Abstract
Increased impetus on the application of nano-fertilizers to improve sustainable food production warrants understanding of nanophytotoxicity and its underlying mechanisms before its application could be fully realized. In this study, we evaluated the potential particle size-dependent effects of soil-applied copper oxide nanoparticles (nCuO) on crop yield and quality attributes (photosynthetic pigments, seed yield and nutrient quality, seed protein, and seed oil), including root and seed Cu bioaccumulation and a suite of oxidative stress biomarkers, in soybean (Glycine max L.) grown in field environment. We synthesized three distinct sized (25 nm = S [small], 50 nm = M [medium], and 250 nm = L [large]) nCuO with same surface charge and compared with soluble Cu2+ ions (CuCl2) and water-only controls. Results showed particle size-dependent effects of nCuO on the photosynthetic pigments (Chla and Chlb), seed yield, potassium and phosphorus accumulation in seed, and protein and oil yields, with nCuO-S showing higher inhibitory effects. Further, increased root and seed Cu bioaccumulation led to concomitant increase in oxidative stress (H2O2, MDA), and as a response, several antioxidants (SOD, CAT, POX, and APX) increased proportionally, with nCuO treatments including Cu2+ ion treatment. These results are corroborated with TEM ultrastructure analysis showing altered seed oil bodies and protein storage vacuoles with nCuO-S treatment compared to control. Taken together, we propose particle size-dependent Cu bioaccumulation-mediated oxidative stress as a mechanism of nCuO toxicity. Future research investigating the potential fate of varied size nCuO, with a focus on speciation at the soil-root interface, within the root, and edible parts such as seed, will guide health risk assessment of nCuO.
Graphical Abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-33070-x/MediaObjects/11356_2024_33070_Figa_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Rising human populations combined with global warming and depleting natural sources and arable land exert far-reaching consequences to global food production and food security (Li et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2023). By 2050, the world population is projected to exceed 9.8 billion, necessitating an increase of 50–70% in production to meet the growing food demand (Kusiak et al. 2023; Rani et al. 2023). To ensure food security, it is crucial to make agriculture more sustainable and productive (FAO 2017). The common strategy to improve agriculture production is through application of excess agrochemicals (Li et al. 2021; Hasegawa et al. 2018). However, conventional fertilizers are limited by low efficiency (often below 30%), leading to environmental degradation and significantly polluting air, water, and soil (Hasegawa et al. 2018; Saia et al. 2021; Guo et al. 2021; Deng et al. 2022). Evolving research suggests that nanotechnology may have the potential to promote crop productivity, sustainability, and global food security (Marchiol et al. 2020; Jia et al. 2022; Dilnawaz et al. 2023). Utilizing nano-based agrochemicals may help minimize the use quantity, thereby reducing the environmental burden of agrochemicals and promoting crop nutrient quality and yield through targeted low-dose use and slow release (Deng et al. 2022; Tripathi et al. 2023).
Insufficient animal product consumption for protein needs prompts the importance of incorporating plant proteins like soybean (Taghizadeh et al. 2007; Sudha et al. 2022). Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) is a vital legume with high vitamin, mineral, fiber, and macronutrient content (Sudha et al. 2022). It ranks as the fifth global crop, contributing 40% of yearly oilseed production (Priester et al. 2012), and plays a vital role in global food security (Van Ittersum et al. 2013). With its protein (35–40%), oil (20%), and carbohydrate (35%) composition, soybean is a valuable resource for enhancing human nutrition (Kumar et al. 2017; Lee et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2020).
Copper (Cu) is an essential micronutrient for plant growth and is involved in various physiological processes (Rahman and Schoenau 2020). However, both excess and deficiency of Cu can be detrimental to plants, animals, and humans (Bona et al. 2007; Chandra et al. 2014). Excess Cu can lead to reduced photosynthetic activity, chlorosis, increased disease susceptibility, and stunted growth due to its limited availability and mobility in soil (Rahman and Schoenau 2020; Kusiak et al. 2023). It can also generate reactive oxygen species, leading to DNA damage, oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation (Nair and Chung 2014; Angel´e-Martínez et al. 2017). Additionally, excess Cu can impact the production of biomolecules such as carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, fatty acids, and photosynthetic pigments such as chlorophyll a (Rocha et al. 2021). These effects are similar to those observed in Cu deficiency, including reduced electron flow, quantum yield, and growth rate (Rocha et al. 2021). Copper-containing fertilizers, fungicides, and bactericides have been used extensively in modern agriculture (Sonmez et al. 2006). Copper chloride, for instance, aids in the enhancement and sustenance of crop productivity owing to Cu bioavailability (Apodaca et al. 2017). Most recently, synthetic nanoparticles (NPs) with unique properties, such as higher adsorption and slow-release potential, have garnered increased interest in agriculture (Rajput et al. 2018; **ao et al. 2022; Jia et al. 2022).
Metal-based nanoparticles (MNPs), particularly copper oxide nanoparticles (nCuO), are commonly employed in seed coatings, pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, and fertilizers to enhance crop production (Dimkpa et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2020; Shang et al. 2021; **ao et al. 2022). However, the effects of nCuO on plants can be both positive and negative, depending on dose and particle size (Hofmann et al. 2020; Deng et al. 2020; **ao et al. 2022). Excessive nCuO application has shown adverse effects on plant biomass and nutrient content, while optimal amounts can promote nutrient transport and crop nutritional value (Wang et al. 2020; Pelegrino et al. 2021; Kusiak et al. 2023). Crops are known to transport and bioaccumulate MNPs in edible parts, raising concern for potential human health risks (Deng et al. 2020; Bajaj et al. 2023). Therefore, it is important to investigate the potential effects of MNPs on the edible parts of crops (Rui et al. 2018; Yusefi-Tanha et al. 2020a, b, 2023). Studies evaluating the effects of nCuO on yield and seed nutritional quality after full life cycle exposure under field conditions are scarce (Wang et al. 2021). In light of the above, it was hypothesized that Cu bioaccumulation-mediated oxidative stress of soybean exposed to varied sizes of nCuO would be size-dependent and that different Cu compounds would induce different biochemical and enzymatic responses in soybean seed. Therefore, recognizing the crucial role of NP size, dose, growth media, and plant species used in nanophytotoxicity (plant growth and development, nutrient quality, and yield) studies, in this study we investigated the potential effects of soil-applied nCuO with three different sizes on soybean seed yield attributes and nutrient quality conducting a 120-day full life cycle exposure experiment and propose particle size-dependent seed-Cu bioaccumulation-mediated oxidative stress as a mechanism of action of nCuO toxicity, in soybean. While controlling for surface charge, the tailored synthesis of three distinct particle sizes with high purity enabled investigating particle size-dependent toxicity in soybean, which is a novelty of this work.
Material and methods
nCuO synthesis, characterization, and localization in seed
Copper oxide nanoparticles (nCuO) with three different sizes (small [S] = 25 nm, medium [M] = 50 nm, and large [L] = 250 nm, hereafter denoted as nCuO-S, nCuO-M, and nCuO-L, respectively) were synthesized by sol–gel method. Briefly, copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O), citric acid (C6H8O7), and ethylene glycol (C2H6O2) were used in a molar ratio of 1:1:1. The details of the synthesis protocol were reported previously by our group (Yusefi-Tanha et al. 2020b). Phase formation and crystal structure, as well as the particle size distribution of the nCuO samples, were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern analysis and field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; FEI Quanta 450 FEG), respectively (see Supplementary Information Fig. S1). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to estimate the hydrodynamic diameter (HDD) and zeta (ζ) potential of the nCuO synthesized. Seed embryo ultrastructural changes were imaged with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and images were analyzed with Digimizer (MedCalc Software Ltd., Belgium).
Experimental setup
The experiment followed a completely randomized design (RCD). Treatments consisted of control (untreated soil; negative control), CuCl2 (Cu2+ ions; positive control), and three different nCuO sizes (average 25, 50, and 250 nm). CuCl2 salt was used as a positive control given its conventional use as a Cu fertilizer and to allow comparison with the published nanophytotoxicity literature (Shi et al. 2011; Apodaca et al. 2017; Ochoa et al. 2017). Each treatment consisted of three pots with each pot containing two plants (n = 6 plants per treatment; total 30 plants). The experiment was carried out at Shahrekord University (50° 49′ E, 32° 21′ N), Iran.
Soil characterization and Cu compounds amendment
The soil was collected at a depth of 0–30 cm, air-dried for 7 days, and sieved (2 mm). The total background Cu concentration in the soil was 0.538 mg/kg. The main physicochemical characteristics of this soil are as follows: classified as silt loam soil (16% sand, 58% silt, and 26% clay), pH = 7.44; EC = 0.47 mmhos/cm; 9.24 g/kg organic matter; 0.88 g/kg total N; 0.011 g/kg available P; and 0.405 g/kg available K. Before planting, 86 kg/ha urea and 100 kg/ha triple superphosphate were added to the culture medium according to the soil test. For soil amendment, different Cu compounds (CuCl2; nCuO: 25 nm, 50 nm, and 250 nm) were weighed and suspended in 100 mL of distilled water to achieve the desired concentration of 500 mg Cu/kg-soil. The concentration of 500 mg/kg represents various soils with high level of Cu (495–2000 mg/kg-soil) (Ure and Berrow 1982; Holmgren et al. 1993; Niu et al. 2013), which can inhibit plant productivity due to higher Cu bioaccumulation in plant tissues, and this applies to both ionic- and nano-Cu (Rawat et al. 2017; Deng et al. 2020). nCuO and Cu2+ ions solutions were ultrasonicated (100 W, 40 kHz) for 30 min at 25 °C before mixing with soil using a hand-mixer. After 24 h of equilibration, seeds were sowed in the soil.
Planting and crop management
This study was conducted in outdoor microcosm conditions to understand the potential phytotoxicity of nanoparticles in the natural field environment. Each polyethylene (PE) pot (20 cm diameter and 20 cm depth) contained 4 kg of soil in a PE bag. To ensure proper drainage, each pot was equipped with an inner PE mesh liner containing 50 holes measuring 5 mm in diameter. Additionally, the bottom of the pot was filled with 500 g of washed gravel to enhance aeration and drainage. Furthermore, to prevent the leaching of Cu and nutrients into the environment, the entire pot was enclosed in a PE bag. The design of the inner PE mesh liner allowed the root system to remain within the pot, facilitating the removal of plants during harvest. For this study, seeds of Glycine max cv. Kowsar were obtained from the Seed and Plant Improvement Institute in Iran. Prior to sowing, seeds were imbibed in water for 24 h. Two seeds inoculated with a bacterium, Rhizobium japonicum, were planted at a 2.5 cm depth of soil. During the growth period, irrigation was provided at 70% field capacity. During each irrigation event, a sub-sample of water was collected and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES; Varian Vista-Pro Axial) to determine the total Cu concentration. Results showed that Cu concentration in irrigated water was extremely low, ranging from 4 to 5 µg Cu/L, in comparison to the total Cu content in the soil, which was 17 mg Cu/kg soil. Upon reaching maturity, i.e., 120 days post-planting, the plants and seeds were harvested. The seeds were air-dried and stored.
Copper bioaccumulation in root and seed
For the quantitation of total Cu bioaccumulation in root and seed, the respective samples (0.3 g) were washed several times with Milli-Q water and dried at 70 °C for 48 h. Samples were digested with 10 mL HNO3 (150 °C for 1 h), then with 2 mL HClO4 at 215 °C for 2 h (5:1 v/v). The digests were diluted to 10 mL using deionized water. The extracts were filtered prior to ICP-OES analysis for total Cu concentrations (Ghasemi Siani et al. 2017). Six-point calibration curves were developed, and the detection limit was 30 µg Cu/L. Blank constituted Milli-Q water with 2% HNO3.
Measurement of photosynthetic pigments
For the measurement of photosynthetic pigments, one of the youngest leaves per plant (two leaves per pot) were sampled, at the flowering stage. Then, 100 mg of fresh leaf tissue were weighed and ground with 5 mL of 80% acetone using a ceramic mortar and pestle until a homogeneous mixture is attained. After filtering of resulting extract with funnel and filter paper, the obtained extract was made up to 10 mL with 80% acetone. The absorbance of the extract was read at 663.2, 646.8, and 470 nm wavelengths, and the chlorophylls (chla and chlb) and carotenoids values were calculated following Lichtenthaler and Buschman (2001). The values are reported in mg/g of plant tissue fresh weight (FW).
where A is the light absorbed by the extract at corresponding wavelengths (shown as subscripts).
Measurement of yield attributes
Plants, pods, and seeds were harvested 120 days after sowing, when the pods turned brown (Kamali-Andani et al. 2023). After counting the number of pods/plant and the number of seeds/pod, the seeds were air-dried and weighed using a digital weighing balance. To determine the amount of seed phosphorus and potassium, after seed drying, grinding, and sieving, the samples were digested and measured using a spectrophotometer (Khoshgoftarmanesh 2007) and a flame photometer (Watson and Isaac 1990), respectively. The seed oil was extracted using the standard Soxhlet extraction method. Seeds (15 g) were weighed and powdered. Then, the sample was poured into the extraction thimbles, and hexane solvent (about 300 mL) was poured into the device balloon. After heating the balloon for 4 h when the solvent color changed, the mixture of solvent + sample oil was transferred to a rotary device. The oil content (%) was calculated following Eq. (4) (Assadi et al. 2014):
where SSW and OW denote seed sample weight (g) and oil weight (g), respectively.
The seed samples were digested after drying, grinding, and sieving. Then, the nitrogen concentration of seed was measured by the Kjeldahl method (Bremner 1996), and seed protein was calculated following Eq. (5) (Olama et al. 2013):
where SN denotes seed nitrogen (%).
Oil and protein yields were calculated as follows (Ghanbari et al. 2019):
where SY, SO, and SP denote seed yield (g), seed oil (%), and seed protein (%), respectively.
Measurement of oxidative stress biomarkers
Two youngest leaves per pot were sampled to determine a suite of oxidative stress biomarkers: hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxidase dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), superoxidase dismutase (SOD), guaiacol peroxidase (POX), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). The details of antioxidative enzymes measurement were reported previously by our group (Yusefi-Tanha et al. 2020a, b), and briefly described below.
Lipid peroxidation was determined in leaf by measuring the formation of MDA content with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) using the method of Heath and Packer (Heath and Packer 1968). Briefly, fresh leaf samples (0.1 g) were homogenized in 1.5 mL of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The resultant homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and 1 mL of the supernatant was added to 2 mL of 20% TCA containing 0.5% TBA. The extract was heated in water bath (95 °C, 30 min), then cooled in ice bath before centrifugation (10,000 × g, 10 min). The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 532 nm and 600 nm and blank corrected. The MDA content was expressed as nmol g−1 FW (using the extinction coefficient of 155 mM−1 cm−1) (Narwal et al. 2009).
The H2O2 levels were measured following Nag et al. (2000). Briefly, fresh leaf tissue (1 g) was powdered using liquid nitrogen and was homogenized in 12 mL cold acetone. Then, homogenate was filtered through the Whatman filter paper. The mixture was diluted using 4 mL titanium (16%), and 0.2 mL ammonium hydroxide (28%). The tissue extract was further centrifuged at 8500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was isolated, then the precipitate washed twice with 5 mL of acetone. Two mL of sulfuric acid (1 M) was added to the precipitate and absorption measured at 410 nm. The H2O2 concentration was expressed as nM g−1 FW.
The SOD is a major O2•−-scavenging enzyme in cytosol, mitochondria, chloroplast, and peroxisome, which converts O2•− into H2O2 (Demidchik 2015). Following the method by Narwal et al. (2009), leaf SOD activity was measured as inhibition of the photochemical reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT). One unit of SOD activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that causes 50% inhibition of oxidation reactions per mg of protein in extract. One g of fresh leaf sample was frozen in liquid nitrogen, homogenized in 10 mL of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH = 7.5), and centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, separated into aliquots, and stored at − 20 °C. 1.95 mL of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 250 μL of 150 mM methionine, 250 μL of 1.2 mM Na2EDTA, 250 μL of 24 μM riboflavin, 250 μL of 840 μM NBT, and 50 μL of plant extract were prepared. The reaction was initiated by light illumination, and the absorbance was read at 560 nm.
The CAT is a key enzyme that breaks H2O2 molecules into H2O and O2, and maintains an optimum level of H2O2 for cellular signaling processes (Nandi et al. 2019). Following the method by Narwal et al. (2009), leaf CAT activity was determined by measuring the decrement in absorbance at 240 nm following the decomposition of H2O2. One unit of CAT activity corresponds to 1 mM of H2O2 consumed per min per mg of protein using an extinction coefficient of 40 mM−1 cm−1. Briefly, the reaction mixture consisted of 50 μL of supernatant, 1.95 mL of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and 100 μL of 264 mM H2O2. The decrease in absorption was recorded for 100 s at 5-s intervals at room temperature (25 °C).
The POX works in the extracellular space for scavenging H2O2 and prevents the formation of more harmful ROS by H2O2 (Rajput et al. 2021). Following the protocol by MacAdam et al. (1992), we estimated leaf POX activity. One unit of POX activity corresponds to 1 mM tetraguaiacol consumed per min per mg of protein using an extinction coefficient of 26.6 mM−1 cm−1. Briefly, 50 μL of plant extract was added to 1.35 mL 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 100 μL 45 mM guaiacol, and 500 μL 44 mM H2O2. Then, we measured changes in absorbance at 470 nm at 10-s intervals for 300 s at 25 °C using an UV–Vis spectrophotometer.
The APX reduces H2O2 to H2O and mono-dehydroascorbic acid (MDHA), using ascorbic acid as a reducing agent, particularly in the cytosol and chloroplast (Ding et al. 2003).
Chla, the major photosynthetic pigment in plants, contains a methyl (-CH3) group whose key function is to bind a photon and is more sensitive to photodegradation than other pigments (Barker and Pilbeam 2015; Rico et al. 2015). Chlb plays an important role in improving light absorption efficiency and thus increasing energy production and biomass in plants (** seeds of low- and high-protein soybean lines. J Exp Bot 56(417):1951–1963. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri191 " href="/article/10.1007/s11356-024-33070-x#ref-CR30" id="ref-link-section-d107143418e2517">2005). Further, the amount of protein depends more on C and N remobilization from leaves, while the amount of oil depends more on the current photosynthesis (Wang et al. 2019). In our study, inhibition of photosynthetic pigments, Chla and Chlb (Fig. 2A, B), and reduced bioavailability of micronutrients such as P and K (Fig. 4), may have a direct bearing in decreased protein and oil content and yield in soybean seed.
Seed ultrastructure
TEM imaging of soybean seed embryo ultrastructure showed that most of the seed embryo cytoplasm contained storage proteins. Oil bodies containing seed oil fill the spaces between the storage proteins, and both (storage proteins and oil bodies) are embedded in the cytoplasmic network of the cell (Fig. 6A, B). TEM images showed normal morphology of cell wall and plasma membrane of untreated soybean seed embryo cells (Fig. 6C). On the other hand, the integrity of cell wall and plasma membrane appeared to be perturbed in plants treated with nCuO-S (Fig. 6D). Mirzajani et al. (2013) reported that NPs at a high concentration can cause damage to the cell wall and plasma membrane, enabling them to enter and disturb different functions in plant. The number of protein storage vacuoles in plants treated with nCuO-S did not differ from control, but their size (on average 1.39 µm) increased compared to control (on average 1.29 µm). The treatment of nCuO-S resulted in modification of protein storage vacuoles’ shape and a disruption of their structural integrity (Fig. 6E, F). This alteration potentially contributed to a reduction in protein content compared to untreated control (Fig. 5A). The number of oil bodies in seed embryo of plants treated with nCuO-S decreased (Fig. 6B, G), leading to a reduction in oil content (%) compared to control (Fig. 5A). Nanoparticles can cross the cell membrane and form agglomerates with themselves or other intracellular substances. In the current study, it is speculated that nCuO may have passed through the cell membrane and agglomerated in the cytoplasm of embryo (Fig. 6H). The putative accumulation of NPs in the seed of soybean merits further investigation into potential health risk to consumers, including humans.
Biomarkers of oxidative stress response
Oxidative stress has predominantly been documented as a toxicity mechanism underlying nanomaterial exposure in various organisms (Tee et al. 2016). In this study, a suite of oxidative stress biomarkers was evaluated as a response to nCuO exposure in soybean grown for a full life cycle of 120 days. The Cu compound types significantly affected the antioxidative enzymes, H2O2, and MDA in soybean (Tables S1, S4). Results showed significantly elevated levels of H2O2 and MDA in soybean leaf upon nCuO treatments compared to the untreated control, and the effects were particle size dependent with nCuO-25-nm treatment showing the highest H2O2 and MDA concentrations while nCuO-250 nm had the lowest H2O2 and MDA concentrations (Fig. 7A, B). To counteract the oxidative stress elicited by stressors, including nanomaterials, plants are known to synthesize a gamut of antioxidative enzymes, including SOD, CAT, POX, and APX, among others (Dogaroglu and Koleli 2017; Ogunkunle et al. 2018). In this study, we measured the leaf concentrations of antioxidative enzymes: SOD, CAT, POX, and APX, in soybean treated with three distinct sized nCuO. Our results showed that, among the NPs used, the tested antioxidant levels were the highest with nCuO-25 nm treatment and the lowest with nCuO-250 nm treatment. These results suggest a direct response of the plant antioxidant system to counteract the higher oxidative stress incurred by higher H2O2 and MDA levels upon nCuO treatments. Akin to the MDA and H2O2 synthesis, the antioxidative responses (i.e., SOD, CAT, POX, and APX) were particle size-dependent (Fig. 7C–F). Furthermore, with the nCuO-250-nm treatment, the oxidative stress biomarkers (MDA and H2O2) and antioxidant biomarkers’ (i.e., SOD, CAT, POX, and APX) concentrations were generally similar to control. On the other hand, Cu2+ ion treatment showed significantly higher H2O2 and MDA levels compared to nCuO-50-nm and nCuO-250-nm treatments, but these biomarker levels were significantly lower than nCuO-25-nm treatment. In response, the antioxidant (i.e., SOD, CAT, POX, and APX) levels also increased significantly, mirroring the trends of oxidative stress biomarkers (MDA and H2O2) (Fig. 7).
Changes in leaf hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production (A), malondialdehyde (MDA) content (B), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (C), catalase (CAT) (D), guaiacol peroxidase (POX) (E), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (F) in soil grown soybean treated with nCuO-25 nm, nCuO-50 nm, nCuO-250 nm, and CuCl2, at 500 mg/kg-soil. Bars represent mean ± SD. Different letters above the bar indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 according to the LSD test
It is, however, unclear if the MDA synthesis is directly related with nCuO or Cu2+ ion impact on the lipid peroxidation of the cell membrane, or indirectly mediated through the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as H2O2 as measured in this study. Nonetheless, higher H2O2 synthesis is expected to cause higher accumulation of MDA, a byproduct of membrane lipid peroxidation, as observed in our study for nCuO-25 nm and Cu2+ ions.
Taken together, the following mechanism of action is proposed: upon root uptake of nCuO or Cu2+ ions, they were transported to and bioaccumulated in seed, leading to oxidative stress, which proportionally affected photosynthetic pigments, seed yield/production, and seed nutrient quality (i.e., protein, oil, P, and K) as a function of particle size.
Particle size, surface charge, concentration, and type of NPs have consistently been documented to affect their absorption, translocation, and bioaccumulation in plants (Kaphle et al. 2018; Yusefi-Tanha et al. 2020a; Mittal et al. 2020). NPs with sizes smaller than that of the pores in cell wall have greater transport potential (Dietz and Herth 2011), while larger NPs may face difficulty traversing through (Iram et al. 2023). With soil application, NPs upon adhering to the root surfaces may penetrate through the cell wall and/or transport between cells via plasmodesmata and to aboveground parts via xylem (Iram et al. 2023). Larger-sized nCuO may have lower toxicity due to decreased surface reactivity, whereas the smaller-sized nCuO (25 nm) that may overcome cellular barriers efficiently may have led to reduced chlorophyll, seed yield, and nutrient quality/yield in soybean. nCuO toxicity may not be solely related to Cu2+ ions released, as Cu2+ ions alone treatments were found to be less toxic than nCuO treatments. Although nCuO-25 nm amendment of soil improved micronutrient Cu concentrations in soybean seed, through this work, we further extended our understanding by documenting inhibitory effects on protein, oil, P, K, and seed ultrastructure albeit at a high concentration of 500 mg Cu/kg-soil.
While soil Cu deficiency is a critical problem impacting human health, organic soil areas in California, Oregon, Florida, and Great Lakes in the United States are known to have higher levels of Cu (as high as 495 mg/kg-soil) (Holmgren et al. 1993). In the farmland of mainland China, elevated soil Cu concentrations up to 515.9 mg/kg-soil have been reported (Niu et al. 2013), while in other parts of the world soil Cu concentrations as high as 2000 mg/kg-soil have been documented (Ure and Berrow 1982). Considering that Cu-based NPs can also naturally form in Cu-rich soils via various pedogenic processes, including reactions occurring at soil-root interface (Manceau et al. 2008) and microbial-mediated soil mineralization (Xu et al. 2023), the results of our study employing higher concentration of nCuO and Cu2+ ions lend credence to deciphering potential toxicity in a major oil crop, soybean, and its underlying mechanism. While NP physicochemical properties and soil types may dictate nCuO and Cu2+ ions fate in the soil-root interface (Sekine et al. 2017), future research should investigate potential fate of varied size nCuO with a focus on speciation at the soil-root interface, within the root, and edible parts such as seed, which will guide health risk assessment of nCuO.
Conclusions
The pursuit of improved sustainable food production has significantly heightened the emphasis on the utilization of nano-fertilizers. However, in order to fully harness the potential of these novel fertilizers, a better understanding of nanophytotoxicity and the intricate underlying mechanisms is warranted. In this study, we show particle size-dependent effects of nCuO on the photosynthetic pigments and seed yield and nutrient quality (i.e., protein, oil, P, and K) in soil-grown soybean for a full life cycle of 120 days. Our findings suggest particle size-dependent Cu bioaccumulation-mediated oxidative stress as a mechanism of nCuO toxicity. Future research investigating potential fate of varied size nCuO, with a focus on speciation at the soil-root interface, within the root, and edible parts such as seed, will guide health risk assessment of nCuO.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, SF.
References
Andreotti F, Mucha AP, Caetano C, Rodrigues P, Gomes CR, Almeida CMR (2015) Interactions between salt marsh plants and Cu nanoparticles - effects on metal uptake and phytoremediation processes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 120:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.06.017
Angel´e -Martínez C, Nguyen KVT, Ameer FS, Anker JN, Brumaghim JL (2017) Reactive oxygen species generation by copper (II) oxide nanoparticles determined by DNA damage assays and EPR spectroscopy. Nanotoxicology. 11:278–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2017.1293750
Apodaca SA, Tan W, Dominguez OE, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2017) Physiological and biochemical effects of nanoparticulate copper, bulk copper, copper chloride, and kinetin in kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants. Sci Total Environ 599–600:2085–2094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.095
Asati A, Pichhode M, Nikhil K (2016) Effect of heavy metals on plants: an overview. Int J Appl Innov Eng Manage 5(3):56–66. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27583.87204
Assadi T, Bargahi A, Nabipour I, Mohebbi GH, Kholdebarin B, Mohajerani S, Aba A, Motamed N (2014) Determination of fatty acid composition of halophyte plant (Suaeda vermiculata) collected from the shorelines of Persian Gulf region (Bushehr province). Iranian South Med J 17:638–646
Bajaj T, Alim H, Ali A, Patel N (2023) Phytotoxicity responses and defence mechanisms of heavy metal and metal-based nanoparticles. In: Husen, A. (eds) Nanomaterials and nanocomposites exposures to plants. Smart Nanomaterials Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2419-6_4
Baker TJ, Tyler CR, Galloway TS (2014) Impacts of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles on marine organisms. Environ Pollut 186:257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.11.014
Barker AV, Pilbeam DJ (2015) Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis group. 2nd edition. pp 210–211
Bona E, Marsano F, Cavaletto M, Berta G (2007) Proteomic characterization of copper stress response in Cannabis sativa roots. Plant Prot 7(7):1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600712
Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen-total. In: Sparks DL (ed), Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. SSSA Book Ser. 5. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, pp 1085–1121
Buchner P, Takahashi H, Hawkesford MJ (2004) Plant sulphate transporters: co-ordination of uptake, intracellular and long-distance transport. J Exp Bot 55(404):1765–1773. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh206
Chandra S, Kumar A, Tomar PK (2014) Synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles by reducing agent. J Saudi Chem Soc 18(2):149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2011.06.009
Da Costa MVJ, Sharma PK (2016) Effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on growth, morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant response in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica 54(1):110–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0167-5
Demidchik V (2015) Mechanisms of oxidative stress in plants: from classical chemistry to cell biology. Environ Exp Bot 109:212–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.021
Deng C, Wang Y, Cota-Ruiz K, Reyes A, Sun Y, Peralta-Videa J, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Turley RS, Niu G, Li C, Gardea-Torresdey J (2020) Bok choy (Brassica rapa) grown in copper oxide nanoparticles-amended soils exhibits toxicity in a phenotype-dependent manner: translocation, biodistribution and nutritional disturbance. J Hazard Mater 398:122978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122978
Deng C, Wang Y, Navarro G, Sun Y, Cota-Ruiz K, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Niu G, Li C, White JC, Gardea-Torresdey J (2022) Copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles affect yield, nutritional quality, and auxin associated gene expression in weedy and cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains. Sci Total Environ 810:152260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152260
Dietz KJ, Herth S (2011) Plant nanotoxicology. Trends Plant Sci 16(11):582–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.08.003
Dilnawaz F, Hazem Kalaji M, Misra AN (2023) Nanotechnology in improving photosynthesis under adverse climatic conditions: cell to canopy action. Plant Nano Biol 4:100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plana.2023.100035
Dimkpa CO, Singh U, Bindraban PS, Adisa IO, Elmer WH, Gardea-Torresdey JL, White JC (2019) Addition-omission of zinc, copper, and boron nano and bulk oxide particles demonstrate element and size-specific response of soybean to micronutrients exposure. Sci Total Environ 665:606–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.02.142
Ding D, Li J, **e J, Li N, Bakpa EP, Han K, Yang Y, Wang C (2022) Exogenous zeaxanthin alleviates low temperature combined with low light induced photosynthesis inhibition and oxidative stress in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. Curr Issues Mol Biol 44:2453–2471. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44060168
Dogaroglu ZG, Koleli N (2017) TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles toxicity in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Clean Soil Air Water 45(11):1700096. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201700096
FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization (2017) The state of food and agriculture leveraging food systems for inclusive rural transformation, population and development review. https://www.fao.org/policy-support/tools-and-publications/resources-details/en/c/1046886/. Accessed 24 Aug 2023
Feigl G, Kumar D, Lehotai N, Tugyi N, Molnár A, Ördög A, Szepesi A, Gémes K, Laskay G, Erdei L, Kolbert Z (2013) Physiological and morphological responses of the root system of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern.) and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) to copper stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 94:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.04.029
Ghanbari M, Mokhtassi Bidgoli A, Talebi Siah Saran P (2019) The effect of bio-fertilizers on yield component, yield, protein, and oil in soybean (Glycine Max Merrill) under different irrigation regimes. J Plant Physiol 13:1–15
Ghasemi Siani N, Fallah S, Pokhrel LR, Rostamnejadi A (2017) Natural amelioration of zinc oxide nanoparticles toxicity in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-gracum) by arbuscular mycorrhizal (Glomus intraradices) secretion of glomalin. Plant Physiol Biochem 112:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.01.001
Gopalakrishnan Nair PM, Kim SH, Chung IM (2014) Copper oxide nanoparticle toxicity in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) seedlings: physiological and molecular level responses of in vitro grown plants. Acta Physiol Plant 36:2947–2958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1667-9
Guo T, Johnson LT, LaBarge GA, Penn CJ, Stumpf RP, Baker DB, Shao G (2021) Less agricultural phosphorus applied in 2019 led to less dissolved phosphorus transported to Lake Erie. Environ Sci Technol 55(1):283–291. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03495
Hasegawa T, Fujimori S, Havlík P, Valin H, Bodirsky BL, Doelman JC, Fellmann T, Kyle P, Koopman JFL, Lotze-Campen H, Mason-D’Croz D, Ochi Y, P´erez Domínguez I, Stehfest E, Sulser TB, Tabeau A, Takahashi K, Takakura J, van Meijl H, van Zeist W-J, Wiebe K, Witzke P (2018) Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy. Nat Clim Change. 8:699–703. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0230-x
Heath RL, Packer L (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys 125:189–198
Hernandez-Sebastia C, Marsolais F, Saravitz C, Israel D, Dewey RE, Huber SC (2005) Free amino acid profiles suggest a possible role for asparagine in the control of storage-product accumulation in develo** seeds of low- and high-protein soybean lines. J Exp Bot 56(417):1951–1963. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri191
Hofmann T, Lowry GV, Ghoshal S, Tufenkji N, Brambilla D, Dutcher JR, Gilbertson LM, Giraldo JP, Kinsella JM, Landry MP, Lovell W, Naccache R, Paret M, Pedersen JA, Unrine JM, White JC, Wilkinson KJ (2020) Technology readiness and overcoming barriers to sustainably implement nanotechnology-enabled plant agriculture. Nature Food 1:416–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0110-1
Holmgren GGS, Meyer MW, Chaney RL, Daniels RB (1993) Cadmium, lead, zinc, copper, and nickel in agricultural soils of the united states of America. J Environ Qual 22(2):335–348
Hong J, Rico CM, Zhao L, Adeleye AS, Keller AA, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2015) Toxic effects of copper-based nanoparticles or compounds to lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Environ Sci Process Impacts 17:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00551A
Iram D, Sansi MS, Singh P, Chandhni PR, Zanab S, Rana S, Kalyan P, Narayan KS, Kaur H, Mittal D, Yadav K, Kaur G, Ali SA (2023) Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on biochemical pathways in plants. Nanometal Oxides in Horticulture and Agronomy.1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91809-1.00018-4
Jia Y, Klumpp E, Bol R, Amelung W (2022) Uptake of metallic nanoparticles containing essential (Cu, Zn and Fe) and non-essential (Ag, Ce and Ti) elements by crops: a meta-analysis. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.2156225
Kamali-Andani N, Fallah S, Peralta-Videa JR, Golkar P (2023) Selenium nanoparticles reduce Ce accumulation in grains and ameliorate yield attributes in mung bean (Vigna radiata) exposed to CeO2. Environ Pollut 316:120638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120638
Kaphle A, Navya PN, Umapathi A, Daima HK (2018) Nanomaterials for agriculture, food and environment: applications, toxicity and regulation. Environ Chem Lett 16:43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0662-y
Khoshgoftarmanesh A (2007) Evaluation of plant nutritional status and optimal fertilizer management. Isfahan University of Technology Publications, Iran
Kumar P, Chatli MK, Mehta N, Singh P, Malav OP, Verma AK (2017) Meat analogues: health promising sustainable meat substitutes. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57:923–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.939739
Küpper H, Kroneck PMH (2005) Heavy metal uptake by plants and cyanobacteria. Met Ions Biol Syst 43:97–144
Kusiak M, Sierocka M, Swieca M, Pasieczna-Patkowska S, Sheteiwy M, Josko I (2023) Unveiling of interactions between foliar-applied Cu nanoparticles and barley suffering from Cu deficiency. Environ Pollut 320:121044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121044
Lalau CM, De Almeida Mohedano R, Schmidt EC, Bouzon ZL, Ouriques LC, Dos-Santos RW, Da Costa CH, Vicentini DS, Matias WG (2015) Toxicological effects of copper oxide nanoparticles on the growth rate, photosynthetic pigment content, and cell morphology of the duckweed Landoltia punctata. Protoplasma 252(1):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0671-7
Lee K, Rahman MS, Kim AN, Gul K, Kang SW, Chun J, Kerr WL, Choi SG (2019) Quality characteristics and storage stability of low-fat tofu prepared with defatted soy flours treated by supercritical-CO2 and hexane. LWT Food Sci Technol 100:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.10.073
Lequeux H, Hermans C, Lutts S, Verbruggen N (2010) Response to copper excess in Arabidopsis thaliana: impact on the root system architecture, hormone distribution, lignin accumulation and mineral profile. Plant Physiol Biochem 48(8):673–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.05.005
Li Q, Ma C, White JC, **ng B (2021) Effects of phosphorus ensembled nanomaterials on nutrient uptake and distribution in Glycine max L. under simulated precipitation. Agronomy 11:1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061086
Lichtenthaler HK Buschman C (2001) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. In: Wrolstad RE (ed), Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry Jhon Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. F4.3.1-F4.3.8.https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01
MacAdam JW, Nelson CJ, Sharp RE (1992) Peroxidase activity in the leaf elongation zone of tall fescue. Plant Physiol 99:872–878
Manceau A, Nagy KL, Marcus MA, Lanson M, Geoffroy N, Jacquet T, Kirpichtchikova T (2008) Formation of metallic copper nanoparticles at the soil-root interface. Environ Sci Technol 42(5):1766–1772. https://doi.org/10.1021/es072017o
Marchiol L, Iafisco M, Fellet G, Adamiano A (2020) Nanotechnology support the next agricultural revolution: perspectives to enhancement of nutrient use efficiency. Adv Agron 161:27–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.12.001
Mirzajani F, Askari H, Hamzelou S, Farzaneh M, Ghassempour A (2013) Effect of silver nanoparticles on Oryza sativa L. and its rhizosphere bacteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 88:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.10.018
Mittal D, Kaur G, Singh P, Yadav K, Ali SA (2020) Nanoparticle-based sustainable agriculture and food science: recent advances and future outlook. Front Nanotechnol 2:579954. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2020.579954
Monica RC, Cremonini R (2009) Nanoparticles and higher plants. Caryologia 62(2):161–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2004.10589681
Nag S, Saha K, Choudhuri MA (2000) A rapid and sensitive assay method for measuring amine oxidase based on hydrogen peroxide-titanium complex formation. Plant Sci 157:157–163
Nair PMG, Chung IM (2014) A mechanistic study on the toxic effect of copper oxide nanoparticles in soybean (Glycine max L.) root development and lignification of root cells. Biolog Trace Elem Res 162(1–3):342–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-014-0106-5
Nair PMG, Chung IM (2015) Study on the correlation between copper oxide nanoparticles induced growth suppression and enhanced lignification in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:302–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.013
Nandi A, Yan LJ, Jana CK, Das N (2019) Role of catalase in oxidative stress- and age-associated degenerative diseases. Oxidative Med Cell Longev 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9613090
Narwal SS, Bogatek R, Zagdanska BM, Sampietro DA, Vattuone MA (2009) Plant Biochemistry. Studium Press LLC, Texas
Niu L, Yang F, Xu C, Yang H, Liu W (2013) Status of metal accumulation in farmland soils across China: from distribution to risk assessment. Environ Pollut 176:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.019
Ochoa L, Medina-Velo IA, Barrios AC, Bonilla-Bird NJ, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2017) Modulation of CuO nanoparticles toxicity to green pea (Pisum sativum Fabaceae) by the phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid. Sci Total Environ 598:513–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.063
Ogunkunle CO, Jimoh MA, Asogwa NT, Viswanathan K, Vishwakarma V, Fatoba PO (2018) Effects of manufactured nano-copper on copper uptake, bioaccumulation and enzyme activities in cowpea grown on soil substrate. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 155:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.070
Olama V, Ronaghi AM, Karimian NA, Yasrebi J, Hamidi R, Tavajjo M (2013) Comparison of yield, yield components and seed quality (oil and protein content) of two rapeseed cultivars as affected by different levels of soil-applied nitrogen and zinc. J Sci Technol Greenh Cult 4:83–98
Pelegrino MT, Pieretti JC, Lange CN, Kohatsu MY, Freire BM, Batista BL, Fincheira P, Tortella GR, Rubilar O, Seabra AB (2021) Foliar spray application of CuO nanoparticles (NPs) and S-nitrosoglutathione enhances productivity, physiological and biochemical parameters of lettuce plants. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 96:2185–2196. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCTB.6677
Peralta-Videa JR, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Zhao L, Diaz BC, Ge Y, Priester JH, Holden PA, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2014) Cerium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles alter the nutritional value of soil cultivated soybean plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 80:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.03.028
Priester JH, Ge Y, Mielke RE, Horst AM, Moritz SC, Espinosa K, Gelb J, Walker SL, Nisbet RM, An YJ, Schimel JP, Palmer RG, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Zhao L, Gardea Torresdey JL, Holden PA (2012) Soybean susceptibility to manufactured nanomaterials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility interruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America 109(37):E2451–E2456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205431109
Rahman N, Schoenau J (2020) Response of wheat, pea, and canola to micronutrient fertilization on five contrasting prairie soils. Sci Reports 10:18818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75911-y
Rai M, Lngle AP, Pandit R, Paralikar P, Shende S, Gupta I, Biswas JK, da Silva SS (2018) Copper and copper nanoparticles: role in management of insect-pests and pathogenic microbes. Nanotechnol Rev 7(4):303–315. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2018-0031
Rajput V, Minkina T, Fedorenko A, Sushkova S, Mandzhieva S, Lysenko V, Duplii N, Fedorenko G, Dvadnenko K, Ghazaryan K (2018) Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles on spring barley (Hordeum sativum distichum). Sci Total Environ 645:1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.211
Rajput VD, Harish, Singh RK, Verma KK, Sharma L, Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Meena M, Gour VS, Minkina T, Sushkova S, Mandzhieva S (2021) Recent developments in enzymatic antioxidant defence mechanism in plants with special reference to abiotic stress. Biology. 10:267. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040267
Rani N, Duhan A, Pal A, Kumari P, Beniwal RK, Verma D, Goyat A, Singh R (2023) Are nano-pesticides really meant for cleaner production? An overview on recent developments, benefits, environmental hazards and future prospectives. J Clean Prod 411:137232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137232
Rawat S, Pullagurala VLR, Hernandez-Molina M, Sun Y, Niu G, Hernandez-Viezcas J, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey J (2017) Impacts of copper oxide nanoparticles in bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) plants: a full life cycle study. Environ Sci-Nano 5:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EN00697G
Rico CM, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2015) Chemistry, biochemistry of nanoparticles, and their role in antioxidant defense system in plants. Nanotechnology and plant sciences: nanoparticles and their impact on plants. pp 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14502-0_1
Rocha GS, Parrish CC, Espíndola ELG (2021) Effects of copper on photosynthetic and physiological parameters of a freshwater microalga (Chlorophyceae). Algal Res 54:102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102223
Rui M, Ma C, White JC, Hao Y, Wang Y, Tang X, Yang J, Jiang F, Ali A, Rui Y, Cao W, Chen G, **ng B (2018) Metal oxide nanoparticles alter peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) physiological response and reduce nutritional quality: a life cycle study. Environ Sci Nano 5:2088–2102. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8en00436f
Saia SM, Carrick HJ, Buda AR, Regan JM, Walter MT (2021) Critical review of polyphosphate and polyphosphate accumulating organisms for agricultural water quality management. Environ Sci Technol 55(5):2722–2742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03566
Sekine R, Marzouk E, Khaksar M, Scheckel K, Stegemeier J, Lowry G, Donner E, Lombi E (2017) Aging of dissolved copper and copper-based nanoparticles in five different soils: short-term kinetics vs. long-term fate. Journal of Environmental Quality. 46(6):1198–1205. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.12.0485
Servin A, Morales MI, Castillo-Michel H, Hernandez-Viezcas J, Munoz B, Zhao L, Nunez JE, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2013) Synchrotron verification of TiO2 accumulation in cucumber fruit: a possible pathway of TiO2 nanoparticle transfer from soil into the food chain. Environ Sci Technol 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403368j
Seyed Sharifi R, Khoramdel S (2016) Effects of nano-zinc oxide and seed inoculation by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, yield components and grain filling period of soybean (Glycine max L.). Iranian J Field Crops Res 13(4):738–753
Shang H, Ma C, Li C, Zhao J, Elmer W, White JC, **ng B (2021) Copper oxide nanoparticle-embedded hydrogels enhance nutrient supply and growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) infected with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae. Environ Sci Technol 55(20):13432–13442. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.1C00777
Shaw AK, Hossain Z (2013) Impact of nano-CuO stress on rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere. 93(6):906–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.044
Shi J, Abid AD, Kennedy IM, Hristova KR, Silk WK (2011) To duckweeds (Landoltia punctata), nanoparticulate copper oxide is more inhibitory than the soluble copper in the bulk solution. Environ Pollut 159(5):1277–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.028
Sonmez S, Kaplan M, Sonmez NK Kaya H, Uz I (2006) High level of copper application to soil and leaves reduce the growth and yield of tomato plants. Sci. agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.) 63:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000300001
Sudha UV, Priya GCGT, Yasmin N (2022) Phytochemical and nutrient analysis of glycine max [milk & okara] bi-products, formulation and it’s acceptability. Int J Health Sci 6(S1):11268–11279. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7761
Taghizadeh M, Asemi Z, Shaker Hosseini R, Aminpur A, Valaie N (2007) Biological evaluation of soya protein quality. J Ilam Univ Med Sci 14:1–6
Tee JK, Ong CN, Bay BH, Ho HK, Leong DT (2016) Oxidative stress by inorganic nanoparticles. Wires Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 8(3):414–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1374
Thounaojam TC, Panda P, Mazumdar P, Kumar D, Sharma GD, Sahoo L, Sanjib P (2012) Excess copper induced oxidative stress and response of antioxidants in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem 53:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.006
Tilney LG, Cooke TJ, Connelly PS, Tilney MS (1991) The structure of plasmodesmata as revealed by plasmolysis, detergent extraction, and protease digestion. J Cell Biol 112(4):739–747. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.112.4.739
Tripathi S, Mahra S, Victoria J, Tiwari K, Rana S, Tripathi DK, Sharma S, Sahi S (2023) Recent advances and perspectives of nanomaterials in agricultural management and associated environmental risk: a review. Nanomaterials. 13:1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101604
Trujillo-Reyes J, Peralta-Videa JR, Majumdar S, Botez CE, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2014) Exposure studies of core-shell Fe/Fe3O4 and Cu/CuO NPs to lettuce (Lactuca sativa) plants: are they a potential physiological and nutritional hazard? J Hazard Mater 267:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.067
Ure AM, Berrow ML (1982) The elemental constituents of soils. In: HJM Bowen (ed) Environmental chemistry, Vol 2 Royal Society of Chemistry, p 94–204. London
Van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance-a review. Field Crop Res 143:4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009
Wang Z, **e X, Zhao J, Liu X, Feng W, White JC, **ng B (2012) Xylem- and phloem-based transport of CuO nanoparticles in maize (Zea mays L). Environ Sci Technol 46(8):4434–4441. https://doi.org/10.1021/es204212z
Wang Y, Deng C, Cota-Ruiz K, Peralta-Videa JR, Sun Y, Rawat S, Tan W, Reyes A, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Niu G, Li C, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2020) Improvement of nutrient elements and allicin content in green onion (Allium fistulosum) plants exposed to CuO nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 725:138387. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.138387
Wang Y, Deng C, Rawat S, Cota-Ruiz K, Medina-Velo I, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2021) Evaluation of the effects of nanomaterials on rice (Oryza sativa L.) responses: underlining the benefits of nanotechnology for agricultural applications. ACS Agric Sci Technol 1:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAGSCITECH.1C00030
Wang J, Zhou P, Shi X, Yang N, Yan L, Zhao Q, Yang C, Guan Y (2019) Primarymetabolite contents are correlated with seed protein and oil traits in near-isogenic lines of soybean. Crop J 651–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2019.04.002
Watson ME, Isaac RA (1990) Analytical instruments for soil and plant analysis. In: Westerman RL (Ed) Soil testing and plant analysis, third edition SSSA book series number 3. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 691–740. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser3.3ed.c26
Wijewardana C, Reddy KR, Bellaloui N (2019) Soybean seed physiology, quality, and chemical composition under soil moisture stress. Food Chem 278:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.035
**ao Y, Ma J, **an J, Peijnenburg WJGM, Du Y, Tian D, **ao H, He Y, Luo L, Deng O, Tu L (2022) Copper accumulation and physiological markers of soybean (Glycine max) grown in agricultural soil amended with copper nanoparticles. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 229:113088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113088
Xu R, Hu W, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Xu S, Guo Q, Qi P, Chen L, Yang X, Zhang F, Liu L, Qiu L, Wang J (2020) Use of near-infrared spectroscopy for the rapid evaluation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merri.] water soluble protein content. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc 224:117400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2019.117400
Xu H, Zhang P, He E, Peijnenburg WJGM, Cao X, Zhao L, Xu X, Qiu H (2023) Natural formation of copper sulfide nanoparticles via microbially mediated organic sulfur mineralization in soil: processes and mechanisms. Geoderma 430:116300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116300
Yusefi-Tanha E, Fallah S, Rostamnejadi A, Pokhrel LR (2020a) Root system architecture, copper uptake and tissue distribution in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) grown in copper oxide nanoparticle (CuONP)-amended soil and implications for human nutrition. Plants 9:1326. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101326
Yusefi-Tanha E, Fallah S, Rostamnejadi A, Pokhrel LR (2020b) Particle size and concentration dependent toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuONPs) on seed yield and antioxidant defense system in soil grown soybean (Glycine max cv. Kowsar). Sci Total Environ 715:136994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136994
Yusefi-Tanha E, Fallah S, Pokhrel LR, Rostamnejadi A (2023) Addressing global food insecurity: soil-applied zinc oxide nanoparticles promote yield attributes and seed nutrient quality in Glycine max L. Sci Total Environ 876:162762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162762
Zhang S, Weng J, Pan J, Tu T, Yao S, Xu C (2003) Study on the photogeneration of superoxide radicals in photosystem II with EPR spin trap** techniques. Photosynth Res 75:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022439009587
Zhang J, Wang X, Lu Y, Bhusal SJ, Song Q, Cregan PB, Yen Y, Brown M, Jiang GL (2018) Genome-wide scan for seed composition provides insights into soybean quality improvement and the impacts of domestication and breeding. Mol Plant 11(3):460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2017.12.016
Zuverza-Mena N, Medina-Velo IA, Barrios AC, Tan W, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2015) Copper nanoparticles/compounds impact agronomic and physiological parameters in cilantro (Coriandrum sativum). Environ Sci Process Impacts 17:1783–1793. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EM00329F
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Carolinas Consortium. This study was funded, in part, by Shahrekord University (grant #96GRN1M731 to SF) and East Carolina University (grant #111101 to LRP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Elham Yusefi-Tanha: conceptualized and designed the study, investigation, collected the data and analysis, and writing—original draft preparation. Sina Fallah: conceptualized and designed the study, project administration, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition. Lok Raj Pokhrel: conceptualized and designed the study, analyzed data, writing—review and editing, and project advisory committee. Ali Rostamnejadi: formal analysis, interpreted nanomaterial properties, writing—review and editing, and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Gangrong Shi
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
- A full life cycle study conducted evaluating effects of nCuO and Cu2+ ions in soybean.
- nCuO size influenced seed yield and nutrient quality in soybean.
- nCuO-25 nm significantly reduced seed P, K, protein, and oil yield.
- Increased root and seed Cu bioaccumulation led to increased oxidative stress.
- Particle size-dependent Cu bioaccumulation-mediated oxidative stress proposed as a mechanism of nCuO toxicity.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yusefi-Tanha, E., Fallah, S., Pokhrel, L.R. et al. Role of particle size-dependent copper bioaccumulation-mediated oxidative stress on Glycine max (L.) yield parameters with soil-applied copper oxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 28905–28921 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33070-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33070-x