Abstract
Recently a new type of Reduced Beam Section (RBS) connection called “Tubular Web RBS (TW-RBS)” has been numerically and experimentally studied. TW-RBS connections are made by replacing a part of web with a tube or pipe at the desirable location of the beam plastic hinge. This paper aims to numerically investigate the effect of key factors such as position, diameter, and thickness of the tube on the hysteretic behavior of the connection under cyclic load using ABAQUS finite element software. First, a model is used for verification purposes where good correlation with experimental results was achieved. Then, 14 models are defined by varying the key parameters and subjected to cyclic loading. The effects of such factors on the behavior of the connection are investigated in order to find out consequences of probable defects during the implementation of TW-RBS connections or intentional utilizing of other pipes in TW-RBSs. Based on the results, the position of the tube is the most sensitive factor in the behavior of TW-RBS connections and its improper location leads to unreliable design, probable plastic hinge formations in unpredicted regions, and possible failure in the connection zone. On the contrary, diameter and thickness of the tube have negligible effect on the energy dissipation mainly depending on beam section properties.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig18_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig19_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig20_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig21_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig22_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13296-020-00418-1/MediaObjects/13296_2020_418_Fig23_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abaqus, V. (2014). 6.14-1. Abaqus/standard user’s manual and Abaqus CAE manual. Providence, RI, USA: Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp.
Abedin, M., Maleki, Sh, Kiani, N., & Shahrokhinasab, E. (2019). Shear lag effects in angles welded at both legs. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8041767.
AISC, A. (2010). AISC 341-10, seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.
Boushehri, R., Estahbanati, S. H., Hosseini, S. M. M. M., & Soroush, A. (2020, February). Influence of reinforcement parameters on the seismic response of reinforced earth dams. In Geo-congress 2020: Engineering, monitoring, and management of geotechnical infrastructure (pp. 637–649). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Chen, S. J., & Tu, C. T. (2004). Experimental study of jumbo size reduced beam section connections using high-strength steel. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(4), 582–587.
Elgaaly, M., Seshadri, A., & Hamilton, R. W. (1997). Bending strength of steel beams with corrugated webs. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(6), 772–782.
Engelhardt, M. D. (1999). Experimental investigation of dogbone monent connections. Engineering Journal, 35(4), 128–139.
Engineers, C., Council, C., Whittier, C. A., Murray, T. M., & Sumner, E. A. A. (2005). AISC 360-05, Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.
Estahbanati, S. H., Boushehri, R., Soroush, A., & Ghasemi-Fare, O. (2020, February). Numerical study of the effects of deep excavations on dynamic performance of buried pipelines. In Geo-congress 2020: Modeling, geomaterials, and site characterization (pp. 86–94). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Foraboschi, P. (2016). Versatility of steel in correcting construction deficiencies and in seismic retrofitting of RC buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 8, 107–122.
Foraboschi, P. (2019). Lateral load-carrying capacity of steel columns with fixed-roller end supports. Journal of Building Engineering, 26, 100879.
Foraboschi, P. (2020). Predictive formulation for the ultimate combinations of axial force and bending moment attainable by steel members. International Journal of Steel Structures, 20, 704–724.
Iwankiw, N. (2004). Seismic design enhancements and the reduced beam section detail for steel moment frames. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 9(2), 87–92.
Kildashti, K., & Mirghaderi, R. (2009). Assessment of seismic behaviour of SMRFs with RBS connections by means of mixed-based state-space approach. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 18(5), 485–505.
Kumar, S. S., & Rao, D. P. (2006). RHS beam-to-column connection with web opening—experimental study and finite element modelling. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(8), 739–746.
Lee, C. H., & Chung, S. W. (2007). A simplified analytical story drift evaluation of steel moment frames with radius-cut reduced beam section. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63(4), 564–570.
Mirghaderi, S. R., Torabian, S., & Imanpour, A. (2010). Seismic performance of the accordion-Web RBS connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(2), 277–288.
Mohammadi, R. K., Nasri, A., & Ghaffary, A. (2017). TADAS dampers in very large deformations. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(2), 515–524.
Moore, K. S., Malley, J. O., & Engelhardt, M. D. (1999). Design of reduced beam section (RBS) moment frame connections. Los Angeles: Steel Committee of California.
Nadi, A., Saleh, A., & Ayazi, A. (2020). Fatigue reduction in tubular web connections in semi-deep beams. International Journal of Steel Structures, 20, 1193–1208.
Pachoumis, D. T., Galoussis, E. G., Kalfas, C. N., & Christitsas, A. D. (2009). Reduced beam section moment connections subjected to cyclic loading: Experimental analysis and FEM simulation. Engineering Structures, 31(1), 216–223.
Pachoumis, D. T., Galoussis, E. G., Kalfas, C. N., & Efthimiou, I. Z. (2010). Cyclic performance of steel moment-resisting connections with reduced beam sections—experimental analysis and finite element model simulation. Engineering Structures, 32(9), 2683–2692.
Roeder, C. W. (2000). State of the art report on connection performance. In FEMA 355d. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Saleh, A., Mirghaderi, S. R., & Zahrai, S. M. (2016a). Cyclic testing of tubular web RBS connections in deep beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 117, 214–226.
Saleh, A., Zahrai, S. M., & Mirghaderi, S. R. (2016b). Experimental study on innovative tubular web RBS connections in steel MRFs with typical shallow beams. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, An Int’l Journal, 57(5), 785–808.
Sarajpoor, S., Kavand, A., Zogh, P., & Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2020). Dynamic behavior of sand-rubber mixtures based on hollow cylinder tests. Construction and Building Materials, 251, 118948.
Tsavdaridis, K. D., & D’Mello, C. (2012). Optimisation of novel elliptically-based web opening shapes of perforated steel beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 76, 39–53.
Yang, Q., Li, B., & Yang, N. (2009). Aseismic behaviors of steel moment resisting frames with opening in beam web. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(6), 1323–1336.
Zahrai, S. M., Mirghaderi, S. R., & Saleh, A. (2017a). Tubular web RBS connection to improve seismic behavior of moment resisting steel frames. Scientia Iranica, 24(6), 2726–2740.
Zahrai, S. M., Mirghaderi, S. R., & Saleh, A. (2017b). Increasing plastic hinge length using two pipes in a proposed web reduced beam section, an experimental and numerical study. Steel and Composite Structures, 23(4), 421–433.
Zahrai, S. M., Mirghaderi, S. R., & Saleh, A. (2017c). Tubular Web Reduced Beam Section (TW-RBS) connection, a numerical and experimental study and result comparison. Steel and Composite Structures, 23(5), 571–583.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vahedi, M., Ardestani, R. & Zahrai, S.M. Sensitivity Analysis of Tubular-Web Reduced Beam Section Connections Under Cyclic Loading. Int J Steel Struct 21, 100–117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-020-00418-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-020-00418-1