Log in

Multiplex and real-time PCR for qualitative and quantitative donkey meat adulteration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Donkey meat is a rich source of protein excellent in indispensable amino acid and low in fat. Its quality has received great attention due to its high nutritional and medicinal value to human beings. Due to donkey resource scarcity and gradually increasing market demand for donkey meat products, adulterated donkey meat products with other low cost animal meat, especially sheep, cattle, pig and horse, were often found in market and had raised widespread concern in recent years. In this study, total 300 mg samples of binary mixtures, containing 90%, 50%, 25%, 10%, 5%, 1% (w/w) of donkey in horse meat respectively, were used for DNA extraction. Both conventional multiplex and real-time PCR techniques were developed for qualitatively and quantitatively detecting the adulteration in donkey meat. The multiplex PCR allowed rapid and simultaneous qualitative detection of donkey and four common adulterated species including sheep, cattle, pig and horse. Moreover, a normalized real-time PCR assay was further developed to detect and quantify the donkey mitochondrial DNA, and the results of simulate adulteration suggested this method could quantitatively detect donkey meat in range of 1–90% with high trueness. The results illustrated that both methods might be applied to detect commercial foodstuff adulteration. Therefore, both improved conventional multiplex and real-time PCR methods were developed to achieve qualitative and quantitative detection of the adulteration in donkey meat products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Polidori, C. Cavallucci, D. Beghelli, S. Vincenzetti, Meat Sci. 82, 469 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. N.Z. Ballin, F.K. Vogensen, A.H. Karlsson, Meat Sci. 83, 165 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Sobrino-Gregorio, S. Vilanova, J. Prohens, I. Escriche, Food Control 95, 57 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Qin, W. Qu, J. Xu, D. Qiao, L. Yao, F. Xue, W. Chen, J. Food Sci. Technol. 56, 1266 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Wang, K. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Lv, X. Tao, X. Zhang, M. Tan, J. Food Qual. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3487985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Lv, Y. Zhao, F. Qi, X. Zhou, J. You, Y. Qin, Y. Zhang, J. Food Drug Anal. 19, 123 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Szabó, H. Fébel, L. Sugár, R. Romvári, J. Food Lipids 14, 62 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Nurjuliana, Y.B. Che Man, D. Mat Hashim, JAOCS J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 88, 75 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Peris, L. Escuder-Gilabert, Anal. Chim. Acta 638, 1 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y.B.C. Man, H.L. Gan, I. NorAini, S.A.H. Nazimah, C.P. Tan, Food Chem. 90, 829 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Berrini, V. Tepedino, V. Borromeo, C. Secchi, Food Chem. 96, 163 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Sawada, T. Opialla, C. Weise, A. Lampen, C. Rozycki, G. Balizs, J. Zagon, Anal. Chim. Acta 693, 89 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Liu, F.C. Chen, J.L. Dorsey, Y.H.P. Hsieh, J. Food Sci. 71, M1 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Sentandreu, E. Sentandreu, Food Res. Int. 60, 19 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.J. Dooley, K.E. Paine, S.D. Garrett, H.M. Brown, Meat Sci. 68, 431 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Xu, S. Wei, G. Zhou, J. Ren, Z. Liu, S. Tang, P.C.K. Cheung, X. Wu, Meat Sci. 137, 41 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Alikord, J. Keramat, M. Kadivar, H. Momtaz, and M. N. E. and A. Homayouni-Rad*, Recent Pat. Food. Nutr. Agric. 8, 175 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M.E. Ali, M.A. Razzak, S.B.A. Hamid, Food Anal. Methods 7, 1933 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Haider, I. Nabulsi, B. Al-Safadi, Meat Sci. 90, 490 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Chen, C. Wei, G. Chen, Y. Zhao, S. Yang, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50, 834 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Chisholm, C. Conyers, C. Booth, W. Lawley, H. Hird, Meat Sci. 70, 727 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Z. Kesmen, A. Gulluce, F. Sahin, H. Yetim, Meat Sci. 82, 444 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Demeke, G.R. Jenkins, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 396, 1977 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Costa, M.B.P.P. Oliveira, I. Mafra, Food Res. Int. 54, 1722 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. K.A.E.-H. Abd El-Razik, A.S.M. Abuelnaga, A.M. Younes, N.S. Atta, A.A. Arafa, M.M. Kandil, Food Sci. Technol. 39, 166 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R.F. Zhang, W.M. **e, T. Zhang, C.Z. Lei, Genet. Mol. Res. 15, gmr8291 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Polidori, S. Vincenzetti, Meat and Meat Proceesssing (Nova Science Publishers INc, Hauppauge, 2017), p. 155

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. Lv, X. Zhou, J. You, B.C. Ye, Y. Zhang, Zeitschrift Fur Naturforsch. Sect. C J. Biosci. 64, 581 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. N.S. Karabasanavar, S.P. Singh, D. Kumar, S.N. Shebannavar, Food Chem. 145, 530 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. T.S. Kang, T. Tanaka, Food Chem. 269, 549 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate the technical assistance by Ms. Pan Zhang for her help in DNA isolation and qRT-PCR assays.

Funding

This work was funded by experimental technology research project of Zhejiang University (SJS201811).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weiren Dong or Haisheng Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All of the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, T., Zhou, X., Zhang, W. et al. Multiplex and real-time PCR for qualitative and quantitative donkey meat adulteration. Food Measure 15, 1161–1168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00717-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00717-5

Keywords

Navigation