Abstract
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is the leading education reform worldwide, yet many teachers need more knowledge and confidence to teach integrated STEM. This study examines the initiative of teaching a STEM-integrated approach through the collaboration of mathematics and science university lecturers and preservice teachers in a teaching and learning subject-specific course. The study presents the preservice teachers’ knowledge development about integrating STEM into their lesson plans and their views and attitudes toward the STEM approach to teaching. Data were collected through presurveys, postsurveys, lesson plans, and presentations from 12 groups (N = 51) of preservice mathematics and chemistry teachers. Results show that these preservice teachers’ experiences with STEM learning and teaching positively impacted their understanding and importance of STEM and their motivation and enthusiasm to design and present STEM lesson plans in group settings while integrating mathematics, chemistry, and other subjects. However, the findings of this research showed that these preservice teachers needed more knowledge regarding the inclusion of formative assessment strategies in their lesson plans. Thus, more research is required to understand better how to support preservice and in-service teachers’ formative assessment practices in the context of STEM education. In summary, the finding suggests policymakers and educational institutions should advocate for additional high-quality integrated STEM courses, programs, and research to enhance and institutionalize teaching and learning of integrated STEM and, as a result, increase the number of individuals working in STEM professions while promoting a consistent vision of integrated STEM education across the school system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- STEM:
-
Science, technology, engineering, and math
References
Bartels, S. L., Rupe, K. M., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Sha** pre-service teachers’ understandings of STEM: A collaborative math and science methods approach. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1602803
Berisha, F., & Vula, E. (2021). Develo** pre-service teachers conceptualization of STEM and STEM pedagogical practices. Frontiers in Education, 6, 585075. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.585075
Berisha, F., Vula, E., Gisewhite, R., & McDuffie, H. (2023). The effectiveness and challenges implementing a formative assessment professional development program. Teacher Development, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2210533
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Brown, R. E., & Bogiages, C. A. (2019). Professional development through STEM integration: How early career math and science teachers respond to experiencing integrated STEM tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9863-x
Brown, J. C., & Livstrom, I. C. (2020). Secondary science teachers’ pedagogical design capacities for multicultural curriculum design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(8), 821–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1756588
Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrel & E. H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20–46). American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.650215
Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17(2), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017002005
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (4th ed.). Pearson.
Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1701–1720. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1638531
Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st-century skills, and STEM careers within science teachers’ conceptions of integrated STEM education. Education Sciences, 11(11), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737
Drost, B. R., & Levine, A. C. (2015). An analysis of strategies for teaching standards-based lesson plan alignment to pre-service teachers. Journal of Education, 195(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741519500206
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(Suppl. 1), S5–S24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
Gardner, M., & Tillotson, J. W. (2019). Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogical innovation within a public middle school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1283–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9927-6
Gilmore, M. W. (2013). Improvement of STEM education: Experiential learning is the key [Editorial]. Modern Chemistry & Applications, 1(3), Article 1000e109. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6798.1000e109
Granger, M., Harrison, C., & Dolin, J. (2021). Exploring assessment in STEM inquiry learning classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1903617
Hargreaves, A., & Moore, S. (2000). Curriculum integration and classroom relevance: A study of teachers’ practice. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(2), 89–112.
Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science Education, 92(6), 1096–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20277
Johnston, J., Walshe, G., & Ríordáin, M. N. (2020). Supporting key aspects of practice in making mathematics explicit in science lessons. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1399–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10016-1
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kim, D., & Bolger, M. (2017). Analysis of Korean elementary pre-service teachers’ changing attitudes about integrated STEAM pedagogy through develo** lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9709-3
Kippers, W. B., Wolterinck, C. H., Schildkamp, K., & Poortman, C. L. (2018). Teachers’ views on the use of assessment for learning and data-based decision making in classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.015
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, art-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.
Lesseig, K., Slavit, D., & Nelson, T. H. (2017). Jum** on the STEM bandwagon: How middle grades students and teachers can benefit from STEM experiences. Middle School Journal, 48(3), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2017.1297663
Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9
Lowrie, T., Downes, N., & Leonard, S. (2017). STEM education for all young Australians: A bright spots learning hub foundation paper, for SVA, in partnership with Samsung. University of Canberra STEM Education Research Centre.
Maiorca, C., & Mohr-Schroeder, M. J. (2020). Elementary preservice teachers’ integration of engineering into STEM lesson plans. School Science and Mathematics, 120(7), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12433
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Nathan, M. J., Srisurichan, R., Walkington, C., Wolfgram, M., Williams, C., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Building cohesion across representations: A mechanism for STEM integration. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 77–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20000
National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Nowikowski, S. H. (2016). Successful with STEM? A qualitative case study of pre-service teacher perceptions. The Qualitative Report, 22(9), 2312–2333. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2893
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Peterson, B., & Hipple, B. T. (2020). Formative assessment in hands-on STEM education. In C. Martin, D. Polly, & R. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of research on formative assessment in pre-K through elementary classrooms (pp. 165–193). IGI Global.
Popa, R. A., & Ciascai, L. (2017). Students’ attitude towards STEM education. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(4), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.10.4.6
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating pre-service STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5
Rinke, C. R., Gladstone-Brown, W., Kinlaw, C. R., & Cappiello, J. (2016). Characterizing STEM teacher education: Affordances and constraints of explicit STEM preparation for elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12185
Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H. H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2019). Perspective teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 69(4), 20–26.
Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Gillet, D., Pelliccione, L., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using educational data from teaching and learning to inform teachers’ reflective educational design in inquiry-based STEM education. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.014
Shaughnessy, J. M. (2013). Mathematics in a STEM context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324–324. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.6.0324
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
Sias, C. M., Nadelson, L. S., Juth, S. M., & Seifert, A. L. (2016). The best-laid plans: Educational innovation in elementary teacher generated integrated STEM lesson plans. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1253539
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The influence of teachers’ attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.014
Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002
Vasquez, J. A., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann.
Vasquez, J. A. (2015). STEM--Beyond the acronym. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 10–15. Retrieved from https://d41super.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/stem-beyond-the-acronym.pdf
Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. R. (2017). Secondary science teachers as curriculum makers: Map** and designing Scotland’s new Curriculum for Excellence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(3), 324–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21346
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
Wilson, K. (2021). Exploring the challenges and enablers of implementing a STEM project-based learning program in a diverse junior secondary context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8
Yildiz, E. P., Alkan, A., & Cengel, M. (2019). Teacher candidate’s attitudes towards the stem and sub-dimensions of the stem. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(2), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v14i2.4144
Acknowledgements
Parts of the findings from this manuscript were presented at the 14th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Shanghai, China, 11th–18th July 2021 by both authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all parts of the study and the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Hereby, Fatlume Berisha and I, Eda Vula, consciously assure that for the manuscript “Introduction of Integrated STEM Education to Pre-service Teachers Through Collaborative Action Research Practices,” the following is fulfilled:
-
The manuscript has not been submitted to any other journal for simultaneous consideration
-
The submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere. Parts of the findings from this manuscript were presented at the 14th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Shanghai, China, July 11–18, 2021
-
A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and is not submitted to various journals or to one journal over time
-
Results are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation
-
No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own
We agree with the above statements and declare that this submission follows the policies of the International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education as outlined in the Submission Guidelines, Instructions for Authors, and Ethical Responsibilities of Authors.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Berisha, F., Vula, E. Introduction of Integrated STEM Education to Pre-service Teachers Through Collaborative Action Research Practices. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 22, 1127–1150 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10417-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10417-3