Abstract
Surrounding the national emphasis on improving STEM education, effective STEM educators are required. Connected, yet often overlooked, is the need for effective preservice STEM teaching instruction for incoming educators. At a basic level, preservice STEM teacher education should include STEM content, pedagogy, and conceptualization. However, the literature suggests no leading conception of STEM education, and little is known about how preservice STEM teachers are conceptualizing STEM education. In order to explore preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education, preservice teachers at a large, Midwestern research university were given an open-ended survey eliciting both textual and visual responses. Here, we report and discuss the results of employing this instrument in relation with the current STEM conceptualization literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson TR, Schonborn KJ, du Plessis L, Gupthar AS, Hull TL (2013) Identifying and develo** students ability to reason with concepts and representations in biology. In: Multiple representations in biological education. Springer, Netherlands, pp 19–38
Babbie ER (1990) Survey research methods. Wadsworth Pub, Co Belmont
Bodnar G, Klobuchar M, Geelan D (2001) The many forms of constructivism. J Chem Educ 78(8):1107
Bodner GM, Orgill M (2007) Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education. Pearson Prentice Hall
Breiner JM, Harkness SS, Johnson CC, Koehler CM (2012) What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. Sch Sci Math 112(1):3–11
Buckley BC (2000) Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. Int J Sci Educ 22(9):895–935
Bybee R (2013) The case of STEM education: challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press, Arlington
Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, London
Cook MP (2006) Visual representations in science education: the influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Sci Educ 90(6):1073–1091
Fink A (1995) The survey handbook, vol 1. Thousand Oaks, CA
Fowler CW (1988) Population dynamics as related to rate of increase per generation. Evol Ecol 2(3):197–204
Hurtado S, Newman CB, Tran MC, Chang MJ (2010) Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: insights from a national project. New Dir Inst Res 2010(148):5–15
Johnson CC (2013) Conceptualizing integrated STEM education. Sch Sci Math 113(8):367–368
Kelly GA (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New York
Kim B (2001) Social constructivism. Emerg Perspect Learn Teach Technol 1(1):16
Koonce DA, Zhou J, Anderson CD, Hening DA, Conley VM (2011) What is STEM? Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/1/papers/289/view
Lynch SJ, Peters-Burton EE, Ford MR (2014) Building STEM opportunities for all. Educ Leadersh 72(4):54–60
Magnusson S, Krajcik J, Borko H (1999) Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In: Gess-Newsome J, Lederman NG (eds) Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–132
Mayer RE, Bove W, Bryman A, Mars R, Tapangco L (1996) When less is more: meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. J Educ Psychol 88(1):64
Merrill C (2009) The future of TE masters degrees: STEM. In: Presentation at the 70th annual international technology education association conference, Louisville, Kentucky
Moore TJ, Johnson CC, Peters-Burton EE, Guzey SS (2015) The need for a STEM road map. In: Johnson CC, Peters-Burton EE, Moore TJ (eds) STEM road map: a framework for integrated STEM education. Routledge, p 1
Morrison JA (1999) Investigating teachers’ understanding and diagnosis of students’ preconceptions in the secondary science classroom. Retrieved from Oregon State University Library. http://hdl.handle.net/1957/33374
Nadelson LS, Callahan J, Pyke P, Hay A, Dance M, Pfiester J (2013) Teacher STEM perception and preparation: inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. J Educ Res 106(2):157–168
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (2014) STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press, Washington
National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press, Washington
National Research Council (2013) Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: a nation advancing?. National Academies Press, Washington
O’Brien S, Karsnitz J, Sandt S, Bottomley L, Parry E (2014) Engineering in preservice teacher education. In: Purzer S, Strobel J, Cardella ME (eds) Engineering in pre-college settings: synthesizing research, policy, and practices. Purdue University Press, pp 277–300
Outlier Research & Evaluation. (2014). What do STEM schools do? 78 components of inclusive STEM high schools. Retrieved from http://outlier.uchicago.edu/s3/findings/infographic/
Peeck J (1993) Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learn Instr 3(3):227–238
Rodriguez AJ (2015) What about a dimension of engagement, equity, and diversity practices? A critique of the next generation science standards. J Res Sci Teach 52(7):1031–1051
Roth WM, Bowen GM, McGinn MK (1999) Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. J Res Sci Teach 36(9):977–1019
Sherin MG (2007) The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S (eds) Video research in the learning sciences. Routledge, New York
Skiba R, Rausch MK (2004) The relationship between achievement, discipline, and race: an analysis of factors predicting ISTEP scores. Children left behind policy briefs. Supplementary Analysis 2-D. Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University
Tobin K (1990) Social constructivist perspectives on the reform of science education. Aust Sci Teach J 36(4):29–35
Tsupros N, Kohler R, Hallinen J (2009) STEM education: a project to identify the missing components. Intermed Unit 1:1–35
Von Glasersfeld E (1995) Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. Studies in mathematics education series: 6. Falmer Press, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Preservice Teacher STEM Education Survey.
Below we provided the front and back pages (Figs. 3, 4) of the STEM survey we utilized during the course of this study, with all prompts and questions. Immediately below is the front page (Fig. 3).
Below is the back page of the STEM survey utilized during this study (Fig. 4).
Table 9 represents a breakdown by teacher experience and visualization type, showing percentages of visualization types by group as well as total participants.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radloff, J., Guzey, S. Investigating Preservice STEM Teacher Conceptions of STEM Education. J Sci Educ Technol 25, 759–774 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5