Abstract
The stocking and harvesting strategies used in aquaculture have a strong influence on the economic yields, and producers of aquatic species need alternatives that improve culture conditions and production economy. In this study, we used tilapia growth data from construct bioeconomic models to determine the best stocking and harvesting strategies under homogeneous (HM) and heterogeneous (HT) stocking sizes. We considered 180, 195, 210, and 225 days to harvest. Minimum marketable sizes (MMS) (minimum harvestable fish sizes) were defined according to the market as 350, 400, 450, and 500 g. The bioeconomic analysis considered a fixed price and a price that was variable depending on the size of the fish. With an average growth model and fixed price of USD$ 2.24 kg−1, independent of MMS, the economic results were negative under both HM and HT stocking and for all harvest times. With size-dependent variable pricing, the highest net benefit was generated by the 225-day, 500 g harvesting strategy, with USD$ 5061.91 per tank under HM and USD$ 5220.53 per tank under HT. Using quantile regressions and fixed pricing, the 225-day, 350 g strategy had the highest yield under HM and HT, with USD$ 4323.51 and USD$ 4190.90 per tank, while with variable pricing, the 225-day, 450 g strategy had higher yield in HM and HT, with USD$ 8634.03 per tank and USD$ 8983.26 per tank. Thus, growth modeling using quantile regression to approximate the population distribution suggested that HT stocking and size-dependent variable pricing generate higher yield for tilapia producers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Supporting information is available in the additional files and further supporting data is available from the authors’ request.
References
Ansah YB, Frimpong EA (2015) Using model-based inference to select a predictive growth curve for farmed tilapia. N Am J Aquac 77(3):281–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15222055.2015.1020080
Araneda ME, Hernández J, Gasca-Leyva E (2011) Optimal harvesting time of farmed aquatic populations with nonlinear size-heterogeneous growth. Nat Resour Model 24:477–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00099.x
Araneda M, Hernández J, Domínguez-May R, Vela MA, Gasca-Leyva E (2018) Harvest time optimization considering the stocking density and heterogeneity of sizes in the culture of white shrimp in freshwater. Aquac Econ Manag 22:431–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2018.1431331
Araneda M, Gasca-Leyva E, Vela MA, Domínguez-May R (2020) Effects of temperature and stocking density on intensive culture of Pacific white shrimp in freshwater. J Therm Biol 94:102056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102756
Arnason R (1992) Optimal feeding schedules and harvesting time in aquaculture. Mar Resour Econ 7(1):15–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.7.1.42629021
Asche F, Guttormsen AG (2002) Patterns in the relative price for different sizes of farmed fish. Mar Resour Econ 16:235–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.16.3.42629321
Azaza MS, Dhraïef MN, Kraïem MM (2008) Effects of water temperature on growth and sex ratio of juvenile Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus) reared in geothermal waters in southern Tunisia. J Therm Biol 33(2):98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2007.05.007
Azaza MS, Dhraïef MN, Kraïem MM, Baras E (2010a) Influences of food particle size on growth, size heterogeneity, feed efficiency and gastric evacuation of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758. Aquaculture 309:193–202
Azaza MS, Legendre M, Kraiem MM, Baras E (2010b) Size-dependent effects of daily thermal fluctuations on the growth and size heterogeneity of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. J Fish Biol 76(3):669–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02524.x
Azaza MS, Assad A, Maghrebi W, El-Cafsi M (2013) The effects of rearing density on growth performance, size heterogeneity and inter-individual variation of food intake in juvenile monosexe Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.). Animal 7:1865–1874
Barbosa JM, Brugiolo SSS, Caroslfeld J, Leitao SS (2006) Heterogeneous growth in fingerlings of the nile tilapia oreochromis niloticus: effects of densityand initial size variability. Braz J Biol 66(2A):537–541
Beard K, Kimble M, Yuan J, Evans KS, Liu W, Brady D, Moore SA (2020) Method for heterogeneous spatio-temporal data integration in support of marine aquaculture site selection. J Mar Sci Eng 8:96. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8020096
Bergström P, Lindegarth M (2016) Environmental influence on mussel (Mytilus edulis) growth–a quantile regression approach. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 171:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.01.040
Bjørndal T (1988) Optimal harvesting of farmed fish. Mar Resour Econ 5:135–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.5.2.42628926
Borrego-Kim P, Gullian-Klanian M, Seij J (2020a) Effect of size heterogeneity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) on the optimal harvest time: a bioeconomics approach. Lat Am J Aquat Res 48(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol48-issue1-fulltext-2360
Borrego-Kim P, Domínguez-May R, Monroy-Borrego A, Gullian-Klanian M (2020b) Bioeconomic modeling of optimal harvest time in Nile tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus) considering size heterogeneity and minimum marketable size. Lat Am J Aquat Res 48(4):602–612. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol48-issue4-fulltext-2526
Brett JR (1979) Environmental factors and growth. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ, Brett JR (eds) Fish Physiology, vol 8. Academic Press, London, pp 599–667
Briceño F, Mascaró M, Rosas C (2010) GLMM-based modelling of growth in juvenile Octopus maya siblings: does growth depend on initial size? ICES J Mar Sci 67:1509–1516. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsq038
Cai JN, Leung PS, Luo YJ, Yuan XH, Yuan YM (2018) Improving the performance of tilapia farming under climate variation: perspective from bioeconomic modelling. FAO Fish Aquac Tech Pap 608. Rome, FAO
Cort JL, Estruch VD (2016) Analysis of the length–weight relationships for the Western Atlantic Bluefin Tuna, Thunnus thynnus (L.). Rev Fish Sci Aquac 24(2):126–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2015.1112359
Domínguez-May R, Hernández JM, Gasca-Leyva E, Poot-López GR (2011) Effect of ration and size heterogeneity on harvest time: Tilapia culture in Yucatan. Mexico Aquac Econ Manag 15(4):278–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2011.624575
Domínguez-May R, Poot-López GR, Hernández J, Gasca-Leyva E (2020) Dynamic optimal ration size in tilapia culture: economic and environmental considerations. Ecol Model 420:108930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.108930
Dumas A, France J, Bureau DP (2007) Evidence of three growth stanzas in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) across life stages and adaptation of the thermal unit growth coefficient. Aquaculture 267(1–4):139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.01.041
Dumas A, France J, Bureau D (2010) Modelling growth and body composition in fish nutrition: where have we been and where are we going? Aquac Res 41(2):161–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02323.x
EL-Sayed AFM, Kawanna M (2008) Optimum water temperature boosts the growth performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry reared in a recycling system. Aquac Res 39(6):670–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652109.2008.01915.x
Estruch VD, Mayer P, Roig B, Jover M (2017) Develo** a new tool based on a quantile regression mixed-TGC model for optimizing gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L) farm management. Aquac Res 48:5901–5912. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13414
FAO (2020) El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura 2020. La sostenibilidad en acción. Roma. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229es
Forsberg OI (1996) Optimal stocking and harvesting of size-structured farmed fish: a multi-period linear programming approach. Math Compu Simul 42:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4754(95)00132-8
Forsberg IO (1999) Optimal harvesting of farmed Atlantic salmon at two cohort management strategies and different harvest operation restrictions. Aquac Econ Manag 3:143–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657309909380241
Forsberg OI, Guttormsen AG (2006) The value of information in salmon farming. Harvesting the right fish at the right time. Aquac Econ Manag 10:183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300600985215
Gasca-Leyva E, Hernández JM, Veliov VM (2008) Optimal harvesting time in a size-heterogeneous population. Ecol Model 210:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.07.018
Goddard S (1996) Feed management in intensive aquaculture. Chapman and Hall, New York, p 194
Grosjean P, Spirlet C, Jangoux M (2003) A functional growth model with intraspecific competition applied to a sea urchin, Paracentrotuslividus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60(3):237–246. https://doi.org/10.1139/f03-017
Heaps T (1993) The optimal feeding of farmed fish. Mar Resour Econ 8:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.8.2.42629053
Heaps T (1995) Density dependent growth and the culling of farmed fish. Mar Resour Econ 10:198–285. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.10.3.42629592
Hernández JM, Gasca-Leyva E, León CJ, Vergara JM (2003) A growth model for gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Ecol Model 165(2–3):265–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00095-4
Hernández JM, León-Santana M, León CJ (2007) The role of the water temperature in the optimal management of marine aquaculture. Eur J Oper Res 181:872–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.021
Jover M, Estruch V (2017) The quantile regression mixed growth model can help to improve the productivity in Gilthead Sea Bream (Sparusaurata) and European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchuslabrax) growing in marine farms. JAMB 6(4):1–3. https://doi.org/10.15406/jamb.2017.06.00161
Katsanevakis S, Maravelias D (2008) Modelling fish growth: multi model inference as a better alternative to a priori using Von Bertalanffy equation. Fish Fish 9:178–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00279.x
Kestemont P, Jourdan S, Houbart M, Mélard C, Paspatis M, Fontaine P, Cuvier A, Kentouri M, Baras E (2003) Size heterogeneity, cannibalism and competition in cultured predatory fish larvae: biotic and abiotic influences. Aquaculture 227 (1–4):333–356
Koenker R (2005) Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press
Koenker R, Bassett G (1982) Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica 50:43–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912528
Koenker R, Hallock KF (2001) Quantile Regression J Eco Perspec 15(4):143–156. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.143
Koenker R, Mizera I (2004) Penalized triograms: total variation regularization for bivariate smoothing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 66:145–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.00437.x
Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50. 0012–9682(197801)46:1<33:RQ>2.0.CO;2-J.
Llorente I, Luna L (2016) Bioeconomic modelling in aquaculture: an overview of the literature. Aquac Int 24(4):931–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9962-z
Lugert V, Thaller G, Tetens J, Schulz C, Krieter J (2016) A review on fish growth calculation: multiple functions in fish production and their specific application. Rev Aquac 8:30–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12071
Martínez-Cordero FJ, Delgadillo TS, Sánchez-Zazueta E, Cai J (2021) Tilapia aquaculture in Mexico: assessment with a focus on social and economic performance. FAO Fish Aquac Circ No. 1219. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb3290en.
Mayer P, Estruch V, Martí P, Jover M (2009) Use of quantile regression and discriminant analysis to describe growth patterns in farmed gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture 292:30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.03.035
Mistiaen J, Strand I (1999) Optimal feeding and harvest time for fish with weight-dependent prices. Mar Resour Econ 13:231–246. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.13.4.42629239
Mjaugeto POW, Sandaker, Steinshamn KB (2017) Predicting the distribution of the atlantic salmon spot price using quantile regression. Master’s thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Musa BO, Hernández-Flores A, Adeogun OA, Oresegun A (2021) Determination of a predictive growth model for cultivated African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1882). Aquac Res 52:4432–4444. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15282
Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical optimization. Springer Verlag, New York
Pascoe S, Wattage P, Naik D (2002) Optimal harvesting strategies: practice versus theory. Aquac Econ Manag 6:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300209380320
Peacor SD, Bence JR, Pfister CA (2007) The effect of size-dependent growth and environmental factors on animal size variability. Theor Popul Biol 71:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2006.08.005
Pérez EP (2014) Economic effects of the multiple harvest’s strategy in the culture of northern scallop Argopecten purpuratus: an opportunity to improve competitiveness. Lat Am J Aquat Res 42:180–191. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol42-issue1-fulltext-15
Pindyck RS, Rubinfield DL (1981) Econometric models and economic forecasts, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA, p 630
Poot-López GR, Hernández JM, Gasca-Leyva E (2014) Analysis of ration size in Nile tilapia production: economics and environmental implications. Aquaculture 420:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.11.005
Potthoff MT, Christman MC (2006) Growth depensation and group behaviour in juvenile hybrid striped bass Morone chrysop Morone saxatilis: effects of group membership, feeding method, ration size and size disparity. J Fish Biol 9:828–845
Power M (1993) The predictive validation of ecological and environmental models. Ecol Model 68:33–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(93)90106-3
Radiarta IN (2011) The use of remote sensing, regression quantiles, and GIS approaches for modeling of scallop larvae: a case study in Funka Bay, Hokkaido Japan. Indones Aquac J 6(2):191–204. https://doi.org/10.15578/IAJ.6.2.2011.191-204
Re AD, Díaz F, Ponce-Rivas E, Giffard I, Munoz-Marquez ME, Sigala-Andrade HM (2012) Combined effect of temperature and salinity on the Thermotolerance and osmotic pressure of juvenile white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone). J Therm Biol 37:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2012.04.004
Research Development Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3–900051–07–0. https://www.R-project.org.
Ricker WE (1979) Growth rates and models. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ, Brett JR (eds) Fish Physiology, vol 8. Academic Press, London, pp 677–743
Rosa MCG, Silva JAA, Silva ALN (1997) Modelling growth in cultures of Oreochromis niloticus (L.) and Cyprinus carpio L. in Pernambuco. Brazil Aquac Res 28:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2002.00748.x
Saiti F, Jamu DM, Chisala B, Kambewa P (2007) Simulation of optimal harvesting strategies for small-scale mixed-sex tilapia (Oreochromis shiranus Boulenger, 1896) ponds using a bio-economic model. Aquac Res 38:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01671.x
Santos VB, Yoshihara E, Fonseca RT, Vilhena R (2008) Exponential growth model of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) strains considering heteroscedastic variance. Aquaculture 274:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.11.005
Santos VB, Mareco EA, Silva MDP (2013) Growth curves of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) strains cultivated at different temperatures. Acta Sci Anim Sci 35:235–242. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v35i3.19443
Santos VB, Silva VV, Almeida MV, Mareco EA, Salomão RAS (2019) Performance of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus strains in Brazil: a comparison with Philippine strain. J Appl Anim Res 47(1):72–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1571495
Seijo JC (1995) Contribución al análisis bioeconómico de las principales pesquerías peruanas. FAO. Documento de Campo. No.5
Sifa L, Chenhong L, Dey M, Gagalac F, Dunham R (2002) Cold tolerance of three strains of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus, in China. Aquaculture 213:123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00068-6
SNIIM (2021) Sistema Nacional de Información e Integración de Mercados. (In Spanish). Online. http://www.economia-sniim.gob.mx/nuevo/Home.aspx
Steen M, Jacobsen F (2020) Modeling the return distribution of salmon farming companies: a quantile regression approach. Aquac Econ Manag 24(3):310–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2020.1765896
Suárez-Puerto B, Delgadillo-Díaz M, Sánchez-Solís MJ, Gullian-Klanian M (2021) Analysis of the cost-effectiveness and growth of Nile tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus) in biofloc and green water technologies during two seasons. Aquaculture 538:736534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736534
Talbot C, Corneillie S, Korsùen Ø (1999) Pattern of feed intake in four species of fish under commercial farming conditions: implications for feeding management. Aquac Res 30:509–518
Uddin MS, Rahman SMS, Azim ME, Wahab MA, Verdegem MCJ, Verreth JAJ (2007) Effects of stocking density on production and economics of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) polyculture in periphyton-based systems. Aquac Res 38:1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01837.x
Vicenzi S, Mangel M, Crivelli AJ, Munch S, Skaug HJ (2014) Determining individual variation in growth and its implication for life-history and population processes using the empirical Bayes method. PLoS Compu Biol 10(9):e1003828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003828
Yoshioka H, Yaegashi Y (2017) Optimization model to start harvesting in stochastic aquaculture system. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 33(5):476–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2250
Funding
This work was supported by National Science and Technology Council (CONACYT) for the PBK’s Ph.D. scholarship (grant #360286).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Patricia Borrego-Kim. The analysis and the first draft of the manuscript was written by Roger Domínguez-May. A provided critical revision of the article was carried out by Ivan Velázquez-Abunader. And all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The authors confirm that the ethical policies of the journal, as noted on the journal’s author guidelines page, have been adhered to and the appropriate ethical review committee approval has been received. The Mexican official norm (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) on the technical specifications form the production, use and care laboratory animals were followed.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Gavin Burnell
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Domínguez-May, R., Borrego-Kim, P. & Velázquez-Abunader, I. Optimization of stocking and harvesting strategies in intensive culture of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), considering minimum marketable sizes. Aquacult Int 32, 521–544 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-023-01172-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-023-01172-x