SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical and Experimental Investigation on Dynamic Characteristic Changes of Encased Steel Profile Before and After Cyclic Loading Tests

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical and experimental investigation regarding changes in dynamic characteristics (natural frequencies, mode shapes, and dam** ratios) of encased steel profile of concrete-encased composite column-steel beam connections prior to and following lateral cyclic loading tests. To do so, four specimens with different column-beam connection details were considered. Pre-ambient vibration measurements were first conducted to extract experimental dynamic characteristics of encased steel profile in column-beam connections using enhanced frequency domain decomposition (EFDD) method in frequency domain and stochastic subspace identification (SSI) method in time-domain. Next, encased steel columns were enforced with longitudinal rebar, stirrups, and concrete to turn them into concrete-encased composite column. Lateral cyclic loading tests were performed on composite column-beam connections until failure. Concrete, stirrups, and rebar were removed and cleaned from the encased steel column after the cyclic loading tests. Post-ambient vibration measurements were repeated on the damaged models for further evaluation and comparisons. Additionally, 3D finite-element models of the samples were constituted using Abaqus program, and modal analyses were performed for each specimen to obtain the numerical dynamic characteristics and compare them with experimental results. The results show that natural frequencies distinctly decrease due to damages in the column-beam connection zones. The maximum decreases were calculated as 8.53% and 16.01% in EPCSB-I; 6.92% and 16.44% in EPCSB-II; 17.38% and 12.20% in EPCSB-III; as well as 23.10% and 22.85% in EPCSB-IV for EFDD and SSI methods, respectively. Also, after the cyclic loading tests, increasing of flexibility and rotational movements due to the decrease in joint stiffness has affected the mode shapes. When the initial finite-element analyses and experimental results were compared with each other, the maximum differences were obtained between 0.18% and 8.99% for EPCSB-I, 2.62% and 25.27% for EPCSB-II, 0.84% and 28.60% for EPCSB-III, and 0.19% and 29.87% for EPCSB-IV, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liang QQ (2018) Analysis and design of steel and composite structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ren QX, Han LH, Hou C, Tao Z, Li S (2017) Concrete-encased CFST columns under combined compression and torsion: experimental investigation. J Constr Steel Res 138:729–741

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karagah H, Shi C, Dawood M, Belarbi A (2015) Experimental investigation of short steel columns with localized corrosion. Thin Walled Struct 87:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lacki P, Derlatka A, Kasza P (2018) Comparison of steel-concrete composite column and steel column. Compos Struct 202:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campian C, Nagy Z, Pop M (2015) Behavior of fully encased steel-concrete composite columns subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading. Procedia Eng 117:439–451

    Google Scholar 

  6. Begum M, Driver RG, Elwi AE (2013) Behaviour of partially encased composite columns with high strength concrete. Eng Struct 56:1718–1727

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cai J, Pan J, Li X (2018) Behavior of ECC-encased CFST columns under axial compression. Eng Struct 171:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen CC, Chen CC, Shen JH (2018) Effects of steel-to-member depth ratio and axial load on flexural ductility of concrete-encased steel composite columns. Eng Struct 155:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim SH, Yom KS, Choi SM (2016) Stress-transfer in concrete encased and filled tube square columns employed in top-down construction. Steel Compos Struct 22(1):63–77

    Google Scholar 

  10. Munoz PR, Hsu CTT (1997) Behavior of biaxially loaded concrete-encased composite columns. J Struct Eng 123(9):1163–1171

    Google Scholar 

  11. An YF, Han LH (2014) Behaviour of concrete-encased CFST columns under combined compression and bending. J Constr Steel Res 101:314–330

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peng-zhen L, Lin-feng C, Yang L, Zheng-lun L, Hua S (2018) Study on mechanical behavior of negative bending region based design of composite bridge deck. Int J Civ Eng 16(5):489–497

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li BY, Yang YL, Chen YF, Cheng W, Zhang LB (2018) Behavior of connections between square CFST columns and H-section steel beams. J Constr Steel Res 145:10–27

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim CS, Park HG, Chung KS, Choi IR (2012) Eccentric axial load testing for concrete-encased steel columns using 800 MPa steel and 100 MPa concrete. J Struct Eng 138(8):1019–1031

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li S, Han LH, Hou C (2018) Concrete-encased CFST columns under combined compression and torsion: analytical behaviour. J Constr Steel Res 144:236–252

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liao FY, Han LH, Tao Z (2014) Behaviour of composite joints with concrete encased CFST columns under cyclic loading: experiments. Eng Struct 59:745–764

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qian WW, Li W, Han LH, Zhao XL (2016) Analytical behavior of concrete-encased CFST columns under cyclic lateral loading. J Constr Steel Res 120:206–220

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G, Cosenza E, Manfredi G (2007) Implementation of OMA procedures using labview: theory and application. In: 2nd international operational modal analysis conference, vol 30. Copenhagen, pp 1–13

  19. Abdulamit A, Demetriu S, Aldea A, Neagu C, Gaftoi D (2017) Ambient vibration tests at some buttress dams in Romania. Procedia Eng 199:2196–2201

    Google Scholar 

  20. Biswal S, Ramaswamy A (2017) Finite element model updating of concrete structures based on imprecise probability. Mech Syst Signal Process 94:165–179

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nozari A, Behmanesh I, Yousefianmoghadam S, Moaveni B, Stavridis A (2017) Effects of variability in ambient vibration data on model updating and damage identification of a 10-story building. Eng Struct 151:540–553

    Google Scholar 

  22. Votsis RA, Kyriakides N, Chrysostomou CZ, Tantele E, Demetriou T (2012) Ambient vibration testing of two masonry monuments in Cyprus. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 43:58–68

    Google Scholar 

  23. Altunişik AC, Adanur S, Genç AF, Günaydin M, Okur FY (2016) Non-destructive testing of an ancient masonry bastion. J Cult Herit 22:1049–1054

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lacanna G, Ripepe M, Marchetti E, Coli M, Garzonio CA (2016) Dynamic response of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence, Italy, based on ambient vibration test. J Cult Herit 20:632–640

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leyder C, Chatzi E, Frangi A (2017) Vibration-based model updating of a timber frame structure. Procedia Eng 199:2132–2139

    Google Scholar 

  26. Russo S (2016) Integrated assessment of monumental structures through ambient vibrations and ND tests: the case of Rialto Bridge. J Cult Herit 19:402–414

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brownjohn J, Au SK, Li B, Bassitt J (2017) Optimised ambient vibration testing of long span bridges. Procedia Eng 199:38–47

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lin J, Leung LK, Xu YL, Zhan S, Zhu S (2018) Field measurement, model updating, and response prediction of a large-scale straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine structure. Measurement 130:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zona A, Barbato M, Conte JP (2005) Finite element response sensitivity analysis of steel-concrete composite beams with deformable shear connection. J Eng Mech 131(11):1126–1139

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kheyroddin A, Emami E, Khalili A (2020) RC beam-column connections retrofitted by steel prop: experimental and analytical studies. Int J Civ Eng 18:501–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00481-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chellini G, De Roeck G, Nardini L, Salvatore W (2010) Damage analysis of a steel–concrete composite frame by finite element model updating. J Constr Steel Res 66(3):398–411

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hüsem M, Nasery MM, Okur FY, Altunişik AC (2018) Experimental evaluation of damage effect on dynamic characteristics of concrete encased composite column-beam connections. Eng Fail Anal 91:129–150

    Google Scholar 

  33. Malveiro J, Ribeiro D, Sousa C, Calçada R (2018) Model updating of a dynamic model of a composite steel-concrete railway viaduct based on experimental tests. Eng Struct 164:40–52

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jacobsen NJ, Andersen P, Brincker R (2006) Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in operational modal analysis. In: Proceedings of ISMA2006: international conference on noise & vibration engineering. Belgium Leuven, pp 18–20

  35. Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2011) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, vol 729. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Felber AJ (1994) Development of a hybrid bridge evaluation system (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia)

  37. Peeters B, De Roeck G (2000) Reference based stochastic subspace identification in civil engineering. Inverse Probl Eng 8(1):47–74

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ren WX, Zhao T, Harik IE (2004) Experimental and analytical modal analysis of steel arch bridge. J Struct Eng 130(7):1022–1031

    Google Scholar 

  39. McConnell KG, Varoto PS (1995) Vibration testing: theory and practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Juang JN (1994) Applied system identification. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Yu DJ, Ren WX (2005) EMD-based stochastic subspace identification of structures from operational vibration measurements. Eng Struct 27(12):1741–1751

    Google Scholar 

  42. Allemang RJ (2003) The modal assurance criterion–20 years of use and abuse. Sound Vib 37(8):14–23

    Google Scholar 

  43. Committee AISC (2010) Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10). American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  44. TS648 (2016) Building code for steel structures. Turkish Standardization Institute, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hwang HJ, Eom TS, Park HG, Lee SH, Kim HS (2015) Cyclic loading test for beam-column connections of concrete-filled U-shaped steel beams and concrete-encased steel angle columns. J Struct Eng 141(11):04015020

    Google Scholar 

  46. PULSE (2006) Analyzers and Solutions, Release 11.2. Bruel and Kjaer, Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S, Denmark

  47. OMA (2006) Operational Modal Analysis, Release 4.0. Structural Vibration Solution A/S, Denmark

  48. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2007) Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components, Report No. FEMA-461

  49. ABAQUS/CAE v6.12 Programme (2016) Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. Providence, RI, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey

    Mohammad Manzoor Nasery, Metin Hüsem, Fatih Yesevi Okur & Ahmet Can Altunişik

Authors
  1. Mohammad Manzoor Nasery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Metin Hüsem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatih Yesevi Okur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmet Can Altunişik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Can Altunişik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasery, M.M., Hüsem, M., Okur, F.Y. et al. Numerical and Experimental Investigation on Dynamic Characteristic Changes of Encased Steel Profile Before and After Cyclic Loading Tests. Int J Civ Eng 18, 1411–1431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00545-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00545-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation