SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of a biological coating and a wax on postharvest quality of mango (Mangifera indica L) variety “Keitt”

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 12 August 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Mango (Mangifera indica L) is one of the most important tropical fruits worldwide; however, being a climacteric fruit, its postharvest deterioration is rapid, which implies that the presence of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloesporioides and the long storage periods for its commercialization affect the shelf life of the fruit. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of three concentrations of a shellac-based wax and three concentrations of a biological coating (bioprotectant) made with Bacillus spp. and Streptomyces spp. as coatings for the preservation of physicochemical and microbiological quality parameters in Keitt mangoes stored for 35 days at 7 ºC ± 3. Mangoes with 0.5% bioprotectant and 30% wax showed an incidence of 40% up to day 35, which was significantly lower than that reported for the control group (80%). In the physicochemical parameters, the 30% wax preserved firmness, maintained a weight loss percentage of less than 10% during 35 days and presented the lowest pH values and the highest percentages of citric acid as of day 21 of storage, and the 0.5% bioprotectant in the variables of pH, total soluble solids and titratable acidity were similar to those reported in the control group; firmness was not affected during the days of storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. FAO, (2020), Organ. Las Nac. Unidas Para La Aliment. y La Agric.

  2. I.S.E. Bally, A. Bombarely, A.H. Chambers, Y. Cohen, N.L. Dillon, D.J. Innes, M.A. Islas-Osuna, D.N. Kuhn, L.A. Mueller, R. Ophir, A. Rambani, A. Sherman, H. Yan, BMC Plant Biol. 21, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02858-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J.J. Reyes-Perez, L.G. Hernandez-Montiel, S. Vero, J.C. Noa-Carrazana, E.E. Quiñones-Aguilar, G. Rincón-Enríquez, J. Food Sci. Technol. 56, 4992 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03971-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Árabe, R. De Oliveira, M. Lúcia, S. Paula, A. De Oliveira, S. Lima, M.D.S. Galvão, J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 95, 260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2019.1664338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Shah, M.S. Hashmi, I.M. Qazi, Y. Durrani, A. Sarkhosh, I. Hussain, J.K. Brecht, Sci. Hortic. 284, 110139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G.V. Benatar, A. Wibowo, Suryanti, Crop Prot. 141, 105432 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. T.M. Vitón, Cultiv. Trop. 38, 135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1234/ct.v38i3.1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R.C. Ploetz, Antracnosis En Mango: Manejo de La Enfermedad Más Importante Pre y Postcosecha (Homestead, USA, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.A. Osuna-García, Y. Nolasco-González, R. Gómez-Jaimes, Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. Postcosecha 40(2), 199–209 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Muy Rangel, J. Siller Ceperda, J. Díaz Pérez, B. Valdez Torres, Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 27, 201 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kamle, P. Kumar, Fungal bioly-current trends plant disease diagnostics and management practices (Springer, Switzerland, 2016), pp. 207–219

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Páez Redondo, (2003), http://bibliotecadigital.agronet.gov.co/bitstream/11348/6459/1/Manejo de la antracnosis en mango.pdf

  13. E.K. Matich, J.A. Laryea, K.A. Seely, S. Stahr, L.J. Su, P.C. Hsu, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 219, 112327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Kara, E. Oztas, R. Ramazanoğulları, D. Kouretas, C. Nepka, A.M. Tsatsakis, A.S. Veskoukis, Toxicol. Reports 7, 501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.04.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Árabe, R. De Oliveira, M. Lúcia, S. Paula, A. De Oliveira, S. Lima, M.D.S. Galvão, J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 00, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2019.1664338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M.V. Hofmeister, E.C. Bonefeld-Jørgensen, Toxicol. Vitro 18, 427 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2003.12.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, (2021), http://www.plaguicidasdecentroamerica.una.ac.cr/index.php/base-de-datos-menu/466procloraz#:~:text=Acción tóxica y síntomas%3A síndrome,%3A nd (IARC)%3B C

  18. Y. Dikmen, A. Güleryüz, B. Metin, S. Bodur, M. Öner, S. Bakırdere, J. Mass Spectrom (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.4622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Dang, J.P. Giesy, J. Wang, C. Liu, Aquat. Toxicol. 160, 69 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.01.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Kundu, N.K. Adhikary, S. Maji, Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 39, 116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2020/v39i2730926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A.S. Passannet, J. Aghofack-Nguemezi, D. Gatsing, Asian J. Biol. 8, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.9734/ajob/2019/v8i130053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J.E. Bello Lara, R. Balois Morales, P. Juárez López, I. Alia Tejacal, C.B. Peña Valdivia, J.O. Jiménez Zurita, M.T. Sumaya Martínez, E.I. Jiménez Ruíz, Rev. Cha**o Ser. Hortic. 22, 209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2015.09.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Moalemiyan, H.S. Ramaswamy, N. Maftoonazad, J. Food Process Eng. 35, 572 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2010.00609.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Shah, M.S. Hashmi, Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 61, 279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00224-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. B. Velasco, J. Mercado Ruiz, J.M. Garcia Roblres, R. Báez Sañudo, Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. Poscosecha 13(2), 130 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. G.M. Cosme Silva, W.B. Silva, D.B. Medeiros, A.R. Salvador, M.H.M. Cordeiro, N.M. da Silva, D.B. Santana, G.P. Mizobutsi, Food Chem. 237, 372 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Jaimun, J. Sangsuwan, Packag. Technol. Sci. 32, 383 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Naeem, T. Abbas, T.M. Ali, A. Hasnain, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 113, 403 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. T. Kasaye Atlaw, J. Food Nutr. Sci. 6, 76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20180603.12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. K. Sripong, J. Food Nutr. Sci (2015). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.s.2015030102.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Sothornvit, P. Klangmuang, Acta Hortic. 1079, 473 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1079.62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P.D. Lima Oliveira, K.Á. Rima de Oliveira, W.A. dos Santos Vieira, M.P. Saraiva Câmara, E. Lite de Souza, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 266, 87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.11.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. K.Á.R. de Oliveira, L.R.R. Berger, S.A. de Araújo, M.P.S. Câmara, E.L. de Souza, Food Microbiol. 66, 96 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Ochiki, M.R. Gesimba, J.N. Wolukau, J. Hortic. For. 7, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5897/jhf2014.0370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Cissé, J. Polidori, D. Montet, G. Loiseau, D. Collin, M. Noëlle, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 101, 10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.11.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. B.H. Mattiuz, M.N. Ducamp-Collin, C.F.M. Mattiuz, C. Vigneault, K.M. Marques, W. Sagoua, D. Montet, Sci. Hortic. 184, 160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.12.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. W. Konsue, T. Dethoup, S. Limtong, Microorganisms 8, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Y.J.H.Y.W. ZhiSHAOKeZENGTANGZHOULI, J. Integr. Agric. 18, 1159 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62128-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. D.G. Alvindia, Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 28, 591 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2018.1468998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Y.W.Z.M.Y. QintianLiTaojiangMin**gZhiShao, ajfcsh hfskds. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 27, 95 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0213-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. L.G. Montiel Hernandez, R. Zuleta Rodriguez, C. Angulo, E.O. Puente Rueda, E.E. Aguilar Quiñonez, R. Galicia, J. Phytopathol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. D.G. Alvindia, M.A. Acda, Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 25, 560 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2014.996738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. W. Admasu, S. Sahile, M. Kibret, Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 47, 2176 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.870110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. M. Zheng, J. Shi, J. Shi, Q. Wang, Y. Li, Biol. Control 65, 200 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.02.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. S. Santos-Villalobos, D.A. Guzmán-Ortiz, M.A. Gómez-Lim, J.P. Délano-Frier, S. De-Folter, P. Sánchez-García, J.J. Peña-Cabriales, Biol. Control 64, 37 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. IDEAM, Inst. Hidrol. Meteorol. y Estud. Ambient. 1 (2020), http://dhime.ideam.gov.co/atencionciudadano/

  47. Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación, (2003), https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12324/13101/44573_58738.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  48. B. Pérez, E. Bringas, L. Cruz, S. Báez, Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. Postcosecha 5, 100 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. Pérez, I. Arisitzábal, J. Restrepo, VITAE. Rev. La Fac. Ciencias Farm. y Aliment. 23, 65 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  50. K. Lai, S. Chen, M. Hu, Q. Hu, P. Geng, Q. Weng, J. Jia, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 69, 40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Y. Fan, Y. Xu, D. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Sun, L. Sun, B. Zhang, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 53, 84 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. F. Wang, J. **ao, Y. Zhang, R. Li, L. Liu, J. Deng, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 174, 111456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. S.B. Pholoma, V. Emongor, S. Tshwenyane, J. Exp. Agric. Int. 42, 133 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. A. López Carrillo, J. B. Valdez Torre, R. Villegas Rojas, E. Yahia, Acta Hortic. (1995)

  55. P.K. Raghav, N. Agarwal, M. Saini, Int. J. Sci. Res. Mod. Educ. 2, 367–382 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  56. M.B. Pérez Gago, C. Rojas, M.A. Del Río, Acta Hortic. 600, 91 (2003). https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.600.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Y. Wang, D. Ji, T. Chen, B. Li, Z. Zhang, G. Qin, S. Tian, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(12), 2994 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. N.A. Anjum, P. Sharma, S.S. Gill, M. Hasanuzzaman, E.A. Khan, K. Kachhap, A.A. Mohamed, P. Thangavel, G.D. Devi, P. Vasudhevan, A. Sofo, N.A. Khan, A.N. Misra, A.S. Lukatkin, H.P. Singh, E. Pereira, N. Tuteja, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 19002 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. A. Jorge, M. Hilda, Y. Nolasco-gonzález, R. Gómez-jaimes, Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. Postcosecha 20, 1 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  60. B. Maina, J. Ambuko, M.J. Hutchinson, W.O. Owino, Adv. Agric. 2019, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5085636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. F.F. Sousa, J.S. Pinsetta Junior, K.T.E.F. Oliveira, E.C.N. Rodrigues, J.P. Andrade, B.H. Mattiuz, Food Chem (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. A. Carrillo Lopez, F. Ramirez Bustamante, J.B. Valdez Torres, R. Rojas Villegas, E.M. Yahia, Food Qual. 23(5), 479–486 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. A.P. Medlicott, A.K. Thompson, J. Sci. Food Agric. 36, 561 (1985)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. M. Cissé, J. Polidori, D. Montet, G. Loiseau, M.N. Ducamp-Collin, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 101, 10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.11.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. A.E.O. Dos Santos, G. De, A. Gravina, P.A. Berbert, J.S. De Assis, P.F. Batista, O.O. Dos Santos, Rev. Bras. Ciencias Agrar. 6, 140 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. R. Jaimun, J. Sangsuwan, P. Intipunya, P. Chantrasri, Package Technol. Sci. 31, 421 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. S. Luo, B. Wan, S. Feng, Y. Shao, J. Food Sci. 80, M2555 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. M. Zequera, A. Molar, D.G. Ruiz, G. Fentanes, J.A. Carrillo-fasio, R.S. García-estrada, M.D. Muy-, A. Sañudo-barajas, I. Márquez-zequera, R. Allende-molar, C. De Investigación, A. Postal, D. Garza-ruiz, U.A. De Sinaloa, F. De Agronomía, C. Culiacán-mazatlán, S. Cp, M. Patiño-, V.E. Galindo-fentanes, U. Nacional, A. De México, D. Biotecnología, A. Universidad, C. Chamilpa, Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 23, 24 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  69. A. Monteon Ojeda, J.S. Sandoval Islas, J.A. Mora Aguilera, C. De Leon García, A. De Alba, Peréz Rodríguez, A. Vasquez Lopez, Agron. Mesoam. 29, 263 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. M.S. Kwack, E.N. Kim, H. Lee, J.W. Kim, S.C. Chun, K.D. Kim, J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 71, 418 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. I. Segovia Romani, (2012), http://www.asohofrucol.com.co/archivos/biblioteca/biblioteca_224_Comportamiento del mango Kent y Keitt_L.pdf

  72. J. Siller, D. Muy, M. Báez, E. Araiza, A. Ireta, Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 32(1), 45–52 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Z. Singh, R.K. Singh, V.A. Sane, P. Nath, CRC. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 32, 217 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2012.743399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge to the Universidad Católica de Manizales for funding the research project (Internal call for research projects 2020) and Coatings SAS Company because partial financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Master’s degree in Agro-industrial Microbiology, Universidad Católica de Manizales, Carrera 23 No. 60–63. Manizales, Caldas, Colombia

    Dilbert Harley Vivas Zárate

  2. Bacteriology Undergraduate, Universidad Católica de Manizales, Carrera 23 No. 60–63. Manizales, Caldas, Colombia

    Joulin Vanessa Vásquez Mina & Laura Duque Aguirre

  3. Research Group in Microbiology and Agroindustrial Biotechnology (GIMIBAG), Institute for Research in Microbiology and Agroindustrial Biotechnology, Universidad Católica de Manizales, Carrera 23 No. 60–63. Manizales, Caldas, Colombia

    Katherin Castro-Ríos & Claudia Nohemy Montoya-Estrada

  4. Coatings SAS Company, Itagüí, Antioquía, Colombia

    Juan Guillermo López

Authors
  1. Dilbert Harley Vivas Zárate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joulin Vanessa Vásquez Mina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura Duque Aguirre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Guillermo López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Katherin Castro-Ríos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Claudia Nohemy Montoya-Estrada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DHVZ: Investigation, collection data, original draft, formal analysis; JVVM: Investigation an collection data, LDA: Investigation an collection data, JGL: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, KCR: Conceptualization, investigation, supervision, writing-review & editing, resources; CNME: Conceptualization, investigation, supervision, writing-review & editing, resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Nohemy Montoya-Estrada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vivas Zárate, D.H., Vásquez Mina, J.V., Duque Aguirre, L. et al. Influence of a biological coating and a wax on postharvest quality of mango (Mangifera indica L) variety “Keitt”. Food Measure 16, 4225–4235 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01518-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01518-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation