Abstract
Anxiety is a common mental disorder, and its prevalence has lately increased because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, the available anxiolytics are often ineffective, and most possess addictive potential. Thus, searching for novel compounds is essential. In our previous studies, we selected a multimodal compound, HBK-15, which showed a fast antidepressant-like effect in animal models of depression. HBK-15 demonstrated a high affinity for serotonin 5-HT1A receptors and moderate for 5-HT7, dopamine D2, and α1-adrenoceptors. Based on the receptor profile and preliminary studies, we aimed to investigate the anxiolytic potential of HBK-15 using the conditioned-response rat model of anxiety, i.e., the Vogel drinking test. We performed hot plate and free-drinking tests to exclude false positive results in the Vogel test. Using radioligand binding studies, we also investigated the affinity of the compound for the selected biological targets, which play a role in anxiety. Our experiments revealed that HBK-15 showed an anxiolytic-like effect in rats (5 mg/kg) without influencing the pain threshold or the amount of water consumed in the free-drinking test. Furthermore, the tested compound did not show a significant affinity for the selected biological targets, which suggests that its anxiolytic-like mechanism of action could be connected with the interaction with other receptors. This study indicates that multimodal compounds with a receptor profile similar to HBK-15 could be an attractive therapeutic option for patients with a generalized anxiety disorder. However, more studies are required to determine the exact mechanism of action of HBK-15 and its safety profile.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization, mental health conditions are increasing globally, affecting around 20% of the world’s young population [1, 2]. One of the most common mental disorders is anxiety, which can interfere with daily functioning causing not only constant fear, tension, irritability, restlessness, inattention, or insomnia, but also many serious physical symptoms such as tachycardia, increased blood pressure, trouble breathing, sweating, trembling or body pains [3]. Thus, patients suffering from anxiety disorders tend to have worse job performance, school productivity, problems in relationships, and overall decreased quality of life [4]. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic worsened this trend globally by increasing anxiety prevalence by 25% worldwide [5, 6].
Unfortunately, the available pharmacotherapy is often ineffective in treating anxiety disorder and only relieves symptoms or prevents panic attacks [7, 8]. In the past, the most prescribed anxiolytics were benzodiazepines - usually effective in improving symptoms but with a risk of serious side effects such as dependency, tolerance, somnolence, and memory impairments [9]. Subsequently, several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (especially escitalopram and duloxetine) have been shown to reduce anxiety; however, their effects only appear after several weeks of treatment [8].
We have previously selected a novel 2-methoxyphenylpiperazine derivative, HBK-15. HBK-15 is a multimodal compound, showing a high affinity for serotonin 5-HT1A receptors [12] and moderate towards serotonin 5-HT7 [12], dopamine D2 [13], and α1-adrenoceptors [14]. It also showed antagonistic properties at the 5-HT3 receptor in biofunctional assay [15]. Our studies demonstrated fast antidepressant-like effects of HBK-15 in mouse models of depression [13, 15]. Our preliminary study indicated the anxiolytic potential of HBK-15 [12]. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate further the anxiolytic potential of HBK-15 using the conditioned-response rat model of anxiety, i.e., the Vogel drinking test.
Materials and Methods
Animals
In all experiments, we used male Wistar rats (200–220 g, in total 140 animals), purchased from the Animal House at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland. The animals were kept in groups of 3 rats in standard cages (42.5 × 26.5 × 18 cm) at constant room conditions (temperature: 22 ± 2 °C, humidity: 50 ± 10%). Behavioral experiments were performed between 8 am and 4 pm and evaluated by a trained observer blind to the treatments. Rats were handled for at least 3 days before starting the experimental procedures. Animals were randomly allocated to the treatment using a computer-generated sequence, and researchers making measurements on the animals or analyzing the results were blind to the allocation. All animals were used only once. Moreover, experimental groups were distributed across multiple cages, and the location of the cages in the room was changed following each day. All experimental procedures were approved by the Local Ethics Committee for Experiments on Animals in Kraków, Poland, and performed under the guidelines provided by the European Union Directive of 22 September 2010 (2010/63/EU) and Polish legislation concerning animal experimentation.
Drugs
1-[(2-Chloro-6-methylphenoxy)ethoxyethyl]-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine hydrochloride (HBK-15) was synthesized in the Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Chair of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College [12]. The studied compound or diazepam (Sigma, Germany) was dissolved in saline and administered intraperitoneally (ip) in a 1 ml/kg volume. Control groups received saline. The doses of the studied compound for experiments were based on the earlier studies [16].
In Vitro Experiments
Binding Assays
Binding studies were performed commercially in Eurofins Laboratories using testing procedures described elsewhere: melatonin 1 [17] and 2 [18], adenosine 1 [19], 2A [20], 2B [21] and 3 [22], neuropeptide Y 1 [23] and 2 [24], N neuronal α4β2 [25], N neuronal α7 [26], orexin 1 [27] and 2 [28], histamine 1 [29], 2 [30] and 3 [31], muscarinic 1 [32], 2 [32], and 3 receptors [33], and GABA transporter [34]. The results are presented as the inhibition of control-specific binding in the presence of HBK-15.
In Vivo Experiments
Vogel Test
The testing procedure was based on a method of Vogel et al. [35] and used the Anxiety Monitoring System “Vogel test” produced by TSE Systems (Germany). It consisted of polycarbonate cages (dimensions 26.5 × 15 × 42 cm), equipped with a grid floor made from stainless steel bars and drinking bottles containing tap water. Experimental chambers were connected to PC software by control chassis and electric shocks generator. On the first day of the experiment, the rats were adapted to the test chambers and drank water from the bottle spout for 10 min. Afterward, the rats were returned to their home cages and were given 30 min free access to water, followed by a 24-h water deprivation period. The adaptation session and water deprivation protocols were repeated on the second day of the experiment. On the third day, the rats were placed again in the test chambers 30 min after HBK-15 or saline administration and given free access to the drinking tube. Recording data started immediately after the first lick, and rats were punished with an electric shock (0.5 mA, lasting 1 s) delivered to the metal drinking tube every 20 licks. The number of licks and the number of shocks received during a 5-min experimental session were recorded automatically. The Vogel conflict drinking test was employed as a “conditional” model where a noxious stimulus is applied.
Hot Plate and Free-Drinking Tests
To exclude possible drug-induced changes in shock sensitivity or an increasing influence on thirst drive, which can lead to false positive results in the Vogel conflict drinking test, stimulus threshold, and water consumption during a free-drinking session were determined in separate groups of rats. In either of those two studies, the rats were manipulated similarly to the Vogel conflict drinking test, including two 24-h water deprivation periods separated by 10-min adaptation session in experimental cages and 30-min of water availability in their home cages. In the free-drinking test, each animal was allowed to drink from the drinking bottle freely and the amount of water (g) consumed during 5 min was recorded for each rat. The pain threshold was evaluated using a hot plate test (Commat Ltd, Turkey) in rats. The plate was enclosed with a transparent Plexiglass cylinder (35 cm high) to keep the animal on the heated surface of the plate. The latency to pain reaction (lick a hind paw or jum**) when the rat was placed on a hot plate (52.5 ± 0.5 °C, 19-cm diameter) was measured. The rat was removed from the plate immediately upon visible pain reaction or if no response occurred within 30 s.
Statistical Analysis
The number of animals in groups was based on our previous experiments [16]. Results are presented as means ± SD. Comparisons between experimental and control groups were performed by unpaired t-test or one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s post hoc. p < 0.05 was considered significant. All data were statistically evaluated with Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA).
Results
HBK-15 Showed No Significant Affinity for the Selected Biological Targets
We investigated the affinity of HBK-15 for not yet tested selected receptors/transporters crucial for anxiolytic effect. The radioligand binding studies revealed that HBK-15 did not bind to any of the selected biological targets, i.e., melatonin 1 and 2, adenosine 1, 2A, 2B and 3, neuropeptide Y1 and 2, N neuronal α4β2, N neuronal α7, orexin 1 and 2, histamine 1, 2 and 3, muscarinic 1, 2 and 3 receptors, or GABA transporter (Table 1).
HBK-15 Demonstrated an Anxiolytic-Like Effect in the Vogel Conflict Test
HBK-15 administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg increased the number of accepted shocks by 51.8% (F(3,27) = 3.5223, p < 0.05) and the number of licks by 46.8% (F(3,27) = 3.1472, p < 0.05) in the Vogel conflict test (Fig. 1).
Diazepam, used as a reference drug, administered at doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg (but not 2.5 mg/kg), produced an anti-conflict effect; it increased the number of accepted shocks by 160% and 143%, respectively (F(3,32) = 10.764, p < 0.0001) and the number of licks by 162% and 159%, respectively (F(3,32) = 11.466, p < 0.0001) in rats (Fig. 1).
HBK-15 Did Not Affect the Animals’ Pain Reaction or Water Consumption
Neither HBK-15 at dose of 5 mg/kg nor diazepam at the doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg affected the pain reaction time in the hot plate test in rats (t(11) = 0.3144, ns and F(2,20) = 1.409, ns, respectively; Table 2). Similarly, none of the compounds changed the amount of liquid consumed by water-deprived rats during a 5-min session (t(10) = 0.07615, ns and F(2,22) = 0.239, ns, respectively; Table 2).
Discussion
We found that HBK-15 showed an anxiolytic-like effect in the Vogel’s test in rats. The lowest effective dose in this test was the same as for diazepam, an anxiolytic drug. The compound did not bind to the selected biological targets, suggesting that its effects might be mediated via other receptors/transporters, such as the 5-HT1A, or 5-HT7 receptors.
Many receptors and transporters play a role in anxiety [36,37,38,39]. Most drugs in the clinic target the GABAergic system, but research has shown that not only GABA receptors are involved in the pathomechanisms of anxiety. Scientists indicated an important role of serotonin, dopamine, adenosine, or nicotinic preceptors [36,37,38,39]. Our previous experiments showed that HBK-15 has a high affinity for serotonin 5-HT1A and moderate for 5-HT7, dopamine D2, or α1-adrenoceptors [14,15,16, 40]. Knowing that HBK-15 targets several receptors, as the first step, we investigated whether the compound influences other biological targets, which could be important for anxiolytic effects, i.e., melatonin 1 and 2 receptors, adenosine 1, 2A, 2B, and 3 receptors, neuropeptide Y 1 and 2 receptors, N neuronal α4β2 and N neuronal α7 receptors, orexin 1 and 2 receptors, histamine 1, 2 and 3 receptors, muscarinic 1, 2, and 3 receptors, and GABA transporter. The radioligand binding studies showed that HBK-15 did not bind significantly with either of the studied biological targets. In our previous studies, HBK-15 showed a high affinity for the 5-HT1A receptor (pKi = 9 [12], and moderate for serotonin 5-HT7 (pKi = 7,47 [12]), dopamine D2 (pKi = 7,27 [13]), and α1-adrenoceptors (pKi = 7,89 [14]). The compound also showed antagonistic properties at the 5-HT3 receptor in the bifunctional assay (pKB = 7361 [15]). However, its affinity for the 5-HT3 receptor is yet to be tested. Moreover, HBK-15 did not show a significant affinity for GABAA receptor [40]. Thus, the observed pharmacological effect of the compound is most likely due to the interaction with either the above receptors or other not-yet-tested biological targets.
Interestingly, HBK-15 showed no significant affinity for histamine or muscarinic receptors, which agrees with our previous biofunctional studies [41, 42]. Affinity for histamine or muscarinic receptors is an undesirable feature of central-acting compounds, as interaction with these receptors may cause side effects such as weight gain, sedation, tachycardia, blurred vision, and others [43, 44]. Thus, the obtained results encourage further studies on HBK-15.
As the next step, we investigated the potential anxiolytic properties of HBK-15 using a punishment-induced conflict test in rats, i.e., the Vogel conflict test. The test predicts drugs that can effectively treat generalized anxiety disorders and acute anxiety states [45]. Vogel test is based on the approach-avoidance conflict generated in rodents between an appetitive drive: to drink water after a period of water deprivation and the fear of doing so as water consumption is punished by electric shocks delivered either to the animal’s paws or tongue [46]. HBK-15 showed an anxiolytic-like effect in the Vogel conflict test. Since the compound did not affect pain threshold or water consumption, the observed effect is specific to the anxiolytic-like effect.
Interestingly, we observed an inverted U-shaped effect for HBK-15 (only 5 mg/kg dose was effective). This common effect is observed in neuropharmacology and is not fully understood [47,48,49,50]. However, in the case of HBK-15, it might be related to its effect on several receptors, i.e., depending on the dose, we observe a different level of activation of receptors that HBK-15 targets. On the other hand, at higher doses, the sedative effect of HBK-15 [12] might mask the anxiolytic-like effect. Nevertheless, explaining this issue requires further studies.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that HBK-15 showed an anxiolytic-like effect at the same dose as diazepam, a drug with proven anxiolytic properties. However, in contrast with HBK-15, diazepam showed its anxiolytic properties also at a two-fold higher dose (10 mg/kg). The obtained results agree with our previous experiments showing that anxiolytic-like properties of HBK-15 in rats in the ethological conflict test – the elevated plus maze or animal models of depression in mice [13, 15, 16]. Together these findings strongly suggest that compounds with a receptor profile like HBK-15 might have potential in the treatment of anxiety disorders.
The study has some limitations. First, we assessed the pharmacological effects using the Vogel test in rats only after a single administration. In generalized anxiety, anxiolytics should be taken daily; thus, investigating the effects of HBK-15 after chronic administration is necessary. Next, in future studies, we should test which receptors targeted by HBK-15 are predominantly engaged in the anxiolytic-like effect of the compound. Such information would make it possible to target the synthesis of new, more effective compounds with anxiolytic properties and potential use in the treatment of generalized anxiety.
Conclusion
Our study suggests that multimodal compounds with a receptor profile like HBK-15, i.e., targeting 5-HT1A and, to a lesser extent, 5-HT7 and D2 receptors, could be attractive therapeutic option for patients with generalized anxiety disorder. However, more studies are required to determine the exact mechanism of action of HBK-15 and its safety profile.
References
Mental health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/mental-health#tab=tab_2. Accessed 18 Aug 2022
Henderson G (2015) Addressing the public’s mental health. J Public Health (Oxf) 37:370–372
Meuret AE, Tunnell N, Roque A (2020) Anxiety disorders and medical comorbidity: treatment implications. Adv Exp Med Biol 1191:237–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9705-0_15
Plaisier I, de Graaf R, de Bruijn J et al (2012) Depressive and anxiety disorders on-the-job: the importance of job characteristics for good work functioning in persons with depressive and anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Res 200:382–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.016
COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide. https://www.who.int/news/item/02-03-2022-covid-19-pandemic-triggers-25-increase-in-prevalence-of-anxiety-and-depression-worldwide. Accessed 18 Aug 2022
Hossain MM, Tasnim S, Sultana A et al (2020) Epidemiology of mental health problems in COVID-19: a review. F1000Research 9:1–16
Ammar G, Naja WJ, Pelissolo A (2015) Treatment-resistant anxiety disorders: a literature review of drug therapy strategies. Encephale 41:260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2013.11.002
Garakani A, Murrough JW, Freire RC et al (2020) Pharmacotherapy of anxiety disorders: current and emerging treatment options. Front Psychiatry 11:595584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.595584
Thibaut F (2017) Anxiety disorders: a review of current literature. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 19:87–88. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2017.19.2/fthibaut
He H, **ang Y, Gao F et al (2019) Comparative efficacy and acceptability of first-line drugs for the acute treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res 118:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.08.009
Chessick CA, Allen MH, Thase M et al (2006) Azapirones for generalized anxiety disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD00611. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006115
Waszkielewicz AM, Pytka K, Rapacz A et al (2014) Synthesis and evaluation of antidepressant-like activity of some 4-substituted 1-(2-methoxyphenyl) piperazine derivatives. Chem Biol Drug Des 85:326–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12394
Pytka K, Głuch-Lutwin M, Kotańska M et al (2017) HBK-15 protects mice from stress-induced behavioral disturbances and changes in corticosterone, BDNF, and NGF levels. Behav Brain Res 333:54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.06.032
Pytka K, Lustyk K, Żmudzka E et al (2016) Chemically homogenous compounds with antagonistic properties at all α1-adrenoceptor subtypes but not β1-adrenoceptor attenuate adrenaline-induced arrhythmia in rats. Front Pharmacol 7:229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00229
Pytka K, Głuch-Lutwin M, Kotańska M et al (2018) Single administration of HBK-15—a triple 5-HT1A, 5-HT7, and 5-HT3 receptor antagonist—reverses depressive-like behaviors in mouse model of depression induced by corticosterone. Mol Neurobiol 55:3931–3945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0605-4
Pytka K, Partyka A, Jastrzębska-Więsek M et al (2015) Antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like effects of new dual 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 antagonists in animal models. PLoS ONE 10:e0142499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142499
Witt-Enderby PA, Dubocovich ML (1996) Characterization and regulation of the human ML1A melatonin receptor stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Pharmacol 50(1):166–174
Beresford IJM, Browning C, Starkey SJ et al (1998) GR196429: a nonindolic agonist at high-affinity melatonin receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 285:1239–1245
Townsend-Nicholson A, Schofield PR (1994) A threonine residue in the seventh transmembrane domain of the human A1 adenosine receptor mediates specific agonist binding. J Biol Chem 269:2373–2376
Luthin DR, Olsson RA, Thompson RD et al (1995) Characterization of two affinity states of adenosine A2a receptors with a new radioligand, 2-[2-(4-amino-3-[125I]iodophenyl)ethylamino]adenosine. Mol Pharmacol 47:307–313
Stehle JH, Rivkees SA, Lee JJ et al (1992) Molecular cloning and expression of the cDNA for a novel A2-adenosine receptor subtype. Mol Endocrinol 6:384–393. https://doi.org/10.1210/mend.6.3.1584214
Salvatore CA, Jacobson MA, Taylort HE et al (1993) Molecular cloning and characterization of the human A3 adenosine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10365–10369
Wieland HA, Willim KD, Entzeroth M et al (1995) Subtype selectivity and antagonistic profile of the nonpeptide Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP 3226. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 275:143–149
Fuhlendorff J, Gether U, Aakerlund L et al (1990) [Leu31, Pro34]neuropeptide Y: a specific Y1 receptor agonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:182–186. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.1.182
Gopalakrishnan M, Monteggia LM, Anderson DJ et al (1996) Stable expression, pharmacologic properties and regulation of the human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine alpha 4 beta 2 receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 276:289–297
Sharples CGV, Kaiser S, Soliakov L et al (2000) UB-165: a novel nicotinic agonist with subtype selectivity implicates the α4β2* subtype in the modulation of dopamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes. J Neurosci 20:2783–2791. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02783.2000
Langmead CJ, Jerman JC, Brough SJ et al (2004) Characterisation of the binding of [3H]-SB-674042, a novel nonpeptide antagonist, to the human orexin-1 receptor. Br J Pharmacol 141:340–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705610
Wieland HA, Söll RM, Doods HN et al (2002) The SK-N-MC cell line expresses an orexin binding site different from recombinant orexin 1-type receptor. Eur J Biochem 269:1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.0014-2956.2001.02739.X
Smit MJ, Timmerman H, Hijzelendoorn JC et al (1996) Regulation of the human histamine H1 receptor stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Br J Pharmacol 117:1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb16699.x
Leurs R, Smit MJ, Menge WM, Timmerman H (1994) Pharmacological characterization of the human histamine H2 receptor stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Br J Pharmacol 112:847–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb13157.x
Lovenberg TW, Roland BL, Wilson SJ et al (1999) Cloning and functional expression of the human histamine H3 receptor. Mol Pharmacol 55:1101–1107
Dörje F, Wess J, Lambrecht G et al (1991) Antagonist binding profiles of five cloned human muscarinic receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 256:727–733
Peralta EG, Ashkenazi A, Winslow JW et al (1987) Distinct primary structures, ligand-binding properties and tissue-specific expression of four human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. EMBO J 6:3923–3929
Shank RP, Baldy WJ, Mattucci LC, Villani FJJ (1990) Ion and temperature effects on the binding of gamma-aminobutyrate to its receptors and the high-affinity transport system. J Neurochem 54:2007–2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb04905.x
Vogel JR, Beer B, Clody DE (1971) A simple and reliable conflict procedure for testing anti-anxiety agents. Psychopharmacologia 21:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403989
Zarrindast M-R, Khakpai F (2015) The modulatory role of dopamine in anxiety-like behavior. Arch Iran Med 18:591–603
Picciotto MR, Lewis AS, van Schalkwyk GI, Mineur YS (2015) Mood and anxiety regulation by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: a potential pathway to modulate aggression and related behavioral states. Neuropharmacology 96:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.12.028
van Calker D, Biber K, Domschke K, Serchov T (2019) The role of adenosine receptors in mood and anxiety disorders. J Neurochem 151:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14841
Żmudzka E, Sałaciak K, Sapa J, Pytka K (2018) Serotonin receptors in depression and anxiety: insights from animal studies. Life Sci 210:106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.08.050
Pytka K, Socała K, Rapacz A et al (2017) HBK-14 and HBK-15, triple 5-HT1A, 5-HT7 and 5-HT3 antagonists with potent antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like properties, increase seizure threshold in various seizure tests in mice. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmaco Biol Psychiatry 79:378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.07.013
Pytka K, Głuch-Lutwin M, Knutelska J et al (2016) HBK-14 and HBK-15 do not influence blood pressure, lipid profile, glucose level, or liver enzymes activity after chronic treatment in rats. PLoS ONE 11:e0165495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165495
Pytka K, Gawlik K, Pawlica-Gosiewska D et al (2017) HBK-14 and HBK-15 with antidepressant-like and/or memory-enhancing properties increase serotonin levels in the hippocampus after chronic treatment in mice. Metab Brain Dis 32:547–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-016-9932-9
Criado PR, Fachini R, Criado J et al (2010) Histamine, histamine receptors and antihistamines: new concepts. An Bras Dermatol 85:195–210
Naji A, Gatling J (2021) Muscarinic antagonists—StatPearls—NCBI Bookshelf. In: StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557541/. Accessed 18 Aug 2022
Witkin JM (2011) A vogel conflict test using food reinforcement in mice. Neuromethods 63:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-313-4_10
Lovick TA, Zangrossi H (2021) Effect of estrous cycle on behavior of females in rodent tests of anxiety. Front Psychiatry 12:1492. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYT.2021.711065/BIBTEX
Linares IM, Zuardi AW, Pereira LC et al (2019) Cannabidiol presents an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve in a simulated public speaking test. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 41:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2017-0015
Zuardi AW, Rodrigues NP, Silva AL et al (2017) Inverted U-shaped dose-response curve of the anxiolytic effect of cannabidiol during public speaking in real life. Front Pharmacol 8:259. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHAR.2017.00259/BIBTEX
Salehi B, Cordero MI, Sandi C (2010) Learning under stress: the inverted-U-shape function revisited. Learn Mem 17:522–530. https://doi.org/10.1101/LM.1914110
Baldi E, Bucherelli C (2005) The inverted “U-Shaped” dose-effect relationships in learning and memory: modulation of arousal and consolidation. Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med. https://doi.org/10.2201/nonlin.003.01.002
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Science Centre, Poland (Grant Number 2019/34/E/NZ7/00454).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KP and AW contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by KL, KS, MJ, MJ-W, AP, HM and KP. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KL, KS and KP and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lustyk, K., Sałaciak, K., Jakubczyk, M. et al. HBK-15, a Multimodal Compound, Showed an Anxiolytic-Like Effect in Rats. Neurochem Res 48, 839–845 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-022-03802-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-022-03802-x