Log in

Utilization of riverbed silt and subsoil of Gopalganj for masonry bricks incorporating internal fuel and comparison of their construction properties with commercial bricks

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural topsoil is the most common raw material for making clay bricks in Bangladesh because of its abundance and prehistoric tradition. This practice of the bygone age is steadily pushing the environment toward the risk of fertile soil depletion. At the same time, the largest delta of this world gathers tons of sediment during the monsoon while bearing the havocs of floods due to the loss of navigability of the rivers. It propels the government to expend more on dredging. According to soil science, particle size is the only difference between clay and silt. Thus, bricks can be thought to be made from the Himalayan silt along with agricultural subsoil. However, this replacement will bring some adverse effects on the construction properties which need to be assessed. Along with the depletion of fertile topsoil, the brick sector exaggerates the environment by emitting fine particles from coal-burning during vitrification. This hazard can be lessened by incorporating internal fuel. In this work, we represent a method to produce masonry bricks by substituting the topsoil completely with riverbed silt and subsoil. The novel feature is a comparison of those silty bricks with commercial bricks available in the market to perceive the real difference in construction properties. Principally, the study presents a realistic evaluation of silt-made bricks as a building material insinuating the potential of a sustainable source of raw material for masonry bricks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Porwal R (2014) Comparative study of the properties of fly ash clay bricks and clay bricks. GJESR Res Pap 1(10):51–60

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan L (2017) "Silo.Tips". [Accessed on 17 December, 2021]. Available at: https://silo.tips/download/sector-assessment-summary-brick-1

  3. Hasan MB, Ali MA, Alam MS, Bhuiyan MAS (2012) Farmers’ awareness on environmental degradation nearby the brickfield areas. J Bangladesh Agril Univ 10(2):229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan HR, Rahman K, Rouf AJMA, Sattar GS, Oki Y, Adachi T (2007) Assessment of degradation of agricultural soils arising from brick burning in selected soil profiles. Int J Environ Sci Tech 4(4):471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous (2011) Introducing energy-efficient clean technologies in the brick sector of Bangladesh. Environment, Climate Change and Water Resources Unit, South Asia Region

  6. United States Environmental Protection Agency, "Health and Environmental Effects of Particulate Matter (PM)". [Accessed on 17 December, 2021]. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effects-particulate-matter-pm

  7. Mueller H, Maity S, Prajapati S, Bhatta AD, Srestha BL (2008) Vertical shaft brick kiln project: green brick making manual

  8. Indian Standard (IS 11650:1991: 1992 (Reaffirmed 2007)) Guide for manufacture of common burnt clay building bricks by semi-mechanized process (First Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards

  9. Premchander S, Bloesch U, Tuladhar B, Raghunandan D (2011) External review of clean building technologies for Nepal VSBK-CESEF Project 2008–2011

  10. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh (2017) National Strategy for Sustainable Brick Production in Bangladesh

  11. Roy SD (2018) Farmlands lose topsoil for brick making. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/country/farmlands-lose-topsoil-brick-making-1514092

  12. Roy SD (2015) Fertility at stake as kilns ‘Buy’ topsoil from poor farmers. The Daily Star

  13. Suryakanta, "Civilblog," 21 April 2014. [Accessed on 17 December, 2021]. Available at: https://civilblog.org/2014/04/21/field-tests-on-soil-to-determine-suitability-of-soil-for-brick-manufacturing/

  14. Angima SD, Terry TA (2011) Best management practices for maintaining soil productivity in the Douglas-Fir region. Figure 2.2, pp 7

  15. Mezencevova A, Yeboah NNN, Burns SE, Kahn LF, Kurtis KE (2012) Utilization of Savannah Harbor river sediment as the primary raw material in production of fired brick Andrea. J Environ Manag 113:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Akter KF, Khan ZH, Hussain MS, Mazumder AR (2011) Physico-chemical characteristics of the seasonally flooded soils of bangladesh and their management implications. Dhaka Univ J Biol Sci 20(2):173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hossain MM, Sattar MA (2002) Physical and chemical properties of some selected soils of Bangladesh. Online J Biol Sci 2(2):79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 2006: C 67, Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile

  19. Personal communication with Shamsunnahar Suchana (2017) Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka

  20. Technical specifications for buildings by Local Government Engineering Department (LGED) and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), pp. 16–18, (2005). [Accessed on 17 December, 2021]. [Available at: http://www.lged.gov.bd/UploadedDocument/UnitPublication/4/12/2005_Technical%20Specifications%20for%20Buildings.pdf]

  21. Indian Standard (IS 1077: 1992 (Reaffirmed 2007))—Common burnt clay building bricks—specification (Fifth Revision) by Bureau of Indian Standards

  22. European Standard (BS EN 771–1) (2003) European standard specification for clay masonry units compared to BS 3921 British standard specification for clay bricks

  23. "Compressive /Crushing Strength of Bricks". [Accessed on 17 December, 2021]. Available at: http://www.theconstructioncivil.org/compressive-crushing-strength-of-bricks/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author, Ms. Kaniz Fatema, is profoundly grateful for the generous support, guidance, and suggestions from the late Mr. Md. Khosru, the owner of Classic Bricks and Ceramics Company Ltd., Zirani Bazar, Savar, Dhaka without whom the research might not have been completed. The author also shows her deepest gratitude to the Civil Engineering Department (CE) and Materials & Metallurgical Department (MME) of BUET for their precious assistance.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors. We also confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all named authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaniz Fatema.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, concerning intellectual property. In so doing, we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.

Ethical approval

We further confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript has been conducted with the ethical approval from all related to the research.

Appendices

Appendix A: Detail calculation for the test specimens

See Tables

Table 3 Dimension of kiln-fired clay–silt bricks (Type-1) after firing

3,

Table 4 Water absorption and strength test of kiln-fired clay–silt bricks (Type-1)

4,

Table 5 Compressive strength test of kiln-fired clay–silt bricks (Type-2)

5,

Table 6 Compressive strength test commercially produced bricks in different brick kilns

6,

Table 7 Dimension of kiln-fired clay–silt–ground sand bricks (Type-3) after firing

7,

Table 8 Water absorption and strength test of kiln-fired clay–silt–ground sand bricks (Type-3)

8,

Table 9 Water absorption and strength test of furnace-fired clay–silt bricks (Type-A)

9.

Appendix B: Physical appearance of the bricks

See Table 10, 11.

Table 10 Physical appearance of kiln-fired clay–silt bricks
Table 11 Physical appearance of kiln-fired clay–silt–ground sand bricks

Appendix C

Sample calculation

Sample calculation for a Type-1 clay–silt brick containing 30% silt is presented below.

Calculation for amount of raw material in brick soil mixture

Total clay mixture for green brick = 1800 gm.

Percentage of silt in clay mixture = 30 wt%

Therefore, Amount of silt in clay mixture = 1800 × 0.30 = 540 gm.

Amount of agricultural soil in clay mixture = 1800 − 540 = 1260 gm.

Amount of coal particle as internal fuel = 50 gm.

Calculation for water absorption test (wet basis)

Weight of saturated surface-dried brick, SSD = 1493 gm.

Weight of oven-dried brick, OD = 1240 gm.

Therefore, water absorption = \(\frac{SSD-OD}{SSD}\times 100= \frac{1493-1240}{1493}\times 100=16.95 wt\%\)

Calculation for compressive strength test

Length of fired brick after oven-dry = 113.35 mm.

Width of fired brick after oven-dry = 107.47 mm.

Load = 115 kN.

Therefore, Area of fired brick after oven-dry = 113.35 × 107.47 = 12,181.72 mm2.

Actual load = 1.026 × load − 11.59.

 = 1.026 × 115 − 11.59.

 = 106.40 kN.

 = 106,400 N.

Now, Compressive strength, CS = \(\frac{\mathrm{Actual load}}{\mathrm{Area}}\)

$$= \frac{106400 N}{12181.72 {\mathrm{mm}}^{2}}$$

\(=8.7 \frac{N}{{\mathrm{mm}}^{2}}\) or MPa.

For Type-3 bricks, 5% of the clay mixture, i.e., 90 g cement and ground sand has been used, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatema, K., Hossain, I. Utilization of riverbed silt and subsoil of Gopalganj for masonry bricks incorporating internal fuel and comparison of their construction properties with commercial bricks. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7, 141 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00745-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00745-8

Keywords

Navigation