SpringerLink
Log in

Different impacts of democracy and income on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from a panel quantile regression approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current research investigates the linear and non-linear effects of democracy and income levels on carbon dioxide emissions for 72 countries from 1993 to 2019. Considering the possibility that the impact of independent variables on carbon dioxide emissions may vary throughout the distribution of carbon dioxide emissions, the correlations between the variables are studied by the panel quantile regression method. The findings confirm the EKC hypothesis in countries having low and medium emissions and demonstrate an inverted U-shaped correlation between GDP and carbon dioxide emissions. In low- and medium-emission countries, a higher democracy level contributes to environmental quality, while it leads to increased carbon dioxide emissions in high-emission countries. On the contrary, it is remarkable that democracy causes a delay in the turning point of the EKC in countries with low and medium emissions. Furthermore, the results demonstrate an EKC correlation between democracy level and carbon dioxide emissions in countries with low and medium emissions. However, the correlation between democracy level and carbon dioxide emissions, which is inverted U-shaped in low- and medium-emission countries, turns into a U-shaped correlation in high-emission countries. These findings emphasize the necessity of considering the changing impact of democracy according to the emission structure of countries in policymaking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the BP Database, World Bank Data, and Freedom House repository (https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html, https://data.worldbank.org/, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world).

Notes

  1. Table 3 presents the list of countries.

References

  • Acaravci A, Ozturk I (2010) On the relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy 35:5412–5420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2006) Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams S, Acheampong AO (2019) Reducing carbon emissions: the role of renewable energy and democracy. J Clean Prod 240:118245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Adebayo TS, Udemba EN, Murshed M, Kirikkaleli D (2022) Effects of economic complexity, economic growth, and renewable energy technology budgets on ecological footprint: the role of democratic accountability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:24925–24940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiyetan IR, Olomola PA (2017) Environmental degradation, energy consumption, population growth and economic growth: does environmental Kuznets curve matter for Nigeria? Econ Policy Rev 16:1–14

  • Akalin G, Erdogan S (2021) Does democracy help reduce environmental degradation? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:7226–7235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbostancı E, Türüt-Aşık S, Tunç Gİ (2009) The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37:861–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allard A, Takman J, Uddin GS, Ahmed A (2018) The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5848–5861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Ozturk I (2021) Mirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the United States. J Environ Manag 293:112890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amri F (2018) Carbon dioxide emissions, total factor productivity, ICT, trade, financial development, and energy consumption: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:33691–33701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari MA, Haider S, Khan N (2020) Environmental Kuznets curve revisited: an analysis using ecological and material footprint. Ecol Indic 115:106416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2009) CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 37:3282–3286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvin M, Savage N, Scigliano M (1998) Herd instinct and offsetting behaviour in the foreign aid contributions of G7 countries. Scand J Dev Altern Area Stud 17:83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubourg RW, Good DH, Krutilla K (2008) Debt, democratization, and development in Latin America: how policy can affect global warming. J Policy Anal Manag: J Assoc Public Policy Anal Manag 27:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey N, Kapetanios G, Pesaran MH (2016) Exponent of cross-sectional dependence: estimation and inference. J Appl Econ 31:929–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S, Graddy K (2000) Freedom, growth, and the environment. Environ Dev Econ 5:433–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry J (1999) Rethinking green politics: nature, virtue and progress. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Başar S, Tosun B (2021) Environmental Pollution Index and economic growth: evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:36870–36879

  • Bättig MB, Bernauer T (2009) National institutions and global public goods: are democracies more cooperative in climate change policy? Int Organ 63:281–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer T, Koubi V (2009) Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecol Econ 68:1355–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder M, Coad A (2011) From Average Joe’s happiness to Miserable Jane and Cheerful John: using quantile regressions to analyze the full subjective well-being distribution. J Econ Behav Organ 79:275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhmelt T, Böker M, Ward H (2016) Democratic inclusiveness, climate policy outputs, and climate policy outcomes. Democratization 23:1272–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubellouta B, Kusch-Brandt S (2020) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for E-waste in the EU28+ 2 countries. J Clean Prod 277:123371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP Database (2021) BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2020. London. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html. Accessed 13 May 2021

  • Buitenzorgy M, Mol AP (2011) Does democracy lead to a better environment? Deforestation and the democratic transition peak. Environ Resour Econ 48:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Hao X, Zhou M (2022) Does institutional quality affect air pollution? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:28317–28338

  • Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K, Smyth R (2018) The environmental Kuznets curve in the OECD: 1870–2014. Energy Econ 75:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congregado E, Feria-Gallardo J, Golpe AA, Iglesias J (2016) The environmental Kuznets curve and CO 2 emissions in the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:18407–18420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature 415:23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran SR, de Sherbinin A (2004) Completing the picture: the challenges of bringing “consumption” into the population–environment equation. Popul Environ 26:107–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon RT, Mueller B (2006) Political economy and natural resource use. In: López R, Toman MA (eds) Economic development and environmental sustainability: new policy options. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 122–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A (2003) Citizenship and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery DW, Pope CA (1994) Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health 15:107–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2020) The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:12717–12724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek J (1987) Rational ecology: environment and political economy. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley R (1992) Environmentalism and political theory: toward an ecocentric approach. Suny Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley R (2004) The green state: rethinking democracy and sovereignty. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • El-Aasar KM, Hanafy SA (2018) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Egypt: the role of renewable energy and trade in mitigating GHGs. Int J Energy Econ Policy 8:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili A, Abdollahzadeh N (2009) Oil exploitation and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 37:371–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzin YH, Bond CA (2006) Democracy and environmental quality. J Dev Econ 81:213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson PG, Neumayer E (2013) Democracy and climate change policies: is history important? Ecol Econ 95:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (2021) Freedom in the World, Washington.

  • Gaarder A, Vadlamannati KC (2017) Does democracy guarantee (de) forestation? An empirical analysis. International Area Stud Rev 20:97–121

  • Gill AR, Hassan S, Viswanathan KK (2019) Is democracy enough to get early turn of the environmental Kuznets curve in ASEAN countries? Energy Environ 30:1491–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregori T, Tiwari AK (2020) Do urbanization, income, and trade affect electricity consumption across Chinese provinces? Energy Econ 89:104800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER working paper series, Working Paper No. 3914. https://www.nber.org/papers/w3914.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2021

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen AG (1995) The environmental promise of democratic deliberation. Univ of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Guris S, Sak N (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis with non-additive fixed effect panel quantile method. Bus Econ Res J 10:327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyamfi BA, Bein MA, Ozturk I, Bekun FV (2020) The moderating role of employment in an environmental Kuznets curve framework revisited in G7 countries. Indonesian J Sustain Account Manag 4:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG (2013) Carbon dioxide emissions and governance: a nonparametric analysis for the G-20. Energy Econ 40:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid I, Alam MS, Kanwai A, Jena PK, Murshed M, Alam R (2022) Decarbonization pathways: the roles of foreign direct investments governance democracy economic growth and renewable energy transition. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18935-3

  • Heilbroner R (1974) An inquiry into the human prospect. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Selden TM (1995) Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. J Public Econ 57:85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isik C, Ongan S, Özdemir D (2019) The economic growth/development and environmental degradation: evidence from the US state-level EKC hypothesis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:30772–30781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwińska K, Kampas A, Longhurst K (2019) Interactions between democracy and environmental quality: toward a more nuanced understanding. Sustainability 11:1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y-Q, Zhao T, Yang Y-Y (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in China: a spatial panel data approach. Ecol Indic 63:231–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S, Kilinc CC (2018) Investigating the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from the globe. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:15029–15035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keho Y (2017) Revisiting the income, energy consumption and carbon emissions nexus: new evidence from quantile regression for different country groups. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7:356–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinda S (2011) Democratic institutions and environmental quality: effects and transmission channels. Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin, No. 46. http://www.hdl.handle.net/10419/48347. Accessed 28 May 2021

  • Koenker R (2004) Quantile regression for longitudinal data. J Multivar Anal 91:74–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society 1978:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Hallock KF (2001) Quantile regression. J Econ Perspect 15:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:28

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Reuveny R (2006) Democracy and environmental degradation. Int Stud Q 50:935–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Wang Y, Zhao D (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve in China: new evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 91:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhang S, Bae J (2017) The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 164:1239–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López R, Galinato GI (2005) Deforestation and forest-induced carbon dioxide emissions in tropical countries: how do governance and trade openness affect the forest-income relationship? J Environ Dev 14:73–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo G, Weng J-H, Zhang Q, Hao Y (2017) A reexamination of the existence of environmental Kuznets curve for CO 2 emissions: evidence from G20 countries. Nat Hazards 85:1023–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Z (2017) The effect of democracy on CO2 emissions in emerging countries: does the level of income matter? Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:900–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak Arvin B, Lew B (2011) Does democracy affect environmental quality in develo** countries? Appl Econ 43:1151–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao Y (2018) Does democratic transition reduce carbon intensity? Evidence from Indonesia using the synthetic control method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:19908–19917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows DL (2013) The limits to growth (1972). Yale University Press, Yale

    Google Scholar 

  • Midlarsky MI (1998) Democracy and the environment: an empirical assessment. J Peace Res 35:341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed H, Jebli MB, Youssef SB (2019) Renewable and fossil energy, terrorism, economic growth, and trade: evidence from France. Renew Energy 139:459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murshed M, Ferdaus J, Rashid S, Tanha MM, Islam MJ (2021) The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for deforestation in Bangladesh: an ARDL analysis with multiple structural breaks. Energy Ecol Environ 6:111–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olale E, Ochuodho TO, Lantz V, El Armali J (2018) The environmental Kuznets curve model for greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. J Clean Prod 184:859–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özokcu S, Özdemir Ö (2017) Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:3220–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. International Labour Organization- ILO Working Papers 992927783402676

  • Panayotou T (1994) Economic growth and the environment. Econ Surv Eur 2:45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2018) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2021a) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:846–861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2021b) Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: a sustainability perspective. Renew Energy 173:197–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK, Caglar AE (2021) Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy 216:119220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RA (1995) Freedom and the environment. J Democr 6:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951

  • Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econ Rev 34:1089–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2021) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empir Econ 60:13–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Policardo L (2016) Is democracy good for the environment? Quasi-experimental evidence from regime transitions. Environ Resour Econ 64:275–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope CA, Dockery DW, Schwartz J (1995) Review of epidemiological evidence of health effects of particulate air pollution. Inhal Toxicol 7:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Povitkina M (2018) The limits of democracy in tackling climate change. Environ Politics 27:411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauf A, Liu X, Amin W, Ozturk I, Rehman OU, Hafeez M (2018) Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:32066–32080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Liu L, Zhu H, Tang R (2020) The direct and indirect effects of democracy on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS countries: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:33085–33102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridzuan NHAM, Marwan NF, Khalid N, Ali MH, Tseng M-L (2020) Effects of agriculture, renewable energy, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve. Resour Conserv Recycl 160:104879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie H, Roser M, Rosado P (2020) CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data. https://www.ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions. Accessed 13 May 2021

  • Roser M (2021) Economic growth. Our World in Data. https://www.ourworldindata.org/economic-growth. Accessed 14 May 2021

  • Salman M, Long X, Dauda L, Mensah CN, Muhammad S (2019) Different impacts of export and import on carbon emissions across 7 ASEAN countries: a panel quantile regression approach. Sci Total Environ 686:1019–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satrovic E, Ahmad M, Muslija A (2021) Does democracy improve environmental quality of GCC region? Analysis robust to cross-section dependence and slope heterogeneity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:62927–62942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs L (2003) Sustaining abundance: environmental performance in industrial democracies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs L (2009) Democracy and environmental protection: an empirical analysis, annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference. In: The Palmer House Hilton. Citeseer, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford economic papers, Oxford, pp 757–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M (2018) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renew Energy 119:703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoppani A (1873) Corso di geologia: Geologia stratigrafica, 2nd edn. Tip, Bernardoni

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremmel J (2018) The Anthropocene concept as a wake-up call for reforming democracy. In: Hickmann T, Partzsch L, Pattberg P, Weiland S (eds) The anthropocene debate and political science. Routledge, London, pp 219–237

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2020) Human development report “The next frontier”. United Nations Development Programme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman O, Iorember PT, Olanipekun IO (2019) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: the effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:13390–13400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward H (2008) Liberal democracy and sustainability. Environ Politics 17:386–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEF (2020) The global risks report, World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risk_Report_2020.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2021

  • WEF (2021) The global risks report, World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2021

  • Weiss EB, Jacobson HK (1999) Getting countries to comply with internationl agreements. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 41:16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2021) World development indicators, Washington. https://www.databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. Accessed 13 May 2021

  • You W-H, Zhu H-M, Yu K, Peng C (2015) Democracy, financial openness, and global carbon dioxide emissions: heterogeneity across existing emission levels. World Dev 66:189–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You W, Li Y, Guo P, Guo Y (2020) Income inequality and CO2 emissions in belt and road initiative countries: the role of democracy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:6278–6299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Management, Igdir University, Igdir, Turkey

    Murat Eren

Authors
  1. Murat Eren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ME performed material preparation, data collection, analysis, writing, and other contributions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Eren.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eren, M. Different impacts of democracy and income on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from a panel quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 71439–71459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20805-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20805-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation