Abstract
Approximately 65% of established non-indigenous species (NIS) identified in the Great Lakes–Saint Lawrence River basin (GLSLR) since 1959 were introduced by ballast water discharges from transoceanic vessels. While the rate of new detections has sharply declined, NIS already present may spread within the system—including upstream—through secondary invasions by domestic ballast water transferred mainly by ‘laker’ vessels. Canada has mandated that all vessels loading or unloading in waters under Canadian jurisdiction in the GLSLR will need to use ballast water management systems (BWMS) by 2030. Here we used simulations informed by empirical data to investigate the expected efficacy of BWMS in reducing zooplankton and phytoplankton introductions on a per-trip basis, and the corresponding probabilities of survival and establishment related to ballast water discharges within the GLSLR. We investigated three ballast water scenarios: no treatment, full treatment, and treatment by a partially-functioning BWMS (owing to malfunctions or challenging water quality). Fully-functioning BWMS reduced community pressure by > 99% and corresponding establishment risk of NIS by 38% and 66% relative to untreated ballast discharges for zooplankton and phytoplankton, respectively. Partial treatment (modelled as a 95% reduction in organism concentrations) resulted in 10–20% reduction in per-trip probability of NIS establishment; results indicate that trips with BWMS inoperability caused by highly turbid uptake conditions may be less risky than trips with BWMS inoperability due to plankton blooms. The implementation of BWMS is expected to reduce risk of secondary spread within the GLSLR system by ballast water, even if the BWMS are subject to periodic malfunction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
R code for simulations and analysis is available via the Zenodo Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7221898 (Bradie 2022).
References
Adebayo AA, Zhan A, Bailey SA, MacIsaac HJ (2014) Domestic ships as a potential pathway of nonindigenous species from the Saint Lawrence River to the Great lakes. Biol Invasions 16:793–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0537-5
Albert RJ, Lishman JM, Saxena JR (2013) Ballast water regulations and the move toward concentration-based numeric discharge limits. Ecol Appl 23:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0669.1
Allan JD, McIntyre PB, Smith SDP, Halpern BS, Boyer GL, Buchsbaum A, Burton GA Jr, Campbell LM, Chadderton WL, Ciborowski JJH, Doran PJ, Eder T, Infante DM, Johnson LB, Joseph CA, Marino AL, Prusevich A, Read JG, Rose JB, Rutherford ES, Sowa SP, Steinman AD (2013) Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:372–377. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213841110
Ardura A, Martinez JL, Zaiko A, Garcia-Vazquez E (2021) Poorer diversity but tougher species in old ballast water: biosecurity challenges explored from visual and molecular techniques. Mar Pollut Bull 168:112465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112465
Bailey SA, Nandakumar K, Duggan IC, Van Overdijk CD, Johengen TH, Reid DF, MacIsaac HJ (2005) In situ hatching of invertebrate diapausing eggs from ships’ ballast sediment. Divers Distrib 11:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00150.x
Bailey SA, Duggan IC, Nandakumar K, MacIsaac HJ (2007) Sediments in ships: biota as biological contaminants. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 10:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980701193870
Bailey SA, Deneau MG, Jean L, Wiley CJ, Leung B, MacIsaac HJ (2011a) Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions. Environ Sci Technol 45:2554–2561. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102655j
Bailey SA, Chan F, Ellis SM, Bronnenhuber JE, Bradie JN, Simard N (2011b) Risk assessment for ship-mediated introductions of aquatic nonindigenous species to the great lakes and freshwater St. Lawrence River. DFO Can Sci Advis Sec Res Doc 2011/104
Bailey SA, Brydges T, Casas-Monroy O, Kydd J, Linley RD, Rozon RM, Darling JA (2022) First evaluation of ballast water management systems on operational ships for minimizing introductions of nonindigenous zooplankton. Mar Pollut Bull 182: 113947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113947
Barry SC, Hayes KR, Hewitt CL, Behrens HL, Dragsund E, Bakke SM (2008) Ballast water risk assessment: principles, processes, and methods. ICES J Mar Sci 65:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn004
Benson AJ (2013) Chronological history of zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissenidae) in North America, 1988–2010. In: Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW (eds) Quagga and zebra mussel: biology, impacts, and control, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 9–32
Bilotta GS, Brazier RE (2008) Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Res 42:2849–2861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.03.018
Bradie JN (2022) johannabradie/BWMS_Bypass: JAE: managing risk ofnon-indigenous species establishment associated with ballast water dischargesfrom ships with bypassed or inoperable ballast water management systems (JAE_BWMS_Bypass). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7221899
Bradie JN, Bailey SA (2021) A decision support tool to prioritize ballast water compliance monitoring by ranking risk of non-indigenous species establishment. J Appl Ecol 58:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13822
Bradie JN, Leung B (2015) Pathway-level models to predict non‐indigenous species establishment using propagule pressure, environmental tolerance and trait data. J Appl Ecol 52:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12376
Bradie JN, Chivers C, Leung B (2013) Importing risk: quantifying the propagule pressure–establishment relationship at the pathway level. Divers Distrib 19:1020–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12081
Bradie JN, Drake DAR, Ogilvie D, Casas-Monroy O, Bailey SA (2021) Ballast water exchange plus treatment lowers species invasion rate in freshwater ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 55:82–89. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05238
Bradie J, Rolla M, Bailey SA, MacIsaac HJ (2022) Managing risk of non-indigenous species establishment associated with ballast water discharges from ships with bypassed or inoperable ballast water management systems. J Appl Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14321
Briski E, Wiley CJ, Bailey SA (2012a) Role of domestic ship** in the introduction or secondary spread of nonindigenous species: biological invasions within the Laurentian Great Lakes. J Appl Ecol 49:1124–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02186.x
Briski E, Ghabooli S, Bailey SA, MacIsaac HJ (2012b) Invasion risk posed by macroinvertebrates transported in ships’ ballast tanks. Biol Invasions 14:1843–1850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0194-0
Briski E, Bailey SA, Casas-Monroy O, DiBacco C, Kaczmarska I, Levings C, MacGillivary ML, McKindsey CW, Nasmith LE, Parenteau M (2012c) Relationship between propagule pressure and colonization pressure in invasion ecology: a test with ships’ ballast. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:2990–2997. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2671
Briski E, Linley RD, Adams J, Bailey SA (2014) Evaluating efficacy of a ballast water filtration system for reducing spread of aquatic species in freshwater ecosystems. Manag Biol Invasions 5:245–253. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2014.5.3.08
Canada Coast Guard (1989) Voluntary guidelines for the control of ballast water discharges from ships proceeding to the St. Lawrence River and Great Lakes. Government of Canada
Canada Gazette (2021) Ballast Water Regulations: SOR/2021-120, Canada Gazette, Part II, Volume 155, Number 13
Casas-Monroy O, Bailey S (2021) Do ballast water management systems reduce phytoplankton introductions to Canadian waters? Front Mar Sci 8: 691723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.691723
Casas-Monroy O, Linley RD, Adams JK, Chan FT, Drake DAR, Bailey SA (2014) National risk assessment for introduction of aquatic nonindigenous species to Canada by ballast water. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document 2013. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4845.9520
Casas-Monroy O, Linley RD, Adams JK, Chan FT, Drake DAR, Bailey SA (2015) Relative invasion risk for plankton across marine and freshwater systems: examining efficacy of proposed international ballast water discharge standards. PLoS ONE 10: 18267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118267
Cassey P, Delean S, Lockwood JL, Sadowski JS, Blackburn TM (2018) Dissecting the null model for biological invasions: a meta-analysis of the propagule pressure effect. PLoS Biol 16: e2005987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005987
Chan FT, Bailey SA, Wiley CJ, MacIsaac HJ (2013) Relative risk assessment for ballast-mediated invasions at Canadian Arctic ports. Biol Invasions 15:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0284-z
Chan FT, MacIsaac HJ, Bailey SA (2015) Relative importance of vessel hull fouling and ballast water as transport vectors of nonindigenous species to the Canadian Arctic. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72:1230–1242. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2014-0473
Chenery ES, Drake DAR, Mandrak NE (2020) Reducing uncertainty in species management: forecasting secondary spread with expert opinion and mechanistic models. Ecosphere 11(4):e03011. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3011
Clapp DF, Schneeberger PJ, Jude DJ, Madison G, Pistis C (2001) Monitoring round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) population expansion in eastern and northern Lake Michigan. J Great Lakes Res 27:335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(01)70649-1
Darling JA, Martinson j, Gong YG, Okum S, Pilgrim E, Lohan KMP, Carney KJ, Ruis GM (2018) Ballast water exchange and invasion risk posed by intracoastal vessel traffic: an evaluation using high throughput sequencing. Environ Sci Technol 52:9926–9936
David M, Gollasch S, Cabrini M, Perkovič M, Bošnjak D, Virgilio D (2007) Results from the first ballast water sampling study in the Mediterranean Sea—the Port of Koper study. Mar Pollut Bull 54:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.041
David M, Gollasch S, Elliott B, Wiley C (2015) Ballast water management under the ballast water management convention. In: David M, Gollasch S (eds) Global maritime transport and ballast water management. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 89–108
DFO (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) (2019) The risks of spreading aquatic invasive species to Canada by moving unmanaged ballast water from Canada to the U.S. within the Great Lakes region. DFO Can Sci Advis Sec Sci Resp 2019/030
Dong K, Wu W, Chen J, **ang J, ** X, Wu H (2023) A study on treatment efficacy of ballast water treatment system applying filtration + membrane separation + deoxygenation technology during shipboard testing. Mar Pollut Bull 188:114620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114620
DFO (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) (2020) Additional analyses of ballast water management scenarios to reduce the establishment of harmful aquatic species across Canada and the Great lakes. DFO Can Sci Advis Sec Sci Resp 2020/053
Drake DAR, Bradie JN, Ogilvie D, Casas-Monroy O, Bailey SA (2020) Effectiveness of ballast water exchange plus treatment as a mechanism to reduce the introduction and establishment of qquatic invasive species in Canadian ports. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat
Duggan IC, Van Overdijk CD, Bailey SA, Jenkins PT, Limén H, MacIsaac HJ (2005) Invertebrates associated with residual ballast water and sediments of cargo-carrying ships entering the Great lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:2463–2474. https://doi.org/10.1139/f05-160
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2015) Analysis of ballast water discharges into the Great Lakes from overseas vessels from 2010 to 2013. EPA 830-R-15-004
Gertzen E, Leung B, Yan N (2011) Propagule pressure, Allee effects and the probability of establishment of an invasive species (Bythotrephes longimanus). Ecosphere 2:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES10-00170.1
Gollasch S, David M (2021) Abiotic and biological differences in ballast water uptake and discharge samples. Mar Pollut Bull 164: 11204610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112046
Gollasch S, Rosenthal H, Botnen H, Hamer J, Laing I, Leppäkoski E, MacDonald E, Minchin D, Nauke M, Olenin S, Utting S, Voigt M, Wallentinus I (2000) Fluctuations of zooplankton taxa in ballast water during short-term and long-term ocean-going voyages. Int Rev Hydrobiol 85:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2632(200011)85:5
Gray DK, MacIsaac HJ (2010) Diapausing zooplankton eggs remain viable despite exposure to open-ocean ballast water exchange: evidence from in situ exposure experiments. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:417–426. https://doi.org/10.1139/F09-192
Gray DK, Johengen TH, Reid DF, MacIsaac HJ (2007) Efficacy of open-ocean ballast water exchange as a means of preventing invertebrate invasions between freshwater ports. Limnol Oceanogr 52:2386–2397. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.6.2386
IMO (International Maritime Organization) (2004) International convention for the control and management of ships’ ballast water and sediments. BWM/CONF./36
Johansson ML, Dufour BA, Wellband KW, Corkum LD, MacIsaac HJ, Heath DD (2018) Human-mediated and natural dispersal of an invasive fish in the Eastern Great Lakes. Heredity 120:533–546. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-0038-x
Keller RP, Drake JM, Drew MB, Lodge DM (2011) Linking environmental conditions and ship movements to estimate invasive species transport across the global ship** network. Divers Distrib 17:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00696.x
Leung B, Drake JM, Lodge DM (2004) Predicting invasions: propagule pressure and the gravity of Allee effects. Ecology 85:1651–1660. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0571
MacIsaac HJ, DeRoy EM, Leung B, Grgicak-Mannion A, Ruiz GM (2016) Possible ballast water transfer of Lionfish to the eastern Pacific Ocean. PLoS ONE 11: e0165584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165584
McCollin T, Shanks AM, Dunn J (2008) Changes in zooplankton abundance and diversity after ballast water exchange in regional seas. Mar Pollut Bull 56:834–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.02.004
Olenin S, Gollasch S, Jonušas S, Rimkutė I (2000) En-route investigations of plankton in ballast water on a ship’s voyage from the Baltic Sea to the open Atlantic coast of Europe. Int Rev Hydrobiol 85:577–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2632(200011)85:5/6%3C577
Poos M, Dextrase AJ, Schwalb AN, Ackerman JD (2010) Secondary invasion of the round goby into high diversity Great Lakes tributaries and species at risk hotspots: potential new concerns for endangered freshwater species. Biol Invasions 12:1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9545-x
Prange G, Pereira NN (2013) Ship ballast tank sediment reduction methods. Nav Eng J 125:127–134
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna
Ricciardi A (2006) Patterns of invasion in the Laurentian Great Lakes in relation to changes in vector activity. Divers Distrib 12:425–433
Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ (2000) Recent mass invasion of the North American Great Lakes by Ponto–Caspian species. Trends Ecol Evol 15:62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01745-0
Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ (2022) Vector control reduces the rate of species invasion in the world’s largest freshwater ecosystem. Conserv Lett 15(2):e12866. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12866
Rup MP, Bailey SA, Wiley CJ, Minton MS, Miller AW, Ruiz GM, MacIsaac HJ (2010) Domestic ballast operations on the Great lakes: potential importance of lakers as a vector for introduction and spread of nonindigenous species. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:256–268. https://doi.org/10.1139/F09-180
Sieracki JL, Bossenbroek JM, Chadderton WL (2014) A spatial modeling approach to predicting the secondary spread of invasive species due to ballast water discharge. PLoS ONE 9:e114217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114217
Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120304
USCG (United States Coast Guard) (1993) Ballast water management for ships entering the Great lakes. Code of Federal Regulations 33 CFR 151.1510.
Verna D, Rueb RR, Gantz CA, Gala J, Green J, Zalusky JA (2018) A decision tree analysis of nonindigenous species risk from ballast water to the lower Columbia River and Oregon coast, USA. Manag Biol Invasions 9:309. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2018.9.3.13
**ang J, Wang Q, Wu W, Wang H, Wu H (2023) Discharge compliance at Shanghai port: a case study on discharged ballast water from vessels with Ballast water treatment system. Manag Biol Invasions 14:178–191. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2023.14.1.10
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Transport Canada, an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship (JB), NSERC Discovery grants (SB and HM) and a Canada Research Chair in Aquatic Invasive Species (HM). We are grateful for helpful comments by two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MRH: writing first draft, graphics, revisions; JBS: conceptualization, modeling; SB: conceptualization, data provision, editing and revisions; MR: conceptualization, writing first draft; HJM: conceptualization, writing first draft, editing, revisions, funding.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rolla, M., Hernandez, M.R., Bradie, J. et al. Ballast water management systems protect the Great Lakes from secondary spread of non-indigenous species. Biol Invasions 26, 437–449 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03182-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03182-5