Log in

Analytical and numerical modeling of squeeze-film dam** in perforated microstructures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature includes a variety of analytical and semi-analytical models to describe squeeze-film dam** in MEMS perforated structures. Even if many of them have been validated by means of numerical simulations, nobody seems to have discussed about the accuracy of numerical approaches in this field. In the present paper, we apply both the main analytical models and a commercial finite element software, COMSOL Multiphysics, to solve a good number of squeeze-film problems. They refer to some cases, which were experimentally investigated during the past by different authors. The tested structures are rigid rectangular plates fabricated with different material, different perforation ratio (i.e., the ratio of the hole side to the holes pitch) and different number of perforations. We compare both the analytical and the numerical results with the available experimental data, in order to have an overview about their effectiveness. Numerical simulations offer in all the considered cases valuable agreement with experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Only the last updated formulations are herein considered.

  2. In the numerical simulations, rarefaction is modeled through the formulation proposed by Veijola and Raback (2007).

References

  • Bao M, Yang H (2007) Squeeze film air dam** in MEMS. Sens Actuators A 137:3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao M, Yang H, Sun Y, French PJ (2003) Modified Reynolds’ equation and analytical analysis of squeeze-film air dam** of perforated structures. J Micromech Microeng 13:795–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pasquale G, Veijola T, Soma A (2009) Gas dam** effect on thin vibrating gold plates: experiments and modeling. In: Proceedings on Symposium of DTIP of MEMS/MOEMS, Rome, Italy, pp 23–28

  • De Pasquale G, Veijola T, Somà A (2010) Modelling and validation of air dam** in perforated gold and silicon MEMS plates. J Micromech Microeng. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/20/1/015010

  • Homentcovschi D, Miles RN (2010) Viscous dam** and spring force in periodic perforated planar microstructures when the Reynold’s equation cannot be applied. J Acoust Soc Am 127(3):1288–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homentcovschi D, Murray BT, Miles RN (2010) An analytical formula and FEM simulations for the viscous dam** of a periodic perforated MEMS microstructure outside the lubrication approximation. Microfluid Nanofluid 9:865–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim E-S, Cho Y-H, Kim M-U (1999) Effect of holes and edges on the squeeze film dam** of perforated micromechanical structures. In: 12th IEEE international conference on micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS ‘99), pp 296–301

  • Kwok PY, Weinberg MS, Breuer KS (2005) Fluid effects in vibrating micromachined structures. J Microelectromech Syst 14:770–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau L, Lifchitz E (1971) Méchanique des Fluides. Editions MIR, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Tung R, Raman A, Sumali H, Sullivan JP (2009) Squeeze-film dam** of flexible microcantilevers at low ambient pressures: theory and experiment. J Micromech Microeng 19. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/19/10/105029

  • Mohite SS, Kesari H, Sonti VR, Pratap R (2005) Analytical solutions for the stiffness and dam** coefficients of squeeze films in MEMS devices with perforated back plates. J Micromech Microeng 15:2083–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohite SS, Sonti VR, Pratap R (2006) Analytical model for squeeze-film effects in perforated MEMS structures including open border effects. In: Proceedings of XX EUROSENSORS 2006, 20th Anniversary, Goteborg, Sweden, vol II, pp 154–155

  • Nigro S, Pagnotta L, Pantano MF (2010) Evaluation of the squeeze-film dam** effects in MEMS perforated plates. In: 8th IASME/WSEAS international conference on fluid mechanics and aerodynamics, Taipei, Taiwan, pp 314–319

  • Pandey AK, Pratap R (2008) A comparative study of analytical squeeze film dam** models in rigid rectangular perforated MEMS structures with experimental results. Microfluid Nanofluid 4:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvor Z (1967–1968) On acoustical resistance due to viscous losses in the air gap of electrostatic transducers. Acustica 19:295–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Somà A, De Pasquale G (2008) Numerical and experimental comparison of MEMS suspended plates dynamic behaviour under squeeze film dam** effect. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 57:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr JB (1990) Squeeze-film dam** in solid-state accelerometers. In: IEEE Workshop on Solid-state Sensor and Actuator, Hilton Head Island, SC, USA, pp 44–47

  • Veijola T (2006) Analytic dam** model for an MEM perforation cell. Microfluid Nanofluid 2:249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veijola T, Raback P (2007) Methods for solving problems in perforated microstructures using a 2D finite-element solver. Sensors 7:1069–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veijola T, De Pasquale G, Soma A (2009) Experimental validation of compact dam** models of perforated MEMS devices. Microsyst Technol 15:1121–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria F. Pantano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nigro, S., Pagnotta, L. & Pantano, M.F. Analytical and numerical modeling of squeeze-film dam** in perforated microstructures. Microfluid Nanofluid 12, 971–979 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-011-0931-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-011-0931-1

Keywords

Navigation