This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Notes
I have also argued elsewhere that responsibility for individual sentencing decisions in the criminal justice system is valuable (Taylor, 2023).
References
Sparrow, R. (2007). Killer Robots. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x
Taylor, I. (2023). Justice by Algorithm: The Limits of AI in Criminal Sentencing. Criminal Justice Ethics, 42(3), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2023.2275967
Wood, N. G. (2023). Autonomous Weapons Systems and Responsibility Gaps: A Taxonomy. Ethics & Information Technology, 25, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09690-1
Funding
The author declares that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Single-authored paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, I. Responsibility for What? Reply to Wood. Philos. Technol. 37, 36 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00729-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00729-9