Log in

Seismic response control of adjacent buildings using optimal backward-shared tuned mass damper inerter and optimal backward-shared tuned inerter damper

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of backward-shared tuned mass damper inerter (BSTMDI) in reducing inter-storey drift as well as pounding between adjacent buildings. A backward-shared-TMDI (BSTMDI) linking two adjacent medium-rise buildings is presented, considering the practical and economical part of design parameters. Inerter in BSTMDI can generate higher reaction forces based on the large relative acceleration response between the two adjacent buildings, which efficiently enhance the seismic performance of both buildings. Moreover, a benchmark structure consisting of two adjacent medium-rise buildings equipped with (BSTMDI) is examined. Eight design parameters of the BSTMDI are optimized through single-objective optimization problems using a genetic algorithm (GA) to minimize either the inter-storey drift or the pounding gap distance of the two adjacent benchmark structures. Mitigating effects of the optimally designed (BSTMDI) on the responses of the benchmark structures are assessed considering a set of one hundred (100) natural ground motions records. It is found that the BSTMDI scheme can reduce the inter-storey drift and pounding distance responses similarly or even better than a single shared tuned mass damper inerter (SSTMDI) using a smaller inertance ratio. The same trend is observed while using backward-shared tuned inerter damper (BSTID) compared to a single shared tuned inerter damper (SSTID). Both BSTMDI and BSTID have proven their robustness under a large set of natural real earthquake records with various frequency characteristics for several dynamical parameters such as displacement, inter-storey drift, pounding gap and stroke displacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The generated data of this study are available for all interested researchers and scientists upon reasonably contacting the corresponding author.

References

  • Abdeddaim, M., Djerouni, S., Ounis, A., & Djedoui, N. (2020). Double tuned mass damper inerter for seismic response reduction of structures. In: EURODYN 2020 Proceedings of the XI International Conference on Structural Dynamics. Greece, Athens: Institute of Research and Development for Computational Methods in Engineering Sciences. 1433–1444. https://doi.org/10.47964/1120.9116.19264

  • Abdeddaim, M., Ounis, A., Bharti, S., & Shrimali, M. (2019). Seismic retrofitting using the concept of coupling two adjacent buildings. In Recent advances in structural engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 355–363). Springer.

  • Abdeddaim, M., Ounis, A., Djedoui, N., & Shrimali, M. K. (2016a). Pounding hazard mitigation between adjacent planar buildings using coupling strategy [journal article]. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0177-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdeddaim, M., Ounis, A., Djedoui, N., & Shrimali, M. K. (2016b). Reduction of pounding between buildings using fuzzy controller. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(17), 958–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdeddaim, M., Ounis, A., Shrimali, M. K., & Datta, T. K. (2017). Retrofitting of a weaker building by coupling it to an adjacent stronger building using MR dampers. Journal of Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 62(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.2.197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, M. M., Hanif, J. H., Richardson, A., & Sobanjo, J. (2001). Use of a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce vibration and pounding in adjacent structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30(8), 1185–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharti, S. D., Dumne, S. M., & Shrimali, M. K. (2010). Seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings connected with MR dampers. Engineering Structures, 32(8), 2122–2133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council, A. T. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors. US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA.

  • De Domenico, D., & Ricciardi, G. (2018a). An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI). Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 47(5), 1169–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Domenico, D., & Ricciardi, G. (2018b). Optimal design and seismic performance of tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) for structures with nonlinear base isolation systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 47(12), 2539–2560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Matteo, A., Furtmüller, T., Adam, C., & Pirrotta, A. (2018). Optimal design of tuned liquid column dampers for seismic response control of base-isolated structures. Acta Mechanica, 229(2), 437–454.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Di Matteo, A., Masnata, C., & Pirrotta, A. (2019). Hybrid passive control strategies for reducing the displacements at the base of seismic isolated structures. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5, 132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djedoui, N., & Ounis, A. (2014). Tuned mass damper for base isolated structures. Sciences & Technologie. B, Sciences de l'ingénieur, 29–34.

  • Djedoui, N., Ounis, A., Pinelli, J., & Abdeddaim, M. (2017). Hybrid control systems for rigid buildings structures under strong earthquakes. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (BHRC), 18(6), 893–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Domenico, D., Qiao, H., Wang, Q., Zhu, Z., & Marano, G. (2020a). Optimal design and seismic performance of Multi-Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (MTMDI) applied to adjacent high-rise buildings. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 29(14), e1781.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Domenico, D., Ricciardi, G., & Zhang, R. (2020b). Optimal design and seismic performance of tuned fluid inerter applied to structures with friction pendulum isolators. Soil Dynamics Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 132, 106099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J., Glover, K., Khargonekar, P., & Francis, B. (1988). State-space solutions to standard H2 and H control problems. In 1988 American Control Conference.

  • Elias, S. (2018). Seismic energy assessment of buildings with tuned vibration absorbers. Shock and Vibration, 2018, 2051687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, S., & Matsagar, V. (2017). Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers. Annual Reviews in Control, 44, 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, S., Matsagar, V., & Datta, T. (2016). Effectiveness of distributed tuned mass dampers for multi-mode control of chimney under earthquakes. Engineering Structures, 124, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaralis, A., & Petrini, F. (2017). Wind-induced vibration mitigation in tall buildings using the tuned mass-damper-inerter. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(9), 04017127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenidi, Z., Abdeddaim, M., Ounis, A., Shrimali, M., & Datta, T. (2017). Control of adjacent buildings using shared tuned mass damper. Procedia Engineering, 199, 1568–1573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochrainer, M. J., & Ziegler, F. J. S. C. (2006). Control of tall building vibrations by sealed tuned liquid column dampers. Structural Control Health Monitoring: The Official Journal of the International Association for Structural Control Monitoring of the European Association for the Control of Structures, 13(6), 980–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, R., & Mahmoud, S. (2016). Linking of adjacent three-storey buildings for mitigation of structural pounding during earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(11), 3075–3097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandemir-Mazanoglu, E. C., & Mazanoglu, K. (2017). An optimization study for viscous dampers between adjacent buildings. Mechanical Systems Signal Processing, 89, 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, I., Neild, S., & Wagg, D. (2014). Using an inerter-based device for structural vibration suppression. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 43(8), 1129–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, I., Neild, S., & Wagg, D. (2016). Vibration suppression of cables using tuned inerter dampers. Engineering Structures, 122, 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., & Liang, Q. (2019). Effect of inerter for seismic mitigation comparing with base isolation. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 26(10), e2409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdi, A., & Abdelhafid, O. (2015) Seismic response reduction using semi-active magneto-rheological dampers. The 3rd International Conference CIGOS Innovation in Construction, 978–972.

  • Marian, L., & Giaralis, A. (2014). Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 38, 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masnata, C., Di Matteo, A., Adam, C., & Pirrotta, A. (2020). Smart structures through nontraditional design of tuned mass damper inerter for higher control of base isolated systems. Mechanics Research Communications, 105, 103513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masnata, C., Di Matteo, A., Adam, C., & Pirrotta, A. (2021). Assessment of the tuned mass damper inerter for seismic response control of base-isolated structures. Structural Control Health Monitoring, 28(2), e2665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsagar, V. A., & Jangid, R. S. (2005). Viscoelastic damper connected to adjacent structures involving seismic isolation. Journal of Civil Engineering Management, 11(4), 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigdeli, S. M., & Bekdas, G. (2014). Optimum tuned mass damper approaches for adjacent structures. Earthquakes Structures, 7(6), 1071–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ok, S.-Y., Song, J., & Park, K.-S. (2008). Optimal design of hysteretic dampers connecting adjacent structures using multi-objective genetic algorithm and stochastic linearization method. Engineering Structures, 30(5), 1240–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özsarıyıldız, ŞS., & Bozer, A. (2015). Finding optimal parameters of tuned mass dampers. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 24(6), 461–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Quiñonero, F., Rubió-Massegú, J., Rossell, J., & Karimi, H. R. (2017). Advanced computational design of shared tuned mass-inerter dampers for vibration control of adjacent multi-story structures. IFAC-Papers Online, 50(1), 13366–13371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Quiñonero, F., Rubió-Massegú, J., Rossell, J., & Karimi, H. R. (2019). Design of inerter-based multi-actuator systems for vibration control of adjacent structures. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 356(14), 7785–7809.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, C., & Jangid, R. (2010). Seismic response of dynamically similar adjacent structures connected with viscous dampers. The IES Journal Part a: Civil Structural Engineering, 3(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrini, F., Giaralis, A., & Wang, Z. (2020). Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design in wind-excited tall buildings for occupants’ comfort serviceability performance and energy harvesting. Engineering Structures, 204, 109904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupakhety, R., Elias, S., & Olafsson, S. (2020). Shared tuned mass dampers for mitigation of seismic pounding. Applied Sciences, 10(6), 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V., Shrimali, M. K., Bharti, S. D., & Datt, T. K. (2020a). Evaluation of responses of semi-rigid frames at target displacements predicted by the nonlinear static analysis. Steel Composite Structures, 36(4), 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V., Shrimali, M. K., Bharti, S. D., & Datta, T. K. (2020b). Behavior of semi-rigid steel frames under near-and far-field earthquakes. Steel Composite Structures, 34(5), 625–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V., Shrimali, M. K., Bharti, S. D., & Datta, T. K. (2021). Seismic fragility evaluation of semi-rigid frames subjected to near-field earthquakes. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 176, 106384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrimali, M., Bharti, S., & Dumne, S. (2015). Seismic response analysis of coupled building involving MR damper and elastomeric base isolation. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6(2), 457–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. C. (2002). Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. In Proceedings of the 41st IEEE conference on decision and control.

  • Soto, M. G., & Adeli, H. (2014). Optimum tuning parameters of tuned mass dampers for vibration control of irregular high rise building structures. Journal of Civil Engineering Management, 20(5), 609–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tributsch, A., & Adam, C. (2012). Evaluation and analytical approximation of tuned mass damper performance in an earthquake environment. Smart Structures Systems, 10(2), 155–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., & Giaralis, A. (2020a). Enhanced serviceability performance in wind-excited tall buildings equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter via top-storey softening. In: EURODYN 2020 Proceedings of the XI International Conference on Structural Dynamics. Greece, Athens: Institute of Research and Development for Computational Methods in Engineering Sciences. 2103–2112.

  • Wang, Z., & Giaralis, A. (2020b). Top-story softening for enhanced mitigation of vortex shedding-induced vibrations in wind-excited tuned mass damper inerter-equipped tall buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 147(1), 04020283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., & Giaralis, A. (2021). Top-storey softening for enhanced mitigation of vortex shedding induced vibrations in wind-excited optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI)-equipped tall buildings.

  • Xu, K., Bi, K., Han, Q., Li, X., & Du, X. (2019). Using tuned mass damper inerter to mitigate vortex-induced vibration of long-span bridges: Analytical study. Engineering Structures, 182, 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R., Zhao, Z., & Dai, K. (2019). Seismic response mitigation of a wind turbine tower using a tuned parallel inerter mass system. Engineering Structures, 180, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Abdeddaim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4, Fig. 23

Table 4 Suite of 100 near-fault and far-fault ground motions records from FEMA P695 (Council, 2009)
Fig. 23
figure 23

Design flowchart of optimal control of adjacent buildings using SSTMDI, SSTID, RSTMDI, and RSTID

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djerouni, S., Abdeddaim, M. & Ounis, A. Seismic response control of adjacent buildings using optimal backward-shared tuned mass damper inerter and optimal backward-shared tuned inerter damper. Asian J Civ Eng 22, 1499–1523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-021-00394-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-021-00394-9

Keywords

Navigation