Log in

Digitalization and informal economy: a global evidence of internet usage

  • Published:
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates the links between the technological evolution and the importance of informal economic activities. We examine the influences of internet usage on the shadow economy in a global sample between 2002 and 2015. With this purpose, we mobilize the panel fixed-effects estimate and the panel corrected standard errors estimate (as a robustness check) for the analysis of 114 economies (and three sub-samples including high-income economies (HIEs), upper-middle-income economies (UMEs), and lower-middle-income economies (LMEs)). Our results indicate that the use of the internet generally has a negative impact on the shadow economy. This influence of internet is consistent across all institutional environments. Interestingly, technology is not spread through the shadow economy in the same way everywhere since we observe a U-shaped relationship between internet usage and the shadow economy. Our research shows that technology might also have a negative influence on official activities if its implementation is not combined with an appropriate institutional policy allowing policy-makers to avoid the technology-side effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data is provided from corresponding author upon reasonable requests.

Notes

  1. Which is also named as shadow or underground economy.

  2. We thank the anonymous reviewer for pointing this interesting aspect.

  3. These indicators are: control of corruption, government effectiveness, political stability and absence of violence, rule of law, regulatory quality, voice and accountability.

  4. See https://www.heritage.org/index/

  5. One of a control variable of the shadow economy is Democracy. Since Author(s) do not have access to democracy index from Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), while the voice and accountability from the World Bank is built based on information of democracy index of EIU. More importantly, “Voice and Accountability captures perceptions of the extent to which a country's citizens are able to participate in selecting their government, as well as freedom of expression, freedom of association, and a free media” thus we use this indicator as alternative one.

  6. Authors are thankful for the suggestions provided by the anonymous reviewers.

  7. It is worth noticing that beside cross-sectional dependence, the literature suggests to check for the stationarity and cointegration of variables in panel data with long T. However, our sample has a short T (only 14 years), thus we do not carry out these tests in this analysis. We thank our anonymous reviewers for their comments on this matter.

  8. Our robustness checks were consistent and robust – they can be provided on request.

  9. In fact, an alternative strategy can be carried out in this case by using dummy variables for LMEs, UMEs, and HIEs and investigate their interaction with Internet usage. This strategy can help to compare the effects of Internet usage on the shadow economy across three income groups in comparison with global sample. In this study, we estimate the effect of Internet usage on the shadow economy by three subsamples. This choice cannot provide comparison with full sample, but it can account for any potential heteroscedastic effect of control variables on the shadow economy across three subsamples.

References

Download references

Funding

Canh Phuc Nguyen, Binh Quang Nguyen and Duyen Thuy Le Tran receive funding from the University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (700000), Vietnam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Canh Phuc Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.

Table 6 List of countries (114 countries)
Table 7 Data description of three subsamples (HIEs, UMEs, LMEs)
Table 8 Internet usage and shadow economy: baseline estimations
Table 9 Internet usage and shadow economy: robustness check by PCSE estimates
Table 10 The interaction of Internet usage with institutional quality on the shadow economy: robustness check by PCSE estimates
Table 11 The non-linear effects of Internet usage on the shadow economy: robustness check by PCSE estimates
Table 12 The Internet usage and shadow economy in three subsamples: robustness check by PCSE estimates

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, C.P., Schinckus, C., Nguyen, Q.B. et al. Digitalization and informal economy: a global evidence of internet usage. J. Ind. Bus. Econ. 51, 1–37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00278-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00278-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation