Log in

Modal and dynamic analysis of damaged steel column-beam frame structure subjected to seismic vibrations using experimental and finite element analysis approach

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steel alloy frame structures are mainly used in civil and mechanical industries. These structures are susceptible to mechanical vibrations arising from seismic forces. These vibrations can potentially induce critical damage to various structural elements within these frameworks. This comprehensive research endeavour embarks on the modal and dynamic analysis of damaged steel column and frame structure using experimental and finite element analysis methods. The damage induction process involves systematically introducing cracks of varying depths at distinct positions (single crack at a time) within the structures consecutively. The modal analysis is carried out for all the damaged and undamaged structures. The seismic signal is applied as acceleration base motion in all cases, and modal dynamic analysis is carried out to determine the random response of the models. The numerical model is validated by comparing it with the experimental model data. For free vibration analysis, an initial excitation is imparted by striking the upper free end of the structure with a hammer. The structures are placed on a shake table for forced vibration analysis, and the seismic signal is applied to the base as a load signal. The ensuing response is determined using an accelerometer, having an accuracy of 492.2 (mv/g). It detects and converts the vibration signal into a voltage signal, which is further analysed using a data acquisition system. It is found that the existence of a crack decreases the structure’s stiffness, leading to a decrease in the natural frequencies. This decrease can be around 15% of the original frequency for more significant cracks. It is established that the maximum response can increase up to 20% of the undamaged structure response as the location and depth of the crack vary. These response changes manifest in cracks at the joints where elevated stresses are generated. Moreover, a change in gravitational acceleration does not affect the lateral response. The response of the damaged structure can be mitigated around 85% by introducing new steel members at the joints. This study helps determine structure health in the case of random vibrations. Timely evaluating damage severity across diverse structural elements is a preemptive measure against potential catastrophic scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data and materials are readily available to reproduce the results of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Ceresa P, Petrini L, Pinho R (2007) Flexure-shear fiber beam-column elements for modeling frame structures under seismic loading - state of the art. J Earthquake Eng 11(sup1):46–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701280237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fraraccio G, Brügger A, Betti R (2008) Identification and damage detection in structures subjected to base excitation. Exp Mech 48(4):521–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-008-9124-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kshirsagar SV, Bhuyar LB (2010) Signature analysis of cracked cantilever beam. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol 2(5):7–13

    Google Scholar 

  4. Teng JG, Yu T, Fernando D (2012) Strengthening of steel structures with fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Constr Steel Res 78:131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nour El-Din M, Kim J (2014) Sensitivity analysis of pile-founded fixed steel jacket platforms subjected to seismic loads. Ocean Eng 85:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Didrov M, Gavriloski V, Jovanova J (2014) Vibration analysis of cantilever beam for damage detection. FME Transact 42(4):311–316. https://doi.org/10.5937/fmet1404311d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Romaszko M, Sapiński B, Sioma A (2015) Forced vibrations analysis of a cantilever beam using the vision method. J Theor Appl Mech 53:243–254. https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl.53.1.243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. El-Din MN, Kim J (2015) Seismic performance evaluation and retrofit of fixed jacket offshore platform structures. J Perform Constr Facil 29(4):04014099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khalate A, Bhagwat V (2016) Detection of cracks present in composite cantilever beam by vibration analysis technique. IJISET-Int J Innov Sci, Eng Technol 3(1):400–404

    Google Scholar 

  10. Talakayala DS, Naik S, Gangadhar L (2016) Forced vibration analysis of breathing cracked cantilever beam using matlab. Int J Sci Eng Res 7:300–304

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elsayed T, El-Shaib M, Gbr K (2016) Reliability of fixed offshore jacket platform against earthquake collapse. Ships Offshore Struct 11(2):167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2014.969473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Toyoshi T (2019) Residual displacement and residual strain measurement for steel frame under seismic load by integrated dot centroid tracking method. Measurement 145:444–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.066

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim S (2019) Seismic performance evaluation of high-rise steel buildings dependent on wind exposures. Adv Mech Eng 11(3):1687814019835111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019835111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pohoryles DA, Melo J, Rossetto T, Varum H, Bisby L (2019) Seismic retrofit schemes with frp for deficient rc beam-column joints: state-of-the-art review. J Compos Constr 23(4):03119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartweg M, Bär J (2019) Analysis of the crack location in notched steel bars with a multiple dc potential drop measurement. Procedia Struct Integ 17:254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hokmabady H, Mojtahedi A, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Farajpour I (2019) Calibration and bias-correction of the steel offshore jacket platform models using experimental data. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 145(3):04019008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan MA, Akhtar K, Ahmad N, Shah F, Khattak N (2020) Vibration analysis of damaged and undamaged steel structure systems: cantilever column and frame. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 19(3):725–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0591-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karmaker R, Deb UK, Das A (2020) Modeling and simulation of a cracked beam with different location using fem. Comput Water, Energy, Environ Eng 9(04):145. https://doi.org/10.4236/cweee.2020.94010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kadhum AK, Abdul-Razzaq KS (2020). Effect of seismic load on steel frame multistory building from economical point of view. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol. 2213, p. 020114 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000052. AIP Publishing LLC

  20. Yu H, Wang B, Gao Z, Li Y (2020) An exact and efficient time-domain method for random vibration analysis of linear structures subjected to uniformly modulated or fully non-stationary excitations. J Sound Vib 488:115648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu S, Wang Z, Pan J, Wang P (2021) Experimental and numerical research on the multi-stage seismic failure modes of steel frame with end-plate connection. Structures 33:3495–3514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ye N, Su C, Yang Y (2021) Free and forced vibration analysis in abaqus based on the polygonal scaled boundary finite element method. Adv Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7664870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karmaker R, Deb UK (2022) Effects of crack location and depths for an iron bar: a finite element approach. Mater Today Proc 49:2225–2233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahiwale D, Madake H, Phadtare N, Jarande A, Jambhale D (2022) Modal analysis of cracked cantilever beam using ansys software. Mate Today Proc 56:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tafsirojjaman T, Ur Rahman Dogar A, Liu Y, Manalo A, Thambiratnam DP (2022) Performance and design of steel structures reinforced with frp composites: a state-of-the-art review. Eng Fail Anal 138:106371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tabrizikahou A, Kuczma M, Łasecka-Plura M, Noroozinejad Farsangi E, Noori M, Gardoni P, Li S (2022) Application and modelling of shape-memory alloys for structural vibration control: state-of-the-art review. Constr Build Mater 342:127975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Giraldo G (2021) How to compute the coefficients for rayleigh dam**? https://www.simscale.com/knowledge-base/rayleigh-dam**-coefficients/

  28. Schopper S (2020) Proportional dam** (Rayleigh dam**). https://wiki.tum.de/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=630294659

  29. Wilson EL (1996) Three-dimensional static and dynamic analysis of structures. Computers and Structures Inc

  30. Thomson W (1996) Theory of vibration with applications, 4E. Taylor & Francis

  31. Young WC, Budynas RG, Sadegh AM (2012) Roark’s formulas for stress and strain, 7E. McGraw Hill LLC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Hamza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Marcelo Areias Trindade.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamza, M., Akhtar, K. & Khan, M.A. Modal and dynamic analysis of damaged steel column-beam frame structure subjected to seismic vibrations using experimental and finite element analysis approach. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 94 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04648-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04648-2

Keywords

Navigation