Log in

Does digital economy agglomeration promote green economy efficiency? A spatial spillover and spatial heterogeneity perspective

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The digital economy has been booming in China in recent years and is characterized by spatial agglomeration. However, there is little literature examining the impact of the digital economy from the perspective of agglomeration, especially in the field of environmental economics. This paper explores the spatial spillover effects and spatial heterogeneity of digital economy agglomeration (DIG) on green economic efficiency (GEE). Using provincial panel data of China from 2011 to 2020, this paper constructs a digital economy indicator system and calculates the degree of DIG. Using the static and dynamic spatial Durbin models and geographic and time-weighted regression (GTWR) method, the spatial effects of DIG on GEE and its mechanism were investigated. The results indicate that: (1) the indirect and total effects of DIG on GEE are significantly positive, both in the short and long term, but the direct effects are not significant. (2) DIG influences GEE through green technological innovation and industrial structure upgrading. (3) The effect of DIG on GEE is spatial heterogeneity. The minimum value of the coefficient of DIG is − 0.300 and the maximum value is 0.878. (4) DIG in developed and more foreign-invested provinces has a greater contribution to GEE. These findings provide a reference for the government to plan the layout of the digital economy and achieve high-quality green economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and materials supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. The data are from a white paper on the development of China’s digital economy (2022).

  2. Due to the limitation of space, the introduction of entropy TOPSIS method is omitted. Readers who need it may contact the corresponding author for a copy.

References

  • Ahmad, T., Madonski, R., Zhang, D., Huang, C., & Mujeeb, A. (2022). Data-driven probabilistic machine learning in sustainable smart energy/smart energy systems: Key developments, challenges, and future research opportunities in the context of smart grid paradigm. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 160, 112128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M. A., Hoque, M. R., & Alam, K. (2018). An empirical investigation of the relationship between e-government development and the digital economy: The case of Asian countries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(5), 1176–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado, R., Tillaguango, B., Dagar, V., Ahmad, M., Işık, C., Méndez, P., & Toledo, E. (2021). Ecological footprint, economic complexity and natural resources rents in Latin America: Empirical evidence using quantile regressions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M., & Harris, P. (2012). Living with collinearity in local regression models. Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences

  • Chauhan, S., Banerjee, R., & Dagar, V. (2023). Analysis of impulse buying behaviour of consumer during COVID-19: An empirical study. Millennial Asia, 14(2), 278–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Chen, X., & Song, M. (2021). Polycentric agglomeration, market integration and green economic efficiency. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Huang, L. (2021). Digital twins for information-sharing in remanufacturing supply chain: A review. Energy, 220, 119712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. H., Yi, J. H., Dai, S., & **ong, Y. (2019). Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China’s pilot low-carbon city initiative. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1158–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China's digital economy (2022). China academy of information and communication research. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202207/P020220729609949023295.pdf.

  • DeStefano, T., Kneller, R., & Timmis, J. (2022). The (fuzzy) digital divide: The effect of universal broadband on firm performance. Journal of Economic Geography. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbac006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, J., Liu, B., & Shao, X. (2022). Spatial effects of industrial synergistic agglomeration and regional green development efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 112, 106156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, W. J., & Li, M. J. (2020). Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: Micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 82, 106382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Matlab software for spatial panels. International Regional Science Review, 37(3), 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., Razzaq, A., Mohsin, M., & Irfan, M. (2022). Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China. Technology in Society, 68, 101844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2010). A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega, 38(5), 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guru, S., Verma, S., Baheti, P., & Dagar, V. (2023). Assessing the feasibility of hyperlocal delivery model as an effective distribution channel. Management Decision, 61(6), 1634–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, D., Ding, Y., Shi, Z., & He, Y. (2022). The impact of digital economy on total factor carbon productivity: the threshold effect of technology accumulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–16, 55691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Gai, Z., Yan, G., Wu, H., & Irfan, M. (2021). The spatial spillover effect and nonlinear relationship analysis between environmental decentralization, government corruption and air pollution: Evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 763, 144183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Wang, C., Yan, G., Irfan, M., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Identifying the nexus among environmental performance, digital finance, and green innovation: New evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 335, 117554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horoshko, O.-I., Horoshko, A., Bilyuga, S., & Horoshko, V. (2021). Theoretical and methodological bases of the study of the impact of digital economy on world policy in 21 century. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, B., Wu, B., & Barry, M. (2010). Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatio-temporal variation in house prices. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(3), 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, B., Zhang, L., & Wu, B. (2009). Spatiotemporal analysis of rural-urban land conversion. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(3), 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, T. (2022). Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference. China Industrial Economics, 5, 100–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Henderson, D. (2019). Broadband and uneven spatial development: The case of Cardiff city-region. Local Economy, 34(3), 228–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Chen, L., Chen, Y., & He, J. (2022). Digital economy, technological innovation, and green economic efficiency—Empirical evidence from 277 cities in China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(3), 616–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Chen, Y. (2021). Development of an SBM-ML model for the measurement of green total factor productivity: The case of pearl river delta urban agglomeration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145, 111131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2022). The dynamic impact of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence city-level empirical data in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, 131570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., Zhili, D. U., & Management, S. O. (2018). A study of China’s urban vehicle energy consumption and public transport efficiency. Economic Research Journal, 6, 142–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Dong, F. (2021). How technological innovation impacts urban green economy efficiency in emerging economies: A case study of 278 Chinese cities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169, 105534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Zhao, X., & Kong, F. (2023). The dynamic impact of digital economy on the green development of traditional manufacturing industry: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan, B., Zou, H., Chen, S., & Huang, J. (2021). The effect of industrial structure adjustment on China’s energy intensity: Evidence from linear and nonlinear analysis. Energy, 218, 119517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, K., Liu, Y., Chen, P.-F., & Zeng, M. (2022). Assessing the impact of digital economy on green development efficiency in the Yangtze river economic belt. Energy Economics, 112, 106127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, D., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development. Journal of Business Research, 145, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Q., Tariq, M., Mahmood, H., & Khan, Z. (2022). The nexus between digital economy and carbon dioxide emissions in China: The moderating role of investments in research and development. Technology in Society, 68, 101910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, B., Florin, N., Mohr, S., & Giurco, D. (2019). Using the waste Kuznet’s curve to explore regional variation in the decoupling of waste generation and socioeconomic indicators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 674–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V., & Marshall, R. J. (1984). Maximum likelihood estimation of models for residual covariance in spatial regression. Biometrika, 71(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, G., Natraj, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2014). Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over twenty-five years. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 60–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, J. D., & Hughes, B. B. (2012). ICTs: Do they contribute to increased carbon emissions? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 919–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulamba, K. C., & Tregenna, F. (2020). Spatially varying relationships between municipal operating expenditure and its determinants: The case of South Africa. Journal of Regional Science, 60(2), 396–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, K. B., Kalsie, A., & Shankar, R. (2021). Digital economy in a global perspective: Is there a digital divide? Transnational Corporations Review, 13(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noussan, M., & Tagliapietra, S. (2020). The effect of digitalization in the energy consumption of passenger transport: An analysis of future scenarios for Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., **e, T., Wang, Z., & Ma, L. (2022). Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity. Journal of Business Research, 139, 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunov, C., & Rollo, V. (2016). Has the internet fostered inclusive innovation in the develo** world? World Development, 78, 587–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, D., Li, R., Shen, C., & Wong, Z. (2022). Industrial agglomeration, urban characteristics, and economic growth quality: The case of knowledge-intensive business services. International Review of Economics and Finance, 81, 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Hao, Y., Xu, L., Wu, H., & Ba, N. (2021). Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China’s energy consumption? Energy Economics, 98, 105220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Li, L., Han, Y., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2022). The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1656–1678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuai, S., & Fan, Z. (2020). Modeling the role of environmental regulations in regional green economy efficiency of China: Empirical evidence from super efficiency DEA-Tobit model. Journal of Environmental Management, 261, 110227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Chen, L. (2023). Impacts of digital economy agglomeration on carbon emission: A two-tier stochastic frontier and spatial decomposition analysis of China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 95, 104624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Chen, L., & Li, Y. (2022). Digital economy and urban low-carbon sustainable development: The role of innovation factor mobility in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 48539–48557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Chen, Y., Ramsey, T. S., & Hewings, G. J. (2021). Will researching digital technology really empower green development? Technology in Society, 66, 101638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., & Sun, Y. (2023). Digital economy, servitization, and enterprise emission reduction—evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03659-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., & Cen, C. (2022). Does digital economy development promote innovation efficiency? A spatial econometric approach for Chinese regions. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2065980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., & Yang, W. (2022). Empirical test of the impact of the digital economy on China’s employment structure. Finance Research Letters, 49, 103047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurlod, J.-D., & Noailly, J. (2018). The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: An empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries. Energy Economics, 71, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **ao, K., Yu, B., Cheng, L., Li, F., & Fang, D. (2022). The effects of CCUS combined with renewable energy penetration under the carbon peak by an SD-CGE model: Evidence from China. Applied Energy, 321, 119396.

  • **n, Y., Song, H., Shen, Z., & Wang, J. (2023). Measurement of the integration level between the digital economy and industry and its impact on energy consumption. Energy Economics, 126, 106988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., Yang, C. Y., Huang, Z. H., & Failler, P. (2022). Interaction between digital economy and environmental pollution: New evidence from a spatial perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5074.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, Y., Tang, C., Wu, H., Liu, J., & Hao, Y. (2022). The emerging driving force of energy consumption in China: Does digital economy development matter? Energy Policy, 165, 112997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., Tang, M., Chao, X., & Li, P. (2023). How environmental regulation influences the green economy efficiency of resource-based cities: an empirical study from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03758-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q., Ma, H., Wang, Y., & Lin, L. (2022a). Research on the influence mechanism of the digital economy on regional sustainable development. Procedia Computer Science, 202, 178–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. F., Wang, H. R., Wang, C., & Yang, B. (2022b). Model-based temporal evolution and spatial equilibrium analysis of green development in China’s Yangtze river economic belt from 2009 to 2018. Ecological Indicators, 141, 109071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y., Ivanovski, K., Inekwe, J., & Smyth, R., (2020). Human capital and CO2 emissions in the long run. Energy Economics, 91, 104907.

  • Yao, X. L., Kou, D., Shao, S., Li, X. Y., Wang, W. X., & Zhang, C. T. (2018). Can urbanization process and carbon emission abatement be harmonious? New evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 71, 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Wang, J., & Xu, J. (2023). Assessing the role of digital economy agglomeration in energy conservation and emission reduction: Evidence from China. Energy, 284, 128667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, H., Feng, Y., Lee, C.-C., & Cen, Y. (2020). How does manufacturing agglomeration affect green economic efficiency? Energy Economics, 92, 104944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, S., Musibau, H. O., Genç, S. Y., Shaheen, R., Ameen, A., & Tan, Z. (2021). Digitalization of economy is the key factor behind fourth industrial revolution: How G7 countries are overcoming with the financing issues? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Lyu, Y., Li, Y., & Geng, Y. (2022a). Digital economy: An innovation driving factor for low-carbon development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, 106821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Wang, L. J., Ma, P. P., & Wang, W. W. (2022b). Urban-rural income gap and air pollution: A stumbling block or step** stone. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 94, 106758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., Kong, F., Choi, Y., & Zhou, P. (2014). The effect of size-control policy on unified energy and carbon efficiency for Chinese fossil fuel power plants. Energy Policy, 70, 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Liu, X., Wang, D., & Zhou, J. (2022c). Digital economy and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China’s city level. Energy Policy, 165, 112927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C. Y., Liu, Z. Q., & Yan, X. F. (2023). Does the digital economy increase green TFP in Cities? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q. Y., Li, X. C., Li, F., Wu, J., & Sun, J. S. (2021). Analyzing the sustainability of China’s industrial sectors: A data-driven approach with total energy consumption constraint. Ecological Indicators, 122, 107235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W., & Chen, J. (2022). The spatial analysis of digital economy and urban development: A case study in Hangzhou, China. Cities, 123, 103563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Liang, D. P., & Liu, T. S. (2020). Can China’s underdeveloped regions catch up with green economy? A convergence analysis from the perspective of environmental total factor productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Major Program of Hubei Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. HBSK2019ZD0035). The authors would like to thank the funded project for providing material for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JX, JW, BD and HY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JX and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiajun Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any authors.

Consent for publication

The corresponding authors had the consent of all co-authors before submitting the article for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 28 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, H., Wang, J., Xu, J. et al. Does digital economy agglomeration promote green economy efficiency? A spatial spillover and spatial heterogeneity perspective. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04197-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04197-7

Keywords

Navigation