Abstract
Log interpretation and evaluation of tight sandstone reservoir in Chang 8 Member of Longdong West area, Ordos Basin, China, are facing great challenges due to the co-development of normal oil pay and resistivity low-contrast oil pay. To better guide the exploration and development of oil resources in this area, the reservoir characteristics and control mechanism of resistivity low-contrast oil pay were studied. Firstly, the reservoirs were divided into resistivity low-contrast oil pay (RLP) and normal oil pay (NP) based on the relative value of the apparent resistivity increase rate. Then, the difference of reservoir characteristics between RLP and NP is analyzed by comparing a series of experimental data and real logging data in those two reservoir types. Finally, the control mechanism of RLP was studied from reservoir micro-factors and regional macro-factors, respectively. It is found that the chlorite and illite are the most abundant clay minerals in RLP and NP, respectively. Compared with NP reservoir, the average porosity of RLP is better, but the pore space is mainly composed of micropores, which lead to smaller average pore throat radius and poor pore structure. The high irreducible water saturation and high formation water salinity reduced the reservoir resistivity from micro-aspect. Besides, the difference of hydrocarbon expulsion capacity of source rock and the regional difference of formation water salinity controlled the distribution of RLP and NP. Comprehensive consideration of the reservoir micro-factors and regional macro-factors is important to carry out effective logging interpretation and evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Resistivity low-contrast oil pay, as an important oil resources with strong concealment, has received much interest in recent years due to their high oil production and wide distribution around the world (Zemanek 1989; Worthington 2000; Onyinye 2010). The resistivity low-contrast oil pay is defined as an oil zone which has small resistivity difference to the water layer, and it can be summarized into two aspects: (1) The absolute value of resistivity in oil layers is low, which can be lower than that of adjacent water layers. (2) The resistivity increase rate of the oil layer is generally between 1.0 and 3.0 (** methods and adaptive analysis of tight sandstone reservoir of Yingcheng formation in Lishu Fault. Adv Earth Sci 31(10):1056–1066" href="/article/10.1007/s13202-021-01195-1#ref-CR15" id="ref-link-section-d236504106e553">2016). On the basis of reservoir characteristics analysis, studying the main influence factors of resistivity low-contrast oil pay from multiple aspects is the key to carry out effective log interpretation and evaluation (Mao et al. 2019) proposed a comprehensive fluid identification method for fluid ty** in the Huanxian area of the Ordos Basin in China by analyzing the regional distribution characteristics of resistivity low-contrast oil pay reservoir.
The tight sandstone reservoir in Longdong West area, Ordos Basin, China, is exploring and develo**. The target bed of this study is Chang 8 tight sandstone reservoir, which is located below the Chang 7 oil shale, and it is the main production horizon of oil and gas in this area due to its good hydrocarbon storage condition (Fig. 1). However, with the deepening of oil exploration and development, more and more resistivity low-contrast oil pays were found, which brings great difficulties to the log interpretation and evaluation of reservoir. Therefore, we present a research to study the reservoir characteristics and control mechanism of resistivity low-contrast oil pay, which aim to provide a valuable reference for the future exploration and development of resistivity low-contrast oil pays in this area.
Data and research method
Considering that the resistivity low-contrast oil pay and normal oil pay are developed together in this region, so we first separated the reservoir into resistivity low-contrast oil pay (RLP) and normal oil pay (NP) based on the relative value of the apparent resistivity increase rate (ARI), which is calculated by dividing the log data of formation resistivity (RT) by the pure water layer (R0) of the same or adjacent well sections. According to the previous understanding of the definition of RLP reservoir (** of acoustic and resistivity log curves to reflect source rock and the filling color is black-gray, third track is geological stratification, fourth track is logging interpretation conclusion and the fifth track is natural gamma and permeability. It can be seen that the effective thickness of source rock in low resistivity reservoir area is small, and the distance between source rock and reservoir is long. Figure 13b shows the plane distribution of formation resistivity in the Huanxian area, which is located in the northwest of our study area, and the red line represents the location of cross-wells. In order to characterize the hydrocarbon expulsion capacity of source rock, we measured the distance between source rock and reservoir (D), and the effective thickness of source rock (H) based on the cross-well profiles. Then, the hydrocarbon expulsion capacity factor H/D was calculated by dividing H by D to reflect the hydrocarbon expulsion capacity of source rocks. The larger the H/D value, the stronger the oil filling capacity of source rocks to reservoir. Figure 13c shows the relationship between calculated H/D and reservoir resistivity. It can be seen that with the increase of H/D, the reservoir resistivity increases gradually, which indicates that the development of RLP reservoirs also controlled the difference of hydrocarbon expulsion ability of source rock.
Macro-factors: regional difference of formation water salinity
The plane distribution characteristics of formation resistivity and formation water salinity were compared to study the influence of regional difference of formation water salinity on reservoir resistivity. The average values of resistivity log in the test interval were used to represent the reservoir resistivity, and a plane distribution map of formation resistivity is shown in Fig. 14a. The plane distribution map of formation water salinity was plotted based on the formation water salinity analysis data (Fig. 14b). By comparing Fig. 14a and Fig. 14b, it can be seen that in the west of Huanxian area, the formation water salinity is high and the formation resistivity is low, while in the east of Huanxian area, the formation water salinity is low and the formation resistivity is high. This corresponding relationship between formation resistivity and formation water salinity shows that the distribution of RLP and NP reservoirs is also controlled by the regional difference of formation water salinity.
Discussion
According to the analysis of reservoir characteristics, the reservoir main difference between RLP and NP lies in the main types of clay minerals and pore structure. The thin-film chlorite and filamentous illite are the most abundant clay minerals in RLP reservoirs and NP reservoirs, respectively. Although the pore structure of RLP is poorer and the micropores are more developed in RLP reservoir than NP reservoir, the average porosity and permeability are better. Previous researches have shown that the clay mineral is an important factor to affect reservoir physical properties (Durand et al. 2001; samakinde et al. 2016; Yousef et al. 2018). In general, the clay minerals filling in the pores will reduce the porosity and permeability and the pore structure becomes worse. However, if the rock matrix grains are coated by chlorite films, the intergranular porosity will be well protected due to its preventing function for quartz cementation (Chen et al. 2011; Stephan and Stuart, 2016; Higgs et al. 2017). In Fig. 15a, b, we plot the relationship between chlorite and illite and core porosity and permeability. It can be seen that the reservoir porosity and permeability are positively correlated with chlorite content, but negatively correlated with illite content. Therefore, it is considered that good reservoir porosity and permeability of RLP reservoir in our study area are related to the filling of a large number of thin-film chlorite in the pores.
In addition, good porosity but high content of micropores in RLP reservoir indicates that when the filling pressure of crude oil is sufficient enough, the oil-bearing reservoir with high oil saturation can be formed. However, the hydrocarbon expulsion ability of source rock in RLP reservoir is weak and pore spaces are mainly occupied by irreducible water, which makes the oil layer indicating a low oil saturation and low resistivity logging response. In addition, the difference of formation water salinity not only indicates the distribution characteristics of the RLP and NP from the macro-aspect, but also reduces the contrast of resistivity on the micro-aspect. The formation and distribution of RLP in our study area are controlled by the micro-factors and macro-factors together.
Conclusions and suggestions
-
(1)
There are differences in main clay mineral types and pore structure between RLP reservoirs and NP reservoirs. Chlorite and illite are the most abundant clay minerals in RLP reservoirs and NP reservoirs, respectively. Although the porosity of RLP is better than NP, the pore space is mainly composed of micropores.
-
(2)
The high content of micropores in RLP reservoir makes the irreducible water saturation high, together with the high formation water salinity reduced the reservoir resistivity from reservoir micro-aspect.
-
(3)
The difference of hydrocarbon expulsion capacity of source rock as well as the regional difference of formation water salinity is the macro-factors influencing the distribution of RLP and NP.
-
(4)
It is suggested to comprehensively consider the micro-factors and macro-factors during the exploration and development of oil resources in our study area.
References
Arbab B, Jahani D, Movahed B (2017) Reservoir characterization of carbonate in low resistivity pays zones in the Buwaib Formation. Persian Gulf Open Journal of Geology 7:1441–1451
Ayham A, Miho U, Andi AS, Saheed OO et al (2016) Evaluating a complex low-resistivity pay carbonate reservoir onshore Abu Dhabi: from model to implementation. In: Abu Dhabi international petroleum exhibition and conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Bai Z, Tan MJ, Li GR, Shi YJ (2019) Analysis of low-resistivity oil pay and fluid ty** method of chang 81 member, Yanchang formation in Huanxian area, Ordos Basin, China. J Petroluem Sci Eng 175:1099–1111
Chen GJ, Du GC, Zhang GC et al (2011) Chlorite cement and its effect on the reservoir quality of sandstones from the Panyu low-uplift. Pearl River Mouth Basin Petroleum Sci 8(2):143–150
Chu W C. Steckhan J (2011) A practical approach to determine low-resistivity pay in clastic reservoirs. SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition (Denver, Colorado, USA. 30 October–2 November 2011) SPE-147360-MS.
Claverie M Allen D F, Heaton N, Bordakov G (2010) A new look at low-resistivity and low-contrast (LRLC) pay in clastic reservoirs SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition (Florence 19–22 September 2010) SPE-134402-MS.
Durand C, Brosse E, Cerepi A (2001) Effect of pore-lining chlorite on petrophysical properties of low-resistivity sandstone reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Eval Eng 4(3):231–239
Etnyre LM, Mullarkey JC (1996) Low contrast, low resistivity reservoirs causes, pitfalls, environments of deposition. Rocky Mountain Assoc Geol. 11–16.
Feng CJ, Gingras M, Sun MS et al (2017) Logging characteristics and identification methods of low resistivity oil layer: upper cretaceous of the third member of Qingshankou formation, Daqingzi**g area, Songliao Basin. China Geofluids 2017:1468–8115
Hamada GM, Al-Awad MNJ (2000) Petrophysical evaluation of low resistivity sandstone reservoirs. J Can Pet Technol 39(7):7–14
Higgs KE, Crouch EM, Raine JI (2017) An interdisciplinary approach to reservoir characterisation; an example from the early to middle Eocene Kaimiro formation, Taranaki Basin. New Zealand Marine and Petroleum Geol 86:111–139
Kibria G, Hossain M (2012) Investigation of geotechnical parameters affecting electrical resistivity of compacted clays. J Geotec Geoenviron Eng 138(12):1520–1529
Kumar P, Solomon R, Varun TR, Samanta A (2009) An integrated approach to solve reverse resistivity contrast problem in fresh water shaly sand reservoir of changmaigaon field, Assam India – A case Ssudy. 2nd SPWLA-India Symposium, November 19–20.
Kusuma DP, Halim A, Audinno RT, Pratama IP (2016) Integrated analysis of the low resistivity hydrocarbon reservoir in the “S” Field. Indonesian Petroleum Association, Fortieth Annual Convention & Exhibition.
Mao KY (2016) Logs fluid ty** methods and adaptive analysis of tight sandstone reservoir of Yingcheng formation in Lishu Fault. Adv Earth Sci 31(10):1056–1066
Mao ZQ, Kuang LC, **ao CW et al (2007) Identification and evaluation of low resistivity pay zones by well logs and the petrophysical research in China. Pet Sci 4(1):41–48
Montaron B (2007) A quantitative model for the effect of wettability on the conductivity of porous rocks. 15th SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain.
Onyinye EM (2010) Recognition, causes, and evaluation of low resistivity pay sands using wireling logs: a case study of “AMO-field” within the greater ughelli depobelt of the Tertiary Niger Delta Basin. University of Nigeria, Nsukka
Ouyang J, Mao ZQ, **u LJ (2009) Genetic mechanism for low contrast hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs and well log evaluation method. Petroleum Industry Press, Bei**g, pp 1–357
Pratama E, Ismail MS, Ridha S (2017) An integrated workflow to characterize and evaluate low resistivity pay and its phenomenon in a sandstone reservoir. J Geophys Eng 14(3):513–519
Qin Z, Hou M, Wang ZH et al (2013) Logging fluid identification method of low resistivity contrast reservoir invaded by fresh water mud—a case study of well block YD in erdos basin. Appl Mech Mater 318:442–446
Samakinde C, Opuwari M, Donker JMV (2016) The effect of clay diagenesis on petrophysical properties of the lower cretaceous sandstone reservoirs, Orange Basin, South Africa. S Afr J Geol 119(1):187–202
Shi YJ, Li GR, Zhou JY et al (2016) Filling mode and corresponding log interpretation method for low permeability-tight reservoirs in Yanchang group, Mesozoic. Ordos Basin Well Logging Technology 40(2):202–208
Stephan S, Stuart JJ (2016) Enhanced porosity preservation by pore fluid overpressure and chlorite grain coatings in the Triassic Skagerrak, Central Graben, North Sea, UK. Geol Soc, London, Special Public 435:321–341
Tan GH (2020) Analysis on log response characteristics of oil shale and in-situ mining geological evaluation in Qingshankou formation of South of Songliao Basin. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/514/2/022080.
William AT, Mshah BI, Astia AH et al (2016) Low-resistivity pay evaluation, case study: thin bed sand-shale lamination reservoirs, Peninsula, Malay Basin. International Petroleum Technology Conference, 14–16 November, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worthington PF (2000) Recognition and evaluation of low-resistivity pay. Pet Geosci 6:77–92
**ao L, Mao ZQ, Dou WT et al (2012) Types and genesis of low contrast hydrocarbon reservoirs in low permeability sandstones. Special Oil Gas Reserv 19(1):42–46
**e RH, Feng QN, Gao J et al (2002) Mechanisms of petrophysical parameter change in oil and gas reservoirs of low resistivity. Chin J Geophys 45(1):132–140
Yan L, Tan SQ, Pan BZ et al (2010) Genetic mechanism and logging evaluation method for low resistivity reservoirs: Taking Guantao Formation of Gangbei area for instance. J Jilin Univ (earth Science Edition) 40(6):1456–1462
Yan WC, Sun JM, Zhang JY et al (2018) Studies of electrical properties of low-resistivity sandstones based on digital rock technology. J Geophy Eng 15(1):153–163
Yang CM, Zhou CC, Cheng XZ (2008) Origin of low resistivity pays and forecasting of favorable prospecting areas. Pet Explor Dev 35(5):600–605
Yao JL, Zhao YD, Deng XQ et al (2015) Controlling factors of tight oil reservoir in Triassic Yanchang formation in Ordos Basin. J Jilin Univ (Earth Science Edition) 45(4):983–992
Yousef I, Sudakov V, Morozov V et al (2018) Diagenetic clay minerals and reservoir quality of the upper triassic sandstone in euphrates graben, East of Syria(Conference Paper). Int Multidiscip Sci Geoconf Surv Geold Mining Ecol Management, SGEM 18(1):397–404
Zemanek J (1989) Low-resistivity hydrocarbon-bearing sand reservoirs. SPE Form Eval 4(4):515–521
Zhang SH, Shi YJ, Chen G et al (2018) Identification methods and water productivity classification evaluation of low contrast chang 61 oil reservoirs in Jiyuan area. Ordos Basin China Petroleum Exploration 23(1):71–80
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This paper is sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41774144), National Major Projects “Log Interpretation and Evaluation of Complex Oil and Water Layers” (2016ZX05050), The Introduced Talent Fund of Anhui University of Science and Technology (13200427).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bai, Z., Tan, M., Shi, Y. et al. Reservoir characteristics and control mechanism of resistivity low-contrast oil pays in Chang 8 tight sandstone of Longdong West area, Ordos Basin. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 11, 2609–2620 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01195-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01195-1