Log in

Proposing two new methods to decrease lateral-torsional buckling in reduced beam section connections

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reduced web section (RWS) connections can prevent lateral-torsional buckling and web local buckling experienced by reduced beam section (RBS) connections. In RWS connections, removing a large portion of web can result in shear demand intolerance induced to plastic hinge region. The present study aims to resolve the problems of RBS and RWS connections by proposing two new connections: (1) RBS with stiffener (RBS-ST) and (2) RBS with reduced web (RW-RBS) connections. In the first connection (RBS-ST), a series of stiffeners is connected to the beam in the reduced flange region, while the second connection (RW-RBS) considers both a reduction in flanges and a reduction in web. Five beam-to-column joints with three different connections, including RBS, RBS-ST, and RW-RBS connections were considered and simulated in ABAQUS. According to the results, RBS-ST and RW-RBS connections can decrease or even eliminate lateral-torsional buckling and web local buckling in RBS connection. It is important to note that RW-RBS connection is more effective in long beams with smaller shear demands in the plastic hinge region. Moreover, results showed that RBS and RW-RBS connections experienced strength degradation at 4% to 5% drift, while no strength degradation was observed in RBS-ST connection until 8% drift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller D K. Lessons learned from the Northridge earthquake. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20(4–6): 249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakashima M, Inoue K, Tada M. Classification of damage to steel buildings observed in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20(4–6): 271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu Q S K, Uang C M, Gross J. Seismic rehabilitation design of steel moment connection with welded haunch. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126(1): 69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chou C C, Tsai K C, Wang Y Y, Jao C K. Seismic rehabilitation performance of steel side plate moment connections. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010, 39(1): 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghobadi M, Ghassemieh M, Mazroi A, Abolmaali A. Seismic performance of ductile welded connections using T-stiffener. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(4): 766–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang C H, Kim Y J, Shin K J, Oh Y S. Experimental investigation of composite moment connections with external stiffeners. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2013, 16(10): 1683–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Popov E P, Yang T S, Chang S P. Design of steel MRF connections before and after 1994 Northridge earthquake. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998, 20: 1030–1038

    Google Scholar 

  8. Plumier A. Behavior of connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1994, 29(1–3): 95–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carter C J, Iwankiw N R. Improved ductility in seismic steel moment frames with dogbone connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1998, 46(1–3): 448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Engelhardt M D, Winneberger T, Zekany A J, Potyraj T J. The dogbone connection: Part II. Modern Steel Construction, 1996, 36(8): 46–55

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deylami A, Moslehi Tabar A. Promotion of cyclic behavior of reduced beam section connections restraining beam web to local buckling. Thin-walled Structures, 2013, 73: 112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tahamouli Roudsari M, Jamshidi K H, Mohebi Zangeneh M. Experimental and numerical investigation of IPE reduced beam sections with diagonal web stiffeners. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 22(4): 533–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang X, Ricles J M. Experimental evaluation of reduced beam section connections to deep columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 132(3): 346–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chi B, Uang C M. Cyclic response and design recommendations of reduced beam section moment connections with deep columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(4): 464–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li F X, Kanao L, Li J, Morisako K. Local buckling of RBS beams subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(12): 1491–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morshedi M A, Dolatshahi K M, Maleki S. Double reduced beam section connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 138: 283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsavdaridis K D, Papadopoulos T. A FE parametric study of RWS beam-to-column bolted connections with cellular beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 116: 92–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hedayat A A, Celikag M. Post-Northridge connection with modified beam end configuration to enhance strength and ductility. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(7): 1413–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davarpanah M, Ronagh H, Memarzadeh P, Behnamfar F. Cyclic behaviour of elliptical-shaped reduced web section connection. Structures, 2020, 24: 955–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Imanpour A, Torabian S, Mirghaderi S R. Seismic design of the double-cell accordion-web reduced beam section connection. Engineering Structures, 2019, 191: 23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Horton T A, Hajirasouliha I, Davison B, Ozdemir Z. More efficient design of reduced beam sections (RBS) for maximum seismic performance. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 183: 106728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang Q, Li B, Yang N. Aseismic behaviors of steel moment resisting frames with opening in beam web. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(6): 1323–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Momenzadeh S, Kazemi M T, Asl M H. Seismic performance of reduced web section moment connections. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2017, 17(2): 413–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Davarpanah M, Ronagh H, Memarzadeh P, Behnamfar F. Cyclic behavior of welded elliptical-shaped RWS moment frame. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 175: 106319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nazaralizadeh H, Ronagh H, Memarzadeh P, Behnamfar F. Cyclic performance of bolted end-plate RWS connection with vertical-slits. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 173: 106236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mirghaderi S R, Torabian S, Imanpour A. Seismic performance of the Accordion Web RBS connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(2): 277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saleh A, Zahrai S M, Mirghaderi S R. Experimental study on innovative tubular web RBS connections in steel MRFs with typical shallow beams. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2016, 57(5): 785–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zahrai S M, Mirghaderi S R, Saleh A. Increasing plastic hinge length using two pipes in a proposed web reduced beam section, an experimental and numerical study. Steel and Composite Structures, 2017, 23(4): 421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mansouri A, Shakiba M R, Fereshtehpour E. Two novel corrugated web reduced beam section connections for steel moment frames. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 43: 103187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vahedi M, Ardestani R, Zahrai S M. Sensitivity analysis of tubular-web reduced beam section connections under cyclic loading. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2021, 21(1): 100–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee C H, Jeon S W, Kim J H, Uang C M. Effects of panel zone strength and beam web connection method on seismic performance of reduced beam section steel moment connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2005, 131(12): 1854–1865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Deylami A, Moslehi Tabar A. Promotion of cyclic behavior of reduced beam section connections restraining beam web to local buckling. Thin-walled Structures, 2013, 73: 112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ANSI/AISC 358-05. Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications. Chicago: AISC, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  34. AISC. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, AISC/ANSI 341-16, American Institute of Steel Construction. Chicago: AISC, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  35. ABAQUS/PRE: User’s Manual. Logan: Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc., 1997

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saneei Nia Z, Ghassemieh M, Mazroi A. WUF-W connection performance to box column subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 88: 90–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Ilam University (Iran, Ilam) funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Iran (Grant No. 04-IRILU-En-000006-21).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasrin Bakhshayesh Eghbali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrahimi, S., Bakhshayesh Eghbali, N. & Ahmadi, M.M. Proposing two new methods to decrease lateral-torsional buckling in reduced beam section connections. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 1581–1598 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0886-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0886-1

Keywords

Navigation