Abstract
The study of psychiatric and neurological diseases requires the substrate in which the disorders occur, that is, the nervous tissue. Currently, several types of human bio-specimens are being used for research, including postmortem brains, cerebrospinal fluid, induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, and induced neuronal (iN) cells. However, these samples are far from providing a useful predictive, diagnostic, or prognostic biomarker. The olfactory epithelium is a region close to the brain that has received increased interest as a research tool for the study of brain mechanisms in complex neuropsychiatric and neurological diseases. The olfactory sensory neurons are replaced by neurogenesis throughout adult life from stem cells on the basement membrane. These stem cells are multipotent and can be propagated in neurospheres, proliferated in vitro and differentiated into multiple cell types including neurons and glia. For all these reasons, olfactory epithelium provides a unique resource for investigating neuronal molecular markers of neuropsychiatric and neurological diseases. Here, we describe the isolation and culture of human differentiated neurons and glial cells from olfactory epithelium of living subjects by an easy and non-invasive exfoliation method that may serve as a useful tool for the research in brain diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Modeling neuropsychiatric disorders is extremely challenging given the subjective nature of many of the symptoms and the lack of biomarkers and objective diagnostic tests [1]. Currently, several types of human bio-specimens are being used for research, including postmortem tissue, cerebrospinal fluid, induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, or induced neuronal (iN) cells [2,3,4].
The human olfactory epithelium supplies information to the olfactory bulbs of the brain and displays a continuous and powerful neurogenesis in humans, by which olfactory sensory neurons are replaced [5]. Neuronal progenitor cells present in the olfactory epithelium are defined as undifferentiated clonogenic cells that possess the capacity for self-renewal, to generate neuronal or astrocytic cells, as well as to remain as neurospheres in cell culture [6,7,8]. In this context, the olfactory epithelium has received increased interest as a window to brain mechanisms in complex psychiatric diseases [4, 9,10,11,12,13]. To date, other studies have developed different methods for obtaining the olfactory neuroepithelium (ON) sample, invasively in biopsies after nasal surgery [14], postmortem at autopsies [15], or even by a recent non-invasive method [16]. However, all these studies have mainly focused on the evaluation of the olfactory epithelium cells, without further differentiation, that could provide more information on the disease-specific alterations in neurons and/or glial cells.
We aimed to obtain and grow the neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from the olfactory epithelium and differentiate into neurons or glial cells for obtaining specific cell-type cultures in sufficient quantity for the study of neuropsychiatric disorders.
The final objective of this work is the development of a non-invasive, easy, reproducible, and reliable method for the isolation, culture, and characterization of neurons and glial cells from human olfactory epithelium. In this way, a unique resource can be obtained for the investigation of the neuronal and glia-related molecular mechanisms underlying psychiatric and neurological disorders.
Material and Methods
A complete workflow of the method is described in Fig. 1.
Nasal Exfoliation
The olfactory epithelium was obtained by nasal exfoliation from eight healthy donors as previously described [16]. Briefly, the nasal area was exfoliated by circular movements with a sterile swab (brush 2.4 cm long and 3 mm in diameter) introduced into the nasal cavity. Four different swabs were used for each donor for exfoliating the middle and upper regions of the two nasal cavities. After exfoliation, each brush was placed in tubes with 250 µl conventional culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Ham F-12 (DMEM/F12) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2% glutamine, and 1% streptomycin-penicillin (supplemented DMEM medium) (Gibco BRL, USA), kee** the samples on ice. Four samples were obtained for each subject, two (middle and upper regions) for each nostril. The sample from the upper part of the right nostril was mixed with the sample from the middle part of the left nostril and put together in the same tube; the same was done with the other two samples. One of these mixed samples was used for the culture of adherent cells and the other for the culture of neurospheres.
Neurospheres were cultured and characterized for the demonstration of the presence of stem cells in the olfactory epithelium. Obtaining differentiated cells from neurospheres is extremely complicated, and the number of cells obtained is very low. For this reason, the generation of neuron- or glia-enriched cultures was performed from adherent cultures.
Culture of Neurospheres from Olfactory Epithelium
For the culture of these neurospheres, the samples previously obtained by nasal exfoliation were undergone to a manual disintegration followed by centrifugation (500 g for 5 min, room temperature (RT)). The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in 500 µl of NeuroCult™ NS-A Proliferation Medium (StemCell Technologies, France) supplemented with 20 ng/ml human recombinant EGF, 10 ng/ml human recombinant bFGF, and 2 μg/ml heparin solution (supplemented NeuroCult™ NS-A Proliferation Medium) and seeded in a 25 cm2 flask with 4 ml of this supplemented medium. Cells were grown at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and observed under a direct bright-light microscope (Primovert KMAT, Zeiss, Germany). Neurospheres were then submitted to passages to test their regeneration and multiplication capacity. In this case, the passage was done when neurospheres reach approximately 100–150 µm in diameter, usually 7–14 days after seeding, although in some cases, it may take up to 21 days. If the medium became acidic before the neurospheres reached 100–150 µm in diameter, 500/1000 µl of supplemented proliferation medium was added to renew nutrients and prevent cell death. On passage 5, neurospheres were isolated by centrifugation and fixed for immunocytochemistry characterization.
On the other hand, another flask of neurospheres was maintained without making any passes. Only additions of supplemented proliferation medium were made for renewing of nutrients every 2 days until adhesion to the flask spontaneously occurred. When neurospheres were adhered to the flask, the neurosphere culture medium was changed to NeuroCult™ NS-A Differentiation medium (StemCell Technologies, France) to promote the differentiation of the cells. This would result in a pure culture of cells of neuronal lineage. After 30 days in differentiation medium, the mix of cells was fixed for immunocytochemistry.
Adherent Culture of Cells from Olfactory Epithelium
For the culture of adherent cells, the samples were manually disaggregated and seeded in a 25 cm2 flask and cells were grown at 37 °C and with 5% CO2 in supplemented DMEM medium. When the culture reached confluence, cells were washed twice with sterile and tempered phosphate-buffered saline (PBS 1X), detached with 0.5% trypsin–EDTA (GibcoBRL, USA), neutralized with supplemented DMEM medium, and centrifuged at 1000 g RT for 5 min and the pellet was resuspended in supplemented DMEM medium. Finally, cells were seeded on a larger surface to obtain a stock of cells. In this way, cells at different stages of maturation were obtained. Characterization of cells with immunocytochemistry was carried out on cells cultured to passage 5.
Neuron and Glia Culture Enrichment Using Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting
For the isolation and purification of neuron- or glia-enriched cultures, anti-PSA-NCAM micro beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) were used for the positive selection of PSA-NCAM+ cells from the adherent cell cultures. Anti-PSA-NCAM micro beads recognize polysialic acid (PSA), which is linked to the extracellular domain of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM, CD56) [17]. Once culture reached confluence at passage 5 (approximately 4/5 days after seeding, although it depends on the cells in the culture), cells were washed twice with sterile and tempered PBS 1X, detached with 0.5% trypsin–EDTA, neutralized with differentiation medium, and centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in 60 µl of buffer (0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS 1X) per 107 total cells (Fluidlab R-300, Anvajo, Germany) well mixed and incubated for 10 min RT at 4 °C. The cells were then incubated with 20 µl of anti-PSA-NCAM MicroBeads/107 cells for 15 min RT at 4 °C. Finally, cells were washed by adding 1 ml of buffer/107 cells and centrifuged at 300 g RT for 10 min, and the pellet was resuspended in 500 µl of buffer/108 cells.
After magnetic labeling, cells were passed through a magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) column (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) placed in a strong permanent magnet. The ferromagnetic spheres in the column amplify the magnetic field by 10,000-fold, thus inducing a high gradient. Unlabeled cells (PSA-NCAM−) pass through the column while magnetically labeled cells (PSA-NCAM+) are retained within it. After removal of the column from the magnetic field, the retained fraction was eluted. Both fractions, labeled (PSA-NCAM+, neuron-enriched fraction) and non-labeled (PSA-NCAM−, glia-enriched fraction), were completely recovered. The glia-enriched culture was then seeded in NeuroCult™ NS-A Differentiation medium with medium changes every 2 days for approximately 30 days. The neuron-enriched culture, however, was first seeded in supplemented DMEM/F12 + medium to allow cell growth, and after 7 days, the medium was changed to NeuroCult™ NS-A Differentiation with medium changes every 2 days until 30 days, when cells were characterized by immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry.
Characterization of Cultures by Immunocytochemistry
After the MACS, approximately 5 days are needed for the culture to stabilize; the cells that survive the magnetic separation begin to adhere to the flask and to differentiate. At this time, we performed the PSA-NCAM immunocytochemistry in both types of cultures, to ensure the quality of the separation. Afterwards, we let the cultures grow for approximately 30 days, and the immunocytochemical characterization of the neuron-enriched and glia-enriched cultures was carried out. Cells were washed twice with sterile and tempered PBS 1X and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals, Spain) in PBS for 20 min at 4 °C and shaking. Cells were washed again with PBS 1X, then 2 times with A solution (PBS 1% BSA + 0.02% azide) at RT for 5 min and with agitation at 90 rpm, continued by a quick wash with B solution (PBS 0.5% Triton X100) at RT for 5 min and with agitation at 90 rpm and two final washes with A solution again (RT for 5 min and with agitation at 90 rpm). After washing, cells were incubated for 1 h RT and agitation at 90 rpm with blocking solution (PBS 2% BSA + 0.02% azide). Finally, cells were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies diluted in a solution with PBS 0.5% BSA and 0.1% azide.
Antibodies against Nestin, Sox2, and Musashi-1 were used for staining the neurospheres; PSA-NCAM, βIII-Tubulin, Neuronal-Nuclei (NeuN), Nestin, Microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) and Microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B) for neural cells; glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for astrocytes; and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) for epithelial cells. A detailed description of primary antibodies and dilutions can be found in Supplemental Table 1.
In the next day, the primary antibodies were removed and washed three times with solution A (RT, 5 min; agitation, 90 rpm). Finally, cells were incubated with the secondary antibodies (90 min, RT; agitation, 90 rpm; and darkness) (Supplemental Table 2). Secondary antibodies were removed, and cells were washed again three times with solution A (RT, 5 min; agitation, 90 rpm). The nuclei were stained with 4′, 6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI 1/5000; Panreac Applichem (A4099), Spain). The immunocytochemistry of the neurospheres was carried out in the same way but with a previous centrifugation for the precipitation of the neurospheres on a slide. Images were acquired with a Nikon Eclipse 80I and processed with ImageJ software.
Characterization of Neuron- and Glia-Enriched Cultures with Flow Cytometry
Sample Preparation
The flow cytometry assays were performed 30 days after the MACS. During this 30-day period, cells are allowed to grow and differentiate with the final objective of having a sufficient amount of differentiated cells.
Cells were washed twice with sterile and tempered PBS 1X, 0.5% trypsin–EDTA was added, and cells were placed in the incubator (37℃) for 2 min. When cells were completely detached, the trypsin was neutralized by pipetting with differentiation medium up and down over the surface of the flask to detach as many cells as possible. Once it was verified that the cells were correctly detached, the cell suspension was collected in a falcon. Cells were then centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 600 µl of blocking solution (1 h, with agitation at 4℃). Primary antibodies were added over the blocking solution overnight with agitation at 4℃. In the following day, the cell suspension was centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 600 µl of sterile (cold) PBS 1X. Another centrifugation was made at 500 g for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 600 µl secondary antibody dilution in blocking solution. After incubating 90 min with agitation at 4℃, cells were washed and centrifuged twice at 500 g for 10 min. The resulting pellet was then resuspended in 600 µl of PBS 1X the first time and the second time in 600 µl of HBSS solution (Hank’s balanced salt solution) which is the solution needed to analyze the sample in the cytometer.
Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)
The samples were analyzed and sorted in a BD FACSJazz Cell sorter equipped with two independently aligned B488 and Y/G561 lasers. System pressure is 27 psi. Prior to analysis, the sample was filtered through a sterile sieve with a pore diameter of 50 µm (BD Filcon, sterile, cup-type, ref: 340,629) to avoid clumps in the sample line.
Quantification of Prostaglandin E2, Interleukin-6, Ratio of Kynunerine/Tryptophan, and Interferon Gamma in Culture Medium
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), interleukin-6 (IL6), ratio of kynunerine (Kyn)/tryptophan (Trp), and interferon gamma (IFNγ) were quantified with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (human IFNγ ELISA Kit, cat. no. BMS228, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.; human IL-6 ELISA kit, cat. no. BMS213-2, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.; and Prostaglandin E 2 ELISA Kit—monoclonal, cat. no. 514010, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) in culture medium samples, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. No dilution was performed, and the absorption peak was at 450 nm. Protein content in culture medium was measured by Bradfords’ method [18], and results are shown as pg/mg protein of culture medium.
HPLC with electrochemical detection was used to quantify Trp and Kyn in culture medium samples. Each sample was first diluted 1:5 in 0.1 M HClO4 and 100 µl EDTA and filtered by centrifugation at 18,000 g × 15 min using Costar® Spin-X® Centrifuge Tubes (0.22 µm Pore CA Membrane, Corning). The concentration of Trp and Kyn was estimated with reference to standards prepared and injected on the same day. The mobile phase composition was 150 mM H2NaPO4, 0.2 mM EDTA, 4.3 mM octyl sodium sulfate (pH 6.3), and 8% (vol/vol) methanol. The mobile phase was filtered and delivered at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min by a Hewlett-Packard model 1200 pump. Separation was carried out at 30 °C on a Zorbax Eclipse Plus column (3.5 μm C18, 2.1 × 150 mm, Agilent Technologies, Spain). Amperometric detection of Trp and Kyn was done by a Hewlett-Packard model 1049 A detector at an oxidizing potential of + 950 mV. Results are expressed as Kyn/Trp concentration ratio.
Ethical Aspects
All subjects (n = 8) were volunteers without a psychiatric condition and gave their written consent before sample extraction. The entire procedure was approved by the corresponding ethics committee (CEI E22/27).
Results and Discussion
Olfactory Epithelium Cells from Living Subjects Are Able to Form Growing and Proliferating Neurospheres
NPCs in the olfactory epithelium are responsible for renewing the population of sensory neurons throughout life, maintaining a lifelong capacity of regeneration after injuries [19, 20]. When the in vitro culture conditions are adequate, the isolated progenitor neural cells, with high mitotic capacity, are capable of growing in the form of spherical aggregates, called neurospheres. This is an inherent capacity of NPCs [21]. These structures derived from the olfactory mucosa might give rise to neurons and glia. So, they are very interesting for establishing new human models for the study of diseases that affect the central nervous system. As they do not require genetic reprogramming, they are very useful for understanding aspects of the etiology of the disease, improving diagnosis, monitoring treatment, or promoting the development of new therapeutic drugs [6].
To demonstrate the presence and functionality of NPCs after nasal exfoliation in our control subjects, we set out to obtain and multiply cultured neurospheres (Fig. 2a). As seen in Fig. 2, when NPCs were cultured in a specific proliferation medium, cells formed rounded aggregates (Fig. 2b). These neurospheres, being formed by multipotent stem cells, have the ability to divide without differentiation (Fig. 2c). When the neurospheres were disaggregated by centrifugation and afterwards with manual pipetting disaggregation and cultured again in a new flask, these independent cells reassembled, giving rise to the formation of new neurospheres for unlimited proliferation, a remarkable characteristic of neurospheres [22,23,24,25,26]. When neurospheres were adhered to the flask, after 10/12 days of culture in differentiation medium, cells begin to appear in different stages of differentiation. As can be seen in Fig. 2d, e, and f, some of these cells have neuronal profile, with extensions that connect with other cells, and some have even developed synaptic buttons.
Neurosphere cultures. Schematic representation of the workflow for the culture of neurospheres (a). Bright-field visual characterization (10X) of growing neurospheres (b) and proliferating neurospheres (c). Cell with neuronal shape and long prolongation (white arrow) connecting with another similar cell (blue arrow) including dendritic spines (orange arrow) (d, e, f)
The ability to obtain growing and dividing neurospheres and that these neurospheres were able to differentiate to neural-like cells demonstrates that NPCs can be isolated from nasal exfoliation in living subjects.
Olfactory Epithelium-Derived Neurospheres Express NPC-Specific Markers
Although, to date, no specific marker for neurospheres has been described, these formations transiently express the protein Nestin [27]. Nestin is an intermediate filament found in nerve cells that has become widely used as a marker for neural precursors. Additionally, neurospheres are formed by different type of cells expressing also the SRY-box transcription factor-2 (Sox2) or the mRNA-binding protein Musashi-1 that has been demonstrated to play a critical role in promoting stem cell self-renewal [28]. The presence of these markers demonstrates that neurospheres from olfactory epithelium are formed by a heterogeneous population of cells in different stages of differentiation such as stem cells or proliferating neural progenitors [29].
Characterization by immunocytochemistry (Fig. 3) using neural markers Sox2 (Fig. 3b, e, f, i), Musashi-1 (Fig. 3c, e), and Nestin (Fig. 3g, i) showed the co-expression of all these markers in the neurosphere culture. These results demonstrate that under our experimental conditions, cells from the olfactory epithelium are able to form neurospheres composed by neural progenitor cells, as previously demonstrated by other groups [7, 30,31,32].
Characterization of proliferating neurospheres by immunocytochemistry. Schematic representation of the workflow for the culture of neurospheres (a). Immunostaining of neural markers Nestin, Sox2, and Musashi-1. Double labeling of Sox2 (b) and Musashi-1 (c) and merge image for Sox2 and Musashi-1 (e). Double labeling of Sox2 (f) and Nestin (g) and merge image for Sox2 and Nestin (i). DAPI was used to stain the nuclei (d, h). Bar = 20 µm
Olfactory Epithelium-Derived Neurospheres Give Rise to Differentiated Neural Progenitors
As described above, neurospheres are capable of giving rise to neurons and glial cells under the right conditions. When neurosphere culture medium was changed to differentiation medium (Fig. 4a), NPCs from the neurospheres begin to differentiate. Figure 4 shows cells expressing βIII-Tubulin (Fig. 4b, d), Nestin (Fig. 4b), GFAP (Fig. 4c), and MAP2 (Fig. 4d).
Despite being able to differentiate to cells expressing neuronal or glial markers, the number of cells obtained from neurospheres is extremely low. Moreover, when these culture of neurosphere-derived differentiated cells reaches confluence, we are not able to re-seed the culture and the cells die because mature neurons do not undergo cell division. As previously stated, the objective of the study was to obtain neuronal and glial cells for studying the cellular and molecular hallmarks of neuropsychiatric diseases. If the number of cells obtained is low, it would be difficult to use these cultures as a useful research tool. For this reason, we decided to grow adherent cultures from olfactory epithelium and then differentiate this culture to neurons and glia.
Differentiation to Neuronal and Glial Cells from Adherent Cell Cultures
As it has been previously explained, the number of differentiated cells obtained from neurospheres is extremely low for potentially being used in neuropsychiatric research. For this reason, the generation of neuron- or glia-enriched cultures was carried out from adherent cultures (Fig. 5a). As shown in Fig. 5, cells begin to grow after seeding (Fig. 5b, c, d). On passage 5, culture was mainly formed by a mix of cells at different stages of differentiation expressing neural markers such as βIII-Tubulin (Fig. 5e), GFAP (Fig. 5f), or MAP2 (Fig. 5g). These results indicate that under our specific conditions, cells from olfactory epithelium can be carried to a mix culture formed mainly by neural-fate cells and are in accordance with other previous studies that have reached this stage of culture for the study of neuropsychiatric disorders [6, 13, 16, 33, 34].
Characterization of adherent cells from olfactory epithelium. Upper panel shows the schematic representation of the workflow for the adherent cultures (a). Cells growing at different days after seeding (10X), at passage 0 (b), at passage 2 (c), and at passage 4 (d). Lower panel shows the immunocytochemistry of adherent cells on passage 5. Immunostaining of βIII-Tubulin (e), GFAP (f), and MAP2 (g). DAPI was used to stain the nuclei. Bar = 50 µm
To this point, we aimed to separate this mix of cells in the adherent culture so that we could obtain neuronal- or glia-enriched different cultures. For this purpose, we tried to pick up from the adherent culture only the cells differentiating to neurons and seed these cells again in a new plate with a specific neuronal growth medium. For that, we carried out a magnetic labeling of the cells expressing PSA-NCAM in the surface. PSA-NCAM, the highly polysialated form of NCAM, is predominantly expressed in embryonic and neonatal neural tissue [35] and in proliferating late intermediate neuronal progenitor cells [36]. Indeed, PSA-NCAM persists in the adult brain in a spatially restricted way, contributing to synaptic plasticity, neuronal-glial structural remodeling, cell migration, and cell differentiation [37].
After magnetic labeling, cells were separated by magnetic activated cell sorting, and both fractions, labeled (PSA-NCAM+, neuronal-enriched fraction) and non-labeled (PSA-NCAM−, glia-enriched fraction), were completely recovered and cultured in differentiation medium. Figure 6 shows the morphological shape of both types of cultures after 30 days of culture. PSA-NCAM+ cells, with a higher proportion of neurons, show a more neuronal morphology, with more elongated shapes (Fig. 6b, c). Moreover, we found differentiated cells with a characteristic neuron shape (Fig. 6d, e, f). In contrast, cultures with a higher proportion of glial cells or lower proportion of neuronal cells (PSA-NCAM− cultures), show a completely different growth, with larger cell aggregates and less elongated cells (Fig. 6g, h).
Bright-field visual characterization of the neuron- or glia-enriched cultures. Schematic representation of the workflow for the magnetic selection of cells (a). Bright-field image of PSA-NCAM-positive cells (neuron-enriched fraction) (10X) showing neuronal shape and long prolongations connecting with other cells (b, c). Differentiated cell with characteristic neuron shape (10X) (d). Prolongation of a neuron (20X) (e) and end of prolongation of a neuron in a synaptic button-like connection between two different cells (20X) (f). Bright-field image of PSA-NCAM-negative cells (glia-enriched fraction) (10X) showing a different growth pattern, with larger aggregates and less elongated cells (g, h)
Neuron-Enriched or Glia-Enriched Cultures Express-Specific Markers of Their Cellular Fate
After the magnetic separation, approximately 5 days are needed for the culture to stabilize; the cells that survive the magnetic separation begin to adhere to the flask and to differentiate. At this time, we perform the PSA-NCAM immunocytochemistry to ensure the quality of the separation (Fig. 7a, b, c). Afterwards, we let the cultures grow for approximately 30 days. Upon reaching 30 days, the cultures have a sufficient number of cells in each flask (F75) in both types of cultures. These 30-day F75s are the ones that we will use to carry out the different experiments in the patients. For the characterization of both types of cultures, the expression of specific neural and glial markers was evaluated by immunocytochemistry. As seen in Fig. 7, neuron-enriched cultures abundantly express neuronal proteins, such as MAP1B (Fig. 7d). This protein is expressed predominantly during the early stages of development of the nervous system, where it regulates processes such as axonal guidance and elongation. In the adult brain, it participates in the regulation of the structure and physiology of dendritic spines in glutamatergic synapses and is also found in presynaptic synaptosomal preparations [38]. Nestin (Fig. 7e) is a class VI intermediate filament protein and a specific marker of neural stem/progenitor cells [39] that can differentiate into neurons and glial cells. Co-expression of both proteins was found in the neuronal-enriched cultures (Fig. 7f). These cultures also express βIII-Tubulin (Fig. 7g, j) together with NeuN (Fig. 7h) and with MAP2 (Fig. 7k) as demonstrated the immunocytochemistry assays. Moreover, co-expression of these proteins was found in the neuronal-enriched cultures (Fig. 7i, l).
Neuron-enriched cultures express specific neuronal markers. Immunocytochemistry of neuron-enriched culture derived from the olfactory epithelium. Immunostaining of PSA-NCAM (a, c). Double labeling of MAP1B (d) and Nestin (e) and merge image for MAP1B and Nestin (f). Double labeling of βIII-Tubulin (g) and NeuN (h) and merge image for βIII-Tubulin and NeuN (i). Double labeling of βIII-Tubulin (j) and MAP2 (k) and merge image for βIII-Tubulin and MAP2 (l). Labeling of EpCAM (m, o). DAPI was used to stain the nuclei (b, n). Bar = 200 µm
Tubulin is a major constituent protein of microtubules and consists of two 50-kDa subunits designated as α and β. Expression of class III β-Tubulin, one of the six isotypes of the β subunit expressed in mammals [40], is restricted almost entirely to neurons [41]. In addition, NeuN is a well-recognized marker that is detected in post-mitotic neurons being distributed in the nuclei of neurons in almost all parts of the nervous system and is stably expressing during specific stages of development [42]. The co-expression of these two neuronal markers has been reported in differentiating and mature neuronal cells from diverse sources [43,44,45]. For this reason, the co-expression of NeuN and βIII-Tubulin in the neuron-enriched cultures suggests that these cultures are formed by a mix of neurons at different stages of differentiation.
On the other hand, MAP2 is the predominant cytoskeletal regulator within neuronal dendrites, and a robust somatodendritic marker due to its abundance and specificity. It influences microtubule dynamics and microtubule/actin interactions to control neurite outgrowth and synaptic functions [46].
A limitation of the study is the use of magnetic beads with PSA-NCAM since this protein is a marker for immature neuronal-committed progenitors, which again, due to the immaturity of the cells, can make the selection less effective. Nevertheless, to date, PSA-NCAM is the only neuron-specific protein expressed in the surface of the cell that can be used for the magnetic sorting in humans. In addition, for discarding the presence of epithelial cells in this culture of ON-derived cells, we carried out an immunocytochemistry assay for the labeling of EpCAM, which was not found in the culture (Fig. 7m, o).
These results suggest that the vast majority of cells in the neuron-enriched culture are neurons at different stages of development, with null presence of epithelial cells.
In addition, we did not find the presence of PSA-NCAM (Fig. 8a, b, c) in the glia-enriched cultures immediately after the magnetic separation. Moreover, in glia-enriched cultures, as seen in Fig. 8, immunocytochemistry assays demonstrated the presence of specific glial proteins such as GFAP (Fig. 8d, e, f), but not the epithelial EpCAM (Fig. 8g, h, i).
To confirm these results and further characterize the two cell-type populations, we performed a flow cytometry analysis by labeling the cells either with NeuN or GFAP. We use the NeuN marker to demonstrate that in these cultures, 30 days after the magnetic separation, there is a sufficient amount of mature neurons in the culture, although the culture may potentially present neurons at different stages of differentiation, which demonstrates the presence of markers of immature neurons in the immunocytochemical characterization as previously explained.
Besides, we also labeled the cultures with EpCAM to discard the presence of epithelial cells. As seen in Fig. 9, we detected an increase of up to 46% of NeuN-positive cell population in the culture of cells positively selected with PSA-NCAM (Fig. 9a). In contrast, the flow cytometry analysis only gave a residual value of 1.90% of GFAP-positive cells in this neuronal-enriched culture.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of neuron-enriched or glia-enriched cultures. The purity of enriched cultures was determined by performing post-sort FACS analysis on samples of neuron or glia cell subpopulations and assessing the percentages of cells in each gate. Sorting cells under the described conditions yielded over > 46% NeuN- and FITC-positive cell populations in neuron-enriched cultures (a) and 48% GFAP- and mCherry-positive cell populations in glia-enriched cultures (b). FACS plots of negative control for EpCAM in neuron-enriched cultures (c) and in glia-enriched cultures (d) are displayed in the lower panel
The percentages obtained on FACS may be so low because the cells suffer during sample processing and may be dying. Although it is difficult to be sure without a propidium iodide (PI) or other viability marker analysis, this population negative to both markers may correspond to cells that are dying due to sample processing since looking at their appearance in forward scatter (FSC) vs. side scatter (SSC), all cells are very stuck together and in values close to 0.
In the glia-enriched fraction, an increase of up to 48% of GFAP-positive cell population was found in the culture of cells negatively selected with PSA-NCAM (Fig. 9b). In contrast, the flow cytometry analysis only gave a residual value of 0.095% of NeuN-positive cells. Moreover, the flow cytometry analysis gave a residual value of 0.093% of EpCAM-positive cells in neuronal-enriched cultures (Fig. 9c) and 0.73% in glia-enriched cultures (Fig. 9d).
These results demonstrate that our methodology has improved the purity of the cultures, obtaining subpopulations of neurons or glia at different stages of development.
Different Pattern of Measurable Molecules in Neuron-Enriched and Glia-Enriched cultures
As previously explained, the final objective of the work is to obtain a biological substrate of the patient in which we will be able to find and measure trait, state, or prognostic biomarkers of the disease. For this reason, we wanted to know if these enriched cultures may produce and release molecules that we could measure in the culture medium and that could serve as potential biomarkers. To do this, we decided to measure some biomarkers already established in psychiatric research, which are related to the inflammatory component of the disease, such as IFNγ, PGE2, IL-6, or the Kyn/Trp ratio [47].
As seen in Fig. 10, both types of cultures are capable to produce and release these compounds. Moreover, significant differences were found in the levels of PGE2 (Fig. 10a), Kyn/Trp ratio (Fig. 10c), and IFNγ (Fig. 10d) between neuron- and glia-enriched cultures, while no significant changes were found in the IL6 levels (Fig. 10b). Specifically, levels of PGE2 and kynunerine were significantly increased in glia-enriched cultures compared to neuron-enriched cultures, while IFNγ levels were higher in neuronal than in glia-enriched cultures. These results demonstrate that both types of cultures exhibit different levels of these measurable molecules in the culture medium.
Levels of PGE2, IL6, Kyn/Trp, and IFNγ in the medium of neuron-enriched or glia-enriched cultures. Levels of PGE2 (a), IL6 (b), ratio of Kyn/Trp (c), and IFNγ (d) measured by ELISA assay in both neuron-enriched and glia-enriched culture medium and expressed in pg/mg protein. Bars represent the mean, and circles represent individual values (n = 5–8 subjects). Statistical analyses consisted on a paired T-test for each subject comparing the levels of the different molecules in neuron or glial cultures. Significance was set at.*p < 0.05
Limitations and Concluding Remarks
To our knowledge, this is the first study describing a method for the generation of sufficient amount of human neurons or glial cells subpopulations in living subjects in an easy and non-invasively form. Other studies had developed similar methods but obtaining the sample invasively in biopsies after nasal surgery and with anesthesia, or even postmortem in autopsies. On the other hand, other groups have developed and characterized non-invasively obtained adherent cultures of the olfactory epithelium in patients, but none of them has reached the step of selecting and culturing neurons and glia.
The study has some limitations that obviously cannot be ignored. First, what we have obtained after selecting the cells based on the presence or absence of PSA-NCAM are cultures enriched in neurons or glia, but not pure cultures. Another limitation is the fact that these neuron and glial cells have developed in vitro, without the natural inputs that they would have had if they had developed physiologically. It must be further studied whether the manipulation of neural progenitors has interfered in their development in terms of the ability to reproduce some alterations inherent to psychiatric or neurological conditions. Moreover, these cultures may be considered with an “olfactory-specific” origin which should be kept in consideration when comparing with other models.
Despite these limitations, we believe that this work has an important clinical impact since it will allow the characterization of disease fingerprints through the study of neurons and glial cells from patients.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Nestler EJ, Hyman SE (2010) Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci 13(10):1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2647
McCullumsmith RE, Hammond JH, Shan D, Meador-Woodruff JH (2014) Postmortem brain: an underutilized substrate for studying severe mental illness. Neuropsychopharmacology 39(1):65–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.239
Alciati A, Reggiani A, Caldirola D, Perna G (2022) Human-induced pluripotent stem cell technology: toward the future of personalized psychiatry. J Personalized Med 12 (8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081340
Unterholzner J, Millischer V, Wotawa C, Sawa A, Lanzenberger R (2021) Making sense of patient-derived iPSCs, transdifferentiated neurons, olfactory neuronal cells, and cerebral organoids as models for psychiatric disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 24(10):759–775. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyab037
Durante MA, Kurtenbach S, Sargi ZB, Harbour JW, Choi R, Kurtenbach S, Goss GM, Matsunami H et al (2020) Single-cell analysis of olfactory neurogenesis and differentiation in adult humans. Nat Neurosci 23(3):323–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0587-9
Matigian N, Abrahamsen G, Sutharsan R, Cook AL, Vitale AM, Nouwens A, Bellette B, An J et al (2010) Disease-specific, neurosphere-derived cells as models for brain disorders. Dis Model Mech 3(11–12):785–798. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.005447
Jimenez-Vaca AL, Benitez-King G, Ruiz V, Ramirez-Rodriguez GB, Hernandez-de la Cruz B, Salamanca-Gomez FA, Gonzalez-Marquez H, Ramirez-Sanchez I et al (2018) Exfoliated human olfactory neuroepithelium: a source of neural progenitor cells. Mol Neurobiol 55(3):2516–2523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0500-z
Idotta C, Tibaldi E, Brunati AM, Pagano MA, Cadamuro M, Miola A, Martini A, Favaretto N et al (2019) Olfactory neuroepithelium alterations and cognitive correlates in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 61:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.06.004
Borgmann-Winter K, Willard SL, Sinclair D, Mirza N, Turetsky B, Berretta S, Hahn CG (2015) Translational potential of olfactory mucosa for the study of neuropsychiatric illness. Transl Psychiatry 5(3):527. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2014.141
Lavoie J, Sawa A, Ishizuka K (2017) Application of olfactory tissue and its neural progenitors to schizophrenia and psychiatric research. Curr Opin Psychiatry 30(3):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000327
Delgado-Sequera A, Hidalgo-Figueroa M, Barrera-Conde M, Duran-Ruiz MC, Castro C, Fernández-Avilés C, de la Torre R, Sánchez-Gomar I et al (2021) Olfactory neuroepithelium cells from Cannabis users display alterations to the cytoskeleton and to markers of adhesion, proliferation and apoptosis. Mol Neurobiol 58(4):1695–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-02205-9
McLean CK, Narayan S, Lin SY, Rai N, Chung Y, Hipolito MS, Cascella NG, Nurnberger JI Jr et al (2018) Lithium-associated transcriptional regulation of CRMP1 in patient-derived olfactory neurons and symptom changes in bipolar disorder. Transl Psychiatry 8(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0126-6
Guinart D, Moreno E, Galindo L, Cuenca-Royo A, Barrera-Conde M, Pérez EJ, Fernández-Avilés C, Correll CU et al (2020) Altered signaling in CB1R-5-HT2AR heteromers in olfactory neuroepithelium cells of schizophrenia patients is modulated by Cannabis use. Schizophr Bull 46(6):1547–1557. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa038
Féron F, Perry C, Girard SD, Mackay-Sim A (2013) Isolation of adult stem cells from the human olfactory mucosa. Methods Mol Biol 1059:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-574-3_10
English JA, Fan Y, Focking M, Lopez LM, Hryniewiecka M, Wynne K, Dicker P, Matigian N et al (2015) Reduced protein synthesis in schizophrenia patient-derived olfactory cells. Transl Psychiatry 5:663. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.119
Benitez-King G, Riquelme A, Ortiz-Lopez L, Berlanga C, Rodriguez-Verdugo MS, Romo F, Calixto E, Solis-Chagoyan H et al (2011) A non-invasive method to isolate the neuronal linage from the nasal epithelium from schizophrenic and bipolar diseases. J Neurosci Methods 201(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.07.009
Rougon G, Marshak DR (1986) Structural and immunological characterization of the amino-terminal domain of mammalian neural cell adhesion molecules. J Biol Chem 261(7):3396–3401
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999
Brann JH, Ellis DP, Ku BS, Spinazzi EF, Firestein S (2015) Injury in aged animals robustly activates quiescent olfactory neural stem cells. Front Neurosci 9:367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00367
Mackay-Sim A, Kittel PW (1991) On the life span of olfactory receptor neurons. Eur J Neurosci 3(3):209–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1991.tb00081.x
Katz J, Keenan B, Snyder EY (2010) Culture and manipulation of neural stem cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 671:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5819-8_2
Othman M, Lu C, Klueber K, Winstead W, Roisen F (2005) Clonal analysis of adult human olfactory neurosphere forming cells. Biotech Histochem 80(5–6):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10520290500469777
Gage FH, Ray J, Fisher LJ (1995) Isolation, characterization, and use of stem cells from the CNS. Annu Rev Neurosci 18:159–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001111
Galli R, Gritti A, Bonfanti L, Vescovi AL (2003) Neural stem cells: an overview. Circ Res 92(6):598–608. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000065580.02404.F4
Rao MS (1999) Multipotent and restricted precursors in the central nervous system. Anat Rec 257(4):137–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990815)257:4%3c137::AID-AR7%3e3.0.CO;2-Q
Begum AN, Guoynes C, Cho J, Hao J, Lutfy K, Hong Y (2015) Rapid generation of sub-type, region-specific neurons and neural networks from human pluripotent stem cell-derived neurospheres. Stem Cell Res 15(3):731–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2015.10.014
Gil-Perotin S, Duran-Moreno M, Cebrian-Silla A, Ramirez M, Garcia-Belda P, Garcia-Verdugo JM (2013) Adult neural stem cells from the subventricular zone: a review of the neurosphere assay. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 296(9):1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22746
Okano H, Kawahara H, Toriya M, Nakao K, Shibata S, Imai T (2005) Function of RNA-binding protein Musashi-1 in stem cells. Exp Cell Res 306(2):349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.02.021
da Silva SL, Majolo F, da Silva APB, da Costa JC, Marinowic DR (2021) Neurospheres: a potential in vitro model for the study of central nervous system disorders. Mol Biol Rep 48(4):3649–3663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06301-4
Murrell W, Feron F, Wetzig A, Cameron N, Splatt K, Bellette B, Bianco J, Perry C, Lee G, Mackay-Sim A (2005) Multipotent stem cells from adult olfactory mucosa. Dev Dyn 233(2):496–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20360
Krolewski RC, Jang W, Schwob JE (2011) The generation of olfactory epithelial neurospheres in vitro predicts engraftment capacity following transplantation in vivo. Exp Neurol 229(2):308–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.02.014
Zelenova EA, Kondratyev NV, Lezheiko TV, Tsarapkin GY, Kryukov AI, Kishinevsky AE, Tovmasyan AS, Momotyuk ED, Dashinimaev EB, Golimbet VE (2021) Characterisation of neurospheres-derived cells from human olfactory epithelium. Cells 10 (7). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10071690
McCurdy RD, Feron F, Perry C, Chant DC, McLean D, Matigian N, Hayward NK, McGrath JJ et al (2006) Cell cycle alterations in biopsied olfactory neuroepithelium in schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder using cell culture and gene expression analyses. Schizophr Res 82(2–3):163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.10.012
Borgmann-Winter K, Willard SL, Sinclair D, Mirza N, Turetsky B, Berretta S, Hahn CG (2015) Translational potential of olfactory mucosa for the study of neuropsychiatric illness. Transl Psychiatry 5:527. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2014.141
Kiss JZ, Muller D (2001) Contribution of the neural cell adhesion molecule to neuronal and synaptic plasticity. Rev Neurosci 12(4):297–310. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro.2001.12.4.297
Seki T (2002) Expression patterns of immature neuronal markers PSA-NCAM, CRMP-4 and NeuroD in the hippocampus of young adult and aged rodents. J Neurosci Res 70(3):327–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10387
Bonfanti L, Nacher J (2012) New scenarios for neuronal structural plasticity in non-neurogenic brain parenchyma: the case of cortical layer II immature neurons. Prog Neurobiol 98(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.002
Bodaleo FJ, Montenegro-Venegas C, Henríquez DR, Court FA, Gonzalez-Billault C (2016) Microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B)-deficient neurons show structural presynaptic deficiencies in vitro and altered presynaptic physiology. Sci Rep 6(1):30069. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30069
Lendahl U, Zimmerman LB, McKay RDG (1990) CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein. Cell 60(4):585–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90662-X
Sullivan KF, Cleveland DW (1986) Identification of conserved isotype-defining variable region sequences for four vertebrate beta tubulin polypeptide classes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83(12):4327–4331. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.12.4327
Dráberová E, Lukás Z, Ivanyi D, Viklický V, Dráber P (1998) Expression of class III beta-tubulin in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Histochem Cell Biol 109(3):231–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004180050222
Duan W, Zhang YP, Hou Z, Huang C, Zhu H, Zhang CQ, Yin Q (2016) Novel insights into NeuN: from neuronal marker to splicing regulator. Mol Neurobiol 53(3):1637–1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9122-5
Delgado D, Bilbao AM, Beitia M, Garate A, Sánchez P, González-Burguera I, Isasti A, López De Jesús M, Zuazo-Ibarra J, Montilla A, Domercq M, Capetillo-Zarate E, García Del Caño G, Sallés J, Matute C, Sánchez M (2021) Effects of platelet-rich plasma on cellular populations of the central nervous system: the influence of donor age. Int J Mol Sci 22 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041725
Mendivil-Perez M, Velez-Pardo C, Jimenez-Del-Rio M (2019) Direct transdifferentiation of human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stromal cells into cholinergic-like neurons. J Neurosci Methods 312:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.11.019
Sultan N, Amin LE, Zaher AR, Grawish ME, Scheven BA (2020) Neurotrophic effects of dental pulp stem cells on trigeminal neuronal cells. Sci Rep 10(1):19694. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76684-0
DeGiosio RA, Grubisha MJ, MacDonald ML, McKinney BC, Camacho CJ, Sweet RA (2022) More than a marker: potential pathogenic functions of MAP2. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience 15:974890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.974890
Leza JC, Garcia-Bueno B, Bioque M, Arango C, Parellada M, Do K, O’Donnell P, Bernardo M (2015) Inflammation in schizophrenia: a question of balance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 55:612–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.014
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the donors for their kind participation in the study and Maria Dolores Boyano and Patricia Robledo for the scientific and technical support. The authors also thank technical and human support provided by the nursing staff of the Department of Psychiatry, Cruces University Hospital, Central Service of Microscopy–SGIker-UPV/EHU and Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience-Cell Analytics Facility.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2019-106404RB-I00), Spanish Ministry of Health (PNSD 2019I021), and Basque Government (2019111082, IT1211/19 and IT1512/22).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Leyre Urigüen, Luis F Callado, and Paula Unzueta-Larrinaga designed the experiments. María Recio, Oihane Mentxaka, and Rafael Segarra recruited the donors and collected the samples. Paula Unzueta-Larrinaga, Rocío Barrena-Barbadillo, Ines Ibarra-Lecue, Igor Horrillo, Aitor Villate, and Nestor Etxebarria performed the experiments. Leyre Urigüen, Luis F Callado, Rebeca Diez-Alarcia, Javier Meana, and Paula Unzueta-Larrinaga analyzed the data, and Leyre Urigüen and Paula Unzueta-Larrinaga wrote the manuscript. All the co-authors gave their final approval of this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
All subjects gave their written consent before sample extraction. The entire procedure was approved by the corresponding ethics committee (CEI E22/27).
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for Publication
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Unzueta-Larrinaga, P., Barrena-Barbadillo, R., Ibarra-Lecue, I. et al. Isolation and Differentiation of Neurons and Glial Cells from Olfactory Epithelium in Living Subjects. Mol Neurobiol 60, 4472–4487 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-023-03363-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-023-03363-2