Log in

Comparative Performance and Reliability Analysis of Do** and Junction Free Devices with High-κ/Vacuum Gate Dielectric

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of channel hot carrier (CHC) reliability and pursuance of do**less FET (DL JLFET) and junctionless FET (JLFET) are studied for various dielectrics and compared with conventional dielectric (SiO2) JLFET. The use of dielectrics such as vacuum near the drain and the high-κ (HfO2) near the source in DL JLFET (VacuHDL JLFET) allows better pursuance and reliability against channel hot carrier (CHC) effects. A simulation study has shown that the pursuance of VacuHDL in terms of Ion/Ioff ratio is improved by 4.5, 19.38 and 39.58 times, respectively, in comparison with vacuum based DL, HJL and JL. Similarly, the intrinsic delay of VacuHDL is improved by 9.5%, 56.8% and 58.7%, respectively, in comparison with VacuDL, VacuHJL and VacuJL. Hence, VacuHDL is a potential candidate for digital circuit applications. Further, we have found that vacuum-based HDL and HJL are more immunes against CHC stress and shown that the drain current of vacuHDL and vacuHJL is reduced by 6.9% and 17.5%, respectively, in comparison with conventional dialectic (SiO2) based DL and JL which is 10.4% and 20.5%. Hence, the incorporation of vacuum dielectric towards drain terminal is helpful in reducing CHC induced effect in comparison with conventional dielectric.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

References

  1. Sahu C, Singh J (2014) Charge-plasma based process variation immune junctionless transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett 35(3):411–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sahu C, Singh J (2015) Potential benefits and sensitivity analysis of Do**less transistor for low power applications. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 62(3):729–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hueting RJE, Rajasekharan B, Salm C, Schmitz J (2008) The charge plasma p-n diode. IEEE Electron Device Lett` 29(12):1367–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bramhane LK, Singh J (2017) Improved performance of bipolar charge plasma transistor by reducing the horizontal electric field. Superlattices Microst 104:215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajasekharan B, Hueting RJE, Salm C, van Hemert T, Wolters RAM, Schmitz J (2010) Fabrication and characterization of the chargeplasma diode. IEEE Electron Device Lett 31(6):528–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bramhane LK, Upadhyay N, Veluru JR, Singh J (2015) Symmetric bipolar charge-plasma transistor with extruded base for enhanced performance. Electron Lett 51(13):1027–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bramhane LK, Singh J (2015) Extended Base Schottky-Collector Bipolar Charge Plasma Transistor. 2015 IEEE international symposium on Nanoelectronic and information systems, Indore, 2015, pp 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1109/iNIS.2015.67

  8. Panchore M, Singh J, Mohanty SP (2016) Impact of channel hot carrier effect in junction-and do**-free devices and circuits. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 63(12):5068–5071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Panchore M, Singh J, Mohanty SP, Kougianos E (2016) Compact behavioral modeling and time dependent performance degradation analysis of junction and do** free transistors. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Nanoelectronic and Information Systems (iNIS), Dec 2016, pp 194–199

  10. Amat E, Kauerauf T, Degraeve R, Rodriguez R, Nafria M, Aymerich X, Groeseneken G (2009) Competing degradation mechanisms in short-channel transistors under channel hot-carrier stress at elevated temperatures. IEEE Trans Device Mater Rel 9(3):454–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Amat E, Kauerauf T, Degraeve R, Keersgieter AD, Rodriguez R, Nafria M, Aymerich X, Groeseneken G (2009) Channel hot-carrier degradation in short-channel transistors with high- k /metal gate stacks. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab 9(3):425–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park CH, Ko MD, Kim KH, Lee SH, Yoon JS, Lee JS, Jeong YH (2012) Investigation of low-frequency noise behavior after hot-carrier stress in an n-channel junctionless nanowire MOSFET. IEEE Electron Device Lett 33(11):1538–1540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gautam R, Saxena M, Gupta RS, Gupta M (2013) Gate all around mosfet with vacuum gate dielectric for improved hot carrier reliability and rf performance. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 60(6):1820–1827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pratap Y, Haldar S, Gupta RS, Gupta M (2016) Gate-materialengineered junctionless nanowire transistor (jnt) with vacuum gate dielectric for enhanced hot-carrier reliability. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab 16(3):360–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma A, Jain A, Pratap Y, Gupta R (2016) Effect of high-k and vacuum dielectrics as gate stack on a junctionless cylindrical surrounding gate (JL-CSG) MOSFET 29(1):26–32

  16. Han W, Ahn JH, Choi Y (2011) Damage immune field effect transistors with vacuum gate dielectric. J Vac Sci Technol B 29:011014(1)–011014(4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ATLAS Device Simulator Software (2012) Silvaco, Santa Clara, CA, USA

  18. Magnone P, Crupi F, Wils N, Tuinhout HP, Fiegna C (2012) Characterization and modeling of hot carrier-induced variability in subthreshold region. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 59(8):2093–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghosh B, Akram MW (2013) Junctionless tunnel field effect transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett 34(5):584–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Rakesh Kumar have analyzed and interpreted the problem statement and suggested a solution. Along with Lokesh Bramhane and Meena, we have simulated the different results and calibrated with the literatures. After evaluation, we all have equal contribution in preparing the manuscript. Hence authors gauranteed about the proposed work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lokesh Bramhane.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to Participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not Applicable.

Conflict of Interest

There is no competing or conflict of interests in the presented preposed work.

Author Declarations

We authors of the above titled paper hereby declare that the work included in the above paper is original and is an outcome of the research carried out by the authors indicated in it.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, R., Panchore, M., Bramhane, L. et al. Comparative Performance and Reliability Analysis of Do** and Junction Free Devices with High-κ/Vacuum Gate Dielectric. Silicon 14, 5035–5039 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01291-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01291-1

Keywords

Navigation