Abstract
The three soft brain tissues white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) identified in a magnetic resonance (MR) image via image segmentation techniques can aid in structural and functional brain analysis, brain’s anatomical structures measurement and visualization, neurodegenerative disorders diagnosis, and surgical planning and image-guided interventions, but only if obtained segmentation results are correct. This paper presents a multiple-classifier-based system for automatic brain tissue segmentation from cerebral MR images. The developed system categorizes each voxel of a given MR image as GM, WM, and CSF. The algorithm consists of preprocessing, feature extraction, and supervised classification steps. In the first step, intensity non-uniformity in a given MR image is corrected and then non-brain tissues such as skull, eyeballs, and skin are removed from the image. For each voxel, statistical features and non-statistical features were computed and used a feature vector representing the voxel. Three multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks trained using three different datasets were used as the base classifiers of the multiple-classifier system. The output of the base classifiers was fused using majority voting scheme. Evaluation of the proposed system was performed using Brainweb simulated MR images with different noise and intensity non-uniformity and internet brain segmentation repository (IBSR) real MR images. The quantitative assessment of the proposed method using Dice, Jaccard, and conformity coefficient metrics demonstrates improvement (around 5 % for CSF) in terms of accuracy as compared to single MLP classifier and the existing methods and tools such FSL-FAST and SPM. As accurately segmenting a MR image is of paramount importance for successfully promoting the clinical application of MR image segmentation techniques, the improvement obtained by using multiple-classifier-based system is encouraging.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11517-016-1483-z/MediaObjects/11517_2016_1483_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11517-016-1483-z/MediaObjects/11517_2016_1483_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11517-016-1483-z/MediaObjects/11517_2016_1483_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11517-016-1483-z/MediaObjects/11517_2016_1483_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11517-016-1483-z/MediaObjects/11517_2016_1483_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alia OM, Mandava R, Aziz ME (2011) A hybrid harmony search algorithm for MRI brain segmentation. Evol Intell 4:31–49. doi:10.1007/s12065-011-0048-1
Apostolova LG, Dinov ID, Dutton RA et al (2006) 3D comparison of hippocampal atrophy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 129:2867–2873. doi:10.1093/brain/awl274
Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2005) Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26:839–851. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018
Baraldi A, Parmiggiani F (1995) An investigation of the textural characteristics associated with gray level cooccurrence matrix statistical parameters. Geosci Remote Sensing 33:283–304. doi:10.1109/36.377929
Chang H-H, Zhuang AH, Valentino DJ, Chu W-C (2009) Performance measure characterization for evaluating neuroimage segmentation algorithms. Neuroimage 47:122–135. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.068
Cocosco CA, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC (2003) A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method. Med Image Anal 7:513–527. doi:10.1016/S1361-8415(03)00037-9
Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297–302
Dietterich TG (2000) Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: Kittler J, Roli F (eds) First international workshop on multiple classifier systems. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, New York, pp 1–15
Egmont-Petersen M, de Ridder D, Handels H (2002) Image processing with neural networks—a review. Pattern Recognit 35:2279–2301. doi:10.1016/S0031-3203(01)00178-9
Gui L, Lisowski R, Faundez T et al (2012) Morphology-driven automatic segmentation of MR images of the neonatal brain. Med Image Anal 16:1565–1579. doi:10.1016/j.media.2012.07.006
Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. 1. New Phytol 11:37–50. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x
Jiménez-Alaniz JR, Medina-Bañuelos V, Yáñez-Suárez O (2006) Data-driven brain MRI segmentation supported on edge confidence and a priori tissue information. Med Imaging IEEE Trans 25:74–83. doi:10.1109/TMI.2005.860999
Kasiri K, Kazemi K, Dehghani MJ, Helfroush MS (2013) A hybrid hierarchical approach for brain tissue segmentation by combining brain atlas and least square support vector machine. J Med Signals Sensors 3:232–243
Kennedy D, Filipek P, Caviness V (1989) Anatomic segmentation and volumetric calculations in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 8:1–7. doi:10.1109/42.20356
Kuklisova-Murgasova M, Aljabar P, Srinivasan L et al (2011) A dynamic 4D probabilistic atlas of the develo** brain. Neuroimage 54:2750–2763. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.019
Kuncheva LI (2004) Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms. Wiley, New Jersey
Lawrie SM, Abukmeil SS (1998) Brain abnormality in schizophrenia. A systematic and quantitative review of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging studies. Br J Psychiatry 172:110–120. doi:10.1192/bjp.172.2.110
Lo C-H, Don H-S (1989) 3-D moment forms: their construction and application to object identification and positioning. Pattern Anal Mach Intell IEEE Trans 11:1053–1064. doi:10.1109/34.42836
Marroquin JL, Vemuri BC, Botello S et al (2002) An accurate and efficient Bayesian method for automatic segmentation of brain MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:934–945. doi:10.1109/TMI.2002.803119
Mayer A, Greenspan H (2009) An adaptive mean-shift framework for MRI brain segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:74–83. doi:10.1109/TMI.2009.2013850
McCarley RW, Wible CG, Frumin M et al (1999) MRI anatomy of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 45:1099–1119. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00018-9
Mukundan R (2008) Fast computation of geometric moments and invariants using Schlick’s approximation. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 22:1363–1377. doi:10.1142/S0218001408006764
Ortiz A, Palacio A, Górriz J (2013) Segmentation of brain MRI using SOM-FCM-based method and 3D statistical descriptors. Methods Med. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu015
Rizon M, Yazid H, Saad P et al (2006) Object detection using geometric invariant moment school of computer and communication engineering. Am J Appl Sci 2:1876–1878
Shahvaran Z, Kazemi K (2012) Variational level set combined with Markov random field modeling for simultaneous intensity non-uniformity correction and segmentation of MR images. J Neurosci 10:844–852. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70176-4
Shahvaran Z, Kazemi K, Helfroush M (2015) Simultaneous vector-valued image segmentation and intensity nonuniformity correction using variational level set combined with Markov random field modeling. Signal Image Video 12:59–64
Shen S, Sandham W (2005) MRI fuzzy segmentation of brain tissue using neighborhood attraction with neural-network optimization. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 9(3):459–467
Shenton ME, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA et al (1992) Abnormalities of the left temporal lobe and thought disorder in schizophrenia: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. N Engl J Med 327:604–612
Smith SM (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17:143–155. doi:10.1002/hbm.10062
Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW et al (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23(Suppl 1):S208–S219. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
Tanabe JL, Amend D, Schuff N et al (1997) Tissue segmentation of the brain in Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:115–123
Tuceryan M, Jain AK (1993) Texture analysis. Handb Pattern Recognit Comput Vis 2:207–248
Vovk U, Pernus F, Likar B (2007) A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:405–421. doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.891486
Younis A, Ibrahim M, Kabuka M, John N (2008) An artificial immune-activated neural network applied to brain 3D MRI segmentation. J Digit Imaging 21:69–88. doi:10.1007/s10278-007-9081-0
Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S (2001) Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:45–57. doi:10.1109/42.906424
Zhao M, Lin H, Yang C et al (2015) Automatic threshold level set model applied on MRI image segmentation of brain tissue. Appl Math Inf Sci 9(4):1971–1980
Acknowledgments
The paper has been extracted from parts of the Saba Amiri M.Sc. thesis supported by the Research Council of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Statistical features
The statistical features consisting of mean, median, standard deviations, entropy, contrast, energy, correlation, and intensity of each voxel [4, 32] mentioned in Sect. 2.2 are detailed as follows:
-
1.
Mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of voxel intensity features which in fact present the mean intensity and variation in intensity level of the voxels lied around a given voxel are calculated as:
$$ \mu = \frac{1}{x + y + z}\sum\limits_{x} {\sum\limits_{y} {\sum\limits_{z} {I(x,y,z)} } } $$(4)$$ \sigma = \sqrt {\frac{1}{x + y + z}\sum\limits_{x} {\sum\limits_{y} {\sum\limits_{z} {(I(x,y,z) - \mu } } } )^{2} } $$(5)
-
2.
Median is the numerical value separating the higher half of intensity from the lower half. The median can be found by arranging all the intensities from lowest value to highest value and picking the middle on.
-
3.
Energy is the performance index for image uniformity that is a good quality to manifest the disorder and entropy in the image. If it grows to increase, it means that the intensity will be changed slightly.
$$ {\text{Energy}} = \sum\limits_{x} {\sum\limits_{y} {\sum\limits_{z} {I(x,y,z)^{2} } } } $$(6)
-
4.
Entropy is a measure of variability and for a fixed image is zero.
-
5.
Contrast expresses the rate of local changes in the image. The high value of the contrast expresses the high local changes in the region of the interest. Contrast is the difference between the highest and the lowest values of a interconnected set of voxels.
-
6.
Correlation is another parameter used to measure randomness in a given image. This parameter can also be used to estimate the similarity between a given voxel and other voxels of the image. Correlation is zero in random images.
Appendix 2: Geometric moments features
For non-statistical feature, the geometric moments are calculated and employed [18, 22, 24]. In general, the geometric moment of order (p + q + r) of image I(x, y, z) is given by:
where M, N, and L are image dimensions.
By using equation (12), geometrical central moments of order equal to (p + q + r) can be computed.
where \( \bar{x} \), \( \bar{y} \), and \( \bar{z} \) are gravity center of image and are calculated as follows:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amiri, S., Movahedi, M.M., Kazemi, K. et al. 3D cerebral MR image segmentation using multiple-classifier system. Med Biol Eng Comput 55, 353–364 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1483-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1483-z