Abstract
Investigations of non-Western art forms and non-Western subjects are needed to understand cross-cultural empirical aesthetics. This study examined the aesthetic evaluation of Chinese calligraphy, a distinguished visual art in East Asia, through people’s preferences among five scripts. These scripts are representative of major artistic writing styles of Chinese characters. We conducted an experiment with Chinese (mean age = 22.64, SD = 2.90) and non-Chinese participants (International students from Asia, Africa, and Northern America; mean age = 26.76, SD = 2.35) and investigated through subjective measures and eye-tracking measures. We adopted Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking (PIA Model) and measured fluency processing, affective feelings, motivational evaluation, and overall likeness as subjective measures to capture the aesthetic evaluation. The two groups evaluated the scripts differently and showed distinctive preferences for scripts. Chinese participants perceived the stimuli to be more fluent than non-Chinese participants. Chinese rated cursive script most fluent, pleasant, interesting, and liked it most, whereas non-Chinese liked the official script the most and rated it most interesting. Regarding eye movement, Chinese participants had fewer fixations and shorter total fixation durations, relative to non-Chinese participants. Non-Chinese participants were more sensitive to the features of the scripts compared with Chinese participants. We suggest that culture could affect aesthetic evaluation of Chinese calligraphy. Experience of Chinese characters and aesthetic expectations of different cultures may contribute to the evaluation differences.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12144-022-03390-7/MediaObjects/12144_2022_3390_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12144-022-03390-7/MediaObjects/12144_2022_3390_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12144-022-03390-7/MediaObjects/12144_2022_3390_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12144-022-03390-7/MediaObjects/12144_2022_3390_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
We promise that the data is available when required and permission to reproduce material from other sources.
The study has been reviewed and approved by School Ethnic Board.
Notes
Five non-Chinese participants had learned a few Chinese characters. Eight participants reported recognition of one or more characters, including: “如” (by five participants), “门” (by three participants), and “食”, “字”, “风”, and “深” (by one or two participants).
References
Augustin, D., & Leder, H. (2006). Art expertise: A study of concepts and conceptual spaces. Psychology Science, 48(2), 135–156.
Baumgarten, A. (1954). Reflections on Poetry (K. Aschenbrenner & WB Holther, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1735).
Blijlevens, J., Carbon, C. C., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. (2012). Aesthetic appraisal of product designs: Independent effects of typicality and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 103(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02038.x
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103
Brieber, D., Nadal, M., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2014). Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e99019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099019
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2007). Lishu. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/art/lishu. Accessed 16 June 2021
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2017). Dazhuan. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/dazhuan. Accessed 16 June 2021
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2019a). Caoshu. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/caoshu. Accessed 16 June 2021
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2019b). Kaishu. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/art/kaishu. Accessed 16 June 2021
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2019c). **ngshu. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/xingshu. Accessed 16 June 2021
Che, J., Sun, X., Gallardo, V., & Nadal, M. (2018). Cross-cultural empirical aesthetics. Progress in Brain Research, 237, 77–103.
Chen, T. (2011). Chinese Calligraphy. Cambridge University Press.
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(35), 12629–12633. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506162102
Coursaris, C. K., Swierenga, S. J., & Watrall, E. (2008). An empirical investigation of color temperature and gender effects on web aesthetics. Journal of Usability Studies, 3(3), 103–117.
Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. MIT Press.
Di, B., Luo, M., Shi, K., Liu, C., & Jiao, Y. (2021). Fractal analyses reveal the origin of aesthetics in Chinese calligraphy. Contemporary Social Science, 2(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.19873/j.cnki.2096-0212.2021.02.002
Duchowski, A. T. (2017). Serious Gaze [Keynote address]. In 2017 9th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games), Athens, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2017.8056614
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 683–703). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fechner, G. T. (1876). Preschool of aesthetics. Breitkopf & Härtel.
Forster, M., Leder, H., & Ansorge, U. (2013). It felt fluent, and I liked it: Subjective feeling of fluency rather than objective fluency determines liking. Emotion, 13(2), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030115
Graf, L. K., & Landwehr, J. R. (2015). A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: The pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315574978
He, L. (2022). Calligraphy creation and aesthetic interest. Chinese Calligraphy,(1), 5.(何来胜. (2022). 书法创作与审美趣味. **书法(1), 5.)
Huang, Y. (2019). Method and value: Methodology in the study of calligraphic aesthetics in the twentieth century. Chinese Calligraphy, 15(3), 189–191. (黄映恺. (2019). 方法与价值:二十世纪书法美学研究中的方法论. **书法(15), 3.189-191.
Ip, M. H. K., & Cutler, A. (2020). Universals of listening: Equivalent prosodic entrainment in tone and non-tone languages. Cognition, 202, 104311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104311
Jacoby, N., Margulis, E. H., Clayton, M., Hannon, E., Honing, H., Iversen, J., … & Wald-Fuhrmann, M. (2020). Cross-cultural work in music cognition: Challenges, insights, and recommendations. Music Perception, 37(3), 185–195.
Ji, L.-J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.943
Kant, I., & Smith, N. K. (1929). Critique of pure reason. Bedford.
Keller, A., Sommer, L., Klöckner, C. A., & Hanss, D. (2020). Contextualizing information enhances the experience of environmental art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(3), 264–275.
Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46(11), 1762–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.002
Kostyk, A., & Huhmann, B. A. (2021). Perfect social media image posts: Symmetry and contrast influence consumer response. European Journal of Marketing, 55(6), 1747–1779. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2018-0629
Landwehr, J. R., Labroo, A. A., & Herrmann, A. (2011). Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts. Marketing Science, 30(3), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0633
Landwehr, J. R., Wentzel, D., & Herrmann, A. (2013). Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypical designs at different stages of exposure. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1509/1547-7185-77.5.92
Lin, D. (2018). Lawless ness in my calligraphy - Zen spirit in the calligraphic creation of Su Shi. Chinese Calligraphy, 326(6), 142–145. 林丹慧. (2018). 我书意造本无法——苏轼书法创作中的禅宗精神. **书法, 326(6), 142-145.
Liu, Y., Liang N. Y., Wang, D. J., Zhang, S. Y. (1990). **an Dai Han Yu Chang Yong Zi Dian [Dictionary of Modern Chinese words in common uses] (Yang, T. Y., Jie, C. Y., & Sun, W., Eds.). Yuhang Publishing House.
Locher, P. J. (2006). The usefulness of eye movement recordings to subject an aesthetic episode with visual art to empirical scrutiny. Psychology Science, 48(2), 106.
Locher, P., Gray, S., & Nodine, C. (1996). The structural framework of pictorial balance. Perception, 25(12), 1419–1436. https://doi.org/10.1068/p251419
Locher, P., Krupinski, E. A., Mello-Thoms, C., & Nodine, C. F. (2007). Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spatial Vision, 21(1–2), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856807782753868
Locher, P. J. (2012). Empirical investigation of an aesthetic experience with art. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience (A. P. Shimamura & S. E. Palmer, Eds.). Oxford University Press.
Locher, P. (2020). The study of eye movements in empirical aesthetics. In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Aesthetics. Edited by Marcos Nadal and Oshin Vartanian. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198824350.013.12
Lu, N. (2004). The rhythm of ancient Chinese calligraphy. Academic Exchange, 8(4), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8284.2004.08.033 鲁宁.(2004).**古代书法的韵律. 学术交流(8), 4, 134-137.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.922
Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(9), 1260–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320555
Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R. (2018). Quantifying visual aesthetics based on processing fluency theory: Four algorithmic measures for antecedents of aesthetic preferences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(4), 399.
Mikuni, J., Specker, E., Pelowski, M., Leder, H., & Kawabata, H. (2021). Is there a general ‘art fatigue’ effect? A cross-paradigm, cross-cultural study of repeated art viewing in the laboratory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(2), 343–360.
Mitrovic, A., Hegelmaier, L. M., Leder, H., & Pelowski, M. (2020). Does beauty capture the eye, even if it’s not (overtly) adaptive? A comparative eye-tracking study of spontaneous attention and visual preference with VAST abstract art. Acta Psychologica, 209, 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103133
Morrison, S. J., & Demorest, S. M. (2009). Cultural constraints on music perception and cognition. Progress in Brain Research, 178, 67–77.
QuianQuiroga, R., & Pedreira, C. (2011). How do we see art: An eye-tracker study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 98. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00098
Reber, R. (2002). Reasons for the preference for symmetry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(3), 415–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02350076
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004a). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004b). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00049-7
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157.
Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, M. J. (1966). The influence of culture on visual perception. Bobbs-Merrill.
Shi, X. (2019). Chinese Calligraphy as “Force-Form.” Journal of Aesthetic Education, 53(3), 54–70.
Smith, L. F., & Smith, J. K. (2006). The nature and growth of aesthetic fluency. In P. Locher, C. Martindale, & L. Dorfman (Eds.), New directions in aesthetics, creativity and the arts (pp. 47–58). Baywood Publishing Co.
Szubielska, M., Imbir, K., & Szymańska, A. (2021). The influence of the physical context and knowledge of artworks on the aesthetic experience of interactive installations. Current Psychology, 40(8), 3702–3715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00322-w
Tseng, Y., & Zeng, Y. (1993). A history of Chinese calligraphy. Chinese University Press.
Varnum, M. E., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13.
Vissers, N., & Wagemans, J. (2021). Processing fluency, processing style, and aesthetic response to artistic photographs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000388
Wassiliwizky, E., & Menninghaus, W. (2021). Why and how should cognitive science care about aesthetics? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(6), 437–449.
White, S. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
Wölfflin, H. (1994). Prolegomena zu einer Psychologie der Architektur [Pro- legomena to a psychology of architecture]. In H. F. Mallgrave & E. Ikonomou (Eds.), Empathy, form, and space: Problems in German aesthetics, 1873–1893 (pp. 149–190). Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities. (Original work published 1886)
Wurtz, P., Reber, R., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2008). The feeling of fluent perception: A single experience from multiple asynchronous sources. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.07.001
Zhan, D. (2018). The temporality of calligraphy and its formal aesthetic significance. Chinese Calligraphy, 5(3), 189–191. 詹冬华. (2018). 书法的时空性及其形式美学意义. **书法(5), 3. 189-191.
Zhang, L., Atari, M., Schwarz, N., Newman, E. J., & Afhami, R. (2022b). Conceptual metaphors, processing fluency, and aesthetic preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, 104247.
Zhang, W., Tao, Y., Lai, S., Zhao, X., Lai, S., & He, X. (2022a). Positive referential meaning and color metaphor bring beauty: Evidence on aesthetic appraisal of ancient Chinese character from Han, Bai, and Yi ethnic groups. Current Psychology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02728-5
Zhou, B., & Yan, Y. (2018). International communication and practice system of Chinese calligraphy. Chinese Calligraphy, 3(2), 200–201. 周斌&颜以琳.(2018).书法的国际传播与实践体系.**书法3(2), 200-201.
Zhu, Y. (2018). Aesthetic value of calligraphy appreciation. China Literature and Art Criticism, 8(1), 77–85. 朱以撒. (2018). 书法欣赏中的审美价值. **文艺评论(8), 9. 77-85.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71902113].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual adult participants included in the study; The authors promise that the data is available when required and will make our data available in an open repository as required.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1 Character stimulus
Table 4
Appendix 2 Repeated measures multiple analysis of variance for subjective measures
Table 5
Appendix 3 Repeated Measures Multiple Analysis of Variance for Eye Movement Measures
Table 6
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, Y., Shen, R. Aesthetic evaluation of Chinese calligraphy: a cross-cultural comparative study. Curr Psychol 42, 23096–23109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03390-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03390-7