Abstract
This article proposes a difference-in-differences empirical research framework that utilizes the Green Financial Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone (GFRIPZ) implemented in China in 2017 as an exogenous shock to identify the incentive and synergy effect of green finance (GF) on enterprise green innovation (GI). The results indicate that GF effectively stimulates enterprise GI and significantly influences the allocation of external and internal funds among industries. GF effectively stimulates GI in clean and non-polluting industries by increasing debt financing and productive investment. However, it has a punitive effect on debt financing of heavy-polluting industries, and the GI effect on heavy-polluting industries is insignificant, although it enhances R&D investment among industries. GF can produce a good synergistic effect with green policies, but the synergistic effect on non-green policies is not obvious. GF mainly promotes GI in non-state, big, and enterprises in areas with high marketization. Moreover, only the heavy pollution industry presents significant environmental performance.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10668-023-03803-y/MediaObjects/10668_2023_3803_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10668-023-03803-y/MediaObjects/10668_2023_3803_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10668-023-03803-y/MediaObjects/10668_2023_3803_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10668-023-03803-y/MediaObjects/10668_2023_3803_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
My manuscript has associated data in a data repository.
Notes
In 2019, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, announced the establishment of additional GFRIPZ. However, this article focuses on the first batch of GFRIPZ, and therefore, all the GFRIPZ referred to below refer to the eight cities in five provinces, excluding Lanzhou City, Gansu.
The data presented in Fig. 1 were manually compiled by the author using information released by the People’s Bank of China.
The placebo test is based on a two-way fixed effect of adding control variables to the full sample.
References
Ali, M., Puah, C. H., Ali, A., Raza, S. A., & Ayob, N. (2021). Green intellectual capital, green HRM and green social identity toward sustainable environment: A new integrated framework for islamic banks. International Journal of Manpower, 43(3), 614–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2020-0185
Anu., Singh, A. K., Raza, A. S., Nakonieczny, J., & Shahzad, U. (2023). Role of financial inclusion, green innovation, and energy efficiency for environmental performance? Evidence from developed and emerging economies in the lens of sustainable development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 64(1), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.12.008
Boekholt, P. (2010). The evolution of innovation paradigms and their influence on research, technological development and innovation policy instruments, in The theory and practice of innovation policy. Edward Elgar Publishing (pp. 334–359).
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
Boscia, V., Stefanelli, V., Coluccia, B., & De Leo, F. (2019). The role of finance in environmental protection: A report on regulators’ perspective. Risk Governance and Control Financial Markets & Institutions, 9(4), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv9i4p3
Bresciani, S., Rehman, S. U., Alam, G. M., Ashfaq, K., & Usman, M. (2022). Environmental MCS package, perceived environmental uncertainty and green performance: In green dynamic capabilities and investment in environmental management perspectives. Review of International Business and Strategy, 33(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-01-2022-0005
Caillaud, B., & Demange, G. (2017). Joint design of emission tax and trading systems. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 127(9), 163–201. https://doi.org/10.15609/annaeconstat2009.127.0163
Cheng, Z., Kai, Z., & Zhu, S. W. J. (2022). Does green finance regulation improve renewable energy utilization? Evidence from energy consumption efficiency. Renewable Energy, 208(6), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.083
Dong, Q. M., Wen, S., & Liu, X. (2020). Credit allocation, pollution, and sustainable growth: Theory and evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(12), 2793–2811. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1528869
Farooq, U., Ahmed, J., Tabash, M. I., Anagreh, S., & Subhani, B. H. (2021). Nexus between government green environmental concerns and enterprise real investment: Empirical evidence from selected Asian economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314(26), 128089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128089
Feng, X., Li, Y. Y., & Huang, B. (2023). Research on manufacturer’s investment strategy and green credit policy for new energy vehicles based on consumers’ preferences and technology adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191(6), 122476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122476
Flammer, C. (2020). Enterprise green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516.
Hu, G. Q., Wang, X. W., & Wang, Y. (2021). Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics, 98(6), 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134
Huang, H. Y., Mbanyele, W., Wang, F. R., Song, M., & Wang, Y. Z. (2022). Climbing the quality ladder of green innovation: Does green finance matter?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184(11), 122007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122007
Hu, J., & Zhang, H. (2023). Has green finance optimized the industrial structure in China? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(28), 32926–32941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24514-3
Kanamura, T. (2020). Are green bonds environmentally friendly and good performing assets? Energy Economics, 88(4), 104767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104767
Klassen, R. D., & Mclaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1199
Klier, T., & Linn, J. (2015). Using taxes to reduce carbon dioxide emissions rates of new passenger vehicles: Evidence from France, Germany, and Sweden. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(1), 212–242. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20120256
Kumar, B., Kumar, L., Kumar, A., Kumari, R., Tagar, U., & Sassanelli, C. (2023). Green finance in circular economy: A literature review. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03361-3
Li, L., Xu, F. Q. L. X., & Zheng, F. M. (2023). The impact of green credit on enterprises’ green investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79(3), 101995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101995
Li, R., & Chen, Y. W. (2022). The influence of a green credit policy on the transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting enterprises: A diversification perspective. Economic Analysis and Policy, 74(2), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.03.009
Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021). Another game in town: Spillover effects of ipos in China. Journal of enterprise Finance, 64(4), 101910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101910
Li, Z., Liao, H., Wang, G. K., & Huang, Z. H. (2018). Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187(20), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.066
Lin, Y., & Linn, J. (2019). Environmental regulation and product attributes: The case of european passenger vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 10(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/720903
Liu, C., & **ong, M. X. (2022). Green finance reform and enterprise innovation: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 48(5), 102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102993
Liu, S., & Wang, Y. K. (2022). Green innovation effect of pilot zones for green finance reform: Evidence of quasi natural experiment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186(1), 122079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122079
Liu, X. H., Wang, E. X., & Cai, D. T. (2019). Green credit policy, property rights and debt financing: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 29(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.014
Liu, X. M., & Zhang, Y. Q. (2023). Green finance, environmental technology progress bias and cleaner industrial structure. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03062-x
Liu, Y., **, B., & Wang, G. G. (2021). The impact of enterprise environmental responsibility on financial performance-based on chinese listed companiesEnviron. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7), 7840–7853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11069-4
Luo, S. M., & Zhou, G. Y. (2021). Does green credit improve the core competence of commercial banks? Based on quasi-natural experiments in China. Energy Economics, 100(8), 105335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105335
Mandell, S. (2008). Optimal mix of emissions taxes and cap-and-trade. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.12.004
Meo, M. S., & Karim, M. Z. A. (2021). The role of green finance in reducing CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 63(2), 2214–8450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.002
Nandy, M., & Lodh, S. (2012). Do banks value the eco-friendliness of enterprises in their enterprise lending decision? Some empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25(5), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.06.008
Peneder, M. (2008). The problem of private under-investment in innovation: A policy mind map. Technovation, 28(8), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.006
Pizer, W. A., & Popp, D. (2008). Endogenizing technological change: Matching empirical evidence to modeling needs. Energy Economics, 30(6), 2754–2770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.006
Porter, M., Ven, D., & Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Qi, Y., Zhang, S. J., & Chen, W. J. (2022). Tax incentives, environmental regulation and firms’ emission reduction strategies: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 117(1), 102750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102750
Shah, S. G. M., & Ivascu, L. (2023). Accentuating the moderating influence of green innovation, environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and innovation output between vigorous board and Romanian manufacturing firms’ performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03164-6
Shi, J. Y., Yu, C. H., Li, Y. X., & Wang, T. H. (2022). Does green financial policy affect debt-financing cost of heavy-polluting enterprises? An empirical evidence based on chinese pilot zones for green finance reform and innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179(6), 121678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121678
Su, T. Y., Meng, L., Wang, K., & Wu, J. C. (2023). The role of green credit in carbon neutrality: Evidence from the breakthrough technological innovation of renewable energy firms. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 101(4), 107135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107135
Su, Z. F., Guo, Q. Q., & Lee, H. T. (2022). Green finance policy and enterprise energy consumption intensity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics, 115(11), 106374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106374
Sun, X. Y., Zhang, A. L., & Zhu, M. Z. (2023). Impact of pilot zones for green finance reform and innovations on green technology innovations: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(28), 43901–43913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25371-4
Tan, X. J., **ao, Z. W., Liu, Y. H., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Wang, B. B., & Dong, H. M. (2022). The effect of green credit policy on energy efficiency: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183(10), 121924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121924
Tang, D. Y. J., & Zhang, Y. P. (2020). Do shareholders benefit from green bonds. Journal of enterprise Finance, 61(2), 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.001
Tang, X. M., Zhou, X. G., & Kholaif, M. M. N. H. K. (2023). Does green finance achieve its goal of promoting coordinated development of economy–environment? Using the pollutant emission efficiency as a proxy. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03129-9
Wan, Y. Y., Sheng, N., Wei, X. Y., Tan, M., & Liang, J. X. (2023). Effect of green finance reform and innovation pilot zone on improving environmental pollution: An empirical evidence from Chinese cities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(28), 75058–75077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27657-z
Wang, Y. L., Lei, X. D., Long, R. Y., & Zhao, J. J. (2020). Green credit, financial constraint, and capital investment: Evidence from China’s energy-intensive enterprises. Environmental Management, 66(2), 1059–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01346-w
Wang, Z. J., & Zhang, J. W. (2022). Nexus between enterprise environmental performance and enterprise environmental responsibility on innovation performance. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02546-6.
Wen, H. W., Lee, C. C., & Zhou, F. X. (2021). Green credit policy, credit allocation efficiency and upgrade of energy-intensive enterprises. Energy Economics, 94(2), 105099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105099
Xu, X. K., & Li, J. S. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt. Financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264(30), 121574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121574
Yahman, Y., & Setyagama, A. (2022). Government policy in regulating the environment for development of sustainable environment in Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02640-9
Yao, S. Y., Pan, Y. Y., Sensoy, A., Uddin, G. S., & Cheng, F. C. (2021). Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China. Energy Economics, 101(9), 105415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105415
Yu, C. H., Wu, X. Q., Zhang, D. Y., Chen, S., & Zhao, J. S. (2021). Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy, 153(6), 23.
Yu, Z., Cao, Y. L., & Liu, M. (2021). Does carbon emission trading policy affect bank loans of firms? Evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters, 29(18), 1709–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1959513
Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 98(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012
Zhang, D. Y., Zhang. Z, W., & Managi, S. (2019). A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters, 29(2), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003
Zhang, S. L., Wu, Z. H., Wang, Y., & Hao, Y. (2021). Fostering green development with green finance: An empirical study on the environmental effect of green credit policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 295(19), 113159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113159
Zhang, X. (2020). The institutional structuring of innovation policy coordination: Theory and evidence from East Asia. Society of Policy Sciences, 53(1), 101–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09364-0
Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Feng, C., & Chen, X. (2023). Do pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation promote energy savings? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 124(8), 106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106763
Acknowledgements
This work received support from the National Social Science Fund in China, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (Grant No. 21&ZD120 and Grant No. 202210408).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, J., Zheng, K. & Han, C. Green finance and enterprise green innovation: incentive effect and synergy perspective. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03803-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03803-y