Abstract
In recent years, China’s economy has shown a trend of coordinated regional development. The integrated construction of urban agglomeration as a space carrier has placed the coordinated governance of the regional environment on the agenda. As such, we need to determine the effect of a city’s degree of regional integration on environmental regulation and green total factor productivity. To this end, a single-city regional integration index based on commodity retail price index is constructed to measure the degree of regional integration. Different from the traditional indexes that measure the integration degree of multiple economies, the proposed index aims to measure the integration degree of a single city into a region. This study also examines the effect of the city’ degree of regional integration on the relationship between environmental regulation and green total factor productivity using panel data on the Yangtze River Delta’s urban agglomeration from 2003 to 2016 for empirical analysis. The results reveal the existence of a positive U-shaped relationship between environmental regulation and green total factor productivity, where the city’s degree of regional integration buffers this relationship. Differing from existed papers, this study provides an index to measure the degree of a single city’s integration into a region and identifies the buffer effect of this regional integration on the city’s green growth based on the urban agglomeration level.
Graphic abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The data used to calculate GTFP and SCRII can be found on the Web site of China City Statistical Yearbook at https://data.cnki.net/yearbook/Single/N2020050229 and China Energy Statistics Yearbook at https://data.cnki.net/yearbook/Single/N2019080025, and the data of other variables can be found in the China Statistical Yearbook at https://data.cnki.net/yearbook/Single/N2019110002.
Code availability
The codes used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
Shanghai, Nan**g, Wuxi, Changzhou, Suzhou, Nantong, Yancheng, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Taizhou, Jiangsu, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Jiaxing, Huzhou, Shaoxing, **hua, Zhoushan, Taizhou, Hefei, Wuhu, Maanshan, Tongling, Anqing, Luzhou, Chizhou, and Xuancheng.
References
Aghion P, Cai J, Dewatripont M, Du LS, Harrison A, Legros P (2015) Industrial policy and competition. Am Econ J Macroecon 7(4):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20120103
Amber S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Env Econ Pol 7(1):2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
Balassa B (1962) The theory of economic integration. Allen Unwin, London, p 1
Brakman S, Garretsen H, van Marrewijk C, Oumer A (2012) The border population effects of EU integration. J Reg Sci 52(1):40–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00752.x
Brambor T, Clark WR, Golder M (2006) Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Pol Anal 14(1):63–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014
Chen SY, Golley J (2014) “Green” productivity growth in China’s industrial economy. Energy Econ 44:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.002
Chen XD, Huang BH (2016) Club membership and transboundary pollution: evidence from the European Union enlargement. Energy Econ 53:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.06.021
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit 42(1):7–71. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205104773558047.g
Domazlicky BR, Weber WL (2004) Does environmental protection lead to slower productivity growth in the chemical industry? Environ Resour Econ 28(3):301–324. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000031056.93333.3a
Du LZ, Zhang ZL, Feng TW (2018) Linking green customer and supplier integration with green innovation performance: the role of internal integration. Bus Strat Environ 27(8):1583–1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2223
Fang CD, Cheng JH, Zhu YG, Chen JH, Peng XJ (2020) Green total factor productivity of extractive industries in China: an explanation from technology heterogeneity. Resour Pol (In Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101933
He WJ, Wang B, Danish WZH (2018) Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data. Energy Econ 74:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.010
Hu SM, Liu SL (2019) Do the coupling effects of environmental regulation and R&D subsidies work in the development of green innovation? Empirical evidence from China. Clean Tech Environ Policy 21:1739–1749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01745-6
Huang Y, Li L, Yu YT (2018) Do urban agglomerations outperform non-agglomerations? A new perspective on exploring the eco-efficiency of Yangtze River Economic Belt in China. J Clean Prod 202:1056–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.202
Jeanneney SG, Hua JP, Liang ZC (2006) Financial development, economic efficiency, and productivity growth: evidence from China. Dev Econ 44(1):27–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2006.00002.x
Ke SZ (2015) Domestic market integration and regional economic growth—China’s recent experience from 1995–2011. World Dev 66:588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.024
Lanoie P, Party M, Lajeunsse R (2008) Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the Porter hypothesis. J Prod Anal 30(2):121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0108-4
Lapan HE, Sikdar S (2011) Strategic environmental policy under free trade with transboundary pollution. Rev Dev Econ 15(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2010.00589.x
Law SH, Kutan AM, Naseem NAM (2018) The role of institutions in finance curse: evidence from international data. J Comp Econ 46(1):174–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2017.04.001
Li B, Wu SS (2017) Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 153(1):342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.042
Li JL, Lin BQ (2017) Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration. Energy Policy 101:366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.036
Li K, Lin BQ (2016) Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China’s manufacturing sector: evidence from a three-stage DEA model. Appl Energy 168:351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.104
Li RQ, Ramathan R (2018) Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 196:1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.132
Lin BQ, Chen X (2020) Environmental regulation and energy-environmental performance: empirical evidence from China’s non-ferrous metals industry. J Environ Manag 269:110722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110722
Lopez LA, Arce G, Zafrilla JE (2013) Parcelling virtual carbon in the pollution haven hypothesis. Energy Econ 39:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.006
Muchlup F (1977) A history of thought on economic integration. Macmillan Press Ltd., Columbia University Press, Columbia, pp 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02571-8_4
Murphy AB (2013) The May 2004 enlargement of the European Union: view from two years out. Eurasian Geogr Econ 47(6):635–646. https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.47.6.635
Oh DH, Heshmati A (2010) A sequential Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index: environmentally sensitive productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology. Energy Econ 32(6):1345–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.09.003
Parsley DC, Wei SJ (2001) Explaining the border effect: the role of exchange rate variability, ship** costs, and geography. J Int Econ 55(1):87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00096-4
Poncet S (2003) Measuring Chinese domestic and international integration. China Econ Rev 14(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-951X(02)00083-4
Porter M, van-der-Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Qadir S, Dosmagambet Y (2020) CAREC energy corridor: opportunities, challenges, and IMPACT of regional energy trade integration on carbon emissions and energy access. Energy Policy 147:111427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111427
Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014
Shen N, Liao HL, Deng RM, Wang QW (2019) Different types of environmental regulations and the heterogeneous influence on the environmental total factor productivity: empirical analysis of China’s industry. J Clean Prod 211:171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.170
Stavropoulos S, Wall R, Xu YZ (2018) Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: evidence from China. Appl Econ 50:1378–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363858
Stoever J, Weche JP (2018) Environmental regulation and sustainable competitiveness: evaluating the role of firm-level green investments in the context of the Porter hypothesis. Environ Resour Econ 70:429–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0128-5
Wang Q, Ren SH, Hou Y (2020) Atmospheric environmental regulation and industrial total factor productivity: the mediating effect of capital intensity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:33112–33126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09523-4
Wang XL, Shao QL (2019) Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: evidence from panel threshold regression. Sci Total Environ 660:1346–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.094
Watanabe M, Tanaka K (2007) Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry: a directional distance function approach. Energy Policy 35(12):6323–6331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.013
Wendling ZA, Emerson JW, Esty DC, Levy MA, de Sherbinin A, et al (2018) Environmental performance index. https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/downloads/epi2018reportv06191901.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2021
Zhao XM, Liu CJ, Yang M (2018) The effects of environmental regulation on China’s total factor productivity: an empirical study of carbon-intensive industries. J Clean Prod 179:325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.100
Funding
This study was funded by Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences (15BGL067).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SY was involved in conceptualization, methodology, software, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. XC was involved in conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
You, S., Chen, X. Regional integration degree and its effect on a city’s green growth in the Yangtze River Delta: research based on a single-city regional integration index. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, 1837–1849 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02070-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02070-7