Log in

Enzyme assisted extraction of protein from mallow leaf (Malva sylvestris L.) for production of alternative protein concentrate

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tendency to consume the plant-based protein is gradually increasing with the increase of the world population. Although the leaf proteins are the sustainable protein sources, the protein isolation from them is difficult due to plants structure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mallow leaf as an alternative protein source, to increase the protein efficiency with enzyme assisted extraction and to determine their functional properties for industrial food production. The optimum conditions for the enzymes were found as 5.6 pH value, 52.5 ˚C, 75 min and 7% enzyme concentration for Pectinex UF, 7 pH value, 48 ˚C, 75.5 min and 7% enzyme concentration for Pectinex Ultra SP-L by response surface methodology. The effect of precipitation methods, isoelectric (IP), ammonium sulfate (ASP) and isoelectric-ammonium sulfate (IASP), on efficiency and functional properties of plant proteins was investigated. The protein contents of IP, ASP and IASP were 40, 65.5 and 61.7%, respectively. Despite the lowest protein content, IP (97% at pH 7.5) has the highest solubility than ASP (95% at pH 7.5) and IASP (94.4% at pH 8.5). The highest foaming capacity at pH 6 was determined as 133.3, 90.9 and 80%, respectively, for IP, ASP and IASP. Also, IP has the highest emulsion activity and stability than ASP and IASP. All these evaluations, mallow leaf can be used for protein isolation, but its economic dimension should be investigated through more comprehensive studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Shahbandeh, Global plant protein market value 2022–2027. https://www.statista.com/statistics/658619/global-plant-protein-market-value/ Accessed 03.01.2023

  2. A. Akyüz, S. Ersus, Food Chem. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Vergara-Barberán, M. Lerma-García, J. Herrero-Martínez, E.F. Simó-Alfonso, Food Chem. (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Q. Cui, X. Ni, L. Zeng, Z. Tu, J. Li, K. Sun, X. Chen, X. Li, Hortic. Plant. J. (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2017.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.Q. Zhang, T.H. Mu, H.N. Sun, J.W. Chen, M. Zhang, Int. J. Food Prop. (2017) https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2016.1230873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P.H. Davis, Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands, vol. 2 (Edinburgh University Press, 1966), pp. 179–242

  7. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), Official method of analysis, 14th edn., Washington, DC, USA, (1990)

  8. S.J. Makwana, B.A. Jadeja, J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 5, pp. 209–2014 (2016)

  9. R. Sánchez-Vioque, A. Clemente, J. Vioque, J. Bautista, F. Millán, Food Chem. (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00133-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Lv, L. Cai, M. Yang, X. Liu, N. Hui, J. Li, Int. J. Food Prop. (2017) https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2017.1354019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Gonzalez-Perez, Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands (2003)

  12. R. Toews, N. Wang, Food Res. Int. (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Kaur, S.K. Singh, V. Garg, M. Gulati, Y. Vaidya, Powder Technol. (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.06.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. **apong, M. Suphantharika, P. Jamnong, J. Food Eng. (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C.F. Chau, P.C. Cheung, Y.S. Wong, J. Agric. Food Chem. (1997) https://doi.org/10.1021/jf970047c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Tabaraki, Z. Yosefi, G.H.A. Asadi, JRAS. 8, 59–68 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Barros, A.M. Carvalho, I.C. Ferreira, Food Chem. Toxicol. (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Molina-Alcaide, D.R. Yáñez-Ruiz, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.C. Gasparetto, C.A.F. Martins, S.S. Hayashi, M.F. Otuky, R. Pontarolo, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. (2012) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01383.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Wichtl, Herbal Drugs and Phytopharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Practice on a Scientific Basis, 3rd edn. (Medpharm GmbH Scientific Publishers, 2004)

  21. M.S. Hadnadev, T. Hadnađev-Dapčević, M.M. Pojić, B.M. Šarić, A.C. Mišan, P.T. Jovanov, M.B. Sakač, Food Feed Res. (2017) https://doi.org/10.5937/FFR1701011H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L.L. Tymchak, Clinical Chemistry: Principles, Techniques, and Correlations (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013), pp. 223–262

  23. F. Sosulski, K. Sosulski, A. Mccurdy, Acta Aliment. 14, 41–49 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y.A. Adebowale, I.A. Adeyemi, A.A. Oshodi, K. Niranjan, Food Chem. (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J.C. Wang, J.E. Kinsella, J. Food Sci. (1976) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1976.tb00602.x

  26. P. Schuck, Advances in Dairy Ingredients (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013), pp. 1–29

  27. P.J. Kanu, Z. Kerui, Z.H. Ming, Q. Haifeng, J.B. Kanu, Z. Kexue, Asian J. Biochem. (2007) https://doi.org/10.3923/ajb.2007.289.301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R.E. Aluko, R.Y. Yada, Food Chem. (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)93931-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J.C. Onweluzo, Z.A. Obanu, K.C. Onuoha, J. Food Sci. Technol. 31, 301–304 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Mahajan, S. Dua, J. Food Sci. Tech. Mys 32, 162–165 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under Grant 119O310.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Seda ERSUS: Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Writing-Review & Editing, Funding acquisition, Resources, Validation. Ayça AKYÜZ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Project administration, Visualization, Formal analysis, Investigation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Akyüz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ersus, S., Akyüz, A. Enzyme assisted extraction of protein from mallow leaf (Malva sylvestris L.) for production of alternative protein concentrate. Food Measure 17, 3283–3294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-023-01874-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-023-01874-z

Keywords

Navigation