Log in

Adaptive certainty-based classification for decomposition of EMG signals

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An adaptive certainty-based supervised classification approach for electromyographic (EMG) signal decomposition is presented and evaluated. Similarity criterion used for grou** motor unit potentials (MUPs) is based on a combination of MUP shapes and two modes of use of motor unit (MU) firing pattern information: passive and active. Performance of the developed classifier was evaluated using synthetic signals of known properties and real signals and compared with the performance of the certainty classifier (CC). Across the sets of simulated and real EMG signals used for comparison, the adaptive certainty classifier (ACC) had both better average performance and lower performance variability. For simulated signals of varying intensity, the ACC had an average correct classification rate (CC r ) of 83.7% with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 5.8% compared to 78.3 and 8.7%, respectively, for the CC. For simulated signals with varying amounts of shape and/or firing pattern variability, the ACC had a CC r of 79.7% with a MAD of 4.7% compared to 76.6 and 6.9%, respectively, for the CC. For real signals, the ACC had a CC r of 70.0% with a MAD of 6.3% compared to 64.9 and 6.4%, respectively, for the CC. The test results demonstrate that the ACC can manage both MUP shape variability as well as MU firing pattern variability. The ACC adapts to EMG signal characteristics to create dynamic data driven classification criteria so that the number of MUP assignments made reflects the signal complexity and the number of erroneous assignments is kept sufficiently low. The ability of the ACC to adjust to specific signal characteristics suggests that it can be successfully applied to a wide variety of EMG signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive: their functions revealed by electromyography, 5th edn, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Luca CJ (1979) Physiology and mathematics of myoelectric signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 26(6):313–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Doherty TJ, Stashuk DW (2003) Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography: methods and initial normative data in five muscles. Muscle Nerve 28(2):204–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Geva AB (2000) Application of fuzzy clustering to biomedical signal processing and dynamic system identification. In: Metin A (ed) Nonlinear biomedical signal processing vol 1. IEEE Press, New York, 27–52

  5. Hamilton-Wright A, Stashuk DW (2005) Physiologically based simulation of clinical EMG signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(2):171–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain AK (1988) Algorithms for clustering data. Prentice-Hall

  7. Lago P, Jones NB (1977) Effect of motor-unit firing time statistics on emg spectra. Med Biol Eng Comput 34(1):648–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matthews PBC (1996) Relationship of firing intervals of human motor units to the trajectory of post-spike after-hyperpolarization and synaptic noise. J physiol 492(2):597–628

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McGill KC (1984) A method for quantitating the clinical electromyogram. Ph.D dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA

  10. Paoli GM (1993) Estimating certainty in classification of motor unit action potentials. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo

  11. Perkel D, Gerstein GL, Moore GP (1967) Neural spike trains and stochastic point process—part I The single spike train. Biophys J 7:391–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stashuk DW (1999) Decomposition and quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic signals. Med Eng Phys 21:389–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stashuk DW (2001) EMG signal decomposition: how can it be accomplished and used? J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11:151–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stashuk DW, Paoli GM (1998) Robust supervised classification of motor unit action potentials. Med Biol Eng Comput 36(1):75–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stashuk DW, Qu Y (1996) Robust method for estimating motor unit firing-pattern statistics. Med Biol Eng Comput 34(1):50–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Usui S, Amidror I (1982) Digital low-pass differentiation for biological signal processing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 29(10):686–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarbast Rasheed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasheed, S., Stashuk, D. & Kamel, M. Adaptive certainty-based classification for decomposition of EMG signals. Med Bio Eng Comput 44, 298–310 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0033-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0033-5

Keywords

Navigation