Log in

Can regional integration promote industrial green transformation? Empirical evidence from Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration

  • Research and Theory
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the spatial–temporal evolution of regional integration and industrial green transformation and empirically investigates the impact of regional integration on industrial green transformation using prefecture-level panel data of cities in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration (YRDUA) from 2006 to 2018. The major findings are as follows: (1) during the observation period, the level of regional integration rose in general, with regions with a high integrated level expanding northward, southward, and westward in the YRDUA. Industrial green transformation has the property of path-dependent and a spatial lock-in pattern of “high in the east, low in the west.” (2) There exists a considerable U-shaped relationship between regional integration and industrial green transformation; most cities in the YRDUA have crossed the inflection point in terms of integrated development. Regional integration has a positive spillover effect on the industrial green transformation of the surrounding areas, which diminishes as geographic distance increases. When the level of regional integration becomes excessive, it also impedes surrounding areas’ industrial green transformation. (3) Regional integration can affect industrial green transformation by promoting economic scale expansion, industrial structure upgrading, and technological progress. At this moment, the economic scale is the most significant mediating factor. With the advancement of regional integration, technological progress will become critical. This paper provides a rationale for understanding industrial green transformation from the perspective of regional integration and enriches theoretical and empirical studies on ecological civilization construction and green development in urban agglomerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data included in this study are available upon request by contact with the corresponding author.

References

  • Anderson RG, Chauvet M, Jones B (2015) Nonlinear relationship between permanent and transitory components of monetary aggregates and the economy[J]. Econ Rev 34(1-2):228–254

  • Anselin L (1999) The future of spatial analysis in the social sciences[J]. Geographic information sciences 5(2):67–76

  • Bai J, Lu J, Li S (2019) Fiscal pressure, tax competition and environmental pollution[J]. Environ Resour Econ 73:431–447

  • Bai JH, Lu JY et al (2018b) Fiscal pressure, tax competition and environmental pollution[J]. Environ Resource Econ 1:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Deng X, Jiang S et al (2018a) Exploring the relationship between urbanization and urban eco-efficiency: evidence from prefecture-level cities in China [J]. J Clean Prod 195:1487–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai YZ, Fu YF (2017) Technological and structural effects of total factor productivity growth: based on The Calculation and decomposition of Macro and industrial Data in China [J]. Econ Res J 01:72–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen MS, Gu YL (2011) The mechanism and measures of adjustment of industrial organization structure: the perspective of energy saving and emission reduction [J]. Energy Proc 5(1):2562–2567

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Huang B (2014) Club membership and transboundary pollution: evidence from the European Union enlargement[J]. Energy Econ 53:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Xu Y, Wang F (2022) Air pollution effects of industrial transformation in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of spatial spillover[J]. J Geog Sci 32(1):156–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YH (2010) High-speed rail in Taiwan: New experience and issues for future development[J]. Transp Policy 17(2):51–63

  • Dai QW, Yang JY, Zhang XQ et al (2020) Characteristics, modes and dynamic mechanism of polluting enterprises/industries transfer [J]. Geographic studies 39(07):1511–1533

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B et al (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve[J]. J Econ Perspect 16(1):147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng HH, Yang LX (2019) Haze control, local competition and green industrial transformation [J]. China Ind Econ 10:118–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng HH, Yang LX (2019) Smog control, local competition and green transformation of industry [J] . China's industrial economy (10):118–136

  • Dong HZ, Li X, Zhang RJ (2021) Spatial-temporal characteristics and driving factors of green innovation efficiency in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Econ Geogr 41(05):134–144. https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du XQ (2021) Financial development, industrial upgrading and high-tech product export: an empirical study based on spatial Dubin Model and mediating effect [J]. J Econ Issues 4:51–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang CL (2014) Important progress and future development direction of Urban agglomeration research in China[J]. Acta Geogr Sin 69(8):1130–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang C (2019) Research on the high-quality development path of the Yangtze River Delta Integration ーー based on the perspective of the new normal of economy [J]. Modern Management Science (12):42–44

  • Fang C, Yu D (2017) Urban agglomeration: An evolving concept of an emerging phenomenon[J]. Landsc Urban Plan 162:126–136

  • Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norrism et al (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries[J]. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng C, Huang JB, Wang M (2018) Analysis of green total-factor productivity in China's regional metal industry: A meta-frontier approach[J]. Resources Policy 58:219–229

  • Flies EJ, Mavoa S, Zosky GR et al (2019) Urban-associated diseases: candidate diseases, environmental risk factors, and a path forward[J]. Environ Int 133:105187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, Gulden et al (2008) The rise of the mega-region[J]. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 1(3):459–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Zhang A, Sun Z (2020) How regional economic integration influence on urban land use efficiency? A case study of Wuhan metropolitan area, China[J]. Land Use Policy 90:104329

  • Hansen MH, Li H, Svarverud R (2018) Ecological civilization: interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future [J]. Glob Environ Chang 53:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Wang B, Wang Z (2018) Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data[J]. Energy Econ 74:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Teo TSH, Zhou F, Lim MK, Chen H (2018) Does industrial green transformation successfully facilitate a decrease in carbon intensity in China? An environmental regulation perspective[J]. J Clean Prod 184:1060–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang QH (2016) On the supply-side structural reform of Chinese industry [J]. China Ind Econ (09):5–23. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2016.09.001

  • Huang W, Zhang YY (2019) Does regional integration strategy affect the high-quality development of urban economy in China? [J]. Ind Econ Res 6:14–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2003) Technological change and the environment[M]. Handbook of environmental economics. Elsevier 1:461–516

  • Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis [J]. Energy Econ 33(2):284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke S (2015) Domestic market integration and regional economic growth: China’s recent experience from 1995–2011[J]. World Dev 66:588–597

  • Kemp R, Never B (2017) Green transition, industrial policy, and economic development[J]. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 33(1):66–84

  • LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial regressions. Chapman and Hall/ CRC

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Lin B (2017) Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?[J]. Energy Policy 101:366–378

  • Li L, Ma S, Zheng Y et al (2022) Integrated regional development: comparison of urban agglomeration policies in China[J]. Land Use Policy 114:105939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li WY, Yang SG, Wu YM (2018) Effects of regional market integration on carbon emission efficiency: a spatial econometric analysis from the Yangtze River Delta region [J]. Soft Sci 32:52–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BQ, Du KR (2013) Effects of market distortion on energy efficiency [J]. Econ Res J 48(9):125–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Feng H (2014) Agglomeration and emission reduction: empirical study on the impact of urban size gap on industrial pollution intensity [J]. World Economy 7:86–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao W, Wang W, Sun H (2019) Driving patterns of industrial green transformation: A multiple regions case learning from China[J]. Sci Total Environ 697:134134

  • Murphy AB (2013) Trapped in the logic of the modern state system? European integration in the wake of the financial crisis[J]. Geopolitics 18(3):705–723

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2019) China city statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Bei**g (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsley D, Wei SJ (2001) Limiting currency volatility to stimulate goods market integration: a price based approach[J]. NBER working paper 8468

  • Pender M (2003) Industrial structure and aggregate growth[J]. Struct Change Econ Dynam 14(4):427–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X (2016) Is environmental decentralization conducive to the green transformation of Chinese industry? --A test of dynamic spatial effects in the perspective of industrial structure upgrading[J]. Ind Econ Res (02):21–31+110. https://doi.org/10.13269/j.cnki.ier.2016.02.003

  • Peng X, Li B (2016) Research on green transformation of chinese industry under different types of environmental regulations. J Financ Res 7:134–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Li B (2015) Trade opening, FDI and green transformation of China S industry: an empirical study based on dynamic panel threshold model [J] . International trade issues (1):166–176

  • Ryzhenkov M (2016) Resource misallocation and manufacturing productivity: The case of Ukraine[J]. J Comp Econ 44(1):41–55

  • Shao S, Chen Y, Li K et al (2019) Market segmentation and urban CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region[J]. J Environ Manag 248:109324

  • Shao S, Luan RR, Yang ZB et al (2016) Does directed technological change get greener: empirical evidence from Shanghai’s industrial green development transformation[J]. Ecol Indic 69:758–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She S, Wang Q, Zhang AC (2020) Technological innovation, industrial structure and green total factor productivity in cities: a test of impact channels based on national low-carbon city pilot [J]. Econ Manag Res 8:44–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen KR, ** G, Fang X (2017) Does environmental regulation causes pollution nearby transfer[J]. Econ Res J 5:44–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen C, Li S, Huang L (2018) Different types of environmental regulation and the green transformation of Chinese industry: path selection and mechanism analysis. Nankai Econ Stud 5:95–114 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Su LY, Zheng HX, Wang Y (2013) Assessment of green development of China's inter-provincial industry [J]. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment 23(08):116–122

  • Suh DH (2016) Interfuel substitution and biomass use in the US industrial sector: a differential approach. Energy 102:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Du J, Wang S (2020) Environmental regulations, enterprise productivity, and green technological progress: large-scale data analysis in China[J]. Ann Oper Res 290:369–384

  • Wang DJ, Zhou QM, Chang ZL et al (2007) A new multi-index comprehensive evaluation method [J]. Statistics and Decision 07:137–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hu H, Dai W et al (2021) Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations[J]. Ecol Ind 124:107371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yao L, Xu Y et al (2021) Potential heterogeneity in the relationship between urbanization and air pollution, from the perspective of urban agglomeration[J]. J Clean Prod 298:126822

  • Wang Y, Yin S, Fang X et al (2022) Interaction of economic agglomeration, energy conservation and emission reduction: evidence from three major urban agglomerations in China[J]. Energy 241:122519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XF, **e JX, Sun BW (2019) A study on the effect path of technological progress of regional integration: based on empirical data of Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. East China Economic Management (33):64–71

  • Wen W, Wang Q (2017) The relationship between urban population size and environmental pollution: based on panel data of 285 cities in China [J]. Urban Probl 9:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen ZL, Zhang L, Hou JT et al (2004) The mediating effect test and its application [J]. Acta Psychol Sin 5:614–620

    Google Scholar 

  • **ao R, Tan G, Huang B et al (2022) Pathways to sustainable development: Regional integration and carbon emissions in China[J]. Energy Rep 8:5137–5145

  • Xu H, Jiao M (2021) City size, industrial structure and urbanization quality—A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China[J]. Land Use Policy 111

  • Xu SC, Li YW, Miao YM et al (2019) Regional differences in nonlinear impacts of economic growth, export and FDI on air pollutants in China based on provincial panel data[J]. J Clean Prod 228:455–466

  • Yang M, Sun F (2018) Factor market distortion correction, resource reallocation and potential productivity gains: an empirical study on China’s heavy industry sector[J]. Energy Econ 69:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Zhang X (2018) Assessing regional eco-efficiency from the perspective of resource, environmental and economic performance in China: A bootstrap** approach in global data envelopment analysis[J]. J Clean Prod 173:100–111

  • Yang Y, Guo H, Chen L et al (2019) Regional analysis of the green development level differences in Chinese mineral resource-based cities[J]. Resour Policy 61:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You JH, Chen XQ (2019) Regional integration cooperation leads to pollution transfer: evidence from urban agglomeration expansion in Yangtze River Delta [J]. China Popul Resour Environ 6:118–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu LC, Bi X, Zhang WG (2019) Construction of evaluation system for green transformation of industrial enterprises [J]. Statistics and Decision 35(14):186–188

  • Zhang K (2018) Will regional integration help reduce emissions? [J]. Financ Res 1:67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Chen SY (2009) Structural reform and Industrial growth in China [J]. China Econ 00:205–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZQ, Li H, Wang LZ (2020) Government R&D subsidies, technological innovation and China’s industrial transformation and upgrading: Based on the threshold effect [J]. Technol Econ (4):30–39

  • Zhang K (2019) Does market integration help improve environmental quality? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economic and Law (04):67–77

  • Zhang W, Hu Y (2020) The impact of innovative human capital on green total factor productivity in the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment 30(9):106–120

  • Zhao YL, Liu DX (2009) Market discrimination, interregional boundary effect and economic growth [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics 35(02):39–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Qi O (2017) Would functional specialization of space narrow down regional disparities?—An empirical analysis based on panel data of Chinese urban agglomerations 2003–2011. Chin J Urban Env Stud 5(1):1750003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Du R (2020) How does urban agglomeration integration promote entrepreneurship in China? Evidence from regional human capital spillovers and market integration[J]. Cities 97:102529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Kahn ME (2013) Understanding China’s urban pollution dynamics[J]. J Econ Lit 51(3):731–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou FL (2020) Urban size and environmental pollution: scale effect or crowding effect: an empirical analysis based on prefecture-level city panel data [J]. Journal of Dalian University Technology (2):34–41

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Project of Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences (grant number 17AGL005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lihua Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration (41): Nan**g, Wuxi, Xuzhou, Changzhou, Suzhou, Nantong, Lianyungang, Huaian, Yancheng, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Taizhou, Suqian, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Jiaxing, Huzhou, Shaoxing, **hua, Quzhou, Zhoushan, Taizhou, Lishui, Hefei, Wuhu, Bengfu, Huainan, Maanshan, Huaibei, Tongling, Anqing, Huangshan, Chuzhou, Fuyang, Suzhou, Luan, Bozhou, Chizhou, and Xuancheng.

Appendix 2

Calculation steps of regional integration by relative price variance method: (i) List K kinds of commodity’s relative price indices in city i and city j of year t \({P}_{it}^{k}\), \({P}_{jt}^{k}\) and then calculate the absolute value of their natural log with the equation: \({P}_{ijt}^{k}=\mathrm{ln\;}({P}_{it}^{k}/{P}_{jt}^{k})=\left|\mathrm{ln\;}{P}_{it}^{k}-\mathrm{ln\;}{P}_{jt}^{k}\right|\). (ii) Since the fixed effect brought by specific commodity category will lead to a certain degree of system bias, we need to use De-mean method to eliminate it, in order to obtain the residual difference only related to segmentation factor. The equation is \(\Delta {P}_{ijt}^{k}={P}_{ijt}^{k}-\overline{{P }_{t}^{k}}\). \(\overline{{P }_{t}^{k}}\) is the average value of all \({P}_{ijt}^{k}\). (iii) Repeat the above steps to calculate the remainder of relative price margin for other kinds of goods. (iv) Calculate the variance of \(\Delta {P}_{ijt}^{k}\), which is \(Var(\Delta {P}_{ijt}^{k})\). Variance in each administrative unit constitutes time series data, enables us to directly observe the evolution of variance along with time, and to test the changing trend of market integration by using self-moving law of time series. Eighty-eight thousand five hundred sixty relative price variances can be obtained based on the retail price index of 9 goods in 41 cities over 13 years; among them, we have 820 (\({C}_{41}^{2}\)) groups of paired cities. (v) Combine these relative price variances with the data of same province by year to obtain market segmentation index of each city (segin). Finally, the square root of segin’s reciprocal is used to calculate the core variable of this paper: regional integration. Carrying on a logarithm analysis, the relevant equation is \(inter=\mathrm{ln}(\sqrt{1/segin})\).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Wu, L. Can regional integration promote industrial green transformation? Empirical evidence from Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. J Environ Stud Sci 14, 117–134 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00872-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00872-3

Keywords

Navigation