Log in

Clinical Use of Impedance Cardiography for Hemodynamic Assessment of Early Cardiovascular Disease and Management of Hypertension

  • Review article
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is for clinicians considering impedance cardiography (ICG) for secondary prevention. ICG is an inexpensive noninvasive technology that can be used to assess hemodynamic function of the central cardiovascular system. Diverse abnormalities of ventricular function, systolic and diastolic, can be detected by ICG. Additional data pertaining to decompensation can be obtained by taking ICG readings with the patient performing postural change, from upright to supine, to quantify the compensatory response. Vascular load consists of resistive and pulsatile loads. Systemic vascular resistance can provide a measure of resistive load. Pulsatile load has two components: arterial stiffness and wave reflection. ICG can be used to calculate arterial compliance and detect aortic wave reflection. For stage 1 hypertension, a significant issue is whether a treating clinician should add pharmacotherapy to lifestyle modification. Adults who have multiple cardiovascular risk factors with stage 1 hypertension have early cardiovascular disease. ICG can be used to identify the functional abnormalities associated with the cardiovascular disease. For the management of hypertension, ICG can be used to calculate the underlying hemodynamic parameters of cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance associated with a patient’s blood pressure. There can be wide ranges for cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance, with many patients having low cardiac index with high systemic vascular resistance or vice versa. These hemodynamic data can be used to customize pharmacotherapy. Drug titration can be guided by patient response to treatment using the initial hemodynamic data as a baseline for comparison to subsequent measurements from serial office visits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med. 1986;14:904–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yancy C, Abraham WT. Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in heart failure: utilization of impedance cardiography. Congest Heart Fail. 2003;9:241–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrario CM, Flack JM, Strobeck JE, Smits G, Peters C. Individualizing hypertension treatment with impedance cardiography: a meta-analysis of published trials. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;4(1):5–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeMarzo AP, Calvin JE, Kelly RF, Stamos TD. Using impedance cardiography to assess left ventricular systolic function via postural change in patients with heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;20(4):163–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Antonicelli R, Savonitto S, Gambini C, et al. Impedance cardiography for repeated determination of stroke volume in elderly hypertensives: correlation with pulse Doppler echocardiography. Angiology. 1991;42:648–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Breithaupt K, Erb KA, Neumann B, et al. Comparison of four noninvasive techniques to measure stroke volume: dual-beam Doppler echoaortography, electrical impedance cardiography, mechanosphygmography and M mode echocardiography of the left ventricle. Am J Noninvas Cardiol. 1990;4:203–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Northridge DB, Findlay IN, Wilson J, et al. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance. Br Heart J. 1990;63:93–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pickett BR, Buell JC. Usefulness of the impedance cardiogram to reflect left ventricular diastolic function. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:1099–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DeMarzo AP, Calvin JE. A new approach for low-cost noninvasive detection of asymptomatic heart disease at rest. Prev Cardiol. 2007;10:9–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeMarzo AP, Kelly RF, Calvin JE. Impedance cardiography: a comparison of cardiac output vs waveform analysis for assessing left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;22:145–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buell JC. A practical, cost-effective, noninvasive system for cardiac output and hemodynamic analysis. Am Heart J. 1988;116:657–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Critchley LA, Zhang Y, Critchley JA, et al. A comparison of two impedance cardiographs using head-up tilting and trend analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2002;17:153–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hubbard WN, Fish DR, McBrien DJ. The use of impedance cardiography in heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 1986;12:71–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ovsyshcher I, Gross JN, Blumberg S, et al. Orthostatic responses in patients with DDD pacemakers: signs of autonomic dysfunction. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15:1932–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richards NT, McBrien DJ. Changes in the impedance cardiogram occurring with change in posture in patients with heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 1988;20:365–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith JJ, Muzi M, Barney JA, et al. Impedance-derived cardiac indices in supine and upright exercise. Ann Biomed Eng. 1989;17:507–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ooi H, Chung W, Biolo A. Arterial stiffness and vascular load in heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2008;14:31–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdelhammed AI, Smith RD, Levy P, et al. Noninvasive hemodynamic profiles in hypertensive subjects. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:51S–9S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF, editors. Cardiac failure: clinical implications. McDonald’s blood flow in arteries. London: Hodder Arnold; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2017;7:1. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brunström M, Carlberg B. Association of blood pressure lowering with mortality and cardiovascular disease across blood pressure levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DeMarzo AP. Commentary: using impedance cardiography to detect asymptomatic cardiovascular disease in prehypertensive adults with risk factors. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2018;25(2):219–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-018-0255-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Medina-Lezama J, Narvaez-Guerra O, Herrera-Enriquez K, Morey-Vargas OL, Bolaños-Salazar JF, Abugattas JP, Zea-Diaz H, Chirinos-Revilla JL, Fernandez-Sivincha JG, Delgado-Lazo V, Chirinos DA, Townsend RR, Chirinos JA. Hemodynamic patterns identified by impedance cardiography predict mortality in the general population: the PREVENCION study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(18):e009259. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. DeMarzo AP. Using impedance cardiography with postural change to stratify patients with hypertension. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;5(3):139–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944711406770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Packer M, Abraham WT, Mehra MR, Yancy CW, Lawless CE, Mitchell JE, Smart FW, Bijou R, O'Connor CM, Massie BM, Pina IL, Greenberg BH, Young JB, Fishbein DP, Hauptman PJ, Bourge RC, Strobeck JE, Murali S, Schocken D, Teerlink JR, Levy WC, Trupp RJ, Silver MA. Prospective Evaluation and Identification of Cardiac Decompensation by ICG Test (PREDICT) Study Investigators and Coordinators. Utility of impedance cardiography for the identification of short-term risk of clinical decompensation in stable patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(11):2245–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.071.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamath SA, Drazner MH, Tasissa G, Rogers JG, Stevenson LW, Yancy CW. Correlation of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with advanced heart failure: the bioimpedance cardiography (BIG) substudy of the evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial. Am Heart J. 2009;158(2):217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. DeMarzo AP, Lang RM, Priemer R, Korcarz CE. Computer method for predicting the reliability of impedance cardiography stroke volume measurements. Comput Cardiol. 1995;497–500.

  28. Duprez DA, Duval S, Hoke L, Florea N, Grandits G, Carlson C, Lee J, Cohn JN. Early cardiovascular structural and functional abnormalities as a guide to future morbid events. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487320901416(online ahead of print).

  29. Kubicek WG. On the source of peak first time derivative (dZ/dt) during impedance cardiography. Ann Biomed Eng. 1989;17:459–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tuckman J, Shillingford J. Effect of different degrees of tilt on cardiac output, heart rate and blood pressure in normal man. Br Heart J. 1966;28:32–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarazi RC, Melsher HJ, Dunstan HP, Frohlich ED. Plasma volume changes with upright tilt: studies in hypertension and syncope. J Appl Physiol. 1970;28:121–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Parker JO, Thadani U. Cardiac performance at rest and during exercise in normal subjects. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1979;15(5):935–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buell JC, Alpert BS, McCrory WW. Physical stressors as elicitors of cardiovascular reactivity. In: Matthew KA, Weise SM, Detre T, et al., editors. Handbook of stress, reactivity, and cardiovascular disease. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1986. p. 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  34. De Hert SG, Gillebert TC, Ten Broecke PW, Mertens E, Rodrigus IE Moulijn AC. Contraction–relaxation coupling and impaired left ventricular performance in coronary surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(3):748–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 15th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Kannel WB, Ho KK. The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA. 1996;275:1557–622.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJV, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Wilson Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Bruce L Wilkoffunt SA. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American Collegeof Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128(16):1810–52. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8807.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. DeMarzo AP, Calvin JE, Kelly RF. Impedance cardiography is less sensitive than clinical signs for early detection of fluid retention in heart failure. J Card Fail. 2002;8(4, suppl):S82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-9164(02)70023-7.

  39. Silva Lopes B, Craveiro N, Firmino-Machado J, Ribeiro P, Castelo-Branco M. Hemodynamic differences among hypertensive patients with and without heart failure using impedance cardiography. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;13:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944719876517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mahajan S, Gu J, Lu Y, Khera R, Spatz ES, Zhang M, Sun N, Zheng X, Zhao H, Lu H, Ma ZJ, Krumholz HM. Hemodynamic phenotypes of hypertension based on cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance. Am J Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.042(online ahead of print).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Matthews RE, Magenheim D. Improvement in blood pressure control using a quality improvement process with impedance cardiography to guide antihypertensive therapy. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;10(issue 5, suppl A, P-170):A76.

  42. Krzesiński P, Gielerak G, Stańczyk A, Piotrowicz K, Skrobowski A. Who benefits more from hemodynamically guided hypotensive therapy? The experience from two randomized, prospective and controlled trials. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;10(1):21–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944715618593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. DeMarzo AP. Multiple cardiovascular risk factors indicate cardiovascular disease in stage 1 hypertension. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2019;26(2):135–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-019-00304-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sheppard JP, Stevens S, Stevens R, Martin U, Mant J, Hobbs FDR, McManus RJ. Benefits and harms of antihypertensive treatment in low-risk patients with mild hypertension. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1626–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4684.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney MT, Corrà U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, Graham I, Hall MS, Hobbs FDR, Løchen ML, Löllgen H, Marques-Vidal P, Perk J, Prescott E, Redon J, Richter DJ, Sattar N, Smulders Y, Tiberi M, van der Worp HB, van Dis I, Verschuren WMM, Binno S; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315–2381. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Vanassche T, Verhamme P, Anand SS, Shestakovska O, Fox KA, Bhatt DL, Avezum A, Alings M, Aboyans V, Maggioni AP, Widimsky P, Berkowitz SD, Yusuf S, Connolly SJ, Eikelboom JW, Bosch J. Risk factors and clinical outcomes in chronic coronary and peripheral artery disease: an analysis of the randomized, double-blind COMPASS trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(3):296–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319882154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. DeMarzo AP. Using impedance cardiography to detect asymptomatic cardiovascular disease in prehypertensive adults with risk factors. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2013;20(2):61–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-013-0009-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. DeMarzo AP. Using impedance cardiography to detect subclinical cardiovascular disease in women with multiple risk factors: a pilot study. Prev Cardiol. 2009;12(2):102–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7141.2008.00012.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Kannel WB, Levy D. Assessment of frequency of progression to hypertension in non-hypertensive participants in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358:1682–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Berry JD, Dyer A, Cai X, Garside DB, Ning H, Thomas A, Greenland P, Van Horn L, Tracy RP, Lloyd-Jones DM. Lifetime risks of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:321–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart JC, James WP, Loria CM, Smith SC Jr; International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; Hational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; International Association for the Study of Obesity. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009 20;120(16):1640–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lauer MS, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, Levy D. The impact of obesity on left ventricular mass and geometry. The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1991;266(2):231–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, Kahan T, Mahfoud F, Redon J, Ruilope L, Zanchetti A, Kerins M, Kjeldsen SE, Kreutz R, Laurent S, Lip GYH, McManus R, Narkiewicz K, Ruschitzka F, Schmieder RE, Shlyakhto E, Tsioufis C, Aboyans V, Desormais I. Authors/Task Force Members: 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018;36(10):1953–2041. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Volpe M, Rosei EA, Ambrosioni E, Cottone S, Cuspidi C, Borghi C, De Luca N, Fallo F, Ferri C, Morganti A, Muiesan ML, Sarzani R, Sechi L, Virdis A, Tocci G, Trimarco B, Filippi A, Mancia G. 2012 Consensus Document of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA): strategies to improve blood pressure control in Italy. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2013; 20:45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-013-0007-2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Muñoz D, Uzoije P, Reynolds C, Miller R, Walkley D, Pappalardo S, Tousey P, Munro H, Gonzales H, Song W, White C, Blot WJ, Wang TJ. Polypill for cardiovascular disease prevention in an underserved population. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(12):1114–23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1815359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Webster R, Salam A, de Silva HA, Selak V, Stepien S, Rajapakse S, Amarasekara S, Amarasena N, Billot L, de Silva AP, Fernando M, Guggilla R, Jan S, Jayawardena J, Maulik PK, Mendis S, Mendis S, Munasinghe J, Naik N, Prabhakaran D, Ranasinghe G, Thom S, Tisserra N, Senaratne V, Wijekoon S, Wijeyasingam S, Rodgers A, Patel A; TRIUMPH Study Group. Fixed low-dose triple combination antihypertensive medication vs usual care for blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate hypertension in Sri Lanka: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(6):566–579. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10359.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Nyboer J. Regional pulse volume and perfusion flow measurement: electrical impedance plethysmography. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1960;105(2):264–76. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1960.00270140086010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med. 1966;37(12):1208–12 (PMID: 5339656).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Nagel JH, Shyu LY, Reddy SP, Hurwitz BE, McCabe PM, Schneiderman N. New signal processing techniques for improved precision of noninvasive impedance cardiography. Ann Biomed Eng. 1989;17:517–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. van der Meer BJ, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Bax JJ, Kamp O, de Vries PM. Non-invasive evaluation of left ventricular function by means of impedance cardiography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43(2):130–4. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430203.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Thomas SHL, Crowther A. Impedance cardiography during exercise in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:150–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Feng S, Okuda N, Fu**ami T, Takada K, Nakano S, Ohte N. Detection of impaired left ventricular function in coronary artery disease with acceleration index in the first derivative of the transthoracic impedance change. Clin Cardiol. 1988;11:843–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Goldman L, Ausiello D, editors. Cecil textbook of medicine. 22nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur P. DeMarzo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

There was no research involving human participants or animals in relation to this communication and therefore no requirement for informed consent.

Funding

The author reports that there is no specific funding in relation to this communication.

Conflict of interest

A potential conflict of interest is the fact that the author is an employee of a company which manufactures an impedance cardiograph.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Background

The resistance to flow of an oscillating electrical current is known as impedance (also called electrical bioimpedance when studying a body segment). Impedance plethysmography is a method of recording changes in impedance in a body segment such as an arm or leg [57]. The placement of electrodes defines the body segment being studied. The outer electrodes apply a very tiny electrical current, oscillating in the radio frequency range, to create an electrical field. The inner electrodes record the impedance. Changes in fluid volume and flow vary inversely with the impedance of the body segment, because an increase in electrically-conductive fluid lowers the impedance of the body segment.

Impedance plethysmography which focuses on the body segment of the thorax is called impedance cardiography. The first commercially available impedance cardiograph was introduced in the late 1960s as a noninvasive and unobtrusive method of measuring systolic time intervals and cardiac output in astronauts [58]. The technique was based on measuring certain landmarks on the ICG waveform and performing calculations to obtain stroke volume relying heavily upon empirical validation. Since astronauts are very fit, the formula for stroke volume was based on a “normal” ICG waveform.

1.2 Fundamentals of Impedance Cardiography

An electric field within the thorax is created by applying oscillating, high-frequency, low-amplitude current (which the patient does not feel) from a constant-current source via a set of outer electrodes (see Leads 1 and 4 in Fig. 

Fig. 3
figure 3

Electrode configuration. Electric current is applied to Leads 1 and 4. Voltage is measured by Leads 2 and 3

3). Blood is an electrically conductive saline solution with less conductive cells (such as erythrocytes) floating in it. With each heartbeat, blood movement in the thorax is the major source of impedance change. Contributing factors are changes in volume and velocity of the blood. These pulsatile changes are measured as voltage differences between a set of inner sensing electrodes (see Leads 2 and 3 in Fig. 3). Using Ohm’s Law, the impedance signal (called Z) is obtained by dividing the measured voltage by the constant applied electrical current.

The real-time impedance signal, which resembles an aortic pressure pulse wave [59], is differentiated to yield the dZ/dt signal, which represents the rate of change in thoracic impedance. To facilitate intuitive interpretation, the signal is inverted so that a decrease in impedance appears as a rise in the displayed waveform. On this ICG waveform, aortic valve opening is synchronous with the B point, and aortic valve closing is synchronous with the X point, often occurring at the nadir of the ICG waveform (see Fig. 2). The B point is the incisura of the ascending limb of the systolic wave. The time interval from the B point to the X point is ventricular ejection time. The B point determines the position of the horizontal line which is the baseline of the ICG waveform. The systolic wave is defined as the portion of the ICG waveform, during systole, which is above the baseline. The vertical distance from the baseline to the highest point on the systolic wave is [dZ/dt]max, measured in ohms per second.

In systole, the major source of the impedance change is blood movement in the aorta. The height of the systolic wave, [dZ/dt]max, correlates with left ventricular systolic function [60,61,62]. An ICG parameter, called systolic amplitude, is defined as the ratio of [dZ/dt]max divided by the average impedance of the thorax, Z0 (ohm). Systolic amplitude is a normalized parameter with the same normal range for males and females. While at rest in a recumbent position, a heart with normal systolic function has a systolic amplitude value ≥ 0.03 (ohm/s/ohm).

With normal diastolic function, blood movement in the thorax is not rapid enough to cause a pronounced wave above the baseline in the diastolic segment of the ICG waveform. When filling pressure is elevated, the accelerated rate of filling causes a prominent diastolic wave on the ICG waveform during early diastole. In heart failure, the size of the diastolic wave, which often is synchronous to the third heart sound, may even exceed the size of the systolic wave [13].

The Frank-Starling relation states that, within limits, the force of ventricular contraction is affected by the end-diastolic length of the fibers (the average sarcomere length) comprising the muscular wall, which is closely related to the end-diastolic volume [63]. In a normal heart, the contractile force increases as muscle length increases. An increase in end-diastolic volume causes the muscle to stretch and results in a greater contractile force. This fundamental property of cardiac muscle is represented by an ascending Frank-Starling curve. As the heart fails, the left ventricle delivers a progressively smaller stroke volume from a normal or even elevated end-diastolic volume until a tip** point is reached where an increase in end-diastolic volume causes no change in contractile force. This is the onset of decompensation.

Aortic wave reflection increases afterload and, therefore, results in forward flow deceleration. On the ICG waveform, this causes a widening of the systolic wave. This first appears when the patient is upright because of the additional increase in afterload due to gravitational pooling of blood in lower extrathoracic compartments.

1.3 Impedance Cardiography Test Procedure

For the ICG test for cardiovascular function, the electrodes are applied while the patient is upright. A total of 6 spot-type electrodes are used for acquiring the ICG signal. One electrode, Lead 2, is placed at the base of the right side of the patient’s neck at or near its intersection with the frontal plane (see Fig. 3). A second electrode, Lead 1, is placed on the right side of the neck with its center being 5 cm (cm) directly above the center of the Lead 2 electrode. (For obese patients, Lead 1 electrode should be placed at least 7 cm above the Lead 2 electrode, because the extra spacing is needed to properly protect against the possibility of the skin folding between the Lead 1 and Lead 2 electrodes which would cause the leads to be too close.) Two electrodes, connected by a common leadwire to become Lead 3, are placed on opposite sides of the lower thorax on the mid-axillary line at the level of the sternal xiphoid process. And the last two electrodes, connected by a common leadwire to become Lead 4, are placed with their centers being 5 cm directly below the centers of the Lead 3 electrodes. (For obese patients, Lead 4 electrodes should be placed at least 7 cm below the Lead 3 electrodes, because the extra spacing is needed to properly protect against the possibility of the skin folding between the Lead 3 and Lead 4 electrodes which would cause the leads to be too close.)

Just prior to capturing the ICG signal, the patient should be instructed to breathe normally, remain stationary, and not speak or cough. Immediately following the capturing of the ICG signal for 5 heartbeats in the upright position, the patient is then moved to the supine position. After 30 s, the patient is again instructed to breathe normally, remain stationary, and not speak or cough. Immediately following the capturing of the ICG signal for 5 heartbeats in the supine position, the electrodes are removed from the patient.

The captured real-time impedance signal is digitized and differentiated to produce the ICG waveform which is then ensemble averaged by superimposing the 5 captured heartbeats using the R wave of the electrocardiogram as a trigger. This results in a single ICG waveform representing a single average heartbeat.

1.4 Impedance Cardiography Data Interpretation

For analytical purposes, the ICG waveform is viewed as having systolic and diastolic segments (see Fig. 2). The systolic segment is between the B point and X point. The diastolic segment occurs after the X point. An abnormal ICG waveform during systole would indicate systolic dysfunction, and a prominent wave above the baseline during diastole would indicate diastolic dysfunction.

A heart with normal function produces ICG waveforms with an easily recognizable pattern consisting of: (1) a triangular shaped systolic wave with a value of systolic amplitude ≥ 0.03 (ohm/s/ohm) during systole and no prominent wave during diastole while supine (see bottom left frame of Fig. 1); and (2) an increase in systolic amplitude with postural change from upright to supine. Since only a heart with normal function can produce this “normal” pattern, it would follow that any functional cardiovascular disorder would cause a deviation from this normal pattern. Therefore, a comparison of the ICG waveforms, while upright and supine, to the normal pattern provides a novel method of detecting cardiovascular disease. The ICG data indicate ventricular dysfunction if there is an abnormal systolic segment of the ICG waveform, there is a prominent wave in the diastolic segment of the ICG waveform, or there is not an increase in systolic amplitude from upright to supine. An abnormal systolic segment of the ICG waveform is defined as a non-triangular systolic wave, while upright or supine, or a supine systolic amplitude < 0.03 (ohm/s/ohm).

With a patient in the supine position, hemodynamic abnormalities are defined as cardiac index < 2.5 (L/min/m2), cardiac index > 4.7, systemic vascular resistance > 1500 (dyne s/cm5), or systemic vascular resistance < 770 (see Table 1). The thoracic fluid level is indicated by the fluid index, defined as the nominal vertical distance between leads 2 and 3 (in centimeters and adjusted for gender and body habitus) divided by Z0 (ohm). The criterion for hypervolemia is fluid index > 1.3 (cm/ohm). Arterial compliance index is defined as supine systolic amplitude divided by supine pulse pressure. An arterial compliance index < 0.1 (ohm/s/ohm/mmHg) indicates central arterial stiffness. Fluid index and arterial compliance index are normalized parameters for both males and females.

For assessing the compensatory response to postural change, the criterion for normal ventricular function is upright systolic amplitude less than supine systolic amplitude. Decompensation is defined as upright systolic amplitude ≥ supine systolic amplitude and is considered a form of ventricular dysfunction.

For assessing aortic wave reflection, the shape of the upright systolic wave is analyzed. With normal heart function, there is a slight rounding of the upright systolic wave peak, due to the higher afterload, with the descending limb of the upright systolic wave being more convex than the descending limb of the supine systolic wave (see left frames of Fig. 1). An upright systolic wave with a pronounced widening or flattening is considered an indication of possible augmented aortic wave reflection (top right frame of Fig. 1).

1.5 ICG Standards

There are no established standards for ICG. The type and placement of electrodes are not the same for all manufacturers. All manufacturers use an electrical current with very low amplitude and high frequency, but the specific values are not the same. Manufacturers used empirical validation to make adjustments to signal processing techniques and formulas for calculating parameters, particularly stroke volume. Most of the variations in electrode placement are minor, but there are some which are clinically significant because it affects the measurement of the average impedance of the thorax, Z0, which is used to calculate stroke volume and systolic amplitude.

Some parameters are given different names by various manufacturers. For example, systolic amplitude is called velocity index and ejection phase contractility index by others. The systolic wave is called E wave or C wave by others. The diastolic wave is called O wave by others. For thoracic fluid level, others use thoracic fluid content, defined as the reciprocal of Z0, which trends the same as fluid index. For thoracic fluid content there are different normal ranges for males and females, whereas fluid index is a normalized parameter with the same normal range for males and females. For vascular resistance, others use systemic vascular resistance index which trends the same as systemic vascular resistance but is defined as systemic vascular resistance multiplied by body surface area.

1.6 Limitations

For cardiovascular disease, ICG can be used to detect the presence of functional abnormalities, but ICG does not identify the causes of the abnormalities. With ventricular abnormalities, ICG alone is not sufficient for a diagnosis, because some ICG abnormalities can have various underlying mechanisms. For example, a pronounced diastolic wave could be caused by elevated filling pressure or aortic regurgitation. For ventricular dysfunction, other modalities, such as echocardiography should be used for diagnosis. Vascular load abnormalities should be diagnosed using other tests including pulse wave analysis and ankle–brachial index. After a diagnosis has been made, serial ICG tests can be used to assess patient response to treatment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeMarzo, A.P. Clinical Use of Impedance Cardiography for Hemodynamic Assessment of Early Cardiovascular Disease and Management of Hypertension. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 27, 203–213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-020-00383-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-020-00383-0

Keywords

Navigation