Abstract
Robule Lake, located in Eastern Serbia, near the city of Bor, is being influenced by waste materials from mining activities. For the purification of water from Robule Lake, contaminated with various metal ions (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd, Ni, etc.), acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment methods such as: passive treatment method, sequential neutralization, ion exchange, adsorption process based on low cost adsorbents, adsorption process based on natural zeolits, electrodialysis, filtration with nanofiltration membranes, and reverse osmosis, were evaluated by the following MCDM methods: TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOOSRA, WASPAS, and CoCoSo. Criteria used for the evaluation were: efficiency in the metal ions removal and the quality of the purified water, necessity of pre-treatment and / or post-treatment of treated water, possibility of using the generated waste, capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, needed area, and sensitivity of the method. The results of the MCDM analysis showed that sequential neutralization was the most appropriate method for this wastewater, while passive treatment system and ion exchange were ranked as second and third, respectively.
After the selection of AMD treatment method, neutralization tests with lime were carried out with the water sample from Robule Lake. The results of sequential neutralization testing showed that concentration of Fe ions could be lowered to 1 mg/L at pH 4. The values of Cu, Zn, and Ni ions concentration obtained at pH 7 were 0.04, 0.65, and 0.21 mg/L, respectively, while the values of Mn and Cd ions concentration of 0.01 and 0.0001 mg/L, were obtained at pH 10.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data will be available in article or upon request.
References
Adalı EA, Işık AT (2017) The multi-objective decision making methods based on MULTIMOORA and MOOSRA for the laptop selection problem. J Ind Eng Int 13(2):229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-016-0175-5
Ali Y, Pervez H, Khan J (2020) Selection of the Most Feasible Wastewater Treatment Technology in Pakistan Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). Water Conserv Sci Eng 5:199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-020-00094-6
Anaokar GS, Khambete AK, Christian RA (2018) Evaluation of a performance index for municipal wastewater treatment plants using MCDM – TOPSIS. Int J Technol 4:715–726. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i4.102
Asl-Rousta B, Mousavi SJ (2019) A TOPSIS-based multicriteria approach to the calibration of a basin-scale SWAT hydrological model. Water Resour Manage 33(1):439–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2111-5
Ayyıldız E, Özçelik G (2018) Evaluation of wastewater treatment performances for municipalities by using MCDM Methods: Case study in Turkey. J Sci Technol 11(2):243–254. https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.390010
Baghapour MA, Shooshtarian MR, Zarghami M (2020) Process mining approach of a new water quality index for long-term assessment under uncertainty using consensus-based fuzzy decision support system. Water Resour Manage 34(3):1155–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02489-5
Chen Y, Jiang X, Wang Y, Zhuang D (2018) Spatial characteristics of heavy metal pollution and the potential ecological risk of a typical mining area: A case study in China. Process Saf Environ 113:204–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.10.008
Dimitrijević M, Kostov A, Tasić V, Milosević N (2009) Influence of pyrometallurgical copper production on the environment. J Hazar Mater 164(2–3):892–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.099
Dursun M (2016) Evaluation of wastewater treatment alternatives using Fuzzy VIKOR Method. J Adv Manage Sci 4(4):333–336. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.4.4.333-336
Gardić V, Marković R, Masuda N, Sokolović J, Petrović J, Đorđievski S, Božić D (2017) The study of leachability and toxicity of sludge after neutralization of Saraka and Robule AMD wastewaters. J Min Metall a 53(1):17–29. https://doi.org/10.5937/JMMA1701017G
Gichamo T, Gökçekuş H, Ozsahin DU, Gelete G, Uzun B (2021) Ranking of Natural Wastewater Treatment Techniques by Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods. In: Ozsahin DU, Gökçekuş H, Uzun B, LaMoreaux J (eds), Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental and Civil Engineering. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, pp 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64765-0_11
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Ilangkumaran M, Sasirekha V, Anojkumar L, Sakthivel G, Boopathi Raja M, Ruban Sundara Raj T, Siddhartha CNS, Nizamuddin P, Praveen Kumar S (2013) Optimization of wastewater treatment technology selection using hybrid MCDM. Manage Environ Qual Int J 24(5):619–641. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2012-0053
Karimi AR, Mehrdadi N, Hashemian SJ, Nabi Bidhendi GR, Tvakkoli-Moghaddam R (2011) Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. Int J Environ Sci Tech 8(2):267–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326215
Kumar R, Ray A (2015) Selection of material under conflicting situation using simple ratio optimization technique. In: Das KN, Deep K, Pant M, Bansal JC, Nagar A (eds) Proc 4th Intern Confer Soft Comput Prob Solv. Springer, New Delhi, pp 513–519
Lai H, Liao H, Wen Z, Zavadskas EK, Al-Barakati A (2020) An Improved CoCoSo Method with a Maximum Variance Optimization Model for Cloud Service Provider Selection. Inz Ekon 31(4):411–424. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.4.24990
Luo Y, Zhang X, Qin Y, Yang Z, Liang Y (2021) Tourism Attraction Selection with Sentiment Analysis of Online Reviews Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets and the IDOCRIW-COCOSO Model. Int J Fuzzy Syst 23:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00969-9
Markovic R, Bessho M, Masuda N, Stevanovic Z, Bozic D, Apostolovski Trujic T, Gardic V (2020) New Approach of Metals Removal from Acid Mine Drainage. Appl Sci-Basel 10(17):5925. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175925
Milijašević D, Milanović A, Brankov J, Radovanović M (2011) Water quality assessment of the Borska Reka river using the WPI (Water Pollution Index) method. Arch Biol Sci 63(3):819–824. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS1103819M
Milosavljevic JS, Serbula SM, Cokesa DM, Milanovic DB, Radojevic AA, Kalinovic TS, Kalinovic JV (2020) Soil enzyme activities under the impact of long-term pollution from mining-metallurgical copper production. Eur J Soil Biol 101:103232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103232
Mir MA, Ghazvinei PT, Sulaiman NMN, Basri NEA, Saheri S, Mahmood NZ, Aghamohammadi N (2016) Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. J Environ Manage 166:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028
Mladenović-Ranisavljević II, Takić L, Nikolić Đ (2018) Water quality assessment based on combined multi-criteria decision-making method with index method. Water Resour Manage 32(7):2261–2276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1927-3
Mwaanga P, Silondwa M, Kasali G, Banda PM (2019) Preliminary review of mine air pollution in Zambia. Heliyon 5(9):e02485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02485
Nikolic N, Nikolic M (2012) Gradient analysis reveals a copper paradox on floodplain soils under long-term pollution by mining waste. Sci Total Environ 425:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.076
Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade. (In Serbian)
Petronijević N, Stanković S, Radovanović D, Sokić M, Marković B, Stopić SR, Kamberović Ž (2020) Application of the flotation tailings as an alternative material for an acid mine drainage remediation: A case study of the extremely acidic Lake Robule (Serbia). Metals 10(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10010016
Petrović JV, Alagić SČ, Milić SM, Tošić SB, Bugarin MM (2021) Chemometric characterization of heavy metals in soils and shoots of the two pioneer species sampled near the polluted water bodies in the close vicinity of the copper mining and metallurgical complex in Bor (Serbia): Phytoextraction and biomonitoring contexts. Chemosphere 262:127808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127808
Popović G, Stanujkić D, Karabašević D, Štirbanović Z (2020) Model for ore deposits selection by using the fuzzy TOPSIS method. J Min Metall a 56(1):59–71. https://doi.org/10.5937/JMMA2001059P
Pourmand E, Mahjouri N, Hosseini M, Nik-Hemmat F (2020) A multi-criteria group decision making methodology using interval type-2 fuzzy sets: Application to water resources management. Water Resour Manage 34(13):4067–4092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2111-5
Regulation on the categorization of watercourses (“Official Gazette of the SRS”, no. 3/1968) (In Serbian)
Regulation on Pollutant Limit Values into Surface and Groundwater and Sediment and Deadlines for their Achievement (“Official Gazette of the RS”, no.50/2012) (In Serbian)
Regulation on Limit Values Priority and Priority Hazardous Substances that Pollute Surface Water and Deadlines for Achieving them, (“Official Gazette RS”, no.24/2014) (In Serbian)
Saha S, Sinha A (2018) Review on Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage with Waste Materials: A Novel Approach. Global Nest J. 20(3):512–528, https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.002610
Sarai Atab M, Smallbone AJ, Roskilly AP (2016) An operational and economic study of a reverse osmosis desalination system for potable water and land irrigation. Desalination 397:174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.06.020
Sarkar A, Panja SC, Das D, Sarkar B (2015) Develo** an efficient decision support system for non-traditional machine selection: an application of MOORA and MOOSRA. Prod Manuf Res 3(1):324–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2014.895688
Stanujkic D, Djordjevic B, Djordjevic M (2013) Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks. Serb J Manage 8(2):213–241. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm8-3774
Stevanović Z, Obradović Lj, Marković R, Jonović R, Avramović Lj, Bugarin M, Stevanovic J (2013) Mine Waste Water Management in the Bor Municipality in Order to Protect the Bor River Water. In: García Einschlag FS (ed), Waste Water - Treatment Technologies and Recent Analytical Developments. InTechOpen, London, pp 41–62. https://doi.org/10.5772/51902
Štirbanović Z, Stanujkić D, Miljanović I, Milanović D (2019) Application of MCDM methods for flotation machine selection. Min Eng 137:140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.04.014
Yahya MN, Gökçekuş H, Ozsahin DU, Uzun B (2020) Evaluation of wastewater treatment technologies using TOPSIS. Desalin Water Treat 177:416–422. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25172
Yan B, Xu DM, Chen T, Yan ZA, Li LL, Wang MH (2020) Leachability characteristic of heavy metals and associated health risk study in typical copper mining-impacted sediments. Chemosphere 239:124748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124748
Yazdani M, Wen Z, Liao H, Banaitis A, Turskis Z (2019) A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management. J Civ Eng Manage 25(8):858–874. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.11309
Wu M, Liu Z (2011) The supplier selection application based on two methods: VIKOR algorithm with entropy method and Fuzzy TOPSIS with vague sets method. Int J Manage Sci Eng Manage 6(2):109–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2011.10671152
Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J, Zakarevicius A (2012) Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektron Elektrotech 122(6):3–6. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810
Zeng B, Zhang ZX, Yang M (2018) Risk assessment of groundwater with multi-source pollution by a long-term monitoring programme for a large mining area. Int Biodeter Biodegr 128:100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.002
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia for the financial support of scientific research at the University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty in Bor (contract number 451-03-9/2021-14/200131) and Mining and Metallurgy Institute Bor (contract number 451-03-9/2021-14/200052).
Funding
Research presented in this paper was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia as it was mentioned in Acknowledgement section of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zoran Štirbanović – conceptualization; methodology; writing – original draft preparation; data curation; editing of manuscript; project administrator. Vojka Gardić – methodology; writing – original draft preparation. Dragiša Stanujkić – methodology; writing – original draft preparation; software. Radmila Marković – data acquisition; investigation. Jovica Sokolović – visualization; validation; formal analysis. Zoran Stevanović – validation; supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to Publish
Authors give their permission to publish.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Štirbanović, Z., Gardić, V., Stanujkić, D. et al. Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection. Water Resour Manage 35, 3737–3753 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3