Abstract
We empirically examine the relationship between business regulation and total (i.e., formal and informal) entrepreneurship using a unique panel data set. We estimate separate regressions for opportunity-driven and necessity-driven nascent entrepreneurship as well as young business entrepreneurship based on two different estimation methods (pooled OLS and system GMM). Our results show that business regulation generally rather hinders entrepreneurship. If we additionally consider the development stage of countries, we find different results for high-income and lower-income countries: first, we surprisingly find that stricter employment protection legislation positively affects entrepreneurship in lower-income countries where the informal sector is larger. This might be because more rigid employment laws make waged employment less attractive to employers, who thus push employees into dependent or informal self-employment. Second, we find that stricter insolvency regulation hinders entrepreneurship only in high-income economies. In lower-income economies, where there are more unregistered businesses, insolvency laws might be more difficult to enforce, so entrepreneurship rates are less affected. Third, we find that government intervention in the form of high-quality governmental support programs stimulates opportunity nascent and young business entrepreneurship. This relationship is apparent only in high-income countries, where the formal sector is larger, as such programs typically address formal rather than informal entrepreneurs. Governmental support programs may thus reach the goal of facilitating entrepreneurship only in high-income economies.
Plain English Summary
How does regulation affect entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurial activity is seen as a major driver of economic growth, as it turns knowledge into economic output. This justifies the interest of policy makers around the world in promoting entrepreneurship. While the United States, well-known for their entrepreneurial spirit, have achieved global dominance in the innovation-driven information and communication technology industry, Western European nations failed to catch up in terms of new business creation. This may be due to the different approaches in terms of new business regulations. Nevertheless, our study suggests that a combination of both the low regulation route pursued by the United States and the high support route favored in Continental Europe may best promote the creation of new firms. However, the impact of regulatory measures depends on the development stage of countries and thus on the size of the formal and informal sector. The simultaneous deregulation of firm entry and provision of government support programs might be most fruitful to facilitate entrepreneurial activity, particularly in highly developed economies. However, policy makers in develo** economies should consider that some measures, such as improving the labor market regulation, may push people into informal entrepreneurship, which might not be desirable from the policy maker’s perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Formal + informal = total entrepreneurship.
The statements experts are asked to rate can be found on the website of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: https://www.gemconsortium.org/wiki/1172.
The World Bank classifications are based on the GNI per capita of the previous year. For instance, in 2022, a country is considered an high-income economy if GNI > $13,205.
References
Acs, Z. (2006). How Is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth? Innovations: Technology. Governance, Globalization, 1(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.1.97
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: The knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth (CEPR Discussion Papers No. 4783). C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/4783.html
Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.001
Ardagna, S., & Lusardi, A. (2010). Heterogeneity in the effect of regulation on entrepreneurship and entry size. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(2–3), 594–605. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2010.8.2-3.594
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1984-x
Bade, M. (2022). Conversion and contagion in entrepreneurship: A cross-country analysis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 16(1), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1412
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921. https://doi.org/10.1086/261712
Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2008). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence. Public Choice, 134(3), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9229-y
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Bond, S. R., Hoeffler, A., & Temple, J. R. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models. SSRN Working Paper 290522. Retrieved on April 17, 2022, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?Abstract_id=290522
Bosma, N., Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Coduras, A., & Levie, J. (2008). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2008 Executive Report. Retrieved on April 16, 2022, from https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=47107
Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x
Calderon, G., Iacovone, L., & Juarez, L. (2017). Opportunity versus necessity: Understanding the heterogeneity of female micro-entrepreneurs. The World Bank Economic Review, 30(1), S86–S96. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhw010
Capelleras, J.-L., Mole, K., Greene, F. J., & Storey, D. J. (2008). Do more heavily regulated economies have poorer performing new ventures? evidence from britain and spain. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400340
Chambers, D., & Munemo, J. (2019). Regulations, institutional quality and entrepreneurship. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 55(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-019-09377-w
Chowdhury, F., Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2019). Institutions and entrepreneurship quality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 51–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718780431
Companies Market Cap. (2022). Largest companies by market cap. Retrieved April 16, 2022, from https://companiesmarketcap.com/
de Jong, A., Rietveld, C. A., & van Stel, A. (2020). The Relationship Between Entry Regulation and Nascent Entrepreneurship Revisited. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 18(3), 419–446.
Dennis, W. J., Jr. (2004). Creating and sustaining a viable small business sector. University of Oklahoma.
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The Regulation of Entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399436
Economist. (2020). The world bank’s business-rankings mess. The Economist. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://www.economist.com/finance-andeconomics/2020/09/03/the-world-banks-business-rankings-mess
European Commission. (2003). Green paper entrepreneurship in europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved on April 16, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/entrepreneurship_europe.pdf
Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2009). The role of venture capital firms in silicon valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society, 38(2), 326–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140902786827
Freytag, A., & Thurik, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0044-2
Fu, K., Larsson, A.-S., & Wennberg, K. (2018). Habitual entrepreneurs in the making: How labor market rigidity and employment affects entrepreneurial re-entry. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0011-y
Fu, K., Wennberg, K., & Falkenhall, B. (2020). Productive entrepreneurship and the effectiveness of insolvency legislation: A cross-country study. Small Business Economics, 54(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0040-6
Ghosh, S. (2017). Regulation and entrepreneurial intention: Cross country evidence. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 6(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-02-2017-0004
Grilo, I., & Irigoyen, J.-M. (2006). Entrepreneurship in the eu: To wish and not to be. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1561-3
Ho, Y.-P., & Wong, P.-K. (2007). Financing, regulatory costs and entrepreneurial propensity. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9015-0
Hoffmann, A. N. (2007). A rough guide to entrepreneurship policy. In D. B. Audretsch, I. Grilo, & A. R. Thurik (Eds.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/3856_8.html
Human Development Reports. (2020). Education index. Retrieved April 16, 2022, from https://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators/103706#
Judson, R. A., & Owen, A. (1999). Estimating dynamic panel data models: A guide for macroeconomists. Economics Letters, 65(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00130-5
Kanniainen, V., & Vesala, T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and labor market institutions. Economic Modelling, 22(5), 828–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2005.05.002
Khyareh, M. M., & Amini, H. (2021). Governance quality, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Journal of Competitiveness, 13, 41–64. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.03
Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 591–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.006
Kuckertz, A., Berger, E. S., & Mpeqa, A. (2016). The more the merrier? Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1288–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.094
Lee, S., McCann, D., & Torm, N. (2008). The world bank’s “employing workers” index: Findings and critiques – a review of recent evidence. International Labor Review, 147(4), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2008.00043.x
Lee, S.-H., Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. (2011). How do bankruptcy laws affect entrepreneurship development around the world? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.05.001
Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392–1419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.x
Machen, R. C., Jones, M. T., Varghese, G. P., & Stark, E. L. (2021). Investigation of data irregularities in doing business 2018 and doing business 2020. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2021/09/16/statement-on-release-of-investigation-into-data-irregularities-in-doing-business-2018-and-2020
McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D. R., & Palich, L. E. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 875–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00260.x
Nyström, K. (2008). The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: Evidence from panel data. Public Choice, 136(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9295-9
Plehwe, D. (2021). The development of neoliberal measures of competitiveness. In D. Russ & J. Stafford (Eds.), Competition in world politics: Knowledge, strategies and institutions (pp. 155–182). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839457474-007
Porter, M., Sachs, J., & McArthur, J. (2002). Executive summary: Competitiveness and stages of economic development. In M. Porter, J. Sachs, J. McArthur, P. Cornelius, & K. Schwab (Eds.), The global competitiveness report 2001–2002 (pp. 16–25). Oxford University Press.
Renko, M., Shrader, R. C., & Simon, M. (2012). Perception of entrepreneurial opportunity: A general framework. Management Decision, 50(7), 1233–1251. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211246987
Rietveld, C. A., & Patel, P. C. (2022). A critical assessment of the National Entrepreneurship Context Index of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved September 17, 2022, from ar**v preprint ar**v:2204.05749.
Rivlin, A. M. (1992). Reviving the american dream. Brookings Review, 10(3), 5–6. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A12722163/AONE?u=anon~b3a5c8f7&sid=googleScholar&xid=8d7c0bc7
Román, C., Congregado, E., & Millán, J. M. (2011). Dependent self-employment as a way to evade employment protection legislation. Small Business Economics, 37(3), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9241-3
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system gmm in stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106
Solomon, S., Bendickson, J. S., Liguori, E. W., & Marvel, M. R. (2022). The effects of social spending on entrepreneurship in developed nations. Small Business Economics, 58(3), 1595–1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00458-9
Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. M. (2010). Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.14
van Stel, A., Storey, D., & Thurik, R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9014-1
Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2002). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: policies, institutions and culture. In D. Audretsch, R. Thurik, I. Verheul, & S. Wennekers (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and Policy in a European-US Comparison. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 27. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47556-1_2
Wennekers, S., Van Wennekers, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1994-8
World Bank. (2017). Key terms explained. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/gfdr/gfdr-2016/background/key-terms-explained
World Bank. (2021). World bank group to discontinue doing business report. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2021/09/16/world-bankgroup-to-discontinue-doing-business-report
Zumbrun, J., & Talley, I. (2018). World bank unfairly influenced its own competitiveness rankings. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-bank-unfairly-influencedits-own-competitiveness-rankings-1515797620
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the useful comments by the anonymous referee and the editor.
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Table 13
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cordier, I., Bade, M. The relationship between business regulation and nascent and young business entrepreneurship revisited. Small Bus Econ 61, 587–616 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00707-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00707-5
Keywords
- Opportunity-driven entrepreneurship
- Necessity-driven entrepreneurship
- Nascent entrepreneurship
- Business regulation
- Young business entrepreneurship