Log in

Direct-Numerical Simulation with the Stability Theory for Turbulent Transition in Hypersonic Boundary Layer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laminar-to-turbulent transition in hypersonic boundary layer is numerically investigated using the direct-numerical simulation (DNS) method combined with the linear stability theory (LST). The DNS-LST framework is validated first for 2D hypersonic boundary layer. The growth of the Mack second mode is matched well to previous DNS data. A complete 3D turbulent transition at Mach 6 is computed in the current DNS to demonstrate the capability of the current method for a whole 3D turbulent transition scenario. Two modes are assigned at the DNS inlet for the fundamental breakdown in the hypersonic boundary layer: the Mack second mode (the fundamental mode) and the pair of oblique waves of the fundamental frequency. These instability modes are obtained from the stability analysis. The current DNS successfully resolves the 3D turbulent transition in the hypersonic boundary layer. Computational data are investigated to identify major flow features associated with the fundamental breakdown phenomena. Major instability modes are analyzed in the late transient stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Mack LM (1984) Boundary-layer linear stability theory. Tech. rep., California Inst of Tech Pasadena Jet Propulsion Lab

  2. Malik MR (1989) Prediction and control of transition in supersonic and hypersonic boundary layers. AIAA J 27(11):1487–1493

  3. Fedorov A (2011) Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43:79–95

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Horvath T, Berry S, Merski N, Berger K, Buck G, Leichty D, Schneider S (2006) In: 9th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-2919

  5. Horvath T, Tomek D, Splinter S, Zalameda J, Krasa P, Schwartz R, Gibson D, Tietjen A, Berger K (2010) In: 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-241

  6. Reed HL, Saric WS, Arnal D (1996) Linear stability theory applied to boundary layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 28(1):389–428

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Franko KJ, Lele SK (2013) Breakdown mechanisms and heat transfer overshoot in hypersonic zero pressure gradient boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 730:491–532

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Renzo M, Urzay J (2021) Direct numerical simulation of a hypersonic transitional boundary layer at suborbital enthalpies. J Fluid Mech 912:A29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Leinemann M, Hader C, Fasel HF (2021) In: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, p 1739

  10. Li X, Fu D, Ma Y (2010) Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic boundary layer transition over a blunt cone with a small angle of attack. Phys Fluids 22(2):025105

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sivasubramanian J, Fasel HF (2015) Direct numerical simulation of transition in a sharp cone boundary layer at Mach 6: fundamental breakdown. J Fluid Mech 768:175–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hader C, Fasel HF (2018) Towards simulating natural transition in hypersonic boundary layers via random inflow disturbances. J Fluid Mech 847:R3

  13. Lim J, Kim M, Kim S, Jee S, Park D (2021) Cost-effective and high-fidelity method for turbulent transition in compressible boundary layer. Aerosp Sci Technol 108:106367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jee S, Joo J, Lin RS (2018) Toward cost-effective boundary layer transition computations with large-Eddy simulation. J Fluids Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039865111201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim M, Lim J, Kim S, Jee S, Park J, Park D (2019) Large-eddy simulation with parabolized stability equations for turbulent transition using OpenFOAM. Comput Fluids 189:108–117

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim M, Lim J, Kim S, Jee S, Park D (2020) Assessment of the wall-adapting local eddy-viscosity model in transitional boundary layer. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 371:113287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113287

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim M, Kim S, Lim J, Lin RS, Jee S, Park D (2021) Effects of phase difference between instability modes on boundary-layer transition. J Fluid Mech 927:A14. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.732

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Duan L, Choudhari MM, Zhang C (2016) Pressure fluctuations induced by a hypersonic turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 804:578–607

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang J, Duan L, Casper KM, Wagnild R, Bitter N (2020) In: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, p 1065

  20. Spall R, Malik M (1989) Goertler vortices in supersonic and hypersonic boundary layers. Phys Fluids A 1(11):1822–1835

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Di Renzo M, Fu L, Urzay J (2020) Htr solver: an open-source exascale-oriented task-based multi-gpu high-order code for hypersonic aerothermodynamics. Comput Phys Commun 255:107262

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Fu L, Hu XY, Adams NA (2016) A family of high-order targeted ENO schemes for compressible-fluid simulations. J Comput Phys 305:333–359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lim J, Kim M, Park J, Kim T, Jee S, Park D (2022) Simulation of hypersonic boundary layer on porous surfaces using OpenFOAM. Comput Fluids 240:105437

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao R, Wen C, Long T, Tian X, Zhou L, Wu Y (2019) Spatial direct numerical simulation of the hypersonic boundary-layer stabilization using porous coatings. AIAA J 57(11):5061–5065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. White FM (2006) Viscous fluid flow, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Driest ER (1956) The problem of aerodynamic heating. Aeronaut Eng Rev 15(10):26–41

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chang CL, Malik MR (1994) Oblique-mode breakdown and secondary instability in supersonic boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 273:323–360

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT) for the project Turbulent Transition Control in Hypersonic Boundary Layer Flow (No. NRF-2021R1A2C1006193).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Solkeun Jee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bae, H., Lim, J., Kim, M. et al. Direct-Numerical Simulation with the Stability Theory for Turbulent Transition in Hypersonic Boundary Layer. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 24, 1004–1014 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00626-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00626-z

Keywords

Navigation