D. et al. Hybrid tip-enhanced nanospectroscopy and nanoimaging of monolayer WSe2 with local strain control. Nano Lett. 16, 2621–2627 (2016).
Park, W. H. & Kim, Z. H. Charge transfer enhancement in the SERS of a single molecule. Nano Lett. 10, 4040–4048 (2010).
Zhu, W. Q. et al. Quantum mechanical effects in plasmonic structures with subnanometre gaps. Nat. Commun. 7, 11495 (2016).
Kravtsov, V. et al. Control of plasmon emission and dynamics at the transition from classical to quantum coupling. Nano Lett. 14, 5270–5275 (2014).
Mortensen, N. A. et al. A generalized non-local optical response theory for plasmonic nanostructures. Nat. Commun. 5, 3809 (2014).
May, M. A. et al. Nanocavity clock spectroscopy: resolving competing exciton dynamics in WSe2/MoSe2 heterobilayers. Nano Lett. 21, 522–528 (2021).
Zhang, M. et al. Observation of ultra-large Rabi splitting in the plasmon-exciton polaritons at room temperature. Nanophotonics 12, 3267–3275 (2023).
Berghuis, A. M. et al. Light–matter coupling strength controlled by the orientation of organic crystals in plasmonic cavities. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 12030–12038 (2020).
Cui, G. Q. & Raymer, M. G. Emission spectra and quantum efficiency of single-photon sources in the cavity-QED strong-coupling regime. Phys. Rev. A 73, 053807 (2006).
He, Z. et al. Quantum plasmonic control of trions in a picocavity with monolayer WS2. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau8763 (2019).
Huang, S. et al. Identifying single bases in a DNA oligomer with electron tunnelling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 868–873 (2010).
Zhang, B. T. et al. Electronic conductance resonance in non-redox-active proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 6432–6438 (2020).
Kang, M. et al. Conformational heterogeneity of molecules physisorbed on a gold surface at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 13, 4133 (2022).
Tang, L. H. et al. Combined quantum tunnelling and dielectrophoretic trap** for molecular analysis at ultra-low analyte concentrations. Nat. Commun. 12, 913 (2021).
Tang, L. H. et al. Measuring conductance switching in single proteins using quantum tunneling. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm8149 (2022).
Hutchison, J. A. et al. Modifying chemical landscapes by coupling to vacuum fields. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 1592–1596 (2012).
Hennessy, K. et al. Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot–cavity system. Nature 445, 896–899 (2007).
Peng, Z. W. et al. Strain engineering of 2D semiconductors and graphene: from strain fields to band-structure tuning and photonic applications. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 190 (2020).
Shen, T. T., Penumatcha, A. V. & Appenzeller, J. Strain engineering for transition metal dichalcogenides based field effect transistors. ACS Nano 10, 4712–4718 (2016).
Qi, J. J. et al. Piezoelectric effect in chemical vapour deposition-grown atomic-monolayer triangular molybdenum disulfide piezotronics. Nat. Commun. 6, 7430 (2015).
Steele, J. A. et al. Thermal unequilibrium of strained black CsPbI3 thin films. Science 365, 679–684 (2019).
**ao, Z. G. et al. Solvent annealing of perovskite‐induced crystal growth for photovoltaic‐device efficiency enhancement. Adv. Mater. 26, 6503–6509 (2014).
Cao, Y. et al. Pressure-induced emission enhancements of Mn2+-doped cesium lead chloride perovskite nanocrystals. ACS Mater. Lett. 2, 381–388 (2020).
Liu, G. et al. Isothermal pressure-derived metastable states in 2D hybrid perovskites showing enduring bandgap narrowing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8076–8081 (2018).
Zhang, Z. X. et al. Uniaxial strain and hydrostatic pressure engineering of the hidden magnetism in La1-xCaxMnO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1/2) thin films. Nano Lett. 22, 7328–7335 (2022).
Yan, H. et al. Sterically controlled mechanochemistry under hydrostatic pressure. Nature 554, 505–510 (2018).
Lee, J. et al. Switchable, tunable, and directable exciton funneling in periodically wrinkled WS2. Nano Lett. 21, 43–50 (2021).
Chen, Y. M. et al. Strain engineering and epitaxial stabilization of halide perovskites. Nature 577, 209–215 (2020).
Desai, S. B. et al. Strain-induced indirect to direct bandgap transition in multilayer WSe2. Nano Lett. 14, 4592–4597 (2014).
Li, Z. W. et al. Efficient strain modulation of 2D materials via polymer encapsulation. Nat. Commun. 11, 1151 (2020).
Yang, S. X. et al. Tuning the optical, magnetic, and electrical properties of ReSe2 by nanoscale strain engineering. Nano Lett. 15, 1660–1666 (2015).
Song, S. et al. Room temperature semiconductor–metal transition of MoTe2 thin films engineered by strain. Nano Lett. 16, 188–193 (2016).
Chen, B. et al. Large electrostrictive response in lead halide perovskites. Nat. Mater. 17, 1020–1026 (2018).
Lee, C. et al. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385–388 (2008).
Zhang, Y. Q. et al. Intriguing heterophase domain patterns in correlated electron material via tip force engineering. Acta Mater. 235, 118089 (2022).
Roy, R., Nečas, D. & Zajíčková, L. Evidence of flexoelectricity in graphene nanobubbles created by tip induced electric field. Carbon 179, 677–682 (2021).
Manzeli, S. et al. Piezoresistivity and strain-induced band gap tuning in atomically thin MoS2. Nano Lett. 15, 5330–5335 (2015).
Ko, W. et al. Tip-induced local strain on MoS2/graphite detected by inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 97, 125401 (2018).
Alyabyeva, N. et al. Metal-insulator transition in V2O3 thin film caused by tip-induced strain. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 241603 (2018).
Zhou, Y. Q. et al. Tip-induced in-plane ferroelectric superstructure in zigzag-wrinkled BaTiO3 thin films. Nano Lett. 22, 2859–2866 (2022).
Klimov, N. N. et al. Electromechanical properties of graphene drumheads. Science 336, 1557–1561 (2012).
Lu, H. et al. Mechanical writing of ferroelectric polarization. Science 336, 59–61 (2012).
Wang, Y. L. et al. Strain-induced direct–indirect bandgap transition and phonon modulation in monolayer WS2. Nano Res. 8, 2562–2572 (2015).
Sun, Z. et al. Stress-induced bandgap renormalization in atomic crystals. Solid State Commun. 288, 18–21 (2019).
Lee, H. et al. Tip-induced strain engineering of a single metal halide perovskite quantum dot. ACS Nano 15, 9057–9064 (2021).
Nickel, R. et al. Nanoscale size effects on push–pull Fe–O hybridization through the multiferroic transition of perovskite ϵ-Fe2O3. Nano Lett. 23, 7845–7851 (2023).
Bauer, S. & Bobisch, C. A. Nanoscale electron transport at the surface of a topological insulator. Nat. Commun. 7, 11381 (2016).
Yuan, R. H. et al. Nanoscale phase separation of antiferromagnetic order and superconductivity in K0.75Fe1.75Se2. Sci. Rep. 2, 221 (2012).
Koo, Y. et al. Tunable interlayer excitons and switchable interlayer trions via dynamic near-field cavity. Light Sci. Appl. 12, 59 (2023).
Young, A. B. et al. Polarization engineering in photonic crystal waveguides for spin-photon entanglers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153901 (2015).
Strauf, S. et al. High-frequency single-photon source with polarization control. Nat. Photonics 1, 704–708 (2007).
Shitrit, N. et al. Spin-optical metamaterial route to spin-controlled photonics. Science 340, 724–726 (2013).
Lin, J. et al. Polarization-controlled tunable directional coupling of surface plasmon polaritons. Science 340, 331–334 (2013).
Sukharev, M. & Seideman, T. Phase and polarization control as a route to plasmonic nanodevices. Nano Lett. 6, 715–719 (2006).
Karimi, E. et al. Generating optical orbital angular momentum at visible wavelengths using a plasmonic metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 3, e167 (2014).
Chen, Y. J. et al. Valley-polarized exciton–polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor. Nat. Photonics 11, 431–435 (2017).
Liu, C. et al. Polarization‐resolved broadband MoS2/black phosphorus/MoS2 optoelectronic memory with ultralong retention time and ultrahigh switching ratio. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2100781 (2021).
Yao, W., **ao, D. & Niu, Q. Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. B 77, 235406 (2008).
Wu, J. X. et al. Identifying the crystalline orientation of black phosphorus using angle‐resolved polarized Raman spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2366–2369 (2015).
Guan, M. L. et al. Polarization modulation with optical lock-in detection reveals universal fluorescence anisotropy of subcellular structures in live cells. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 4 (2022).
Kim, J. et al. Anomalous polarization dependence of Raman scattering and crystallographic orientation of black phosphorus. Nanoscale 7, 18708–18715 (2015).
Robert, C. et al. Spin/valley pum** of resident electrons in WSe2 and WS2 monolayers. Nat. Commun. 12, 5455 (2021).
Da̧browski, M. et al. All-optical control of spin in a 2D van der Waals magnet. Nat. Commun. 13, 5976 (2022).
Islam, R. et al. Tunable spin polarization and electronic structure of bottom-up synthesized MoSi2N4 materials. Phys. Rev. B 104, L201112 (2021).
Li, L. et al. Highly in‐plane anisotropic 2D GeAs2 for polarization‐sensitive photodetection. Adv. Mater. 30, 1804541 (2018).
Rivera, P. et al. Valley-polarized exciton dynamics in a 2D semiconductor heterostructure. Science 351, 688–691 (2016).
Liu, X. Y. et al. WS2/hBN hetero-nanoslits with spatially mismatched electromagnetic multipoles for directional and enhanced light emission. ACS Nano 16, 675–682 (2022).
Li, Y. B. et al. Dimensional reduction of Cs2AgBiBr6: a 2D hybrid double perovskite with strong polarization sensitivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 3429–3433 (2020).
Zakharko, Y., Graf, A. & Zaumseil, J. Plasmonic crystals for strong light–matter coupling in carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 16, 6504–6510 (2016).
Schietinger, S. et al. Plasmon-enhanced single photon emission from a nanoassembled metal–diamond hybrid structure at room temperature. Nano Lett. 9, 1694–1698 (2009).
Liu, X. J. et al. Near-field modulation of differently oriented single photon emitters with a plasmonic probe. Nano Lett. 22, 2244–2250 (2022).
Ge, D. D. et al. Hybrid plasmonic nano-emitters with controlled single quantum emitter positioning on the local excitation field. Nat. Commun. 11, 3414 (2020).
Liu, E. F. et al. Excitonic and valley-polarization signatures of fractional correlated electronic phases in a WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 037402 (2021).
Miao, S. N. et al. Strong interaction between interlayer excitons and correlated electrons in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattice. Nat. Commun. 12, 3608 (2021).
Yu, H. Y. & Yao, W. Luminescence anomaly of dipolar valley excitons in homobilayer semiconductor moiré superlattices. Phys. Rev. X 11, 021042 (2021).
Torun, E. et al. Interlayer and intralayer excitons in MoS2/WS2 and MoSe2/WSe2 heterobilayers. Phys. Rev. B 97, 245427 (2018).
Park, K. D. & Raschke, M. B. Polarization control with plasmonic antenna tips: a universal approach to optical nanocrystallography and vector-field imaging. Nano Lett. 18, 2912–2917 (2018).
Sanders, A. et al. Understanding the plasmonics of nanostructured atomic force microscopy tips. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 153110 (2016).
Fiebig, M. et al. Probing of ferroelectric surface and bulk domains in RMnO3 (R=Y, Ho) by second harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. B 66, 144102 (2002).
Neacsu, C. C. et al. Second-harmonic near-field imaging of ferroelectric domain structure of YMnO3. Phys. Rev. B 79, 100107 (2009).
Krasnok, A. E. et al. Optical nanoantennas. Phys. Usp. 56, 539–564 (2013).
Singh, A., Calbris, G. & van Hulst, N. F. Vectorial nanoscale map** of optical antenna fields by single molecule dipoles. Nano Lett. 14, 4715–4723 (2014).
Sick, B., Hecht, B. & Novotny, L. Orientational imaging of single molecules by annular illumination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4482–4485 (2000).
Novotny, L. et al. Longitudinal field modes probed by single molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5251–5254 (2001).
Lee, H. et al. Inducing and probing localized excitons in atomically thin semiconductors via tip‐enhanced cavity‐spectroscopy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2102893 (2021).
Kern, J. et al. Nanoscale positioning of single‐photon emitters in atomically thin WSe2. Adv. Mater. 28, 7101–7105 (2016).
Lee, D. Y. et al. Adaptive tip-enhanced nano-spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 12, 3465 (2021).
Koo, Y. et al. Nanocavity-integrated van der Waals heterobilayers for nano-excitonic transistor. ACS Nano 17, 4854–4861 (2023).
Vellekoop, I. M. & Mosk, A. P. Phase control algorithms for focusing light through turbid media. Opt. Commun. 281, 3071–3080 (2008).
Gjonaj, B. et al. Active spatial control of plasmonic fields. Nat. Photonics 5, 360–363 (2011).
Man, Z. S. et al. Dynamic plasmonic beam sha** by vector beams with arbitrary locally linear polarization states. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 011110 (2014).
Sahin, H. et al. Anomalous Raman spectra and thickness-dependent electronic properties of WSe2. Phys. Rev. B 87, 165409 (2013).
Del Corro, E. et al. Excited excitonic states in 1L, 2L, 3L, and bulk WSe2 observed by resonant Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano 8, 9629–9635 (2014).
Mogi, H. et al. Ultrafast nanoscale exciton dynamics via laser-combined scanning tunneling microscopy in atomically thin materials. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 6, 72 (2022).
Román, R. J. P. et al. Tip-induced and electrical control of the photoluminescence yield of monolayer WS2. Nano Lett. 22, 9244–9251 (2022).
Kravtsov, V. et al. Plasmonic nanofocused four-wave mixing for femtosecond near-field imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 459–464 (2016).
Luo, W. J. et al. Ultrafast nanoimaging of electronic coherence of monolayer WSe2. Nano Lett. 23, 1767–1773 (2023).
Shaltout, A. M. et al. Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces. Science 364, eaat3100 (2019).
Park, J. et al. All-solid-state spatial light modulator with independent phase and amplitude control for three-dimensional LiDAR applications. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 69–76 (2021).
Binnig, G., Quate, C. F. & Gerber, C. Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930–933 (1986).
Tersoff, J. & Hamann, D. R. Theory and application for the scanning tunneling microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1998–2001 (1983).
Zhou, Y. et al. Probing dark excitons in atomically thin semiconductors via near-field coupling to surface plasmon polaritons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 856–860 (2017).
Madéo, J. et al. Directly visualizing the momentum-forbidden dark excitons and their dynamics in atomically thin semiconductors. Science 370, 1199–1204 (2020).
Reithmaier, J. P. et al. Strong coupling in a single quantum dot–semiconductor microcavity system. Nature 432, 197–200 (2004).
Peter, E. et al. Exciton-photon strong-coupling regime for a single quantum dot embedded in a microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 067401 (2005).
Li, Q. S. et al. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 374, 609–613 (2008).
Falin, A. et al. Mechanical properties of atomically thin tungsten dichalcogenides: WS2, WSe2, and WTe2. ACS Nano 15, 2600–2610 (2021).
Reitzenstein, S. et al. Control of the strong light-matter interaction between an elongated In0.3Ga0.7As quantum dot and a micropillar cavity using external magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 127401 (2009).
Rajabali, S. et al. Polaritonic nonlocality in light–matter interaction. Nat. Photonics 15, 690–695 (2021).
Kolosov, O. et al. Nanoscale visualization and control of ferroelectric domains by atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4309–4312 (1995).
Kim, J. H. et al. Nontrivial, unconventional electrochromic behaviors of plasmonic nanocubes. Nano Lett. 21, 7512–7518 (2021).
Taguchi, A. et al. Deep‐UV tip‐enhanced Raman scattering. J. Raman Spectrosc. 40, 1324–1330 (2009).
Elias, C. et al. Flat bands and giant light-matter interaction in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 137401 (2021).
Ma, W. L. et al. In-plane anisotropic and ultra-low-loss polaritons in a natural van der Waals crystal. Nature 562, 557–562 (2018).
Huth, F. et al. Resonant antenna probes for tip-enhanced infrared near-field microscopy. Nano Lett. 13, 1065–1072 (2013).
Ladani, F. T. & Potma, E. O. Dyadic Green’s function formalism for photoinduced forces in tip-sample nanojunctions. Phys. Rev. B 95, 205440 (2017).
Zhang, J. W. et al. Terahertz nanoimaging of graphene. ACS Photonics 5, 2645–2651 (2018).
Jahng, J. et al. Direct chemical imaging of ligand-functionalized single nanoparticles by photoinduced force microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 5785–5791 (2020).
Romero, E. et al. Quantum coherence in photosynthesis for efficient solar-energy conversion. Nat. Phys. 10, 676–682 (2014).
Romero, E., Novoderezhkin, V. I. & van Grondelle, R. Quantum design of photosynthesis for bio-inspired solar-energy conversion. Nature 543, 355–365 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the projects of 2020R1C1C101130114, 2022M3H4A1A0409639611, SSTP-BA2102-05, RS-2022-00164799, 2023-22030003-30, 2021R1A6A1A1004294413, 2019-0-00005, and RS-2023-00258359. V.K. acknowledges support from Priority 2030 Federal Academic Leadership Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.K., T.M., M.K., H.J., C.L., H.L., V.K., and K.-D.P. wrote the manuscript. K.-D.P. supervised this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Koo, Y., Moon, T., Kang, M. et al. Dynamical control of nanoscale light-matter interactions in low-dimensional quantum materials. Light Sci Appl 13, 30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-024-01380-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-024-01380-x
- Springer Nature Limited