Abstract
Diurnal variations of the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices (SML and SMU) were examined for the period of 1980–2010, and the differences between SML and SMU were especially analyzed. The diurnal variation of SML with a maximum at around 1100 UT has a prenoon-postnoon asymmetry. At solstices, the diurnal variation of SML is much stronger than that at equinoxes. For the SMU, two maxima are recorded in the diurnal variation with the bigger one at 1700 UT and the smaller one at 0400 UT. The seasonal variations are not obvious in the UT variation characteristics of SMU although the intensity of SMU is changed remarkably season by season. For both SML and SMU, the contributing stations are located at higher geomagnetic latitude around 1600 UT and at lower geomagnetic latitude around 0400 UT. These results indicate that: (1) the SML is mostly controlled by the convection electric field. Its diurnal variation is mainly correlated with the equinoctial and R-M hypothesis; (2) the SMU is largely controlled by the ionospheric conductance. Its diurnal variation is tightly correlated with the solar radiation.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11434-014-0451-y/MediaObjects/11434_2014_451_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11434-014-0451-y/MediaObjects/11434_2014_451_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11434-014-0451-y/MediaObjects/11434_2014_451_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11434-014-0451-y/MediaObjects/11434_2014_451_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11434-014-0451-y/MediaObjects/11434_2014_451_Fig5_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davis TN, Sugiura M (1966) Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations. J Geophys Res 71:785–801
Vassiliadis D, Klimas AJ, Baker DN et al (1995) A description of the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling based on nonlinear filters. J Geophys Res 100:3495–3512
Kamide Y, Baumjohann W, Daglis IA et al (1998) Current understanding of magnetic storms: storm-substorm relationships. J Geophys Res 103:17705–17728
Xu WY (2009) Variations of the auroral electrojet belt during substorms. Chin J Geophys 52:607–615 (in Chinese)
Zhou XY, Sun W, Ridley AJ et al (2011) Joule heating associated with auroral electrojets during magnetospheric substorms. J Geophys Res 116:A00I28
Du AM, Tsurutani BT, Sun W (2011) Solar wind energy input during prolonged, intense northward interplanetary magnetic fields: a new coupling function. J Geophys Res 116:A12215
Feldstein YI, Grafe A, Gromova LI et al (1997) Auroral electrojets during geomagnetic storms. J Geophys Res 102:14223–14235
Chen GX, Du AM, Xu WY et al (2001) Response of the high-latitude geomagnetic field to the geomagnetic storm of July 15–16, 2000. Sci China Ser A Math 31:111–119 (in Chinese)
Singh AK, Sinha AK, Rawat R et al (2012) A broad climatology of very high latitude substorms. Adv Space Res 50:1512–1523
Akasofu SI (1977) Physics of Magnetospheric substorms. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Boston, pp 381–472
Kamide Y, Akasofu SI (1983) Notes on the auroral electrojet indices. Rev Geophys Space Phys 21:1647–1656
Xu WY, Chen GX (2004) Quantitative analysis of the relationship between polar ionospheric currents and the electrojet indices. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 34:291–297 (in Chinese)
Ahn BH, Chen GX, Sun W et al (2005) Equatorward expansion of the westward electrojet during magnetically disturbed periods. J Geophys Res 110:A01305
Wang QJ, Du AM, Zhao XD et al (2009) Manifestation of the AE index in substorms on August 6, 1998. Chin J Geophys 52:2943–2950 (in Chinese)
Cortie AL (1912) Sunspots and terrestrial magnetic phenomena, 1898–1911: the cause of the annual variation in magnetic disturbances. MNRAS 73:52
McIntosh DH (1959) On the annual variation of magnetic disturbance. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 251:525–552
Russell CT, McPherron RL (1973) Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity. J Geophys Res 78:92–108
Berthelier A (1976) Influence of the polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field on the annual and diurnal variations of magnetic activity. J Geophys Res 81:4546–4552
Hajkowicz LA (1998) Longitudinal (UT) effect in the onset of auroral disturbances over two solar cycles as deduced from the AE-index. Ann Geophys 16:1573–1579
Takalo J, Mursula K (2001) A model for the diurnal universal time variation of the Dst index. J Geophys Res 106:10905–10914
Chen HF (2004) Analysis of the diurnal and semiannual variations of Dst index at different activity levels. J Geophys Res 109:A03212
Cliver EW, Kamide Y, Ling AG (2000) Mountains versus valleys: semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity. J Geophys Res 105:2413–2424
Cliver EW, Kamide Y, Ling AG et al (2001) Semiannual variation of the geomagnetic Dst index: evidence for a dominant nonstorm component. J Geophys Res 106:21297–21304
Cliver EW, Kamide Y, Ling AG (2002) The semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity: phase and profiles for 130 years of aa data. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 64:47–53
Zhao H, Zong QG (2012) Seasonal and diurnal variation of geomagnetic activity: Russell–McPherron effect during IMF polarity and/or extreme solar wind conditions. J Geophys Res 117:A11222
Kamide Y, Kroehl HW (1994) Auroral electrojet activity during isolated substorms at different local times: a statistical study. Geophys Res Lett 21:389–392
Chen GX, Xu WY, Wei ZG et al (2003) Auroral electrojet oval. Earth Planets Space 55:255–261
Xu WY, Chen GX, Du AM et al (2008) Key points model for polar region currents. J Geophys Res 113:A03S11
Kamide Y, Kokubun S (1996) Two-component auroral electrojet: importance for substorm studies. J Geophys Res 101:13027–13046
Ahn BH, Kroehl HW, Kamide Y et al (2000) Universal time variations of the auroral electrojet indices. J Geophys Res 105:267–275
Ahn BH, Moon GH, Sun W et al (2002) Universal time variation of the Dst index and the relationship between the cumulative AL and Dst indices during geomagnetic storms. J Geophys Res 107:1409
Ahn BH, Moon GH (2003) Seasonal and universal time variations of the AU, AL and Dst indices. J Korean Astron Soc 36:S93–S99
Lyatsky W, Newell PT, Hamza A (2001) Solar illumination as cause of the equinoctial preference for geomagnetic activity. Geophys Res Lett 28:2352–2356
Newell PT, Sotirelis T, Skura JP et al (2002) Ultraviolet insolation drives seasonal and diurnal space weather variations. J Geophys Res 107:1305
Gjerloev JW, Hoffman RA, Ohtani S et al (2010) Response of the auroral electrojet indices to abrupt southward IMF turnings. Ann Geophys 28:1167–1182
Newell PT, Gjerloev JW (2011) Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power. J Geophys Res 116:A12211
Newell PT, Gjerloev JW (2011) Substorm and magnetosphere characteristic scales inferred from the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices. J Geophys Res 116:A12232
Wan BD, Li M, Wang Y et al (2013) A preliminary analysis of the center latitude distribution of auroral electrojet. Prog Geophys 28:1655–1661 (in Chinese)
Gjerloev JW (2012) The SuperMAG data processing technique. J Geophys Res 117:A09213
Ohtani S, Ueno G, Higuchi T et al (2005) Annual and semiannual variations of the location and intensity of large-scale field-aligned currents. J Geophys Res 110:A01216
Du AM, Tsurutani BT, Sun W (2008) Anomalous geomagnetic storm of 21–22 January 2005: a storm main phase during northward IMFs. J Geophys Res 113:A10214
Sun W, Zhou XY, Du A (2008) Quantitative separation of the directly-driven and unloading components of the ionospheric electric field. Geophys Res Lett 35:L13104
Mursula K, Hiltula T, Zieger B (2002) Latitudinal gradients of solar wind speed around the ecliptic: systematic displacement of the streamer belt. Geophys Res Lett 29:1738
Boller BR, Stolov HL (1970) Kelvin-Helmholtz instability and the semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity. J Geophys Res 75:6073–6084
Newell PT, Meng CI, Lyons KM (1996) Discrete aurorae are suppressed in sunlight. Nature 381:766–767
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB845903, 2011CB811404), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41104110), the Ocean Public Welfare Scientific Research Project, State Oceanic Administration, China (201005017), and the Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDYZ2012-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Du, A., Chen, G. et al. Comparing the diurnal variations in the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices SML and SMU . Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 3877–3883 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0451-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0451-y