Abstract
As human strive towards a better future, it's become clear that the quality of the environment is one of the most critical factors. But how exactly does human consumption lifestyle impact the environment? That's where this study comes in. As a proxy for human consumption pressure on the environment, this study used the ecological footprint. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of clean and dirty energy consumption per capita and globalization on the ecological footprint using a panel quantile random− effect model across 90 countries during the period 1980–2020. The results indicate, Dirty energy consumption per capita (DEC) has a positive significant effect on ecological footprint. However, clean energy consumption per capita (CEC) has a positive but non− significant effect on the ecological footprint. In other words, the impact of pure energy consumption is much less than that of dirty energy consumption. For example, in the fifth decile, the estimated coefficient of CEC is 2.4, while the coefficient of DEC is 12.3. Globalization and economic growth also have positive effects on ecological footprint. In this regard, within the fifth decile, both the coefficients of globalization and economic growth stand at 0.003. Hence, promoting sustainable development with a focus on substituting clean energy with dirty ones is a viable policy approach to reduce the environmental burden caused by human consumption. Furthermore, by cutting back globalization and denouncing consumerism, we have the power to limit the growth of the Ecological Footprint.
Graphical abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset of ecological footprint generated during the current study are available in the [Data World] repository, [http://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/countryTrends?type=BCtot,EFCtot&cn=165]. The datasets of clean energy consumption & dirty energy consumption generated during the current study are available in the [Energy Information Administration] repository, [International—U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]. The dataset of Economic growth generated during the current study are available in the [World Bank] repository, [http://data.worldbank.org/indicator]. The dataset of globalization generated during the current study are available in the [KOF Globalization Index] repository, [KOF Globalisation Index – KOF Swiss Economic Institute | ETH Zurich]. The dataset of Human development generated during the current study are available in the [United Nationsa] repository, [http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human−development−index−hdi].
Notes
The list of countries is given in the appendix A.
References
Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., Mahmood, F., et al. (2019). Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 18565–18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356−019−05224−9
Alvarado, R., Tillaguango, B., Dagar, V., Ahmad, M., Işık, C., Méndez, P., & Toledo, E. (2021). Ecological footprint, economic complexity and natural resources rents in Latin America: Empirical evidence using quantile regressions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128585.
Ansari, Mohd Arshad, Haider, Salman, & Masood, Tariq. (2020). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Do renewable energy and globalization enhance ecological footprint: an analysis of top renewable energy countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356−020−10786−0
Awan, A. M., & Azam, M. (2022). Evaluating the impact of GDP per capita on environmental degradation for G− 20 economies: Does N− shaped environmental Kuznets curve exist? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 11103–11126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668−021−01899−8
Azam, M., Rehman, Z. U., & Ibrahim, Y. (2022a). Causal nexus in industrialization, urbanization, trade openness, and carbon emissions: Empirical evidence from OPEC economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 13990–14010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668−021−02019−2
Azam, M., Uddin, I., Khan, S., et al. (2022b). Are globalization, urbanization, and energy consumption cause carbon emissions in SAARC region? New evidence from CS− ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 87746–87763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356−022−21835−1
BP Global 2018. Energy outlook Available at: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business−sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy−economics/energy−outlook/bp−energy−outlook2018.pdf
Chowdhury, M. A. F., Shanto, P. A., Ahmed, A., & Rumana, R. H. (2020). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Does foreign direct investments impair the ecological footprint? New Evidence from the Panel Quantile Regression. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356−020−11518−0
Danish, S. T. A, Muhammad A. B, Nasir M & JianWu Z. (2019). Sustainable Cities and Society, Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capitaland biocapacity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516
Damette, O. and Delacote, P., (2012). On the economic factors of deforestation: what can we learn from quantile analysis?. Economic Modelling, 29(6), pp. 2427–2434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.015
Destek, M. A., & Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non− renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co− operation and development countries. Journal of cleaner production., 242, 118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537
Figge, L., Oebels, K., & Offermans, A. (2017). The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: An empirical analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668−016−9769−8
Global footprint network (2018). Available at: http://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/countryTrends?type=BCtot,EFCtot&cn=165.
Hassan, S. T., Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101516.
Hassan, S. T., Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). Sustainable cities and society linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516
Huwart, J., & Verdier, L. (2013). Economic Globalisation: Origins and consequences OECD Insights. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264111905−en
Işık, C., Ahmad, M., Ongan, S., et al. (2021). Convergence analysis of the ecological footprint: Theory and empirical evidence from the USMCA countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 32648–32659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356−021−12993−9
Ito, K. (2017). International Economics, CO2 emissions, renewable and non− renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from panel data for develo** countries. International Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2017.02.001
Jameson, F., & Miyoshi, M. (Eds.). (1998). The Cultures of Globalization. Duke University Press.
Jorgenson, A. K. (2003). Consumption and environmental degradation: A cross− national analysis of the ecological footprint. Social Problems., 50(3), 374–94. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.374
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression Quantiles Econometrica. Journal of the Econometric Society, 46, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643
Kassouri, Y., & Altıntaş, H. (2020). Environmental Management, Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: A trade-off? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110405
Koenker R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of multivariate analysis, 91(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006
KOF Globalization Index (2020). Globalization Index. Available at: KOF Globalisation Index – KOF Swiss Economic Institute | ETH Zurich
Lamarche, C. (2011). Measuring the incentives to learn in Colombia using new quantile regression approaches. Journal of Development Economics., 96(2), 278–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.10.003
Nathaniel, S., Anyanwu, O., & Shah, M. (2020). Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the middle east and north Africa region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356−020−08017−7
Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations Econometrica. Journal of the Econometric Society. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914288
Pata, U. K., Aydin, M., & Haouas, I (2020). Resource Policy, Are natural resources abundance and human development a solution for environmental pressure? Evidence from top ten countries with the largest ecological footprint. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101923
Pata, U. K., & Isik, C. (2021). Determinants of the load capacity factor in China: A novel dynamic ARDL approach for ecological footprint accounting. Resources Policy, 74, 102313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102313
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). Econometrics, general diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. SSRN Electronic Journal, 69, 1240.
Powell, J. L. (1984). Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression model. Journal of econometrics, 25(3), 303–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304−4076(84)90004−6
Rashid, A., Irum, A., Malik, I. A., Ashraf, A., Rongqiong, L., Liu, G., Ullah, H., Ali, M. U., & Yousaf, B. (2018). Cleaner production, ecological footprint of Rawalpindi; Pakistan’s first footprint analysis from urbanization perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 362–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.186
Salari, T. E., Roumiani, A., & Kazemzadeh, E. (2021). Globalization, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural production impacts on ecological footprint in emerging countries: using quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356−021−14204−x
Sharma, R., Sinha, A., & Kautish, P. (2020). Cleaner Production, Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from Eight Develo** Countries of Asia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867
Ulucak, R., & Khan, S. U. (2020). Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustainable Cities and Society., 54, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
United Nations (2021) United Nations Documentation & Data. Available at: HDR21–22_Statistical_Annex_HDI_Trends_Table.xlsx
Usman, M., & Makhdum, M. S. (2021). What abates ecological footprint in BRICS− T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non− renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development. Renewable Energy, 179, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.014
Usman, O., Akadiri, S. S., & Adeshola, I. (2020). Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: Implications for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 30681–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint reducing human impact on the earth (Vol. 9). New society publishers.
Westerlund, J. (2007). New Simple Tests for Panel Cointegration. Econometric Reviews, 24, 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
World wide fund for nature, (2016). Living planet: report 2016: Risk and resilience in a new era. https://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/living− planet− report− 2016
World Bank, (2018). World Bank Indicators. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator
Yao, Y., Ivanovski, K., Inekwe, J., & Smyth, R. (2019). Energy Economics Human capital and energy consumption: Evidence from OECD countries. Resources Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104534
Acknowledgements
The work is supported by the University of Tehran (UT), Economics Department, Faculty of Economics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author of this paper confirms that there are no conflicts of interest. The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shojaeenia, M.A. How globalization and type of energy consumption affects ecological footprint? An inter-continental panel quantile analysis. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04794-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04794-0