Log in

Bottleneck analysis of lithium and boron recovery technologies from oil and gas produced water: a conceptual approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Energy and Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lithium (Li) demand is projected to increase shortly due to vehicle electrification, especially light-duty vehicles for personal transport. Although lithium is abundant on the surface of the earth, lithium is mainly extracted from salt-lake brines. New production routes could become available with the advancements of lithium recovery technologies from low-concentration brines, such as seawater and produced water from the oil and gas industry. In the case of produced water from the oil and gas industry, lithium recovery could be coupled with removing boron (B), a chemical with environmental limitations in water concentration for disposal or human consumption. In this case, lithium could bring revenue for the process while solving the issues of boron concentration in disposed or consumed produced water. This study developed a qualitative bottleneck analysis methodology based on experts’ opinions to analyze direct lithium and boron recovery technologies. In the results, experts were able to group 62 variables into 8 classes: technical parameters, fluid parameters, decision variables, quantification variables, and impact variables. In the bottleneck analysis, 5 technical risk pathways have been identified: the microemulsion issue, the concentration issue, the efficiency issue, the market issue and, finally, the environmental legislation issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 2

Source: Adapted from Cirillo et al. (2021)

Fig. 3

Source: Adapted from Cirillo et al. (2021)

Fig. 4

Source: Adapted from Zavahir et al. (2021)

Fig. 5

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 6

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 7

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 8

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 9

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 10

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 11

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 12

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fig. 13

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No data available.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge support of the RCGI—Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Innovation, hosted by the University of São Paulo (USP) and sponsored by FAPESP—São Paulo Research Foundation (2014/50279-4 and 2020/15230-5), Petronas Petróleo Brasil LTDA, and the strategic importance of the support given by ANP (Brazil’s National Oil, Natural Gas and Biofuels Agency) through the R&D levy regulation. COR thanks CNPq for their support through process 308909/2021-6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, PGM, COR, CAON; methodology, PGM, COR; formal analysis, PGM, COR, CAON; investigation, PGM, COR, CAON; resources, CAON; data curation, PGM; writing—original draft preparation, PGM; writing—review and editing, PGM, COR, CAON; visualization, PGM; supervision, PGM, COR, CAON; project administration, PGM, COR, CAON; funding acquisition, COR, CAON. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. G. Machado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 and Figs. 14 and 15.

Table 3 Final variables in technical parameters group
Table 4 Final variables in fluid parameters group
Table 5 Final variables in decision variables group
Table 6 Final variables in quantification variables group
Table 7 Final variables in impact variables group
Table 8 Final variables in financial-economic variables group
Table 9 Final variables in economic parameters group
Table 10 Final variables in environmental parameters group
Fig. 14
figure 14

Final influence diagram, with color-coded variables and their links

Fig. 15
figure 15

Final weighted influence diagram, showing links with 4 and 5 average weights, with color-coded variables and their links

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Machado, P.G., de Olivera Ribeiro, C. & Oller do Nascimento, C.A. Bottleneck analysis of lithium and boron recovery technologies from oil and gas produced water: a conceptual approach. Int J Energ Water Res 7, 465–486 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-023-00261-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-023-00261-0

Keywords

Navigation