Log in

Claros System: A Rapid Microfluidics-Based Point-of-Care System for Quantitative Prostate Specific Antigen Analysis from Finger-Stick Blood

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Determination of circulating prostate specific antigen (PSA) is commonly used in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of prostate cancer [1]. Presently, PSA testing is performed in centralized laboratories, which is associated with prolonged time between venipuncture and the PSA value being available. In this prospective study, we present a new and rapid test system for the quantitative determination of PSA levels from finger-stick blood.

Methods

The Claros1® analyzer is a rapid microfluidics-based point-of-care system for quantitative PSA analysis from 10-µl finger-stick blood that requires only 10 min for testing. Total PSA concentrations by the Claros system in 100 consecutive asymptomatic men (median age 57 years, range 44–81 years) were compared with two commercially available, commonly used PSA assays (Abbott and Elecsys by Roche) performed by a reference laboratory.

Results

Eighty-six percent of finger-stick blood-borne probes from 100 men were evaluable for PSA testing by the Claros1® analyzer system. In 13/14 cases the expiry date of the microfluid cassettes of the Claros system was exceeded and one blood puncture was performed inadequately. The correlations between the Claros results and OPKO–Abbott and OPKO–Roche assay results were high, with R2 values of 0.982 and 0.985, respectively. The R2 value for the Roche–Abbott correlation was 0.991 with a slope value of 1.160. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in seven cases, with a median PSA of 1.8 ng/ml in the Claros group compared to 1.75 ng/ml and 2.1 ng/ml in the Abbott and Roche groups, respectively.

Conclusion

The Claros1® PSA assay combines the advantages of rapid, accurate detection with a low required sample volume, allowing the analysis to be performed using finger-stick blood. Provided that further analysis proves the reproducibility of the test, it may help to reduce the number of office visits, thus decreasing costs to the health care system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Catalona WJ, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol. 1994;151:1283–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Welch HG, Gorski DH, Albertsen PC. Trends in metastatic breast and prostate cancer–lessons in cancer dynamics. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1685–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Meng MV, Mehta SS, Carroll PR. The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2141–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fossati N, et al. Impact of stage migration and practice changes on high-risk prostate cancer: results from patients treated with radical prostatectomy over the last two decades. BJU Int. 2015;22:24. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schröder FH, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzpatrick JM, Banu E, Oudard S. Prostate-specific antigen kinetics in localized and advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2009;103:578–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scattoni V, et al. Diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2004;93:680–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson DH, et al. Fifth-generation digital immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen by single molecule array technology. Clin Chem. 2011;57:1712–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lepor H, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel method for the measurement of prostate-specific antigen, AccuPSA(TM), as a predictor of 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: results of a pilot study. BJU Int. 2012;109:1770–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Okada H, Hosokawa K, Maeda M. Power-free microchip immunoassay of PSA in human serum for point-of-care testing. Anal Sci. 2011;27:237–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin YY, et al. A nanoparticle label/immunochromatographic electrochemical biosensor for rapid and sensitive detection of prostate-specific antigen. Biosens Bioelectron. 2008;23:1659–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim DJ, et al. Organic electrochemical transistor based immunosensor for prostate specific antigen (PSA) detection using gold nanoparticles for signal amplification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;25:2477–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adel Ahmed H, Azzazy HME. Power-free chip enzyme immunoassay for detection of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in serum. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;49:478–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karim O, et al. Point-of-care PSA testing: an evaluation of PSAwatch. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10:270–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dok An C, et al. Evaluation of a rapid qualitative prostate specific antigen assay, the One Step PSA(TM) test. Cancer Lett. 2001;162(2):135–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung K, et al. Rapid detection of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels in blood: performance of various membrane strip tests compared. Urology 1999;53(1):155–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lein M, et al. Rapid screening of PSA: evaluation of an immunochemical membrane strip test. Clin Chem. 1995;41(10):1545–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Madersbacher S, et al. Validation of a 10-minute dipstick test for serum prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol. 1996;30(4):446–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berg W, et al. Possibility of improving the acceptance rateof early detection testing for prostate cancerwith a one-step test for prostate-specific antigen in whole blood. Urol Int. 1999;63(2):102–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernandez-Sanchez C, et al. One-step immunostrip test for the simultaneous detection of free and total prostate specific antigen in serum. J Immunol Methods 2005;307(1–2):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miano R, et al. Evaluation of a new, rapid, qualitative, one-step PSA Test for prostate cancer screening: the PSA RapidScreen test. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005;8(3):219–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu CC, et al. Evaluation of a rapid quantitative determination method of PSA concentration with gold immunochromatographic strips. BMC Urol. 2015;15:109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the study.

Funding

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article. The article processing charges were funded by the authors.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosures

Agnieszka Maj-Hes, Sabina Sevcenco, Tibor Szarvas, and Gero Kramer have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical committee of the Medical University of Vienna and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data Availability

The manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gero Kramer.

Additional information

Enhanced Digital Features

To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7613810.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maj-Hes, A., Sevcenco, S., Szarvas, T. et al. Claros System: A Rapid Microfluidics-Based Point-of-Care System for Quantitative Prostate Specific Antigen Analysis from Finger-Stick Blood. Adv Ther 36, 916–922 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-0888-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-0888-0

Keywords

Navigation