Log in

Do foreign MNEs alleviate multidimensional poverty in develo** countries?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of the investment-based presence of multinational enterprises (MNEs) on poverty in develo** countries. The relationship is decomposed into different pathways corresponding to various facets of firms’ presence and activities, and monetary and multidimensional poverty. We hypothesize that depending on the pathways, the effects can be positive or negative in terms of poverty alleviation, and an overall conclusion has to be nuanced. The hypotheses are tested across 431 Indonesian administrative districts, observed in 2008, 2014 and 2018. Pooled instrumental variable regressions show that a higher presence of foreign MNEs does not reduce the number of people below the poverty line. It raises the depth and severity of poverty, and the population is also more exposed to pollutions. These results inform the ongoing debate, and offer important implications for policy makers eager to attract foreign direct investments, as well as for MNEs’ managers concerned with social responsibility and achieving sustainable development goals in host develo** countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank a referee for pointing out that these effects are mainly mediated.

  2. For instance, when British American Tobacco started the manufacturing and sale of incense sticks in India, this destroyed the jobs of many Indian women. They were homeworking, making these incense sticks by hand, and had this occupation as their main source of livelihood (Jenkins, 2005).

  3. Below the 33 Indonesian provinces, the second-level administrative subdivision is composed of rural districts (kabupaten) and municipalities (kota). Administrative districts have their own local government, and are central in the provision of governmental services.

  4. The Indonesian Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of Regional Autonomy (KPPOD) builds periodically local (district, province) business and investment climate indexes, to monitor the consequences of decentralization. To do so, KPPOD interviews representative samples of private firms with 10 employees or more, in the non-primary sectors. The surveys are complemented with secondary data such as the frequency of land eviction in a district, or the average length to obtain a registered land certificate. Data are retrieved from local economic governance reports for various years, available at: https://www.kppod.org/penelitian/index (accessed 19 March 2022).

References

  • Alkire, S., Foster, J., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler, A., Copeland, B., & Taylor, S. M. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment. American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auwalin, I. (2021). The effect of a credit policy change on microenterprise upward transition and growth: Evidence from Indonesia. Eurasian Business Review, 11(4), 611–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, L. M., Pinilla-Roncancio, M., Walsham, M., Van Minh, H., Neupane, S., Mai, V. Q., Neupane, S., Blanchet, K., & Kuper, H. (2021). Does disability increase the risk of poverty ‘in all its forms’? Comparing monetary and multidimensional poverty in Vietnam and Nepal. Oxford Development Studies, 49(4), 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., & Oates, W. (1988). The theory of environmental policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Van Roy, V., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2021). Does trade participation limit domestic firms’ productivity gains from inward foreign direct investment? Eurasian Business Review, 11(1), 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. J. (2008). Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. Journal of international Economics, 74(2), 402–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C. S. (2003). Foreign direct investment trends and statistics. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved March 19, 2022 from https://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/fdi/eng/2003/102803.pdf.

  • Dembek, K., Sivasubramaniam, N., & Chmielewski, D. A. (2020). A systematic review of the bottom/base of the pyramid literature: Cumulative evidence and future directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(3), 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Simone, L., Petracci, B., & Piva, M. (2022). Economic sustainability, innovation, and the ESG factors: An empirical investigation. Sustainability, 14(4), 2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P. (2019). MNEs, FDI, inequality and growth. Multinational Business Review, 27(3), 217–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Virgillito, M. E., & Yu, X. (2023). Gains from trade or from catching-up? Value creation and distribution in the era of China’s WTO accession. Eurasian Business Review, 13(1), 119–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganson, B., He, T. L., & Henisz, W. J. (2022). Business and peace: The impact of firm-stakeholder relational strategies on conflict risk. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri, P. N. (2022). The role of multinational enterprises in achieving sustainable development goals. Aib Insights, 22(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gohou, G., & Soumaré, I. (2012). Does foreign direct investment reduce poverty in Africa and are there regional differences? World development, 40(1), 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haile, G., Srour, I., & Vivarelli, M. (2017). Imported technology and manufacturing employment in Ethiopia. Eurasian Business Review, 7(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanandita, W., & Tampubolon, G. (2016). Multidimensional poverty in Indonesia: Trend over the last decade (2003–2013). Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 559–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanoteau, J., & Vial, V. (2020). Institutional quality, conforming and evasive entrepreneurship. Eurasian Business Review, 10(1), 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. V., & Kuncoro, A. (2011). Corruption and local democratization in Indonesia: The role of islamic parties. Journal of Development Economics, 94(2), 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaax, A. (2020). Private sector development and provincial patterns of poverty: Evidence from Vietnam. World Development, 127, 104747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2005). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81(3), 525–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jude, C., & Silaghi, M. I. P. (2016). Employment effects of foreign direct investment: New evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. International Economics, 145, 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kis-Katos, K., & Sparrow, R. (2015). Poverty, labor markets and trade liberalization in Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2018). Multinationals, international business, and poverty: A cross-disciplinary research overview and conceptual framework. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1), 92–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenluecke, M. K. (2022). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research. Multinational Business Review, 30(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martuscelli, A., & Gasiorek, M. (2019). Regional integration and poverty: A review of the transmission channels and the evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 431–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, J., & Yoo, M. (2017). FDI and inequality in Vietnam: An approach with census data. Journal of Asian Economics, 48, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. (2004). Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, E., Gertler, P., & Levine, D. (2006). Does industrialization build or destroy social networks? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(2), 287–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalache-O’Keef, A. S. (2018). Whose greed, whose grievance, and whose opportunity? Effects of foreign direct investments (FDI) on internal conflict. World Development, 106, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Park, J., Antolín-López, R., & Husted, B. W. (2021). Implementing the united nations’ sustainable development goals in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(5), 999–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, E. (2010). Local multipliers. American Economic Review, 100(2), 373–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. (2007). Causal inference with observational data. Stata Journal, 7(4), 507–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnenkamp, P., Schweickert, R., & Wiebelt, M. (2007). Distributional effects of FDI: How the interaction of FDI and economic policy affects poor households in Bolivia. Development policy review, 25(4), 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oetzel, J., & Doh, J. P. (2009). MNEs and development: A review and reconceptualization. Journal of World Business, 44(2), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, P. M., & Zhu, B. (2018). Brewing violence: Foreign investment and civil conflict. Retrieved March 19, 2022 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2998123.

  • Piva, M. (2003). The impact of technology transfer on employment and income distribution in develo** countries: A survey of theoretical models and empirical studies, International Labour Office, Policy Integration Department, International Policy Group, Working Paper n.15, Geneva.

  • Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2005). Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2016). The economics of poverty: History, measurement, and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2014). Mexico’s growth problem. Retrieved March 19, 2022 from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/mexico-growth-problem-by-dani-rodrik-2014-11.

  • Ross, M. L. (2005). Resources and rebellion in Aceh, Indonesia. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggeri Laderchi, C., Saith, R., & Stewart, F. (2003). Does it matter that we do not agree on the definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches. Oxford Development Studies, 31(3), 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In A. Sen, & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life (30 vol.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J. W. (2008). The impact of multinational enterprise strategy on indigenous enterprises: Horizontal spillovers and crowding out in develo** countries. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumarto, S., Vothknecht, M., & Wijaya, L. (2014). Explaining regional heterogeneity of poverty: Evidence from a decentralized Indonesia. In H. Hill (Ed.), Regional dynamics in a decentralized Indonesia (pp. 68–97). Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takii, S., & Ramstetter, E. D. (2005). Multinational presence and labour productivity differentials in indonesian manufacturing, 1975–2001. Bulletin of Indonesian Economical Studies, 41(2), 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorbecke, E. (2008). Multidimensional poverty: Conceptual and measurement issues. In N. Kakwani, & J. Silber (Eds.), The many dimensions of poverty (pp. 3–19). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vial, V., & Hanoteau, J. (2015). Returns to micro-entrepreneurship in an emerging economy: A quantile study of entrepreneurial indonesian households’ welfare. World Development, 74, 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waagstein, P. R. (2011). The mandatory corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and implications. Journal of business ethics, 98(3), 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wihardja, M. M., & Cunningham, W. (2021). Pathways to middle-class jobs in Indonesia. World Bank Technical Report. Retrieved March 19, 2022 from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/.

  • Yoshino, N., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Otsuka, M. (2018). International remittances and poverty reduction: Evidence from develo** Asia. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 17(2), 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management journal, 38(2), 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPPOD (2012). Local economic governance in Indonesia: A survey of business operators in 245 districts/municipalities in Indonesia, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2022 from https://www.kppod.org/penelitian/index.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the associate editor (Mariacristina Piva) and two anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments and suggestions. I also thank participants to seminar at KEDGE Business School, and 39th EBES conference (Rome, 6 April 2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Hanoteau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest statement

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. He has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. He certifies that he has no affiliation with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The author has no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanoteau, J. Do foreign MNEs alleviate multidimensional poverty in develo** countries?. Eurasian Bus Rev 13, 719–749 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-023-00246-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-023-00246-3

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation