1 Introduction

The plant-based foods that we eat not only provide macronutrients (proteins and carbohydrates) and micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) but also phytochemicals like phenolics and flavonoids. The latter are bioactive non-nutrient chemicals present in fruits, vegetables, legumes, and other plants, which they often accumulate under different biotic and abiotic stresses. A growing body of evidence suggests that the potential benefits of antioxidant capacity inherent in phytochemicals in fruits and vegetables may be even more significant than currently acknowledged. This is because oxidative stress caused by free radicals is implicated in the genesis of a wide range of non-communicable chronic disorders like cancer, obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, to name a few [1, 2]. Phytochemicals are classified as phenolics, nitrogen-containing compounds, carotenoids, terpenoids, and sulfur-containing compounds. Phenolic acids and flavonoids (flavone, isoflavone, flavanol, flavonol, flavonone, anthocyanidin) (Fig. 1), are the most studied phytochemicals owing to their vast structural and functional diversity. These phytochemicals and their synthetic derivatives have shown beneficial biological activities, such as anticancer, antifungal, antibacterial, and antioxidant activities [3]. Their antioxidant activity is linked to the structure, length of the side chain, and substitutions on the aromatic ring [4]. However, in the current era where consumption of isolated dietary supplements is more prevalent, it cannot be overemphasized that the same compounds can become toxic or antagonistic if consumed in excess or wrong combinations. In this context, wisdom lies in their intake via the food matrix, where the individual concentrations of the nutraceuticals are balanced.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Basic flavan structure and chemical structures of flavonoid subgroups. Structures are drawn using Marvin sketch software

In our body, cellular respiration, protein folding, and some metabolic activities constantly produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydroxyl radicals, superoxide anions, and singlet oxygen, which are essential for various signalling pathways and regulation of physiological activities. But, in the case of redox imbalance, excessive ROS can be harmful and cause oxidative stress, which can trigger inflammation or lead to chronic diseases [5]. According to epidemiological reports, regular intake of fruits and vegetables has been related to a lower risk of diseases, often heralded by this redox imbalance. Phytochemical extracts from vegetables and fruits have potent antioxidant and antiproliferative properties, and the majority of overall antioxidant activity comes from the combination of phytochemicals. Their strong antioxidant activity is often implicated to their additive and synergistic effects [1].

As a concept, food synergy highlights the positive interactions between nutrients and/or nutraceuticals, their absorption, and bioavailability in human body. It emphasizes the interaction of nutrients in various foods rather than a single component present therein. For example, green tea and black pepper were reported to have a synergistic effect, increasing the bioavailability of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a compound present in green tea [6]. It is important to remember that phytochemicals may still cause cytotoxicity. The cytotoxic effects of phytochemicals may be worsened by excessive dosageor incompatible interactions. Because of these reasons, it is preferable to obtain bioactive compounds from whole plant-based foods that contain low-dose phytochemicals and have a generally favorable safety profile [7].

Plants growing in desert regions face harsh environmental conditions like excessive temperatures and low rainfall, and therefore accumulate unique anti-stress metabolites to combat the same [8]. Studies on synergistic interactions between traditional food combinations from the (semi) arid zones are missing. For this, five foods from three different categories, including Prosopis cineraria and Acacia senegal (legumes), Capparis decidua and Cordia dichotoma (non-legume), and Mangifera indica (fruit), were selected (Fig. 2). These plants are found in different regions worldwide and fruits/vegetables derived from them are dried/processed, and traditionally consumed in the arid and semi-arid parts of Indian subcontinent and Western Asia in different combinations, like ker-sangri (Capparis decidua-Prosopis cineraria), ‘Panchkuta’ (combination of all five above-mentioned plants), etc. Indigenous communities (such as the Bishnoi in Rajasthan, India) have been known to protect these plants/trees, particularly Prosopis cineraria, since ancient times. However, apart from corroboration through ethnic dietary practices, there is no scientific evidence till date on whether these foods have any synergistic effects. The objective of the current study is to investigate interactions between phenolic bioactives in the food matrix in order to scientifically validate the antioxidant synergy in traditional food combinations of the (semi) arid regions, by employing multi-mechanistic antioxidant assays.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Dried edible parts of the five selected semi (arid) zone plants from India

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Chemicals and reagents

DPPH, ascorbic acid, quercetin, ferric chloride (FeCl3), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium nitrite, and sodium carbonate were purchased from HiMedia (Mumbai, India), methanol, aluminium chloride, sodium acetate, and Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (FCR) were obtained from Sigma Company (United States), glacial acetic acid and 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ) were purchased from SRL (Mumbai, India).

2.2 Sample collection and extraction

Commercially available dried pods of Prosopis cineraria (PC; Local name in Rajasthan: Sangri), berries of Capparis decidua (CD; Local name in Rajasthan: Ker), seeds of Acacia senegal (AS; Local name in Rajasthan: Kumatiya), the fruit of Cordia dichotoma (CDI; Local name in Rajasthan: Lasora), and pulp of Mangifera indica (MI; Mango) were purchased from a local grocery store (Nagaur district, Rajasthan, India; N 27° 11′ 55.0644″, E 73° 44′ 4.9848″).

2.2.1 Sample preparation and extraction

The dried edible parts were powdered using a Waring blender. For each plant, 10 g of the dry powder was extracted with 80% methanol (1:5 w/v) at room temperature (1 h) in an orbital shaker incubator. The samples were further centrifuged at 3000×g for 10 min. The supernatant was filtered with a filter paper (Whatman). This step was performed twice, followed by concentrating the pooled supernatants to dryness using a rotary evaporator (Aditya Scientific, India). The resulting extracts were stored at 4 °C for further analysis.

2.3 Evaluation of antioxidant activity

Different concentrations of methanolic extracts were prepared to evaluate their antioxidant activities. For binary combinations, the food extracts were mixed in a 1:1 (v/v) ratio. Individual extracts were twofold diluted before testing.

2.3.1 Total phenolic content (TPC)

The TPC was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method described by Tsao et al. [9] and Wang et al. [10] with some modifications. Briefly, 1 ml of the FCR (Folin–Ciocalteu Reagent) and 0.8 ml of 7.5% sodium carbonate were mixed with 0.2 ml of the extract. After gently shaking, the mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and the absorbance was recorded at 765 nm. A standard curve of gallic acid was prepared (50–250 μg/ml), and the TPC values were expressed as micrograms of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram of sample. All tests were performed in triplicates.

2.3.2 Total flavonoid content (TFC)

The TFC was calculated by the Aluminum chloride colorimetric assay described by John et al. [11]. Briefly, in a flask containing 4 ml distilled water, an aliquot (1 ml) of extracts or standard solutions of quercetin (200–1000 μg/ml) was added. To the flask was added 0.30 ml 5% NaNO2, followed by 0.30 ml 10% AlCl3 after 5 min. Further, 2 ml of 1 M NaOH was added after five minutes, and the volume was adjusted to 10 ml with distilled water. After shaking absorbance of the sample was read at 510 nm. The TFC values were expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents (QE) per g of sample. All tests were performed in triplicates.

2.3.3 DPPH free radical scavenging assay

The DPPH assay was performed as described by Hidalgo et al. [12]. A 100 μM DPPH solution was prepared in methanol, and to 290 μl of this solution, 10 μl of individual food extract or extract combination was added. The concentration of methanolic extracts ranged between 0.5 and 2.5 mg/ml (final concentration). The above reactions were carried out in a 96-well microplate, followed by incubation in the dark at room temperature for 1 h, and absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO). The percentage DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated using the following equation:

$$Inhibition\;\% = \frac{{A_{c} - A_{s} }}{{A_{c} }},$$

where Ac represents the absorbance of the control while As represents that of the sample. Solution devoid of the sample was taken as control. The results were expressed as EC50 (μM) obtained by plotting a graph between concentration and inhibition percentage.

2.3.4 FRAP assay

The FRAP assay was performed using the protocol described by earlier researchers [

Data availability

The datasets generated in present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TPC:

Total phenolic content

TFC:

Total flavonoid content

DPPH:

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate

FRAP:

Ferric ion reducing antioxidant power

EAC:

Experimental antioxidant capacity

TAC:

Theoretical antioxidant capacity

SE:

Synergy effect

References

  1. Liu RH. Health benefits of fruit and vegetables are from additive and synergistic combinations of phytochemicals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:517S-520S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/78.3.517S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu RH. Potential synergy of phytochemicals in cancer prevention: mechanism of action. J Nutr. 2004;134:3479S-3485S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.12.3479S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaradat N. Phytochemistry, traditional uses and biological effects of the desert plant Styrax officinalis L. J Arid Environ. 2020;182: 104253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mathew S, Abraham TE, Zakaria ZA. Reactivity of phenolic compounds towards free radicals under in vitro conditions. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52:5790–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1704-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Li H, Zhang B, Deng Z. The synergistic and antagonistic antioxidant interactions of dietary phytochemical combinations. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;62:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1888693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Natarajan TD, Ramasamy JR, Palanisamy K. Nutraceutical potentials of synergic foods: a systematic review. J Ethn Foods. 2019;6:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-019-0033-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapinova A, Stefanicka P, Kubatka P, et al. Are plant-based functional foods better choice against cancer than single phytochemicals? A critical review of current breast cancer research. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;96:1465–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Asati V, Deepa PR, Sharma PK. Silent metabolism and not-so-silent biological activity: possible molecular mechanisms of stress response in edible desert legumes. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2021;30:640–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-021-00728-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsao R, Yang R, Young JC, Zhu H. Polyphenolic profiles in eight apple cultivars using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:6347–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0346298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang S, Meckling KA, Marcone MF, et al. Synergistic, additive, and antagonistic effects of food mixtures on total antioxidant capacities. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:960–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf1040977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. John B, Sulaiman CT, George S, Reddy VRK. Total phenolics and flavonoids in selected medicinal plants from Kerala. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;6:406–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hidalgo M, Sánchez-Moreno C, de Pascual-Teresa S. Flavonoid–flavonoid interaction and its effect on their antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2010;121:691–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsao R, Yang R, **e S, et al. Which polyphenolic compounds contribute to the total antioxidant activities of apple? J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:4989–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf048289h.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. The Ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hajimehdipoor H, Shahrestani R, Shekarchi M. Investigating the synergistic antioxidant effects of some flavonoid and phenolic compounds. Res J Pharmacogn. 2014;1:35–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zanfini A, Corbini G, La Rosa C, Dreassi E. Antioxidant activity of tomato lipophilic extracts and interactions between carotenoids and α-tocopherol in synthetic mixtures. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2010;43:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.06.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Olszowy M. Synergistic, antagonistic and additive antioxidant effects in the binary mixtures. Phytochem Rev. 2020;19:63–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-019-09658-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Piluzza G, Bullitta S. Correlations between phenolic content and antioxidant properties in twenty-four plant species of traditional ethnoveterinary use in the Mediterranean area. Pharm Biol. 2011;49:240–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2010.501083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar A, Nirmal P, Kumar M, et al. Major phytochemicals: recent advances in health benefits and extraction method. Molecules. 2023;28:887. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Phytochemical CS. In vitro free radical scavenging and antimicrobial activity of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2015;4:102–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coward L, Barnes NC, Setchell KDR, Barnes S. Genistein, daidzein, and their.beta.-glycoside conjugates: antitumor isoflavones in soybean foods from American and Asian diets. J Agric Food Chem. 1993;41:1961–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00035a027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Křížová L, Dadáková K, Kašparovská J, Kašparovský T. Isoflavones. Molecules. 2019;24:1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz-Larrea MB, Mohan AR, Paganga G, et al. Antioxidant activity of phytoestrogenic isoflavones. Free Radic Res. 1997;26:63–70. https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769709097785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rathore M. Nutrient content of important fruit trees from arid zone of Rajasthan. J Hortic For. 2009;1:103–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mohammed N, Sati E, Abdallah F, et al. Carbohydrates and ascorbic acid contents in the acacia senegal and acacia seyal gum arabic. Dusunen Adam. 2019;10:613–20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kirankumar J, Gulhane PR. Evaluation of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) from some medicinal plants of Melghat region. J Glob Biosci. 2016;5:4638–42.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jain D, Pancholi S, Patel R. Synergistic antioxidant activity of green tea with some herbs. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2011;2:177. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.85538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Asati V, Deepa PR, Sharma PK. Desert legume Prosopis cineraria as a novel source of antioxidant flavonoids/isoflavonoids: biochemical characterization of edible pods for potential functional food development. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2022;29: 101210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sapkota BK, Khadayat K, Sharma K, et al. Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of extracts from Bergenia ciliata, Mimosa pudica, and Phyllanthus emblica. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4929824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng W, Wang SY. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:5165–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bellik Y, Selles SMA. In vitro synergistic antioxidant activity of honey-Mentha spicata combination. J Food Meas Charact. 2017;11:111–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9377-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Waisundara AFDE-V. Recent advances in antioxidant capacity assays. IntechOpen: Rijeka; 2021. p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marinova E, Toneva A, Yanishlieva N. Synergistic antioxidant effect of α-tocopherol and myricetin on the autoxidation of triacylglycerols of sunflower oil. Food Chem. 2008;106:628–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.06.022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shi J, Qu Q, Kakuda Y, et al. Investigation of the antioxidant and synergistic activity of lycopene and other natural antioxidants using LAME and AMVN model systems. J Food Compos Anal. 2007;20:603–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2007.03.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pinelo M, Manzocco L, Nuñez MJ, Nicoli MC. Interaction among phenols in food fortification: negative synergism on antioxidant capacity. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:1177–80. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0350515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:4290–302. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0502698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Apak R, Güçlü K, Demirata B, et al. Comparative evaluation of various total antioxidant capacity assays applied to phenolic compounds with the CUPRAC assay. Molecules. 2007;12:1496–547. https://doi.org/10.3390/12071496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Clarke G, Ting KN, Wiart C, Fry J. High correlation of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, ferric reducing activity potential and total phenolics content indicates redundancy in use of all three assays to screen for antioxidant activity of extracts of plants from the Malaysian rainforest. Antioxidants. 2013;2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox2010001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Trush K, Pal’ove-Balang P. Biosynthesis and role of isoflavonoids in legumes under different environmental conditions. Plant Stress. 2023;8: 100153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. García-Pérez P, Rocchetti G, Giuberti G, et al. Phenolic acids, lignans, and low-molecular-weight phenolics exhibit the highest in vitro cellular bioavailability in different digested and faecal-fermented phenolics-rich plant extracts. Food Chem. 2023;412: 135549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135549.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Joshi T, Deepa PR, Sharma PK. Effect of different proportions of phenolics on antioxidant potential: pointers for bioactive synergy/antagonism in foods and nutraceuticals. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2022;92:939–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01396-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mitra S, Tareq AM, Das R, et al. Polyphenols: a first evidence in the synergism and bioactivities. Food Rev Int. 2023;39:4419–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2022.2026376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Reber JD, Eggett DL, Parker TL. Antioxidant capacity interactions and a chemical/structural model of phenolic compounds found in strawberries. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2011;62:445–52. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2010.549115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Barreca D, Trombetta D, Smeriglio A, et al. Food flavonols: nutraceuticals with complex health benefits and functionalities. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;117:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.03.030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Joshi T, Mandal SK, Puri S, et al. Investigating the antioxidant activity enhancer effect of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba seed extract on phenolic phytochemicals. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:807. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1131173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bishnoi RS, Kumar M, Shukla AK, Jain CP. Development and validation of novel HPLC method for the estimation of Rutin in crude hydromethanolic leaf extract of Prosopis cineraria. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2018;8:68–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Neeraj NV, Jangir SSBL. Quality assessment and phytochemical profile of Capparis decidua (Forssk) Edgew. Pharma Innov. 2019;8:424–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Raghuvanshi D, Sharma K, Verma R, et al. Phytochemistry, and pharmacological efficacy of Cordia dichotoma G. Forst. (Lashuda): a therapeutic medicinal plant of Himachal Pradesh. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153: 113400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Peng D, Zahid HF, Ajlouni S, et al. LC-ESI-QTOF/MS profiling of Australian mango peel by-product polyphenols and their potential antioxidant activities. Processes. 2019;7:764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ybañez-Julca RO, Asunción-Alvarez D, Quispe-Díaz IM, et al. Metabolomic profiling of mango (Mangifera indica Linn) leaf extract and its intestinal protective effect and antioxidant activity in different biological models. Molecules. 2020;25:5149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Marcillo-Parra V, Anaguano M, Molina M, et al. Characterization and quantification of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in three different varieties of mango (Mangifera indica L.) peel from the Ecuadorian region using HPLC-UV/VIS and UPLC-PDA. NFS J. 2021;23:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the administration of Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani–Pilani Campus for infrastructural and logistic support. TJ is grateful to University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India for providing Senior Research Fellowship. Authors are thankful to SAIF (Sophisticated Analytical Instrumentation Facility), Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow (India) for LC–MS instrumentation facility.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TJ performed the study and drafted the manuscript. KA and MM assisted in LC–MS data analysis. PRD and PKS supervised the study and interpreted the data. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Kumar Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (PDF 1160 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, T., Agrawal, K., Mangal, M. et al. Measurement of antioxidant synergy between phenolic bioactives in traditional food combinations (legume/non-legume/fruit) of (semi) arid regions: insights into the development of sustainable functional foods. Discov Food 4, 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-024-00082-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-024-00082-y

Keywords