Abstract
Tea plant [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] is one of the important foliar cash crops in China, and its root system absorbs heavy metal (HM) elements enriched in the soil and transports them to the over ground part. In order to ensure the safety of the soil ecological environment and tea raw materials in the tea production area, the HM contents of soil and tea plant leaves in Suzhou tea plantations were detected, the relationship between HMs and soil physicochemical properties was analyzed, and the ecological risk of HMs in tea plantation soils was evaluated by using relevant detection techniques and evaluation models. The results showed that the average pH of tea plantation soils around Tai Lake in Suzhou was within the range suitable for the growth of tea plants. The pH, soil organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium of tea plantation soil satisfying the requirements of high quality, high efficiency and high yield (‘3H’) tea plantation accounted for 47.06%, 26.47%, 8.82%, 79.41% and 67.65%, respectively. Site 2 fully met the requirements of ‘3H’ tea plantation. In addition, the contents of cadmium (Cd) and mercury (Hg) were extremely variable, and the average contents exceeded the background value of soil in Jiangsu Province, but the HM contents of tea leaves all met the pollution-free standard, and the HM contents of tea leaves around Tai Lake in Suzhou were generally at a safe level. The composite ecological risk index ranged from 0.05 to 0.60, and 32 of the 34 sample sites (except site 21 and site 23) are the most suitable agricultural land for tea plantations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Any metal having a density of more than 4.5 kg dm−3 is commonly referred to as a HM in the industrial sector, and from the perspective of environmental protection, the most biologically harmful elements such as Cu, Pb, Cd, Zn, Hg, As, etc. are categorized as HM elements (Xu et al. 2019). HM accumulation in soil is a significant problem due to its long-term persistence, cunningness, laggardly character, and irreversibility (Xu et al. 2013; Massas et al. 2013). The quality of agricultural soils is gradually deteriorating due to the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in agricultural production activities, as well as the arbitrary discharge of sewage and manure from livestock and poultry (Guan and Sun 2014). As a result, soil HM overloading is becoming a significant environmental problem in China (**ao et al. 2017). According to the ‘Bulletin on the Investigation of Soil Pollution in China’, the rate of soil HM exceedance was 16.1% (MEE and MNR 2014). In recent years, the tea plantations near the “three wastes” have continued to raise the ecological danger of HMs in the soil due to the influence of industrialization, in addition to air deposition, pesticides, fertilizers, and other reasons.
Tea plant [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] is an important cash crop in the subtropical region of China. According to the statistics of the “2021 China Tea Production and Marketing Situation Report” released by the China Tea Circulation Association, the total area of tea gardens in 18 major tea-producing regions in 2021 is 3,264,406 ha (about 60% of the global total tea garden area), and the total national output is 3.18 million tons (about 45% of the global total tea production). The annual production of green tea is 1.8494 million tons, accounting for 60.38% of the total production (Association 2022). In recent years, there have been more and more reports on the excess of HMs in tea (Ju et al. 2024; Gogoi et al. 2023; SeyyediBidgoli et al. 2020). According to popular belief, the soil in tea plantations serves as the plant’s physical foundation. Its elemental composition is also the primary source of HMs in tea, and it has a significant impact on the development, metabolism, production, and quality of tea plants (Othman et al. 2012; Lv et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2013; Guan and Sun 2014). The distribution of soil HMs is largely influenced by geological differences (Zhang et al. 2020b), and there is a high degree of correlation between soil physicochemical properties and HM elements (Yang et al. 2018), so that there are some differences in the HM contents of tea plantation soils in different regions.
HM enrichment in soil not only causes ecological damage and deterioration of environmental quality, but also affects human health through the food chain (Xu et al. 2019). Gradual enrichment of HMs or decomposition products in the environment and in the human body through the “soil-plant-body” system (Guan and Sun 2014). For microorganisms, bacterial communities such as Acidobacteria and Bacillus were highly resistant and more abundant in tea plantations with acidic soils and higher levels of HM exceedances compared to other bacterial communities (Lei et al. 2018). Additionally, the tea plant’s development condition will be significantly impacted by an overabundance of HM components. According to research findings, Cd stress makes tea plant leaves brown, green, or yellow while preventing the growth of buds, roots, and new shoots (Podwika et al. 2017). The effects of Hg stress on the tea plant’s cells and metabolism cause the plant to eventually wither or possibly die (Suszcynsky and Shann 1995). Drinking large amounts of HMs in tea over the long term can be harmful to one’s health.
Environmental ecological risk assessment is, in the words of the U.S. EPA, “the process of evaluating the likelihood of adverse ecological impacts that may occur or are occurring as a result of exposure to one or more stressors (e.g., chemicals, exotic species, physical changes, fire, etc.)” (Smith et al. 2005). The United States (Usepa. 1996), Australia (Council 2013) and other countries have adopted a hierarchical approach to build an ecological risk assessment framework for soil HMs, while the assessment framework of Canada (Ohio 2003) does not include a hierarchical assessment process, but in order to reduce the uncertainty of the assessment, it adds a screening assessment step prior to the ecological risk assessment process, and the risk manager or decision maker. The risk manager or decision maker determines the number of iterations of a step in the basic framework based on the actual needs of soil ecosystem management. The “weight-of-evidence” (WoE) method is widely used in soil ecological risk assessment, which is characterized by its systematic, holistic and scientific nature. Dagnino et al. (2008) proposed a chemical parameter based on HM concentration, an ecotoxicological parameter at the level of individual organisms, a biophysiological parameter at the level of sublethal HMs, and an ecological parameter related to the structure and function of the biota, which were compared with the corresponding reference values, and finally a comprehensive ecological risk index was obtained by using the WoE method according to the respective weights, which led to a comprehensive ecological risk assessment.
Suzhou City, one of the key regions for producing China’s renowned green tea, has a long history of producing tea. Jiangsu Province’s Suzhou Tai Lake, which makes up 14.3% of the entire province’s land area and has promising growth potential, is located along a large expanse of rugged mountainous landscapes. The hilly mountainous areas have been included in the “Ninth Five-Year Plan” and the “Notice on Accelerating Comprehensive Agricultural Development in the Hilly Mountainous Areas of the Province” since 1996. Since then, the provincial government has gradually strengthened resource development and utilization in the hilly mountainous areas, which has led to a rapid rise in the level of economic and social development. This study adopts the WoE method to study the HM risk of tea plantation soils around Tai Lake area in Suzhou by investigating, detecting and assessing the current status of HM content, analyzing the current problems, and then providing a theoretical basis for the reasonable and effective treatment and remediation of the HM risk of tea plantation soils in Suzhou City and Jiangsu Province. Effective governance and repair to provide a theoretical basis, and then promote the sustainable development of green ecological agricultural construction.
Material and method
Study area and sample collection
Using ArcGIS 10.7 software, 34 sample sites were deployed in the tea plantations around Tai Lake area of Suzhou in accordance with the current land use situation in Wuzhong District, Suzhou City, as well as field research (Fig. 1). Each site was deployed with 3–5 sampling points depending on the size of the area, and 34 sites in total were deployed. After the surface litters and 0–20 cm of topsoil were removed, the soil samples were selected from 20 to 40 cm layer using a 3.5 cm-diameter soil auger in late September 2022. The soil samples, which were kept on ice in the field, were taken to laboratory then passed through 2 mm sieve after removing the fine roots and stones manually. The photos were taken to record the sampling depth of the sampling sites and the latitude and longitude of each sampling site were recorded by GPS after sampling. In the second half of March 2023, the young leaves (one bud and three leaves) and mature leaves of tea plant leaves were picked at the above 34 sites. The leaf samples, quick freezing with liquid nitrogen in the field, were brought back to the laboratory the same day and killed-green in a microwave oven for 15 min, then baked in an oven at 70 °C until constant weight, the tea samples were ground to powder and sieved through a 0.45 mm sieve, and the sieved tea powder was placed in a polyethylene self-sealing bag to be stored in a dry place and used for subsequent experiments.
Determination of soil physical and chemical properties
Soil water content was determined by drying method with reference to Liu et al. (2018). Briefly, 50.00 g of fresh soil samples through 2 mm sieve were weighed in an aluminum box of known weight (accurate to 0.01 g), placed in an oven that had been preheated to 105 °C for 24 h, cooled to room temperature in a desiccator, the dry weight was determined, and the soil water content was calculated. Field water content (FWC) was determined by referring to the PRC Forestry Industry Standard (China 1999). Soil pH and organic matter (SOM) content were determined with reference to He et al. (2016).
The contents of NH4+-N and NO3−-N were determined by automatic continuous flow analyzer (seal AA3, Germany) (Zhang et al. 2020a). Briefly, 2.00 g of fresh soil samples with 2 mm sieve were weighed into 50 mL centrifuge tubes, 20 mL of 2 mol L−1 KCl was added to a shaker at room temperature for 1 h. The samples were filtered through qualitative filter paper and the filtrate was used for determination. Total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) contents were determined using an elemental analyzer (Jena multi EA 5000, Germany). Soil effective phosphorus available phosphorus (AP) content was determined using molybdenum antimony colorimetric method with reference to MOA (2014). Soil available potassium (AK) content was determined using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Briefly, 2.5 g of air-dried soil passing a 1 mm sieve was weighed into a 50 mL centrifuge tube, 25 mL of 0.1 mol L−1 neutral ammonium acetate solution was added, and the solution was shaken for 30 min at room temperature, filtered through qualitative filter paper, and the filtrate was used for the determination.
According to the method of Li et al. (2019), weigh 0.1 g soil sample passing through 0.15 mm sieve, put it in a PTFE digestion tank, add 4.5 mL HCl and 1.5 mL HNO3, and put it in a microwave digestion instrument to digest the sample. After digestion, the solution was diluted to 50 mL with ultrapure water, and 10 mL of the diluted solution was filtered with a membrane with a diameter of 0.22 μm. The contents of TP and TK in the filtrate were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) (**g et al. 2019).
Determination of heavy metal content
According to the method of Li et al. (2019), weigh 0.1 g of soil sample with a sieve of 0.15 mm, put it in a polytetrafluoroethylene digestion tank, add 4 mL HNO3 and 1 mL HClO4, and put the mixed solution in a microwave digestion instrument to digest the sample. After digestion, the solution was diluted to 50 mL with deionized water, and 10 mL of the diluted solution was filtered with a 0.45 μm filter membrane. The heavy metal content in soil was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) (**g et al. 2019).
According to the method of Xu et al. (2019), 0.2 g of tea plant leaf samples were weighed in a polytetrafluoroethylene digestion jar. The samples were digested with a mixture of 8 mL of HNO3 and 2 mL of HClO4, and the samples were digested at 150 °C until the solution was colorless and transparent. The digested solution was then fixed with deionized water for 50 mL, and 10 mL of the fixed solution was sucked up and filtered with a 0.45 μm diameter filter membrane with a diameter of 0.45 μm, and the heavy metal content of tea was determined by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) (**g et al. 2019).
WoE method for ecological risk assessment and determination of relevant indicators
Refer to Wang et al. (2022b) for the WoE method for ecological risk assessment and related formulae.
Experiments with tea plants in pots
The test tea seedlings were homogeneous one-year old ‘Long**g 43’ cuttings with a plant height of 15–20 cm, in good health and free from diseases and pests and other undesirable symptoms. Three well-grown, essentially uniform seedlings were implanted in each air-dried soil sample, with three replicates for each treatment, to maintain the same culture conditions. The soil samples were ground, weighed at 1.5 kg, and passed through a 2 mm nylon sieve before being placed into plastic pots. The soil’s water content was then adjusted with deionized water to 70% of the maximum field water holding capacity. Samples were collected to ascertain the pertinent indexes of tea seedlings after 30 days after transplanting.
Determination of photosynthetic index of tea plants
Before sampling, a clear and sunny morning between 9:00 and 11:00 was chosen to measure the photosynthetic indexes of the second and third mature leaves of the tea plant using the Li-6400 portable photosynthesizer (LI-COR, USA). LED red and blue light sources were selected to provide effective radiation for photosynthesis of tea plants, and buffer bottles were used to ensure stable air intake, and the buffer bottles were placed in a high place to ensure relatively stable air flow. The parameters were set as follows: Leaf chamber temperature: 25 °C, Flow: 500, Lamp: 1600 μmol m−2 s−1, Light intensity: 1200 μmol m−2 s−1. Net photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (E) were measured.
Determination of antioxidant enzyme activities in tea plants
For the determination of antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of tea seedlings, 0.1 g of fresh sample was ground with 2 mL 0.05 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) in the ice bath. After grinding, the homogenate was centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 min at 10000 rpm, and the supernatant was kept at 4 °C to be tested for enzyme activity. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined by measuring the inhibition of the photochemical reduction of pyrogallol utilizing the method of pyrogallol autoxidation method by spectrophotometry at 325 nm (Xu et al. 2019). Catalase (CAT) activity was determined by decomposition of H2O2 and was measured spectrophotometrically by assessing the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm (Aebi 1984). Peroxidase (POD) activity was determined by the degree of oxidation of guaiacol by spectrophotometer at 470 nm (Xu et al. 2019).
Determination of soil microbial function indicators in tea plantations
The urease activity was determined by the sodium phenol-sodium hypochlorite colorimetric method. 5.0 g of air-dried soil samples were weighed and sieved through 0.25 mm sieve, and the samples were incubated with 10 mL of 10% urea as the substrate for 24 h at 37 °C in a constant temperature oven and then filtered. Pipette 1 mL of filtrate was added with 4 mL of sodium phenol and 3 mL of sodium hypochlorite solution, and then shaken well to develop the color, and then volume to 50 mL, and colorimetrically measured at 578 nm within 1 h. The colorimetric analysis was carried out at 578 nm on an enzyme meter (Gu et al. 2009).
Polyphenol oxidase activity was determined by the gallotannin colorimetric method by weighing 1.0 g of air-dried soil samples that had passed through a 0.25 mm sieve, placing them in 50 mL triangular flasks, and then incubating them for 2 h by adding 10 mL of 1% o-catechol solution, so as to allow the o-catechol to be oxidized into purple gallotannin under the action of polyphenol oxidase, and then comparing the colorimetry at 430 nm on an enzyme marker (Ma et al. 2019).
Soil basal respiration was determined with reference to Xu et al. (2019). Briefly, fresh soil samples equivalent to 50 g dry weight in 100 mL beakers were placed in 2.5 L wide-mouth flasks along with beakers containing 25 mL of 1 mol L−1 NaOH, and appropriate amounts of distilled water were added every 3 days during the incubation period to maintain the soil samples at a humidity level of 70% of the maximum water-holding capacity. The soil samples were incubated for 42 days at 25 ± 1 °C in darkness. On the 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days of incubation, the CO2 content was determined by titration method and the cumulative CO2 emission was calculated.
Data analysis
The experimental data were statistically processed using Excel 2019, plotted using ArcMap (v10.3) and R (v4.3.0), and the differences in indicators between different sites were compared using SPSS software applying one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Result
Analysis of soil quality in tea plantations
Analysis of physical and chemical properties of tea plantation soils
The soil water content of the 34 sites in the study area ranged from 17.10 to 39.78%, with a mean value of 27.77%; pH ranged from 4.22 to 7.30, with a mean value of 5.45; SOM content ranged from 7.82 to 45.17 g kg−1, with a mean value of 16.92 g kg−1; soil TC content ranged from 4.53 to 36.47 g kg−1, with a mean value of 9.96 g kg−1. NH4+-N and NO3−-N content ranged from 0.20 to 10.32 mg kg−1, 1.27 to 47.18 mg kg−1, with mean values of 2.29 mg kg−1 and 9.13 mg kg−1, respectively, while TN content ranged from 0.50 to 2.36 g kg−1, with a mean value of 1.01 g kg−1. AP and TP content ranged from 0.51 to 235.46 mg kg−1 and 202.13 to 2631.15 mg kg−1, respectively, with mean values of 79.71 mg kg−1 and 794.78 mg kg−1. AK and TK content ranged from 61.92 to 292.50 mg kg−1, 167.45 to 1296.84 mg kg−1, and the mean values were 132.38 mg kg−1 and 526.45 mg kg−1, respectively. Among them, the NO3−-N content had the highest coefficient of variation of 106.69%, while soil water content had the lowest coefficient of variation of 0.11% (Table 1).
Based on the China’s agricultural standards “Green food-Environmental quality for production area NY/T 391-2021” (MOA 2021) and “Environmental requirement for growing area of tea NY/T 853-2004” (MOA 2004), as well as soil nutrient diagnostic indexes of ‘3H’ tea plantations, the soil nutrient grading standards of tea plantations were integrated and the sample sites in the study area were classified into soil nutrient grades (Table S1). The percentage of pH up to ‘3H’ tea plantation standard is 47.06%. The proportion of SOM content in grade I – III is 26.47%, 26.47% and 47.06% respectively, the average level was grade II, and 26.47% of them meet ‘3H’. 38.24%, 35.29%, and 26.48% of the sites met the requirements for TN content grade I – III, respectively, with grade I as the mean value level and ‘3H’ compliance at 8.82%. With a mean level of grade I and 79.41% meeting ‘3H’, the percentage of AP content that met the standards for grades I – III were 79.41%, 14.71%, and 5.88%, respectively. The percentage of AK content grade I – III was 67.65%, 32.35%, and 0.00%, with a mean level of grade I and 67.65% conforming to ‘3H’, respectively. It is worth noting that only one site (site 2) had all indicators satisfy the criterion for ‘3H’ tea gardens, while 8 sample sites of tea gardens met the standard of grade II or higher, accounting for 23.53% of all sample sites.
Analysis of heavy metal content and spatial distribution of tea plantation soils
Soil Cd content ranged from 0.04 to 9.45 mg kg−1 with a mean value of 0.84 mg kg−1, Hg content ranged from 0.04 to 28.61 mg kg−1 with a mean value of 4.54 mg kg−1. As Hg ranged from 0.04 to 28.61 mg kg−1 with a mean value of 4.54 mg kg−1. As ranged from 1.04 to 19.07 mg kg−1 with a mean value of 8.73 mg kg−1. Pb ranged from 17.56 to 63.49 mg kg−1 with a mean value of 32.61 mg kg−1. Cr ranged from 9.09 to 41.0 mg kg−1 with a mean value of 8.73 mg kg−1. The range of Pb content was 17.56 ~ 63.49 mg kg−1, and the average value was 32.61 mg kg−1. Cr content was 9.09 ~ 41.43 mg kg−1, and the average value was 24.69 mg kg−1. Cu content ranged from 7.00 to 31.63 mg kg−1, and the average value was 16.13 mg kg−1. Ni content ranged from 3.70 to 25.08 mg kg−1 with a mean value of 12.15 mg kg−1. Zn content ranged from 14.18 to 134.62 mg kg−1 with a mean value of 58.68 mg kg−1 (Fig. 2).
Based on the background values of HM elements in soils of Jiangsu Province as the reference standard values, the percentage of samples with eight HMs in soils of 34 sites exceeding the background values was Hg (91.18%) = Pb (91.18%) > Cd (50.00%) > As (41.18%) > Zn (26.47%) > Ni (0.00%) = Cr (0.00%). Among them, the highest concentrations of As, Cu and Zn were higher than the background values in each site, but their average concentrations were lower than the background values. On the other hand, the average concentrations of Cd, Hg and Pb in the sites were much higher than the background values, reaching 7.64, 28.29 and 1.56 times of the background values, respectively (Table S2).
An essential scale known as coefficient of variation (CV) is used to describe how variable a sample is. CV values below 0.10 indicate mild variability, 0.10 to 0.30 indicate moderate variability, and CV values over 0.30 indicate significant variability. The CVs of these eight HMs in the soils of the test tea plantations were Cd > Hg > As > Zn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb in descending order, with the CVs of Cd, Hg, As, Zn, Ni, Cu, and Cr amounting to 266.39%, 139.50%, 52.56%, 51.19%, 47.79%, 39.94%, and 31.03%, respectively (Table S2).
According to the results of the geographical distribution of HMs, the concentrations of Cd are highest in the Dongshan area and lowest in the **shan area and Northern urban area. The high values of Hg are concentrated in the **shan area and the southern part of the Dongshan area, and decrease to the north. While high values of As were concentrated in the Dongshan area and the northern part of the **shan area, and decreased to the south. The highest values of Pb occurred in the Dongshan area, and the concentration was moderate and uniform in the rest of the area. Ni concentration was higher in **shan area as a whole, and the highest value is in the south of **shan area. The distribution of Cu concentrations was similar to that of Cd, with high values concentrated in the Dongshan area and lower concentrations in the **shan area, and high values of Zn concentrated in the northern part of the **shan area (Fig. S1).
Correlation analysis between physical and chemical properties of tea plantation soil and heavy metal content
The HM contents in tea plantation soils were closely related to their physicochemical properties (Fig. 3). NH4+-N and NO3−-N were significantly negatively correlated with seven HMs except Cd, while AK and TK were significantly positively correlated with these seven HMs. Notably, Cd concentration was significantly negatively correlated with SOM, TC, TN, AP, and TP. In the RDA analysis, the individual sample sites were relatively concentrated, and only individual sample sites with higher HM concentrations were far away. In addition, this RDA model could explain 89.37% of the whole environmental variables.
Analysis of heavy metal content in tea plant
Considering the standards of ‘Organic Tea NY 5196-2002’ (MOA 2002) and ‘Residue limits for Cr, Cd, Hg, As and F in tea NY 659-2003’ (MOA 2003), 1.0, 0.3, 2.0, 2.0, 5.0 and 30.0 mg kg−1 for Cd, Hg, As, Pb, Cr and Cu were selected as the pollution-free tea in the samples. The results showed that the mean values of the six HM elements, Cd, Hg, As, Pb, Cr and Cu, in one bud with three leaves and mature leaves were much less than the limit values, and the overall heavy metal content of tea in this region was at a safe level (Fig. 4, Table S3 and Table S4). The relevant standards of Ni and Zn in tea were not available for the time being, so they were not evaluated.
The CVs of 8 HMs in one bud with three leaves of tea plants were Cd > Ni > Pb > As > Cr > Cu > Zn > Hg in descending order, with the CVs of Cd, Ni, Pb, As, and Cr amounting to 55.09%, 47.62%, 43.14%, 40.86%, and 35.30%, respectively, indicating that there was a high spatial variability of these HMs (Table S3). The high values of Cd, As, Cu, Pb and Zn were scattered in the study area, the high values of Cr were concentrated in the western and southern parts of the **shan area, Ni concentrations were high in the **shan area as a whole, and the spatial distribution of Hg was uniform (Fig. S2).
The CVs of the 8 HMs in the mature leaves of tea plants were Cd > Cr > Ni > Pb > As > Cu > Zn > Hg in descending order, among which the coefficients of variation for Cd, Ni, Pb, As, and Cr were 90.03%, 57.05%, 46.61%, 42.06%, and 40.48%, respectively (Table S4), which was similar to that for the distribution of the heavy metal contents in one bud with three leaves. The high value points of Cd were concentrated in the southwest of **shan area and decreased in the northeast direction, while the Dongshan area gradually decreased from north to south. The high value points of As were concentrated in **shan area and the overall concentration in Dongshan area was moderate, and the distribution of Pb was similar to that of As. The high value points of Cu, Cr, Ni, and Zn were dispersed in the study area, while the spatial distribution of Hg content was uniform (Fig. S3).
Characterization of soil-tea heavy metal migration
In this study, the order of bioconcentration factor (BCF) of HM in one bud with three leaves was Ni > Cd > Cu > Hg > Zn > Cr > Pb > As (Table 2), with higher variation in BCF values of Cd, Hg and Ni. The order of BCF values of HM in mature leaves was Ni > Cu > Zn > Hg > Cd > Cr > Pb > As. The content and enrichment coefficients of HM in various organs of tea plants at different sites varied considerably, and the overall performance was as follows: for the four elements of Cd, As, Pb and Cr, one bud with three leaves > mature leaves; for the three elements of Cu, Ni and Zn, mature leaves > one bud with three leaves.
The HM enrichment coefficients of tea plantation leaves were closely related to the signs of the physicochemical properties of the corresponding Tea plantation soils (Fig. 5). In one bud with three leaves, Hg, As, Cr, Cu and Zn were positively correlated with NH4+-N and NO3−-N, while negatively correlated with AK and TK, and Cd, Pb and Ni were positively correlated with SOM, TC, AP and TP, while negatively correlated with pH. This RDA model explains 86.28% of the whole environmental variables. Hg, As, Cr, Cu, and Zn in mature leaves were positively correlated with NH4+-N and NO3−-N, while negatively correlated with AK and TK, and Cd was positively correlated with SOM, TC, AP, and TP, while negatively correlated with pH. It is noteworthy that the effect of soil physicochemical properties on the enrichment coefficient of Pb in mature leaves was opposite to that of Cd. This RDA model could explain 86.13% of the whole environmental variables.
WoE for ecological risk assessment
Chemical risk evaluation
Based on the relative accumulation index of each total HM, the chemical risk score of the sample sites was calculated (Fig. 6A), and the chemical risk score ranged from 275 to 3525. According to the chemical risk evaluation criteria, only four out of 34 sample sites had chemical risks score below 100 (Table S5), of which 2 sites were between 100 and 300, and 2 sites were between 300 and 900. The chemical risk scores of the other 30 sites were over 900. Therefore, the results of the chemical risk evaluation indicated that the assessment site requires the next level of bioaccumulation risk evaluation.
Bioaccumulation risk evaluation
In-situ soil cultivation incubation test was conducted on the soil of the sample site in the study area. After 30 days of incubation, the results of ANOVA analysis of the cumulative concentrations of 8 HMs in the tea plant showed that the differences in the cumulative concentrations of the heavy metal elements, Cd, As, Pb, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn, except for Hg, reached a highly significant level (p < 0.01) in the tissues of the tea plant at different sites (Table S6).
The soil bioaccumulation risk index of 34 sites in the study area ranged from 200 to 525 (Fig. 6B). According to the bioaccumulation risk evaluation criteria, the bioaccumulation risk scores of 8 sample sites were between 100 and 300, and the rest of the sample sites were ranged from 300 to 900 (Table S5). In terms of risk level, the bioaccumulation risk level of each sample site was generally lower than the chemical risk. In addition, the next level of ecotoxicological risk evaluation was required due to the presence of moderate and higher bioaccumulation risks in the soils at the site.
Ecotoxicological risk evaluation
The toxicity test of in situ soil was used in this assessment, and the physiological and biochemical indicators of tea plant were selected as the endpoints for ecotoxicological risk evaluation. The results of ANOVA analysis on the physiological indicators of tea plant showed that the differences of CAT, SOD and POD activity, A, gs, Ci and E between soils at different sites reached highly significant levels (Table S7).
The correlation analysis between soil HM concentrations and physiological and biochemical indexes of tea plant showed that the A, gs and SOD activity of tea plant were significantly negatively correlated with the concentrations of four HMs, and that the Ci and CAT activity were significantly positively correlated with the concentrations of Ni and Cd, respectively (Fig. 7A). The above results indicated that the physiological and biochemical indexes of tea plant were greatly affected by soil HM content, and the toxic effects on tea plant responded to the overall toxicity of soil heavy metals. Therefore, A, gs, Ci, CAT and SOD activity of tea plant were selected as the endpoints of ecotoxicological risk evaluation.
Based on the physiological and biochemical indicators of tea plants, the ecotoxicological risk score of soils at different sample sites was calculated, and the results showed that the range of ecotoxicological risk score was 76–394 (Fig. 7B), and according to the criteria for ecotoxicological risk evaluation, the ecotoxicological risk scores of 5 sample sites were below 200 (Table S8).
Ecosystem risk evaluation
ANOVA analysis of soil microbial functional indicators showed that the differences in β-glucosidase (β-Glu) activity, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity, urease activity, and soil basal respiration among different sites were all at highly significant levels (Table S7). Soil microbial community functional indicators were highly significantly correlated with soil organic carbon, and each functional indicator was divided with the organic carbon content of the corresponding soil site before exposure-effect analysis to eliminate the masking of HM toxic effects by organic matter.
The results of Pearson correlation analysis of microbial function indicators with the content and total amount of each HM in the soil showed that PPO activity was significantly positively correlated with Hg content, and β-Glu activity was significantly negatively correlated with Hg and Cr (Fig. 8A). HM Hg is an important influence factor of soil microbial function in the study area, so β-Glu and PPO activity can be used as the endpoint of soil ecosystem risk evaluation in the study area. The results of ecosystem risk evaluation showed that the range of ecosystem risk integral was 70–450 (Fig. 8B). According to the ecosystem risk evaluation criteria, the ecosystem risk scores of 21 sample sites were over 400, and those for 6 sites belonged were below 100 (Table S8).
Comprehensive ecological risk characterization
The integrated ecological risk index was calculated based on the composite ecological risk index of chemical risk index, bioaccumulation risk index, ecotoxicological risk index, and ecosystem risk index, which ranged from 0.04 to 0.60 (Fig. 9). The standard deviation of the chain of evidence for the comprehensive ecological risk assessment is less than 0.4, so the accuracy of the results of this assessment is high. According to the comprehensive ecological risk assessment criteria (Table S9), the comprehensive ecological risk index of the 32 sites is less than 0.5, which is acceptable as agricultural land.
Discussion
Analysis of tea plantation soil quality and heavy metal in tea plants
The average soil Cd content of the tea plantation sites in the study area exceeded the background value in Suzhou, and the spatial variation scale of Cd content in the tea plantations differed greatly, with its coefficient of variation reaching 266.39%, while the spatial correlation was relatively weak, indicating that the content of Cd element in the soil in the study domain was relatively significant by the external interference, and it is necessary to pay close attention to the further development of Cd element in the soil, and to take preventive and control measures at the earliest possible time. In addition, the CVs of Hg, As, Zn, Ni, Cu, and Cr were all more than 30% indicating those HMs among different tea gardens in the study area were more significantly disturbed by the outside world, with greater spatial variability, which might be due to the influence of industrial, transportation and agricultural activities.
The main sources of HM contamination are agricultural activities such as pesticide application, sewage irrigation, misuse of feed additives, etc. (Kersten et al. 2017). On the other hand, transportation pollution is also an important factor contributing to the accumulation of heavy HMs in the soil, and barite accumulates through atmospheric deposition processes (Xu et al. 2015), S. alfredii (Yang et al. 2004) and B. niveaon (Chen et al. 2021) in cultivation. In the western and southern parts of the eastern mountains, where high values of Hg concentration are concentrated, it is recommended that intercrop** or set-planting of enrichment plants P. nummularia, B. officinalis, A. ageratoides (Qian et al. 2018), E. polymnioides (Chamba et al. 2017), etc. At the same time, with the application of amendments to reduce the effective state content of Cd in the soil. Heavy metal absorption by tea plants is related to their forms, and reducing the effective state content of soil heavy metals is the key to reduce the absorption of heavy metals by tea plants and control the enrichment of heavy metals (Li et al. The average pH level of tea plantation soils around Tai Lake in Suzhou is within the range suitable for tea growth, site 2 fully meets the requirements of ‘3H’ tea plantations. HMs in tea plantation around Tai Lake in Suzhou accumulated in different degrees and had obvious regional distribution characteristics. In addition, the HMs content of tea leaf samples was generally at a safe level, which met the requirements of pollution-free tea. The composite ecological risk index evaluation of ‘WoE’ method showed that the soil in the area around Tai Lake in Suzhou is basically safe, and almost all sample sites were the most suitable agricultural land for tea plantations.Conclusion
Availability of data and materials
All data and material included in this study are available upon request by contact with the corresponding author.
Abbreviations
- AK:
-
Available potassium
- AP:
-
Available phosphorus
- BCF:
-
Bioconcentration factor
- CV:
-
Coefficient of variation
- EC:
-
Electrical conductivity
- GPS:
-
Global positioning system
- NH4 +-N:
-
Ammonium-N
- NO3 −-N:
-
Nitrate-N
- RDA:
-
Redundancy analysis
- SWC:
-
Soil moisture content
- SOM:
-
Soil organic carbon
- TC:
-
Total carbon
- TK:
-
Total potassium
- TN:
-
Total nitrogen
- TP:
-
Total phosphorus
References
Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105(105):121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05016-3
Association, C. T. C (2022) 2021 China tea production and marketing situation report. Tea World 481:1–23 (in chinese)
Chamba I, Rosado D, Kalinhoff C, Thangaswamy S, Sánchez-Rodríguez A, Gazquez MJ (2017) Erato polymnioides – a novel hg hyperaccumulator plant in ecuadorian rainforest acid soils with potential of microbe-associated phytoremediation. Chemosphere 188:633–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.160
Chen K, Chen P, Qiu X, Chen J, Gao G, Wang X, Zhu A, Yu C (2021) Regulating role of abscisic acid on cadmium enrichment in ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.). Sci Rep 11(1):22045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00322-6
China, T. s. f. a. o. t. P. s. R. o (1999) Determination of forest soil water-physical properties. The state forestry administration of the People’s Republic of China, Bei**g
Council NEP (2013) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013 (No. 1). National Environment Protection Council (NEPC), Australia
Dagnino A, Sforzini S, Dondero F, Fenoglio S, Bona E, Jensen J, Viarengo A (2008) A weight-of-evidence approach for the integration of environmental “triad” data to assess ecological risk and biological vulnerability. Integr Environ Assess Manag 4(3):314–326. https://doi.org/10.1897/ieam_2007-067.1
Giller KE, Witter E, McGrath SP (1998) Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 30(10–11):1389–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00270-8
Gogoi BB, Yeasin M, Paul RK, Borgohain A, Deka D, Malakar H, Saikia J, Rahman FH, Panja S, Sarkar A, Maiti CS, Bordoloi J, Karak T (2023) The level of selected metals in made tea and tea infusion from the roadside tea plants and health risk assessment. Biol Trace Elem Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-023-03865-z
Gu Y, Wang P, Kong CH (2009) Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soil influenced by allelopathic rice variety. Eur J Soil Biol 45(5–6):436–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.06.003
Guan X, Sun LN (2014) Current situation and the harm of soil heavy metal pollution and food safety. Appl Mech Mater 675-677:612–614. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net%2FAMM.675-677.612
Hadar Y, Papadopoulou KK (2012) Suppressive composts: microbial ecology links between abiotic environments and healthy plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50(1):133–153. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172914
He F, Yang B, Wang H, Yan Q, Cao Y, He X (2016) Changes in composition and diversity of fungal communities along Quercus mongolica forests developments in Northeast China. Appl Soil Ecol 100:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.014
He L, Peng X (2023) Content and Bioavailability of Hg in a Soil–Tea Plant System in Anxi Area, Southeast China. Water 15(1):179. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010179
** CW, Du ST, Zhang K, Lin XY (2008) Factors determining copper concentration in tea leaves produced at Yuyao County, China. Food Chem Toxicol 46(6):2054–2061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.01.046
** CW, Zheng SJ, He YF, Di Z, Zhou ZX (2005) Lead contamination in tea garden soils and factors affecting its bioavailability. Chemosphere 59(8):1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.058
**g F, Chen C, Chen X, Liu W, Wen X, Hu S, Yang Z, Guo B, Xu Y, Yu Q (2019) Effects of wheat straw derived biochar on cadmium availability in a paddy soil and its accumulation in rice. Environ Pollut 257:113592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113592
Ju Y, Luo Z, Bi J, Liu C, Liu X (2024) Transfer of heavy metals from soil to tea and the potential human health risk in a regional high geochemical background area in Southwest China. Sci Total Environ 908:168122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168122
Kandeler E, Kampichler C, Horak O (1996) Influence of heavy metals on the functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Biol Fertil Soils 23(3):299–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335958
Kanwar P, Kumar M, Srivastava S (2023) Investigation of phytoextraction and tolerance capacity of Calotropis procera for the detoxification of hexavalent chromium, nickel, and lead. Environ Technol Innov 32:103238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103238
Kersten G, Majestic B, Quigley M (2017) Phytoremediation of cadmium and lead-polluted watersheds. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 137:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.12.001
Kuang J, Yang T (2022) Distribution and genesis of soil mercury in western Suzhou. J Geol 46(03):285–290 (in chinese)
Lei L, Bo W, Zhang X, Yue Z, Yu D, Song X, Shuang R, Wangwang Y, Fang W, Zhu X (2018) Geographical origin traceability of tea based on multi-element spatial distribution and the relationship with soil in district scale. Food Control 90:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.031
Li K, Yang B, Wang H, Xu X, Gao Y, Zhu Y (2019) Dual effects of biochar and hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. on the remediation of cd-contaminated soil. Peerj 7:e6631. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6631
Li L, Mao K, Ippolito JA, **ng W, Chen X, Zhu W, Cheng Y (2022) Calcium amendments affect heavy metal bioavailability in acidic and calcareous soils. Int J Environ Sci Technol 19(10):10067–10076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03840-y
Lin L, Ning B, Liao M, Ren Y, Wang Z, Liu Y, Cheng J, Luo L (2015) Youngia erythrocarpa, a newly discovered cadmium hyperaccumulator plant. Environ Monit Assess 187(1):4205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4205-8
Lin WW, Lin MH, Zhou HY, Wu HM, Li ZW, Lin WX (2019) The effects of chemical and organic fertilizer usage on rhizosphere soil in tea orchards. PLoS One 14(5):e0217018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018
Liu D, Huang Y, An S, Sun H, Bhople P, Chen Z (2018) Soil physicochemical and microbial characteristics of contrasting land-use types along soil depth gradients. Catena 162:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.10.028
Liu S, Wang X, Guo G, Yan Z (2020) Status and environmental management of soil mercury pollution in China: a review. J Environ Manag 277:111442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111442
Lv H-P, Lin Z, Tan J-F, Guo L (2013) Contents of fluoride, lead, copper, chromium, arsenic and cadmium in Chinese Pu-erh tea. Food Res Int 53(2):938–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.014
Ma Z-L, Zhao W-Q, Liu M (2019) Responses of polyphenoloxidase and catalase activities of rhizosphere and bulk soils to warming during the growing season in an alpine scrub ecosystem. Chin J Appl Ecol 30(11):3681–3688. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.201911.010
Massas I, Kalivas D, Ehaliotis C, Gasparatos D (2013) Total and available heavy metal concentrations in soils of the Thriassio plain (Greece) and assessment of soil pollution indexes. Environ Monit Assess 185(8):6751–6766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3062-1
MEE, and MNR (2014) Bulletin on the investigation of soil pollution in China. Nat Resour Commun 8:26–29
MOA (2002) Organic tea. The Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China, Bei**g
MOA (2003) Residue limits for chromium, cadmium, mercury, arsenic and fluoride in tea. The Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, Bei**g
MOA (2004) Environmental requirement for growing area of tea. The Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China, Bei**g
MOA (2014) Soil testing-part 7: method for determination of available phosphorus in soil. The Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China, Bei**g
MOA (2021) Green food-environmental quality for production area. The Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China, Bei**g
Ohio E (2003) Ecological risk assessment guidance document. State of Ohio EPA DERR-00-RR-031
Othman A, Al-Ansi S, Al-Tufail M (2012) Determination of Lead in Saudi Arabian imported green tea by ICP-MS. E- J Chem 9(1):79–82. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012%2F132683
Petersen DG, Blazewicz SJ, Firestone M, Herman DJ, Turetsky M, Waldrop M (2012) Abundance of microbial genes associated with nitrogen cycling as indices of biogeochemical process rates across a vegetation gradient in Alaska. Environ Microbiol 14(4):993–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02679.x
Podwika W, Kleszcz K, Krośniak M, Zagrodzki P (2017) Copper, manganese, zinc, and cadmium in tea leaves of different types and origin. Biol Trace Elem Res 183(2):389–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-1140-x
Qian X, Wu Y, Zhou H, Xu X, Xu Z, Shang L, Qiu G (2018) Total mercury and methylmercury accumulation in wild plants grown at wastelands composed of mine tailings: insights into potential candidates for phytoremediation. Environ Pollut 239:757–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.105
Qu X, Xu W, Ren J, Zhao X, Li Y, Gu X (2020) A field study to predict cd bioaccumulation in a soil-wheat system: application of a geochemical model. J Hazard Mater 400:123135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123135
SeyyediBidgoli N, Mostafaii GR, Akbari H, Mohammadzadeh M, Arani MH, Miranzadeh MB (2020) Determination of the concentration of heavy metals in infused teas and their assessment of potential health risk in Kashan, Iran. Int J Environ Anal Chem 102(19):7673–7683. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1836174
Shi Y-Z, Ruan J-Y, Ma L-F, Han W-Y, Wang F (2006) Absorption and accumulation of as and cd in tea. J Ecol Rural Environ 22(3):70–75 (in Chinese)
Smith R, Pollard SJT, Weeks JM, Nathanail CP (2005) Assessing significant harm to terrestrial ecosystems from contaminated land. Soil Use Manag 21(1):527–540. https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2005345
Suszcynsky EM, Shann JR (1995) Phytotoxicity and accumulation of mercury in tobacco subjected to different exposure routes. Environ Toxicol Chem 14(1):61–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620140108
Topchiy NM (2010) Influence of heavy metals on photosynthesis. Physiol Biochem Cult Plants 42(2):95–106
Usepa. (1996) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. U.S. Fed Reg, p 61
Wang JX, Fu HY, Xu DM, Mu ZQ, Fu RB (2022a) The remediation mechanisms and effects of chemical amendments for heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of literature. Pol J Environ Stud 31(5):4511–4522. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes%2F146705
Wang M-E, Ma W-K, Jiang R, **e T (2022b) Ecological risk assessment of contaminated soil using improved “Weight of Evidence” approach: A case study of electroplating site in **gjiang, Jiangsu, China. Chin J Appl Ecol 33(6):1639–1651. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202206.017
**ao R, Wang S, Li R, Wang JJ, Zhang Z (2017) Soil heavy metal contamination and health risks associated with artisanal gold mining in Tongguan, Shaanxi, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 141:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.002
Xu C, Pu J, Wen B, **a M (2021) Potential ecological risks of heavy metals in agricultural soil alongside highways and their relationship with landscape. Agriculture 11(8):800. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080800
Xu LL, Zhang LZ, Liu BL (2013) Survey and evaluation of heavy metal elements pollution of Changchun suburb land. Adv Mater Res 634-638:130–133. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.634-638.130
Xu Q, Duan D, Cai Q, Shi J (2018) Influence of humic acid on Pb uptake and accumulation in tea plants. J Agric Food Chem 66(46):12327–12334. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03556
Xu X, Yang B, Qin G, Wang H, Zhu Y, Zhang K, Yang H (2019) Growth, accumulation, and antioxidative responses of two Salix genotypes exposed to cadmium and lead in hydroponic culture. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26(19):19770–19784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05331-7
Yang QQ, Li ZY, Lu XN, Duan QN, Huang L, Bi J (2018) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: pollution and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 642:690–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05331-7
Yang XE, Long XX, Ye HB, He ZL, Calvert DV, Stoffella PJ (2004) Cadmium tolerance and hyperaccumulation in a new Zn-hyperaccumulating plant species (Sedum alfredii Hance). Plant Soil 259(1–2):181–189. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000020956.24027.f2
Yi XY, Ji LF, Hu ZM, Yang XD, Li HT, Jiang YY, He TH, Yang YY, Ni K, Ruan JY (2022) Organic amendments improved soil quality and reduced ecological risks of heavy metals in a long-term tea plantation field trial on an Alfisol. Sci Total Environ 838:156017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156017
Zhang C, Wang J, Ren Z, Hu Z, Tian S, Fan W, Chen X, Griffiths BS, Hu F, Liu M (2020a) Root traits mediate functional guilds of soil nematodes in an ex-arable field. Soil Biol Biochem 151:108038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108038
Zhang J, Yang R, Li YC, Peng Y, Wen X, Ni X (2020b) Distribution, accumulation, and potential risks of heavy metals in soil and tea leaves from geologically different plantations. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 195:110475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110475
Zhang J, Yang RD, Li YC, Peng YS, Wen XF, Ni XR (2020c) Distribution, accumulation, and potential risks of heavy metals in soil and tea leaves from geologically different plantations. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 195:110475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110475
Ziolek M, Bartminski P, Stach A (2017) The influence of seabirds on the concentration of selected heavy metals in organic soil on the Bellsund coast, western Spitsbergen. Arct Antarct Alp Res 49(4):507–520. https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0016-024
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. **aoli Dai (Central laboratory of College of Resources and Environment, Nan**g Agricultural University) for assistance in using element analyzer (multi EA S 5000, Analytik Jena, Germany), automated Continuous-Flow Auto Analyzer (AutoAnalyzer AA3, Seal, Germany) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP − MS, Agilent 710, Agilent Technologies Inc., Australia).
Funding
This work was supported by Natural Resources Science and Technology Foundation of Jiangsu Province (2022018), Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System (JATS[2023]416), Science and technology projects of Nan**g (202210013), Ning-Huai Key Agricultural Technology Extension Project (NJAU-05) and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
**aohan Xu, Jiahui Yang and Zelong Gong participated in designing the experiments, carried out the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the manuscript. **aohan Xu, Jiahui Yang and Zelong Gong performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/mate-rials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables. Xueyan Sui, Yang Zhang, Shu**g Liu, Xuan Chen and **nghui Li reviewed drafts of the manuscript. Yuhua Wang conceived and designed the experiments, authored and reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
Handling editor: Dr. Tong Chen.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Fig. S1.
Spatial distributions of contents of heavy metals in soil. Fig. S2. Spatial distributions of contents of heavy metals in one bud with three leaves of tea plant. Fig. S3. Spatial distributions of contents of heavy metals in mature leaves of tea plant.
Additional file 2: Table S1.
Grading evaluation results of soil physical-chemical indexes. Table S2. Heavy metal concentrations in 34 samples. Table S3. Heavy metal concentrations in one bud with three leaves of tea plant. Table S4. Heavy metal concentrations in mature leaves of tea plant. Table S5. Risk classification for chemical risk and bioaccumulation risk. Table S6. Heavy metal accumulation in leaves of tea seedling. Table S7. Physiological indexes in leaves of tea seedling. Table S8. Soil microbial functional indicators. Table S9. Classification of integrated ecological risk index.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, X., Yang, J., Zhang, Y. et al. Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in tea plantation soil around Tai Lake region in Suzhou, China. Stress Biology 4, 15 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-024-00149-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-024-00149-x