Abstract
The aim of this article is to analyze a robust numerical approximation to the solution along with the scaled first derivative (physically known as diffusive flux) of its components of a weakly coupled system of singularly perturbed convection-diffusion boundary-value-problems having diffusion parameters of different orders of magnitude. To accomplish this, we construct a generalized S-mesh, a general form of the piecewise-uniform Shishkin mesh, which appropriately resolves the overlap** boundary layers caused by the multiple diffusion parameters. For discretizing the governing system of equations, we confine our study to the upwind finite difference scheme. At first, we prove that the numerical solution converges uniformly in \(C^0\)-norm with faster convergence rate on the generalized S-mesh than the standard Shishkin mesh. Afterwards, we prove uniform convergence of the global numerical approximation in an appropriate weighted \(C^1\)-norm with same order of accuracy, which essentially establishes global accuracy to the numerical solution as well as the scaled discrete derivative. We confirm the theoretical findings by conducting extensive numerical experiments on two test examples for both equal and unequal values of diffusion parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreev VB (2002) Pointwise and weighted a priori estimates of the solution and its first derivative for a singularly perturbed convection-diffusion equation. Differ. Equ. 38:918–929
Bose S, Mukherjee K (2022) Numerical approximation of system of singularly perturbed convection-diffusion problems on different layer-adapted meshes. In: Das B, Patgiri R, Bandyopadhyay S, Balas VE (eds) Modeling, Simulation and Optimization. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 523–535
Cen Z (2005) Parameter-uniform finite difference scheme for a system of coupled singularly perturbed convection–diffusion equations. Int. J. Comput. Math. 82(2):177–192
Christy R, Tamilselvan A, Geetha N (2020) An analysis of overlap** schwarz method for a weakly coupled system of singularly perturbed convection–diffusion equations. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 92(1):528–544
Ervin V, Layton W (1987) On the approximation of derivatives of singularly perturbed boundary value problems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 8:265–277
Farrell PA, Hegarty AF, Miller JJH, ORiordan E, Shishkin GI (2000) Robust computational techniques for boundary layers. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press
Kellogg RB, Tsan A (1978) Analysis of some differences approximations for a singular perturbation problem without turning point. Math. Comp. 32(144):1025–1039
Kopteva N, Stynes M (2001) Approximation of derivatives in a convection-diffusion two-point boundary value problem. Appl. Numer. Math. 39:47–60
Linß T (2007) Analysis of an upwind finite-difference scheme for a system of coupled singularly perturbed convection–diffusion equations. Computing 79:23–32
Madden N, Stynes M (2003) A uniformly convergent numerical method for a coupled system of two singularly perturbed linear reaction-diffusion problems. IMA J Numer Anal 23
Manassero M, Shackelford CD (1994) The role of diffusion in contaminant migration through soil barriers. Riv. Ital. Geotec. 28(1):5–31
Miller JJH, O’Riordan E, Shishkin GI (1996) Fitted Numerical Methods for Singular Perturbation Problems. World Scientific, Singapore
Mohapatra J, Natesan S (2010) Parameter-uniform numerical method for global solution and global normalized flux of singularly perturbed boundary value problems using grid equidistribution. Comput. Math. Appl. 60:1924–1939
O’Riordan E, Pickett ML (2017) Numerical approximations to the scaled first derivatives of a two parameter singularly perturbed problem. J Comput Appl Math 347
Pao CV (1992) Nonlinear Parabolic and Elliptic Equations. Springer, US, Boston, MA
Priyadharshini RM, Ramanujam N (2009a) Approximation of derivative for a singularly perturbed second-order ordinary differential equation of robin type with discontinuous convection coefficient and source term. Numer Math Theory Methods Appl 2(1):100–118
Priyadharshini RM, Ramanujam N (2009b) Approximation of derivative to a singularly perturbed second-order ordinary differential equation with discontinuous convection coefficient using hybrid difference scheme. Int J Comput Math 86(8):1355–1365
Priyadharshini RM, Ramanujam N (2013) Uniformly-convergent numerical methods for a system of coupled singularly perturbed convection-diffusion equations with mixed type boundary conditions. Math. Model. Anal. 18(5):577–598
Priyadharshini RM, Ramanujam N, Shanthi V (2009) Approximation of derivative in a system of singularly perturbed convection-diffusion equations. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 29(1–2):137–151
Shackelford CD, Daniel DE (1991) Diffusion in saturated soil. I: Background. J. Geotech. Eng., 117(3):467–484
Subburayan V (2016) A robust computational method for system of singularly perturbed differential difference equations with discontinuous convection coefficients. Int. J. Comput. Methods 13(4):1641008
Tamilselvan A, Ramanujam N (2010) A parameter uniform numerical method for a system of singularly perturbed convection-diffusion equations with discontinuous convection coefficients. Int. J. Comput. Math. 87(6):1374–1388
Tamilselvan A, Ramanujam N, Shanthi V (2007) A numerical method for singularly perturbed weakly coupled system of two second order ordinary differential equations with discontinuous source term. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 202(1):203–216
Vulanović R (2001a) A higher-order scheme for quasilinear boundary value problems with two small parameters. Computing 67:287–303
Vulanović R (2001b) A priori meshes for singularly perturbed quasilinear two-point boundary value problems. IMA J Numer Anal 21(1)
Yang ZP, Pao CV (1999) Positive solutions and dynamics of some reaction diffusion models in hiv transmission. Nonlinear Anal 35(3)
Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. The first author wishes to acknowledge Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, for the research grant 09/1187(0004)/2019-EMR-I during his Ph.D.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Zhaosheng Feng.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A Proof of Lemma 6
Proof
\((\mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _2, i+1}-\mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _2, i})=-\frac{\uplambda h_{i+1}}{\varepsilon _2}\mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _2, i+1}\). So we have
Similarly, one can establish the other inequality for \(\texttt{L}_{x, \varepsilon _2}^{N}\varvec{\mathbb {G}}_{\varepsilon _2, i}\). Also, \((\mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _1, i+1}-\mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _1, i})=-\frac{\uplambda h_{i+1}}{\varepsilon _1}\mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _1, i+1}\). It implies that
\(\square \)
Appendix B Proof of Lemma 7
Proof
-
(i)
For \(1 \le i < N_1\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _1, i} \le e^{\frac{-\uplambda x_i}{\varepsilon _1 \!+\! \uplambda h_i}}=e^{\frac{-\uplambda x_i}{\varepsilon _1 \!+\! \uplambda \texttt{h}^1}} \!\le \! e^{\frac{-2i{N_1}^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N}{1+2N_{1}^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N}} = (\ln ^{\Bbbk -1} N)^{\frac{-2i{N_1}^{-1}}{1+2N_{1}^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N}} \le \text {C} (\ln ^{\Bbbk -1} N)^{{-2iN_{1}^{-1}}}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
For \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{n-1}N_j \le i < \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{n}N_j, ~\forall ~n \in \{ 2, 3, ..., \Bbbk \}\), and proceeding as above, we get
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _1, i}&\le e^{\frac{-\uplambda x_i}{\varepsilon _1 + \uplambda h_i}} =e^{\frac{-\uplambda x_i}{\varepsilon _1 + \uplambda \texttt{h}^{n}}}\nonumber \\&\le (\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N)^{\frac{-2\big (1-(i-\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}N_j)N_n^{-1}\big )}{1+2N_{n}^{-1}(\ln ^{n-1}N -\ln ^{n} N)}}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n}N)^{\frac{-2\big (i-\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}N_j\big )N_n^{-1}}{1+2N_{n}^{-1}(\ln ^{n-1}N -\ln ^{n} N)}}, \nonumber \\&\le \text {C} (\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N)^{-2\big (1-(i-\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}N_j){N_{n}^{-1}}\big )}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n}N)^{{-2\big (i-\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}N_j\big )N_{n}^{-1}}}. \end{aligned}$$(B.1)Since, \(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N<\ln ^{\Bbbk -n}N\), the inequality in (B.1) implies that
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _1, i}&\le {\text {C}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N)^{-2\big (1-(i-\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}N_j)N_n^{-1}\big )} (\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N)^{-2\big (i-\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}N_j\big )N_n^{-1}}}\nonumber \\ {}&\le {\text {C}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1} N)^{-2}}\le \text {C}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1} N)^{-1}. \end{aligned}$$(B.2)In particular, let \(\displaystyle i=\sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk }N_j-1\). Then, from the inequality in (B.1) for \(n=\Bbbk \), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _1, i}&\le {\text {C}(\ln N)^{-2(1-(N_{\Bbbk }-1)N_{\Bbbk }^{-1})} N^{-2(N_{\Bbbk }-1)N_{\Bbbk }^{-1}}}\nonumber \\&= {\text {C}(\ln N)^{-2N_{\Bbbk }^{-1}} N^{-2+2N_{\Bbbk }^{-1}}}\nonumber \\&\le \text {C} N^{-2+2N_{\Bbbk }^{-1}}\le \text {C} N^{-1}. \end{aligned}$$(B.3) -
(iii)
For \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk }N_j \le i < \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +1}N_j\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _2, i}&\le e^{\frac{-\uplambda x_i}{\varepsilon _2 + \uplambda h_i}}= e^{\frac{-\uplambda x_i}{\varepsilon _2 + \uplambda \texttt{h}^{\Bbbk +1}}}\\&\le e^{\frac{-2(i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk }N_j)N_{\Bbbk +1}^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N}{1+2N_{\Bbbk +1}^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N}} \\&= (\ln ^{\Bbbk -1} N)^{\frac{-2(i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk }N_j)N_{\Bbbk +1}^{-1}}{1+2N_{\Bbbk +1}^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N}} \\&\le \text {C} (\ln ^{\Bbbk -1} N)^{{-2(i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk }N_j)N_{\Bbbk +1}^{-1}}}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(iv)
For \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_j \le i < \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n}N_j, ~\forall ~n \in \{ 2, 3, ..., \Bbbk \},\)
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _2, i}&\le e^{\frac{-\uplambda x_i}{\varepsilon _2 + \uplambda h_i}} =e^{\frac{-\uplambda x_i}{\varepsilon _2 + \uplambda H^{\Bbbk +n}}}\nonumber \\&\le (\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N)^{\frac{-2\big (1-(i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_j)N_{\Bbbk +n}^{-1}\big )}{1+2N_{\Bbbk +n}^{-1}(\ln ^{n-1}N -\ln ^{n} N)}}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n}N)^{\frac{-2\big (i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_j\big )N_{\Bbbk +n}^{-1}}{1+2N_{\Bbbk +n}^{-1}(\ln ^{n-1}N -\ln ^{n} N)}}, \nonumber \\&\le \text {C} (\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N)^{-2\Big (1-(i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_j){N_{\Bbbk +n}^{-1}}\Big )}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n}N)^{{-2\big (i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_j\big )N_{\Bbbk +n}^{-1}}}. \end{aligned}$$(B.4)Since, \(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N<\ln ^{\Bbbk -n}N\), the inequality in (B.4) implies that
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _2, i}&\le {\text {C}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N)^{-2\big (1-(i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_j)N_{\Bbbk +n}^{-1}\big )} (\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N)^{-2\big (i-\sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_j\big )N_{\Bbbk +n}^{-1}}}\nonumber \\ {}&\le \text {C}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1} N)^{-2} \le \text {C}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1} N)^{-1}. \end{aligned}$$(B.5)Let \(\displaystyle i=\sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{2\Bbbk }N_j -1=N/2-1\). Then, from the inequality in (B.4) for \(n=\Bbbk \), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {G}_{\varepsilon _2, i}&\le {\text {C}(\ln N)^{-2(1-(N_{2\Bbbk }-1)N_{2\Bbbk }^{-1})} N^{-2(N_{2\Bbbk }-1)N_{2\Bbbk }^{-1}}}\nonumber \\&= {\text {C}(\ln N)^{-2N_{2\Bbbk }^{-1}} N^{-2+2N_{2\Bbbk }^{-1}}}\nonumber \\&\le \text {C} N^{-2+2N_{2\Bbbk }^{-1}}\le \text {C} N^{-1}. \end{aligned}$$(B.6)
This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Appendix C Proof of Lemma 8
Proof
We define the truncation error associated with the smooth component \(\varvec{S}\) by
Then, by using the bounds of derivatives of \(\varvec{s}\) given in Lemma 3, we get
Similarly, we can prove that \( \Big |\texttt{L}_{x, \varepsilon _2}^{N}(\varvec{S}-\varvec{s})(x_i)\Big |\le \text {C}N^{-1}. \) Now, we derive the desired bounds for the truncation error associated with the layer component \(\varvec{R}\).
-
(i)
Let \(x_i \in (0,\eta _{\varepsilon _1}^1).\) For \(\displaystyle 1 \le i < N_1\), by using Lemma 3 and the method of [ Kellogg and Tsan (1978), Lemma 3.3] and since \(\frac{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _2} <1, \text {sinh}x \le x,\) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Big |\texttt{L}_{x,\varepsilon _1}^{N}(\varvec{R}-\varvec{r})(x_i)\Big |&\le \text {C} \Bigg [\int _{x_{i-1}}^{x_{i+1}}(\varepsilon _1^{-2}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x)+ \varepsilon _2^{-2}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x))dx\Bigg ]\nonumber \\&\le \text {C} \Bigg [\varepsilon _1^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x_{i})\text {sinh}(\uplambda \texttt{h}^{1}/\varepsilon _1)+ \varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i})\text {sinh}(\uplambda \texttt{h}^{1}/\varepsilon _2)\Bigg ]\nonumber \\&\le \text {C} \Bigg [\varepsilon _1^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x_{i})(\uplambda \texttt{h}^{1}/\varepsilon _1)+ \varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i})(\uplambda \texttt{h}^{1}/\varepsilon _2)\Bigg ]\nonumber \\&\le \text {C} \Bigg [(\varepsilon _1^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x_{i})+\varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i}))N^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N\Bigg ]. \end{aligned}$$(C.1)Now, for \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{n-1}N_{j} \le i < \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{n}N_{j}, \forall ~n \in \{2, ..., \Bbbk \},\) since \(\eta _{\varepsilon _1}^1< \frac{\eta _{\varepsilon _2}^\Bbbk }{2} \Rightarrow \frac{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _2} \ln N < \ln ^{\Bbbk }N\), we get \(\frac{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _2} (\ln ^n N-\ln ^{(n+1)}N) < \ln ^{\Bbbk }N,\) and proceeding as above we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Big |\texttt{L}_{x,\varepsilon _1}^{N}(\varvec{R}-\varvec{r})(x_i)\Big |&\le \text {C} \Bigg [\varepsilon _1^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x_{i})(\uplambda \texttt{h}^{n}/\varepsilon _1)+ \varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i})(\uplambda \texttt{h}^{n}/\varepsilon _2)\Bigg ]\nonumber \\ {}&\le \text {C} \Bigg [\varepsilon _1^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x_{i})N^{-1}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N-\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+2}N)\nonumber \\ {}&+\varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i})(\varepsilon _1/\varepsilon _2)N^{-1}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N-\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+2}N) \Bigg ]\nonumber \\&\le \text {C} \Bigg [\varepsilon _1^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x_{i})N^{-1}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N-\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+2}N)\nonumber \\ {}&+\varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i})N^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk }N \Bigg ]. \end{aligned}$$(C.2)Similarly, for \(\displaystyle 1 \le i < N_1\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \Big |\texttt{L}_{x,\varepsilon _2}^{N}(\varvec{R}-\varvec{r})(x_i)\Big | \le \text {C} \Bigg [(\varepsilon _1^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x_{i})+\varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i}))N^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N\Bigg ], \end{aligned}$$(C.3)and, for \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{n-1}N_{j} \le i < \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{n}N_{j}, \forall ~n \in \{ 2, ..., \Bbbk \}\),
$$\begin{aligned} \Big |\texttt{L}_{x,\varepsilon _2}^{N}(\varvec{R}-\varvec{r})(x_i)\Big |&\le \text {C} \Bigg [\varepsilon _1^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _1}(x_{i})N^{-1}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N-\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+2}N)\nonumber \\ {}&\quad \, +\varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i})N^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk }N \Bigg ]. \end{aligned}$$(C.4) -
(ii)
Let \(x_i \in [\eta _{\varepsilon _1}^1, \eta _{\varepsilon _2}^1).\) Since \(\varepsilon _1^{-2}\exp (-\uplambda x/\varepsilon _1) \le \varepsilon _2^{-2}\exp (-\uplambda x/\varepsilon _2)\), for \(x > 2\varepsilon _1/\uplambda \), then we obtain, for \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk }N_{j} \le i < \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +1}N_{j},\) that
$$\begin{aligned} \Big |\texttt{L}_{x,\varepsilon _1}^{N}(\varvec{R}-\varvec{r})(x_i)\Big |&\le \text {C} \Big [\int _{x_{i-1}}^{x_{i+1}} \varepsilon _2^{-2}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x)dx\Big ]\nonumber \\&\le \text {C} \Big [\varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i})(\uplambda \texttt{h}^{\Bbbk +1}/\varepsilon _2)\Big ]\nonumber \\&\le \text {C}\Big [ \varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_i)N^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk }N\Big ], \quad \uplambda \texttt{h}^{\Bbbk +1} \le \text {C}\varepsilon _2N^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk } N. \end{aligned}$$(C.5)Similarly, for \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_{j} \le i < \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n}N_{j}, \forall ~n \in \{2, ..., \Bbbk \},\)
$$\begin{aligned} \Big |\texttt{L}_{x,\varepsilon _1}^{N}(\varvec{R}-\varvec{r})(x_i)\Big |&\le \text {C} \Big [\varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_{i})(\uplambda \texttt{h}^{\Bbbk +n}/\varepsilon _2)\Big ]\nonumber \\&\le \text {C}\Big [ \varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_i)N^{-1}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N-\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+2}N) \Big ]. \end{aligned}$$(C.6)Apply same technique for \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk }N_{j} \le i < \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +1}N_{j},\) we have
$$\begin{aligned} \Big |\texttt{L}_{x,\varepsilon _2}^{N}(\varvec{R}-\varvec{r})(x_i)\Big |&\le \text {C}\Big [ \varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_i)N^{-1}\ln ^{\Bbbk }N\Big ], \end{aligned}$$(C.7)and for \(\displaystyle \sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n-1}N_{j} \le i < \sum _{j=1}^{\Bbbk +n}N_{j}, \forall ~n \in \{2, ..., \Bbbk \},\)
$$\begin{aligned} \Big |\texttt{L}_{x,\varepsilon _2}^{N}(\varvec{R}-\varvec{r})(x_i)\Big |\le \text {C}\Big [ \varepsilon _2^{-1}\mathfrak {B}_{\varepsilon _2}(x_i)N^{-1}(\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+1}N-\ln ^{\Bbbk -n+2}N)\Big ]. \end{aligned}$$(C.8)
Thus, we obtain the required truncation error bounds for \(\varvec{R}\) from the inequalities (C.1)–(C.8). \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bose, S., Mukherjee, K. A fast uniformly accurate global numerical approximation to solution and scaled derivative of system of singularly perturbed problems with multiple diffusion parameters on generalized adaptive mesh. Comp. Appl. Math. 42, 180 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02218-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02218-9
Keywords
- System of singularly perturbed convection-diffusion problems
- Overlap** boundary layers
- Generalized S-mesh
- Scaled discrete derivative
- Parameter-uniform convergence