Abstract
This paper is part of a special section devoted to an interdisciplinary exploration of vulnerability, assessing the theoretical elaborations of the concept, its uses, its political significance, and methodological issues in studying it. By foregrounding feminist and phenomenological philosophical methods that center on lived experience, the paper elaborates a multidimensional theoretical framework for understanding vulnerability as a complex experience and concept. It advances a pluralist understanding of vulnerability, seeking to connect dimensions of the concept that may be fragmented and focusing on its relational nature. Such a non-dualist approach entails that the political and ethical conclusions that can be drawn about vulnerability are complex and thus require critical analysis, especially of how vulnerability becomes a matter of political rhetoric, rather than straightforward prescription. Finally, in light of its complexity and ambiguity, adequate and socially just theorizing about and application of the concept of vulnerability requires more thoroughgoing interdisciplinary collaboration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
What I term “anthropological” vulnerability is akin to what Fuchs (2013: 4) describes with the term “existential vulnerability,” which names the way these fundamental aspects of human existence are revealed to those who experience a kind of hypersensitivity to their significance.
References
Ahmad, A., Chung, R., Eckenwiler, L., Ganguli-Mitra, A., Hunt, M., Richards, R., Saghai, Y., Schwartz, L., Scully, J. L., & Wild, V. (2020). What does it mean to be made vulnerable in the era of COVID-19? The Lancet, April 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30979-X.
Benhabib, S. (1987). The generalized and the concrete other. In E. F. Kittay & D. T. Meyers (Eds.), Women and moral theory (pp. 154–177). Rowman and Littlefield.
Boublil, E. (2018). The ethics of vulnerability and the phenomenology of interdependency. The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 49(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2018.1434952.
Boublil, E. (2023). Vulnerability, interdependence and the care for the living. In E. Boublil & S. Ferrarello (Eds.), The vulnerability of the human world: Well-being, health, technology, and the environment (pp.143–159). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41824-2_10.
Boublil, E. (2024). A critical phenomenology of vulnerability: Toward a paradigm shift? A contribution to an interdisciplinary trialogue on vulnerability. Human Studies, (in this issue). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09736-3.
Braithwaite, P., & Graham, T. (2023). The toll of police violence on black people’s mental health. The New York Times, May 25. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/25/well/mind/black-mental-health-police-violence.html.
Brooks, C. P., Johnston, I., & Gilson, E. (2023). On being open in closed places: The avoidance of vulnerability as a contributor to violence in inpatient psychiatric settings. Under review.
Brown, K. (2011). ‘Vulnerability’: Handle with care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2011.597165
Brown, K. (2014). Questioning the vulnerability zeitgeist: Care and control practices with ‘vulnerable’ young people. Social Policy and Society, 13(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746413000535.
Brown, K. (2019). Vulnerability and child sexual exploitation: Towards an approach grounded in life experiences. Critical Social Policy, 39(4), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018318824480.
Brown, K. (2024). Vulnerability and social control at the margins: A contribution to an interdisciplinary trialogue on vulnerability. Human Studies, (in this issue). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09734-5
Brown, K., Ecclestone, K., & Emmel, N. (2017). The many faces of vulnerability. Social Policy and Society, 16(3), 497–510.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life. Verso.
Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war. Verso.
Butler, J. (2012). Precarious life, vulnerability, and the ethics of cohabitation. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 26(2), 134–151.
Butler, J., Sabsay, L., & Gabetti, Z. (2016). Vulnerability in resistance. Duke University Press.
Cole, A. (2016). All of us are vulnerable, but some are more vulnerable than others: The political ambiguity of vulnerability studies, an ambivalent critique. Critical Horizons, 17(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2016.1153896.
Dreir, H. (2023). Alone and exploited, migrant children work brutal Jobs across the U.S. The New York Times, February 25. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/25/us/unaccompanied-migrant-child-workers-exploitation.html.
Drichel, S. (2013). Introduction: Reframing vulnerability: so obviously the problem… SubStance. 42 (3), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2013.0030.
Ferrarese, E. (2016). The vulnerable and the political: On the seeming impossibility of thinking vulnerability and the political together and its consequences. Critical Horizons, 17(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2016.1153892.
Ferrarese, E. (2018). Vulnerability and critical theory. Brill.
Fineman, M. A. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 1–23.
Ford, A., De Togni, G., Erikainen, S., Filipe, A. M., Pickersgill, M., Sturdy, S., Swallow, J., & Young, I. (2023). How and why to use ‘vulnerability’: An interdisciplinary analysis of disease risk, indeterminacy and normality. Medical Humanities, 11. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012683.
Fuchs, T. (2013). Existential vulnerability: Toward a psychopathology of limit situations. Psychopathology, 46(5), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351838.
Gilson, E. (2011). Vulnerability, ignorance, and oppression. Hypatia, 26(2), 308–332.
Gilson, E. (2016). Vulnerability and victimization: Rethinking key concepts in feminist discourses on sexual violence. Signs, 42(1), 1–28.
Gilson, E. (2014). The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. Routledge.
Gilson, E. (2021a). Continental feminist ethics. In K. Q. Hall & Ásta (Eds.), Oxford handbook of feminist philosophy (pp. 261–272). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628925.001.0001
Gilson, E. (2021b). The problems and potentials of vulnerability. In V. Browne, J. Danely, & D. Rosenow (Eds.), Vulnerability and the politics of care: Transdisciplinary dialogues (pp. 85–107). Oxford University Press.
Held, V. (1998). Feminist reconceptualizations in ethics. In J. Kourany (Ed.), Philosophy in a feminist voice (pp. 92–115). Princeton University Press.
Langer, S. (1961). Why philosophy? Saturday Evening Post. May 13.
Lorey, I. (2015). State of insecurity: Government of the precarious. Verso.
Michel, N. (2016). Accounts of injury as misappropriations of race: Towards a critical black politics of vulnerability. Critical Horizons, 17(2), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2016.1153895.
Miller, S. C. (2017). Feminist ethics. In C. Hay (Ed.), Philosophy: Feminism (pp. 189–213). Macmillan.
Oliveiro, K. (2016). Vulnerability’s ambivalent political life: Trayvon Martin and the racialized and gendered politics of protection. Feminist Formations, 28(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2016.0013.
Oliveiro, K. (2018). Vulnerability politics: The uses and abuses of precarity in political debate. New York University.
Paper Title Toward a Pluralist Approach to Vulnerability: A Contribution to an Interdisciplinary Trialogue on Vulnerability.
Petherbridge, D. (2016). What’s critical about vulnerability? Rethinking interdependence, recognition, and power. Hypatia, 31(3), 589–604.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge.
Rogers, W., MacKenzie, C., & Dodds, S. (2012). Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 5(2), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.2979/intjfemappbio.5.2.11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/.
Sabsay, L. (2020). The political aesthetics of vulnerability and the feminist revolt. Critical Times, 3(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-8517711.
The Care Collective (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: A crisis of care. Verso Books Blog, March 26. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/4617-covid–19-pandemic-a-crisis-of-care.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gilson, E. Toward a Pluralist Approach to Vulnerability: A Contribution to an Interdisciplinary Trialogue on Vulnerability. Hum Stud (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09735-4
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09735-4