Log in

Oncological outcomes and stoma-free survival following TaTME, a prospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Transanal TME (TaTME) was introduced to improve access to the pelvis in difficult cases (male sex, obesity and mid to low rectal cancers) and reduce the risk of anastomotic leak by avoiding cross stapling. In April 2018 the Norwegian hospital to whom all local; recurrences for rectal cancer are referred reported an unexpected rise in early multifocal local recurrences of 9.5% following TaTME compared with 3.4% following conventional TME leading to a nationwide moratorium on the procedure and ending, in an editorial published on the British Journal of Surgery in August 2020, by saying that other countries should consider the issue in the context of local practices and results. There are limited data concerning oncological outcomes of TaTME compared to conventional TME. The aim of this study was to report perioperative and oncological outcomes for patients with rectal cancer treated with TaTME in a high-volume, experienced UK centre.

Methods

From January 2015 to January 2020 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed rectal cancer having TaTME at Worcestershire Royal Hospital NHS were prospectively entered into an online international registry. Patients were followed according to local protocol with clinical examination, tumour markers, endoscopy and radiology.

Results

Seventy patients underwent TaTME for rectal cancer. The median distance of the tumour from the anorectal junction was 4 cm (IQR 2–5). The mesorectal margin was involved in 20 (1%) patients, all of whom received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Overall survival was 94% at a median follow-up of 15 months (IQR 9–31 months). Distant recurrence occurred in 12 (17%) of patients at a median of 14 months (IQR 10–17 months). The 18-month stoma-free survival rate was 66%.

Conclusions

A local recurrence rate of 5.7% supports the oncological safety of TaTME for rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data are taken from the TaTME registry, an online database developed in the United Kingdom and funded by the Pelican Cancer Foundation [24]. It can be accessed via the following website (https://tatme.medicaldata.eu/).

References

  1. Aitken RJ (1996) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83(2):214–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atallah S, Albert M, DeBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Polavarapu H, Larach S (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): a stepwise description of the surgical technique with video demonstration. Tech Coloproctol 17(3):321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0971-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Augestad KM, Keller DS, Bakaki PM, Rose J, Koroukian SM, Øresland T, Delaney CP (2018) The impact of rectal cancer tumor height on recurrence rates and metastatic location: a competing risk analysis of a national database. Cancer Epidemiol 53:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2018.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyle E, Braun M, Hill J, Kuryba A, Meulen J, Walker K, Eaves E, Roe A, Whitehead A (2018) National bowel cancer audit, annual report 2018

  5. Buchs NC, Wynn G, Austin R, Penna M, Findlay JM, Bloemendaal AL, Mortensen NJ, Cunningham C, Jones OM, Guy RJ, Hompes R (2016) A two-centre experience of transanal total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis 18(12):1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Påhlman L, Rutqvist LE, Wilking N, Trial SRC (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 336(14):980–987. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199704033361402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen K, Cao G, Chen B, Wang M, Xu X, Cai W, Xu Y, **ong M (2017) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies in the last 5 years. Int J Surg 39:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Corp I (Released 2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp

  9. Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181(4):335–346

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fearnhead NS, Acheson AG, Brown SR, Hancock L, Harikrishnan A, Kelly SB, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Sagar PM, Siddiqi S, Walsh CJ, Wheeler JMD, Abercrombie JF, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain IAE, Gitting It Right First Time (GIRFT) (2020) The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis 22(7):745–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George VV, Abbas MA, Peters WR, Maun DC, Chang GJ, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch MG, Wexner SD, Whiteford MH, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin DA, Larson DW, Marcello PW, Posner MC, Read TE, Monson JRT, Wren SM, Pisters PWT, Nelson H (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(4):589–595. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hajibandeh S, Eltair M, George AT, Thumbe V, Torrance AW, Budhoo M, Joy H, Peravali R (2020) Meta-analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in management of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(4):575–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03545-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800691019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y, Saito N (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(7):703–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0470-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang L, Chen YG, Zhang H, Zhang HY, Lin GL, Yang YC, Chen WH, Luo SL, Chen N, Tong WD, Shen ZL, **ong DH, **ao Y, Zhang ZT, Wang JP (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicentric cohort study. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 8(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernández M, Delgado S, Sylla P, Martínez-Palli G (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)—short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27(9):3165–3172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2872-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Larsen SG, Pfeffer F, Kørner H, Group NCC (2019) Norwegian moratorium on transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 106(9): 1120–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11287

  19. Lee L, Kelly J, Nassif GJ, deBeche-Adams TC, Albert MR, Monson JRT (2020) Defining the learning curve for transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 34(4):1534–1542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6360-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leonard D, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, Jouret-Mourin A, Sempoux C, Jehaes C, Van Eycken E, PROCARE amBPoCotR (2010) Factors predicting the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 252(6):982–988. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181efc142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marks JH, Frenkel JL, D'Andrea AP, Greenleaf CE (2011) Maximizing rectal cancer results: TEM and TATA techniques to expand sphincter preservation. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 20 (3):501–520, viii–ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2011.01.008

  22. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, Patankar R, Johnson CD (1999) Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 42(12):1569–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02236209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Office for National Statistics (2016) Cancer Registration Statistics, England: 2014. UK

  24. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna GB, Mortensen NJ, Tekkis PP, Collaborative TR (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266(1):111–117. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Perdawood SK, Kroeigaard J, Eriksen M, Mortensen P (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision: the Slagelse experience 2013–2019. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07454-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roodbeen SX, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Kusters M, Slater A, Jones OM, Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Cunningham C, Hompes R (2019) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 33(8):2459–2467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roodbeen SX, Spinelli A, Bemelman WA, Di Candido F, Cardepont M, Denost Q, D’Hoore A, Houben B, Knol JJ, Martín-Pérez B, Rullier E, Sands D, Setton I, Van de Steen K, Tanis PJ, Wexner SD, Hompes R, Wolthuis AM (2020) Local recurrence after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Brown CSB, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Investigators AG-ITGAA (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted resection or open resection for rectal cancer: the Australasian laparoscopic cancer of the rectum randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 269(4):596–602. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Investigators A (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.12009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24(5):1205–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0965-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wasmuth HH, Faerden AE, Myklebust T, Pfeffer F, Norderval S, Riis R, Olsen OC, Lambrecht JR, Kørner H, Larsen SG, Forsmo HM, Baekkelund O, Lavik S, Knapp JC, Sjo O, Rashid G, Norwegian TaTME Collaborative Group obotNCCG (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway. Br J Surg 107(1): 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11459

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DN and SH were involved in study design. SH, FA, and NG collected the data. SH and FA analysed the data. SH and FA wrote the paper. SH, FA, SP, and DN edited the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Hallam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Audit and Clinical Governance Committee of the Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS trust. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent as this was a retrospective observational study, formal informed consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hallam, S., Ahmed, F., Gouvas, N. et al. Oncological outcomes and stoma-free survival following TaTME, a prospective cohort study. Tech Coloproctol 25, 439–447 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02390-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02390-8

Keywords

Navigation