Log in

A FUCOM-MABAC-based integrated approach for performance evaluation of the Indian National Parks

  • Application Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

National parks (NPs) play an indispensible role in development and promotion of nature-based tourism destinations through effective management of resources and socio–economic growth. It has become mandatory to deploy a potent management effectiveness evaluation tool to assess how the NPs are being managed with respect to their protection and fulfilment of the basic objectives. In this paper, an integrated application of full consistency method (FUCOM) and multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) technique is proposed for appraising the relative performance of 39 Indian NPs and their subsequent ranking based on nine evaluation criteria. The weight of those criteria are estimated using FUCOM while taking into account the varied judgements of four decision makers. The MABAC method is subsequently adopted for ranking of the shortlisted NPs in India. It also identifies the relative strengths and weaknesses of each of the NPs with respect to the considered evaluation criteria. This integrated approach singles out Namdapha NP and Manas NP as the two best NPs in India, whereas, Nanda Devi NP and Pin Valley NP are the laggards having several unfavourable criteria. These two best performing NPs can act as the benchmarks to the underperforming NPs so as to make them better habitats for the diversified species, and more attractive destinations for the domestic and foreign visitors. The outcome of this analysis would propose an adaptive approach to the concerned authorities in effectively allocating scarce resources, promoting accountability and transparency, encouraging participative roles of the community, and promoting values of the Indian NPs, thereby achieving biological diversity and sustainability goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings in this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Agarwal, S., Chakraborty, S., Chakraborty, S.: A DEMATEL-MABAC-based approach for grading and evaluation of jute fibers. Res. J. Text. Appar. 24, 341–355 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alinezhad, A., Khalili, J.: MABAC method. In: New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM). International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, Cham, 277 (2019)

  3. An, L.T., Markowski, J., Bartos, M., Rzenca, A., Namiecinski, P.: An evaluation of destination attractiveness for nature-based tourism: recommendations for the management of national parks in Vietnam. Nat. Conserv. 32, 51–80 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakhat, R., Rajaa, M.: Risk assessment of a wind turbine using an AHP-MABAC approach with grey system theory: a case study of Morocco. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020(1), 22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2496914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biswas, T.K., Das, M.C.: Selection of commercially available electric vehicle using fuzzy AHP-MABAC. J. Inst. Eng.(India): C 100(3), 531–537 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bosworth, G., Curry, N.: National Parks. In: International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography. (eds.) Elsevier, 229–237 (2020)

  7. Božanić, D.I., Pamučar, D.S., Karović, S.M.: Use of the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up positions. Mil. Tech. Cour. 64, 705–729 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Božanić, D., Tešić, D., Milićević, J.: A hybrid fuzzy AHP-MABAC model : application of the location of deep wading as a technique of crossing the river by tanks. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 1, 143–164 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Božanić, D., Tešić, D., Kočić, J.: Multi-criteria FUCOM-fuzzy MABAC model for the selection of location for construction of single-span bailey bridge. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2, 132–146 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Çetinkaya, C., Kabak, M., Erbaş, M., Özceylan, E.: Evaluation of ecotourism sites: a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Kybernetes 47, 1664–1686 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chakraborty, S., Dandge, S.S., Agarwal, S.: Non-traditional machining processes selection and evaluation: a rough multi-attributive border approximation area comparison approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139, 106201 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chakraborty, S., Ghosh, S., Sarker, B., Chakraborty, S.: An integrated performance evaluation approach for the Indian international airports. J. Air. Transp. Manag. 88, 101876 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatterjee, K., Bandyopadhyay, A., Ghosh, A., Kar, S.: Assessment of environmental factors causing wetland degradation, using fuzzy analytic network process: a case study on Keoladeo National Park. India. Ecol. Modell. 316, 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chatterjee, P., Mondal, S., Boral, S., Banerjee, A., Chakraborty, S.: A novel hybrid method for non-traditional machining process selection using factor relationship and multi-attributive border approximation method. Facta Univ. Ser.: Mech. Eng. 15, 439–456 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D’Auria, A., De Toro, P., Fierro, N., Montone, E.: Integration between GIS and multi-criteria analysis for ecosystem services assessment: a methodological proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy). Sustainability 10(9), 3329 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Debnath, A., Roy, J., Kar, S., Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J.: A hybrid MCDM approach for strategic project portfolio selection of agro by-products. Sustainability 9(8), 1302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Castro, M., Urios, V.: A critical review of multi-criteria decision making in protected areas. Agric. Resour. Econo. 16, 89–109 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delice, E.K., Can, G.F.: A stochastic approach for failure mode and effect analysis. RAIRO Oper. Res. 51, 1077–1100 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Durmic, E.: Evaluation of criteria for sustainable supplier selection using FUCOM method. Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl. 2, 91–107 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farashi, A., Naderi, M., Parvian, N.: Identifying a preservation zone using multi-criteria decision analysis. Anim. Biodiver. Conserv. 39, 29–36 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbasic, A., Stevic, Z.: FUCOM method in group decision-making: selection of forklift in a warehouse. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2, 49–65 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hjortsø, C.N., Stræde, S., Helles, F.: Applying multi-criteria decision-making to protected areas and buffer zone management: a case study in the Royal Chitwan National Park. Nepal. J. For. Econ. 12, 91–108 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N., Courrau, J.: Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK (2006)

  24. Ji, P., Zhang, H.-Y., Wang, J.-Q.: Selecting an outsourcing provider based on the combined MABAC-ELECTRE method using single-valued neutrosophic linguistic sets. Comput. Ind. Eng. 120, 429–441 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Manwa, H., Boemah, D.L.: Performance management in an interpretive setting: Tour guides in South African National Parks (SAN Parks). J. Contemp. Manag. (2012)

  26. Mathur, V.B., Gopal, R., Yadav, S.P., Sinha, P.R.: Management effectiveness evaluation (MEE) of protected areas network in India: process and outcomes. Nat. Tiger Conserv. Auth., Gov. of India (2011)

  27. Mathur, V.B.: Management effectiveness evaluation (MEE) of National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in India. Technical manual, Wildlife Institute of India (2016)

  28. Mohseni, M., Ataei, M., Kakaie, R.: Dilution risk ranking in underground metal mines using multi-attributive approximation area comparison. J. Min. Environ. 11, 977–989 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moore, S.A., Taplin, R.: A benchmarking method for visitor management by National Park agencies. Visit. Stud. 17, 107–127 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muravev, D., Mijic, N.: A novel integrated provider selection multicriteria model: the BWM-MABAC model. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 3, 60–78 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nenadic, D.: Ranking dangerous sections of the road using MCDM model. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2, 115–131 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Negru, C., Gaibor, I.D., Halalis, A.-F., Popa, B.: Management effective assessment for Ecuador’s national parks. Diversity 12, 487 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nunić, Z.: Evaluation and selection of the PVC carpentry manufacturer using the FUCOM-MABAC model. Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl. 1, 13–28 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pamučar, D., Ćirovic, G.: The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 3016–3028 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž, Sremac, S.: A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry 10(9), 393 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pamučar, D., Lukovac, V., Božanić, D., Komazec, N.: Multi-criteria FUCOM-MAIRCA model for the evaluation of level crossings: case study in the Republic of Serbia. Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl. 1, 108–129 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Prato, T.: Multiple attribute evaluation for national parks and protected areas. The George Wright Forum 21, 62–74 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Roy, J., Chatterjee, K., Bandyopadhyay, A., Kar, S.: Evaluation and selection of medical tourism sites: a rough analytic hierarchy process based multi-attributive border approximation area comparison approach. Expert Syst. 35(1), e12232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sharifi, M.A., Vandentoorn, W., Rico, A., Emmanuel, M.: Application of GIS and multicriteria evaluation in locating sustainable boundary between the Tunari National Park and Cochabamba City (Bolivia). J. Multi-criteria Decis. Anal. 11, 151–164 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sharma, H.R., Roy, J., Kar, S., Prentkovskis, O.: Multi criteria evaluation framework for prioritizing Indian railway stations using modified rough AHP-MABAC method. Transp. Telecommun. J. 19, 113–127 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tsai, W.-H., Chou, W.-C., Lai, C.-W.: An effective evaluation model and improvement analysis for national park websites: a case study of Taiwan. Tour. Manag. 31, 936–952 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wei, G., Wei, C., Wu, J., Wang, H.: Supplier selection of medical consumption products with a probabilistic linguistic MABAC method. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 5082 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, D., Cui, X., **an, H., Hong, Y., Hu, D.: A novel TOPSIS-MABAC method for multi-attribute decision making with interval neutrosophic set. Int. J. Appl. Math. 50, 1–6 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Pamucar, D., Chakraborty, S.: Development of an integrated decision making model for location selection of logistics centers in the Spanish autonomous communities. Expert Syst. Appl. 148, 113208 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zagradjanin, N., Pamucar, D., Jovanovic, K.: Cloud-based multi-robot path planning in complex and crowded environment with multi-criteria decision making using full consistency method. Symmetry 11(10), 1241 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11101241

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection, literature review and draft writing were performed by SC. Analysis was performed by BS. Final writing and technical editing were done by SC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shankar Chakraborty.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to submit and publish this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 9 and 10

Table 9 Weighted normalized decision matrix
Table 10 Distance matrix

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakraborty, S., Sarkar, B. & Chakraborty, S. A FUCOM-MABAC-based integrated approach for performance evaluation of the Indian National Parks. OPSEARCH 60, 125–154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-022-00611-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-022-00611-2

Keywords

Navigation