Log in

Easy-to-use machine learning system for the prediction of IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion using MRI images of adult-type diffuse gliomas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Brain Tumor Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adult-type diffuse gliomas are divided into Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted and Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype based on the IDH mutation, and 1p/19q codeletion status. To determine the treatment strategy for these tumors, pre-operative prediction of IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status might be effective. Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) systems using machine learning have been noted as innovative diagnostic methods. However, it is difficult to promote the clinical application of machine learning systems at each institute because the support of various specialists is essential. In this study, we established an easy-to-use computer-aided diagnosis system using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio (MAMLS) to predict these statuses. We constructed an analysis model using 258 adult-type diffuse glioma cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. Using MRI T2-weighted images, the overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the prediction of IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion were 86.9%, 80.9%, and 92.0%, and 94.7%, 94.1%, and 95.1%, respectively. We also constructed an reliable analysis model for the prediction of IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion using an independent Nagoya cohort including 202 cases. These analysis models were established within 30 min. This easy-to-use CADx system might be useful for the clinical application of CADx in various institutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Suzuki H, Aoki K, Chiba K et al (2015) Mutational landscape and clonal architecture in grade II and III gliomas. Nat Genet 47:458–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aoki K, Nakamura H, Suzuki H et al (2018) Prognostic relevance of genetic alterations in diffuse lower-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 20:66–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brat DJ, Verhaak RG, Aldape KD et al (2015) Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med 372:2481–2498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23:1231–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wijnenga MMJ, French PJ, Dubbink HJ et al (2018) The impact of surgery in molecularly defined low-grade glioma: an integrated clinical, radiological, and molecular analysis. Neuro Oncol 20:103–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding X, Wang Z, Chen D et al (2018) The prognostic value of maximal surgical resection is attenuated in oligodendroglioma subgroups of adult diffuse glioma: a multicenter retrospective study. J Neurooncol 140:591–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukuma R, Yanagisawa T, Kinoshita M et al (2019) Prediction of IDH and TERT promoter mutations in low-grade glioma from magnetic resonance images using a convolutional neural network. Sci Rep 9:20311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang K, Bai HX, Zhou H et al (2018) Residual convolutional neural network for the determination of IDH status in low- and high-grade gliomas from MR imaging. Clin Cancer Res 24:1073–1081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang P, Grinband J, Weinberg BD et al (2018) Deep-learning convolutional neural networks accurately classify genetic mutations in gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:1201–1207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsui Y, Maruyama T, Nitta M et al (2020) Prediction of lower-grade glioma molecular subtypes using deep learning. J Neurooncol 146:321–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nalawade S, Murugesan GK, Vejdani-Jahromi M et al (2019) Classification of brain tumor isocitrate dehydrogenase status using MRI and deep learning. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 6:046003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi YS, Bae S, Chang JH et al (2021) Fully automated hybrid approach to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas via deep learning and radiomics. Neuro Oncol 23:304–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Voort SR, Incekara F, Wijnenga MMJ et al (2022) Combined molecular subty**, grading, and segmentation of glioma using multi-task deep learning. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac166

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim I, Choi HJ, Ryu JM et al (2019) A predictive model for high/low risk group according to oncotype DX recurrence score using machine learning. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Twarish Alhamazani K, Alshudukhi J, Aljaloud S et al (2021) Implementation of machine learning models for the prevention of kidney diseases (CKD) or their derivatives. Comput Intell Neurosci 2021:3941978

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi S, Park J, Park S et al (2021) Establishment of a prediction tool for ocular trauma patients with machine learning algorithm. Int J Ophthalmol 14:1941–1949

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenzo AJ, Rickard M, Braga LH et al (2019) Predictive analytics and modeling employing machine learning technology: the next step in data sharing, analysis, and individualized counseling explored with a large, prospective prenatal hydronephrosis database. Urology 123:204–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pawelka D, Laczmanska I, Karpinski P et al (2022) Machine-learning-based Analysis Identifies miRNA expression profile for diagnosis and prediction of colorectal cancer: a preliminary study. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 19:503–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Park YJ, Bae JH, Shin MH et al (2019) Development of predictive models in patients with epiphora using lacrimal scintigraphy and machine learning. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53:125–135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Makino Y, Arakawa Y, Yoshioka E et al (2021) Prognostic stratification for IDH-wild-type lower-grade astrocytoma by Sanger sequencing and copy-number alteration analysis with MLPA. Sci Rep 11:14408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeuken J, Cornelissen S, Boots-Sprenger S et al (2006) Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a diagnostic tool for simultaneous identification of different genetic markers in glial tumors. J Mol Diagn 8:433–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hrapsa I, Florian IA, Susman S et al (2022) External validation of a convolutional neural network for IDH mutation prediction. Medicina (Kaunas) 58:526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. **e Y, Zaccagna F, Rundo L et al (2022) Convolutional neural network techniques for brain tumor classification (from 2015 to 2022): review, challenges, and future perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel) 12:1850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: TN, FO, KA, and RS; development of methodology: TN, FO, KA, and HI; acquisition of clinical and experimental data; TN, SH, KM, JY, SM, YK, HS, AN, and RS; analysis and interpretation of data; TN, FO, KM, and RS: writing of the manuscript; TN, FO, and RS: All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumiharu Ohka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishikawa, T., Ohka, F., Aoki, K. et al. Easy-to-use machine learning system for the prediction of IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion using MRI images of adult-type diffuse gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 40, 85–92 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-023-00459-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-023-00459-4

Keywords

Navigation